Issue 
A&A
Volume 570, October 2014



Article Number  L7  
Number of page(s)  3  
Section  Letters  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201424227  
Published online  17 October 2014 
Tidal dissipation and the formation of Kepler nearresonant planets
ASD, IMCCECNRS UMR 8028, Observatoire de Paris, UPMC, 77 Av. DenfertRochereau, 75014 Paris, France
email:
delisle@imcce.fr
Received: 17 May 2014
Accepted: 25 September 2014
Multiplanetary systems detected by the Kepler mission present an excess of planets close to firstorder meanmotion resonances (2:1 and 3:2), but with a period ratio slightly higher than the resonant value. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this observation. Here we provide some clues that indicate that these nearresonant systems were initially in resonance and reached their current configuration through tidal dissipation. It has been argued that this only applies to the closein systems and not to the farthest ones, for which the tidal effect is too weak. Using the KOI catalog of the Kepler mission, we show that the distributions of the period ratio among the most closein and the farthest planetary systems differ significantly. This distancedependent repartition is a strong argument in favor of the tidal dissipation scenario.
Key words: celestial mechanics / planets and satellites: general
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
The Kepler mission has opened the opportunity to perform statistical studies on a considerable number of planets. More specifically, the large number of planets detected in multiplanetary systems allows testing the formation and evolution scenarios of planetary systems. One of the most surprising results obtained by the Kepler mission was the fact that only a small fraction of planet pairs are locked in firstorder meanmotion resonances (2:1, 3:2), while a significant excess of pairs is found with a period ratio close to but higher than the resonant value (Lissauer et al. 2011; Fabrycky et al. 2012). We reproduce in Fig. 1 the distribution of the period ratio of planet pairs close to these firstorder resonances using the Q1Q16 Kepler object of interest (KOI) catalog (Batalha et al. 2013). This data set contains both confirmed planets and unconfirmed planet candidates. Candidates that are known to be false positives are removed from the sample. We observe, as described in the literature, an excess of planet pairs with a period ratio higher than the resonant value (see Fig. 1).
Fig. 1 Distribution of the period ratio between pairs of planets close to the 2:1 and 3:2 meanmotion resonances. The distributions around both resonances are accumulated to obtain a more meaningful set of systems. These statistics are obtained from the Q1Q16 KOI catalog (Batalha et al. 2013). The origin of the xaxis is the exact commensurability of the periods (resonant systems) and is highlighted with a red strip. Negative values correspond to internal circulation (P_{2}/P_{1}< (p + 1) /p), positive values to external circulation (P_{2}/P_{1}> (p + 1) /p). We observe a strong excess of systems in external circulation, with P_{2}/P_{1} − (p + 1) /p ≈ 2 × 10^{2}. 

