Issue |
A&A
Volume 569, September 2014
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A104 | |
Number of page(s) | 8 | |
Section | Planets and planetary systems | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322120 | |
Published online | 30 September 2014 |
Trajectory, orbit, and spectroscopic analysis of a bright fireball observed over Spain on April 13, 2013
1 Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Facultad de Física, Universidad de Sevilla, 41012 Sevilla, Spain
e-mail: jmmadiedo@gmail.com
2 Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales, Universidad de Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain
3 Institut de Ciéncies de l’Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, Facultat de Ciéncies, Torre C5-parell-2 a, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain
4 Departamento de Astrofísica y CC. de la Atmósfera, Facultad de Ciencias Fósicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
5 Observatorio Astronómico de La Hita, La Puebla de Almoradiel, Toledo, Spain
6 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Apt. 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain
7 Observatorio Astronómico de La Murta, Molina de Segura, 30500 Murcia, Spain
8 Centro Astronómico Hispano-Alemán, Calar Alto (CSIC-MPG), 04004 Almería, Spain
Received: 22 June 2013
Accepted: 7 August 2014
On April 13, 2013 a very bright fireball with an absolute magnitude of −13.0 ± 0.5 was recorded over the center of Spain. This sporadic event, which was witnessed by numerous casual observers throughout the whole country, was imaged from seven meteor-observing stations operated by the Spanish Meteor Network (SPMN), and its emission spectrum was also obtained in the framework of our meteor spectroscopy campaign. The atmospheric trajectory of the bolide and the heliocentric orbit of the parent meteoroid are analyzed here. The spectrum reveals a chondritic nature for this particle, which was following a Jupiter family comet orbit before its encounter with the Earth. In addition, the emission spectrum of the meteoric afterglow was recorded during about 0.8 s. The main emission lines appearing in this signal were identified and their evolution with time is also discussed. Afterglow spectra are not abundant in the literature, and these can provide important clues about the physical proceses taking place in meteoric persistent trains.
Key words: meteorites, meteors, meteoroids
© ESO, 2014
1. Introduction
The analysis of fireball events provides information about the behavior of large cometary and asteroidal meteoroids in the Earth’s atmosphere. The detailed recordings performed from meteor-observing stations allows determining the orbit of these particles, but also their mass and strength. Milley et al. (2007) found that the light produced during the ablation of meteoroids in the atmosphere is a combination of either continuum or unresolved spectral line emission, along with spectral emission lines of neutral and single-ionized species such as Ca, Fe, Na, N, Mg, Si, and O. But emission bands of different molecules (such as CN, N2, C2, FeO, and CaO), have also been observed (Borovička 1994; Jenniskens 2004). Spectroscopy clearly also plays a fundamental role in the analysis of these events, since fireball emission spectra can provide very useful data about the physicochemical conditions in meteor plasmas and about the composition of the progenitor meteoroids (see, e.g., Borovička 1993; 2005; Babadzhanov & Kokhirova 2007; Jenniskens 2007). In addition, these compositions can be employed to infer key information about the parent bodies of these particles (Koten et al. 2006; Madiedo et al. 2013a, 2014).
In the evening of April 13, 2013, a fireball with an absolute magnitude of −13.0 ± 0.5 flew over the center of Spain. Because of its extraordinary luminosity and favorable weather conditions on most of the Iberian Peninsula, it was witnessed by numerous casual observers throughout the country. No thunder-like or electrophonic sounds were reported. This sporadic bolide was confirmed by our meteor-observing stations, which recorded the fireball at 21h43m55.4 ± 0.1s UTC (about 16 min before local midnight). The event was included in our fireball database with the Spanish Meteor Network (SPMN) code 130413, which was assigned after the observing date with format yymmdd. We named this extraordinary fireball Serranillos del Valle, since its maximum brightness was reached when the bolide was located next to the zenith of this town, at about 26 km southwest of Madrid. Here we analyze the atmospheric trajectory and radiant of the Serranillos del Valle bolide. The heliocentric orbit of the parent meteoroid is also obtained. In addition, we discuss the emission spectrum produced during the ablation of this particle in the atmosphere In this way, we have derived information about the bulk chemistry of this particle. The afterglow spectrum, which was recorded during about 0.8 s after the main flare took place, is also discussed.
2. Instrumentation and methods
The SPMN meteor-observing stations that recorded the event discussed here (Table 1) employ an array of low-lux monochrome 8-bit CCD cameras (models 902H2 and 902H Ultimate, from Watec Corporation) that operate, weather permitting, during the whole night. Station #1 also employs several color CCD video cameras. Although these were set up to monitor the sky during the day, we usually keep them working also during the night to image events with brightness higher than that corresponding to an apparent magnitude of about −4. Our monochrome and color devices, whose operation is detailed elsewhere (Madiedo & Trigo-Rodríguez 2008; Madiedo et al. 2010; Madiedo 2014), generate interlaced video sequences with a frame rate of 25 fps and a resolution of 720 × 576 pixels.
Geographical coordinates of the meteor-observing stations that imaged the fireball discussed in this work.
