Free Access

Table 3

Results of the combined fit weak+strong lensing, with or without a central point mass.

SIS PLAW NFW



Constraints χ2/d.o.f. σv M0 χ2/d.o.f. α ⟨Σ0 M0 χ2/d.o.f. M200 c200 M0
(km s-1) 1012 M (M pc-2) 1012 M (1014 M) 1012 M

S0 15.8/8 13.1/7 6.8/7
S0+RE 18.6/9 26.1/8 15.3/8

S0 16.2/7 <2.33 14.3/6 <0.96 6.9/6 <1.70
S0+RE 15.3/8 22.2/7 11.3/7

Notes.Columns are (1) constraints used in the fit (S0 for weak lensing, RE for strong lensing); (2) χ2 per degree of freedom for the best-fit SIS model; (3) best-fit SIS velocity dispersion; (4) central mass component added to the SIS model; (6) χ2 per degree of freedom for the best-fit PLAW model; (7) best-fit PLAW slope; (8) best-fit PLAW normalization; (9) central mass component added to the PLAW model; (10) χ2 per degree of freedom for the best-fit NFW model; (11) best-fit NFW spherical M200; (12) best-fit NFW concentration c200; (13) central mass component added to the NFW model. Best-fit parameters and 1σ uncertainties are obtained after marginalization over the other free parameters. The first two lines show the results of the fit without a point mass; the first line corresponds to the first line of Table 2.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.