Open with DEXTER 
Different explanations for this observation have been proposed, which involve tidal dissipation raised by the star on the planets (Lithwick & Wu 2012; Delisle et al. 2012, 2014; Batygin & Morbidelli 2013), dissipative effects between the planets and the protoplanetary disk (Rein 2012; Baruteau & Papaloizou 2013; Goldreich & Schlichting 2014), between planets and planetesimals (Chatterjee & Ford 2014), or insitu formation (Petrovich et al. 2013; Xie 2014). In this article we provide some statistical clues in favor of the scenario involving tidal dissipation in planets that are initially locked in resonance.
The phenomenon of resonant departure induced by tidal dissipation was described by Papaloizou & Terquem (2010) and Papaloizou (2011) and has been analyzed with a particular focus on Kepler statistics by different authors (Lithwick & Wu 2012; Delisle et al. 2012; Batygin & Morbidelli 2013). These studies showed that for closein planetary systems an excess of planets similar to the observed excess is naturally produced by tidal dissipation raised on the planets by the stars.
Recently, Lee et al. (2013) showed that this scenario is too slow to explain the typical distance of planet pairs to the nominal resonance (P_{2}/P_{1} − (p + 1) /p ≈ 2 × 10^{2}) on a reasonable timescale. In Delisle et al. (2014), we showed that tidal dissipation raised by the star in the innermost planet induces an increase of the amplitude of libration in the resonance. If the initial amplitude of libration (at the time when the protoplanetary disk disappears) is significant, the system is able to cross the separatrix and leave the resonance while the eccentricities of the planets are still high (e_{1} ≳ 0.15). The subsequent evolution of the period ratio of the planets is in this case 3−5 orders of magnitude higher than in the scenario of departure at low eccentricities considered by Lee et al. (2013)^{1} because the tidal effect becomes more efficient with increasing eccentricities (see Delisle et al. 2014, Sect. 5). Therefore, many systems that were discarded by Lee et al. (2013) might have evolved from the resonance to their current configuration by tidal dissipation, following this new scenario. Assuming a large initial amplitude of libration in the resonance is not absurd. Goldreich & Schlichting (2014) showed that during the phase of migration in the protoplanetary disk, many planet pairs that are locked in resonance have an increased libration amplitude due to the dissipation induced by the disk.
However, this new scenario still involves the tidal effect and should thus be very efficient for closein systems, but not for the farthest ones. This is the main argument against the tidal dissipation scenario (e.g., Rein 2012; Baruteau & Papaloizou 2013), while the other proposed mechanisms (Rein 2012; Baruteau & Papaloizou 2013; Petrovich et al. 2013; Goldreich & Schlichting 2014; Chatterjee & Ford 2014; Xie 2014) are able to act both on closein and farther systems. In the following we reanalyze the Kepler statistics with a focus on the distance of the planets to the star.
2. Dependency on the distance to the star
Different authors analyzed the impact of the distance to the star on the distribution of systems close to firstorder meanmotion resonances. Rein (2012) divided the sample of Kepler planet pairs into two groups depending on the period of the innermost planet. The author used a threshold of five days and found a similar distribution for systems with P_{1}< 5 d and for systems with P_{1} ≥ 5 d. Using a threshold of ten days, Baruteau & Papaloizou (2013) reached the same conclusion. Both studies discarded the scenario of a tidally induced distribution of the period ratio since according to this scenario, the excess should only be observed for the innermost systems.
Fig. 2 Same as Fig. 1, but the statistics are computed using different subsets of KOI pairs depending on the period of the inner planet (P_{1}). We divide the data set into three groups: P_{1}< 5 d (top), 5 d ≤ P_{1}< 15 d (middle) and P_{1} ≥ 15 d (bottom). See text for discussion. 

Open with DEXTER 
In Fig. 2 we show the results of a similar study on more recent data (Q1Q16 KOI catalog, Batalha et al. 2013). Our findings disagree with previous studies. We divided the data set into three groups:

1.
closein systems with P_{1}< 5 d,

2.
intermediate systems with 5d ≤ P_{1}< 15 d,

3.
farthest systems with P_{1} ≥ 15 d.
For groups 1 and 2, we observe an excess of planets in external circulation (i.e., with a period ratio higher than the resonant value, P_{2}/P_{1}> (p + 1) /p for the resonance p + 1:p). However, the excess seems more significant for the closest systems (group 1). In addition, there is no detected closein system (group 1) inside the resonance (P_{2}/P_{1} ≈ (p + 1) /p), while a significant number of farther systems (groups 2 and 3) are found in commensurability. Moreover, the number of systems in commensurability in the third group is similar to or even higher than the number of pairs in external circulation.
Fig. 3 Cumulative distributions of planet pairs in the vicinity of the 2:1 and 3:2 meanmotion resonances (the statistics of both resonances are accumulated) for the three groups defined in Fig. 2 (see also Sect. 2) Using KS tests to compare these distributions, we obtain pvalues of 0.08% (red and blue distributions), 10% (blue and green), and 3.5% (green and red). See text for discussion. 

