Table 2
Fitting results of the density-contrast profiles
(Eq. (9)) using the SIS, NFW, and PLAW mass models.
SIS | PLAW | NFW | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Stack ID | z stack | L Z | S / N | χ2/d.o.f. | ⟨σv⟩ | χ2/d.o.f. | ⟨α⟩ | ⟨Σ0⟩ | χ2/d.o.f. | ⟨M200⟩ | ⟨c200⟩ | ||
(![]() |
(km s-1) | (M⊙ pc-2) | (1014 M⊙) | ||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
S0 | 0.52 | 3.87 | 14.3 | 15.8/8 |
![]() |
13.1/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.8/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|||||||||||||
N1 | 0.47 | 3.80 | 6.8 | 11.8/7 |
![]() |
11.2/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
8.2/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
N2 | 0.59 | 3.87 | 7.7 | 10.2/8 |
![]() |
10.2/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
10.8/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
N3 | 0.53 | 3.98 | 12.6 | 3.8/8 |
![]() |
4.2/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
4.0/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|||||||||||||
L1 | 0.47 | 3.84 | 8.1 | 15.9/7 |
![]() |
17.9/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
12.4/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
L2 | 0.50 | 3.80 | 10.2 | 5.7/8 |
![]() |
7.4/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
5.7/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
L3 | 0.67 | 4.10 | 9.4 | 5.4/8 |
![]() |
5.7/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
7.1/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|||||||||||||
V1 | 0.53 | 3.89 | 5.2 | 11.6/7 |
![]() |
8.4/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
7.7/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
V2 | 0.44 | 3.82 | 10.9 | 15.4/8 |
![]() |
15.4/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
10.0/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
V3 | 0.62 | 3.90 | 12.7 | 10.5/8 |
![]() |
12.0/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
10.3/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
|
|||||||||||||
R1 | 0.53 | 3.84 | 8.2 | 10.5/7 |
![]() |
11.4/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
7.8/6 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
R2 | 0.51 | 3.86 | 8.3 | 8.7/8 |
![]() |
9.0/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
6.9/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
||
R3 | 0.51 | 3.95 | 9.4 | 6.7/8 |
![]() |
3.8/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
7.2/7 |
![]() |
![]() |
Notes.Columns are (1) name of the stack; (2) average redshift of the
composite lens (weighted by the number of sources within 0.1−2 Mpc); (3) normalization factor of
the second-order contribution to the estimator
; (4) total signal-to-noise ratio
within the range in radius used to fit the profile; (5) χ2 per
degree of freedom for the best-fit SIS model; (6) best-fit SIS velocity dispersion;
(7) χ2 per degree of freedom for the
best-fit PLAW model; (8) best-fit PLAW slope; (9) best-fit PLAW normalization; (10)
χ2 per degree of freedom for the
best-fit NFW model; (11) best-fit NFW mass enclosed in the sphere of average
contrast density Δ =
200ρc; (12) best-fit NFW
concentration c200 =
R200/rs.
Best-fit parameters and 1σ uncertainties are obtained after
marginalization over the second free parameter for the PLAW and NFW models.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.