Open with DEXTER 
Figure 3 shows cumulative distributions of the period ratio in the vicinity of the 2:1 and 3:2 meanmotion resonances for these three groups. The conclusions are the same as for Fig. 2. We performed KS tests on the distributions given in Fig. 3 to check the statistical significance of the observed differences between the three distributions. The KS test gives the probability of obtaining distributions at least as different as the observed ones with random samplings following the same underlying law. This probability is 0.08% for groups 1 and 3. It is thus very unlikely that both empirical distributions come from the same underlying law and are this different just by chance. When comparing the intermediate group (2) with the two extreme groups (1 and 3), the differences are of course less significant and the probabilities given by the KS test are 3.5% (groups 1 and 2) and 10% (groups 2 and 3).
Therefore, we conclude that the distance to the star does have a statistically significant impact on the distribution of the period ratio of planet pairs. Very closein systems (P_{1}< 5 d) are not found in resonance and are very often found in external circulation, while for the farthest systems (P_{1} ≥ 15 d), both populations (commensurability and external circulation) are equivalent with a slight excess of systems in commensurability. While a strong dependency on the distance to the star arises naturally within the framework of tidal dissipation, the other possible mechanisms would require additional consideration to explain the data.
3. Conclusion
We showed that the distribution of the period ratio among pairs of planets depends on the distance of the planets to the star. For closein systems no planet pair in firstorder meanmotion
resonances (2:1, 3:2) is detected, and there is an excess of planets in external circulation, that is close to the resonance, but with a period ratio higher than the resonant value. For the farthest systems, slightly more pairs are in commensurability than there are in external circulation. Using a KS test to compare these two distributions, we obtained a pvalue of 0.08% and conclude that the differences we observe are statistically significant. Some observational biases might contaminate the data sets, but it seems very unlikely that the differences we observe between closein and farther systems arise from these biases. Tidal dissipation raised by the star on the planets naturally explains these observations because this effect strongly depends on the distance to the star and is much stronger for closein systems.
These observations together with the new scenario of formation we proposed recently (still involving the tidal dissipation, but with a faster evolution of the period ratio, see Delisle et al. 2014, Sect. 5) favor a strong influence of tidal dissipation at the origin of the excess of planets in external circulation in the Kepler data.
Lee et al. (2013) considered the same scenario of resonance departure at low eccentricities as in previous studies (Papaloizou & Terquem 2010; Papaloizou 2011; Lithwick & Wu 2012; Delisle et al. 2012; Batygin & Morbidelli 2013).
Acknowledgments
We thank Stéphane Udry for useful advice. This work has been supported by PNPCNRS, CS of Paris Observatory, and PICS05998 FrancePortugal program.
References
 Baruteau, C., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2013, ApJ, 778, 7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Batalha, N. M., Rowe, J. F., Bryson, S. T., et al. 2013, ApJS, 204, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Batygin, K., & Morbidelli, A. 2013, AJ, 145, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Chatterjee, S., & Ford, E. B. 2014, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:1406.0521] [Google Scholar]
 Delisle, J.B., Laskar, J., Correia, A. C. M., & Boué, G. 2012, A&A, 546, A71 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Delisle, J.B., Laskar, J., & Correia, A. C. M. 2014, A&A, 566, A137 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Fabrycky, D. C., Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., et al. 2012, ApJ, submitted [arXiv:1202.6328] [Google Scholar]
 Goldreich, P., & Schlichting, H. E. 2014, AJ, 147, 32 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lee, M. H., Fabrycky, D., & Lin, D. N. C. 2013, ApJ, 774, 52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lissauer, J. J., Ragozzine, D., Fabrycky, D. C., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 8 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Lithwick, Y., & Wu, Y. 2012, ApJ, 756, L11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Papaloizou, J. C. B. 2011, Celest. Mech. Dyn. Astron., 111, 83 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Papaloizou, J. C. B., & Terquem, C. 2010, MNRAS, 405, 573 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Petrovich, C., Malhotra, R., & Tremaine, S. 2013, ApJ, 770, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rein, H. 2012, MNRAS, 427, L21 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Xie, J.W. 2014, ApJ, 786, 153 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
All Figures
Fig. 1 Distribution of the period ratio between pairs of planets close to the 2:1 and 3:2 meanmotion resonances. The distributions around both resonances are accumulated to obtain a more meaningful set of systems. These statistics are obtained from the Q1Q16 KOI catalog (Batalha et al. 2013). The origin of the xaxis is the exact commensurability of the periods (resonant systems) and is highlighted with a red strip. Negative values correspond to internal circulation (P_{2}/P_{1}< (p + 1) /p), positive values to external circulation (P_{2}/P_{1}> (p + 1) /p). We observe a strong excess of systems in external circulation, with P_{2}/P_{1} − (p + 1) /p ≈ 2 × 10^{2}. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Same as Fig. 1, but the statistics are computed using different subsets of KOI pairs depending on the period of the inner planet (P_{1}). We divide the data set into three groups: P_{1}< 5 d (top), 5 d ≤ P_{1}< 15 d (middle) and P_{1} ≥ 15 d (bottom). See text for discussion. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 Cumulative distributions of planet pairs in the vicinity of the 2:1 and 3:2 meanmotion resonances (the statistics of both resonances are accumulated) for the three groups defined in Fig. 2 (see also Sect. 2) Using KS tests to compare these distributions, we obtain pvalues of 0.08% (red and blue distributions), 10% (blue and green), and 3.5% (green and red). See text for discussion. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.