The fireball was also recorded by a low-resolution video camera operating at the Calar Alto Astronomical Observatory. In addition, it was captured by a digital photographic camera (model 10D, manufactured by Canon Inc.) endowed with an 8 mm fisheye lens, which was taking images in the framework of an education and outreach activity developed at La Hita Astronomical Observatory. In addition, the emission spectrum produced during the ablation of the parent meteoroid in the atmosphere was recorded from several SPMN meteor-observing stations. Thus, we perform a systematic spectroscopic monitoring since 2006 to infer information about the chemical composition of meteoroids. For this purpose we employ holographic diffraction gratings (500 or 1000 lines/mm, depending on the device) attached to the objective lens of our low-lux Watec cameras (Trigo-Rodriguez et al. 2009; Madiedo et al. 2013b−d). These video spectrographs can obtain the spectrum of meteor events with brightness higher than that corresponding to an apparent magnitude of around −4. The first step of the data reduction involved deinterlacing the video sequences by separating the even and odd fields contained in each video frame. Then, these frames were processed by hand to measure the plate (x,y) coordinates of the fireball along its apparent trajectory in the night sky from each observing meteor station. The planes-intersection method (Ceplecha 1987) was employed to derive the atmospheric trajectory and radiant of the event. This calculation was performed with our AMALTHEA software by following the procedure described in Madiedo et al. (2013b, 2013d). When these data were known, the software computed the heliocentric orbit of the parent meteoroid by means of the procedure described in Ceplecha (1987).
3. Observations: atmospheric path, radiant, and orbit
![]() |
Fig. 1 Video frames showing the brightest phase a) and afterglow b) of the fireball as imaged from La Hita Astronomical Observatory. c) Image taken from Calar Alto during the brightest phase of the fireball. d) Composite image of the event taken from Molina de Segura. e) Projection on the ecliptic plane of the heliocentric orbit of the meteoroid. |
Figure 1a shows an instant image of the Serranillos del Valle fireball as seen from La Hita Astronomical Observatory during its maximum brightness. The persistent train recorded immediately after the end of the bolide is shown in Fig. 1b. The significant increase in the luminosity of the environment as a consequence of the fireball is obvious. Image 1c was taken by a surveillance camera at the Calar Alto Astronomical Observatory (located at about 330 km from the epicenter of the event), which generates video imagery at a rate of one frame per second. Thus, because of the relatively low temporal precision, we cannot be sure if the frame shown in that figure corresponds exactly to the maximum brightness phase of the event. A composite image taken from our meteor station at Molina de Segura is shown in Fig. 1d. The long-exposure (30 s) image taken by the digital camera operating at La Hita Astronomical Observatory is shown in Fig. 2. The reports sent by the casual witnesses did not provide precise positional data, but all of them coincided in the extraordinary brightness of the bolide. In particular, those located in the center of Spain, near the epicenter of the event, remarked that the night turned into day for a fraction of a second. They also reported a greenish to bluish color for the fireball and that it was relatively slow, lasting for several seconds.
According to the calculated atmospheric trajectory, the bolide began at 101.4 ± 0.5 km above the ground level, and the preatmospheric velocity of the meteoroid was V∞ = 19.1 ± 0.5 km s-1. The apparent radiant was located at the coordinates α = 167.78 ± 0.02°, δ = −8.08 ± 0.02° and the atmospheric path had an inclination of around 42° with respect to the ground. When the fireball penetrated the atmosphere to a height of 86.5 ± 0.5 km it exhibited a very bright flare, reaching then its maximum brightness. The photometric analysis of the images revealed that this maximum luminosity corresponded to an absolute magnitude of −13.0 ± 0.5. The bolide continued to penetrate the atmosphere to a final height of 68.1 ± 0.5 km. Table 2 contains the main parameters characterizing this atmospheric path. The projection on the ecliptic plane of the heliocentric orbit of the meteoroid is plotted in Fig. 1e, and the corresponding orbital parameters are also summarized in Table 2.
![]() |
Fig. 2 Photograph taken by Leonor Ana-Hernández of the SPMN130413 fireball from La Hita Astronomical Observatory. |
Trajectory, radiant and orbital data obtained for the SPMN130413 fireball (J2000).
4. Results
4.1. Photometric analysis
The light curve of the bolide (Fig. 3), which lasted about 3.1 s, was obtained from the photometric analysis of the video sequences obtained by our CCD cameras. The peaks in this curve correspond to the main flares exhibited by the fireball. These took place at times t1 = 1.9, t2 = 2.2, and t3 = 2.8 s, respectively, after the beginning of the event, that is, during the second half of its atmospheric trajectory. The most intense of these flares was the first one, which took place at a height of 86.5 ± 0.5 km above the ground level. The second of these followed almost immediately and, in fact, was not reported by the casual observers since it was almost completely masked by the first one. After the third flare, the surviving material continued to ablate to a final height of 68.1 km.
The initial mass m∞ of the meteoroid was inferred from this light curve by employing the classical meteor luminous equation: (1)In this relationship tb and te are the instants corresponding to the beginning and the end of the luminous trajectory of the event, with I being the measured luminosity of the fireball. This luminosity is expressed as a function of the absolute magnitude M by means of the equation
(2)The velocity-dependent luminous efficiency τ was calculated from the relationships given by Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976). Thus, the inferred mass of the meteoroid is 40 ± 5 kg.
Aerodynamic pressure for the main flares exhibited by the fireball.
![]() |
Fig. 3 Light curve (relative pixel intensity vs. time) of the SPMN130413 fireball. |
4.2. Tensile strength
We estimated the strength of the meteoroid by calculating the aerodynamic pressure under which the flares took place. When this pressure equates the mechanical strength of the meteoroid, the particle breaks up. This produces a quick release of dust grains and an increase in the effective cross-section of the meteor, which gives rise in turn to a sudden increase in luminosity. (Trigo-Rodriguez & Llorca 2006, 2007). According to this approach, the tensile strength S was obtained by means of the following equation (Bronshten 1981): (3)where v and ρatm are the velocity of the meteoroid and the atmospheric density at the height where the flare takes place. We calculated this density by following the U.S. standard atmosphere model (U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976). The values obtained for the three flares highlighted in Fig. 2 are listed in Table 3, together with the corresponding heights and velocities.
4.3. Fireball spectrum
The emission spectrum of the fireball was obtained by three video spectrographs operating at observing stations 4, 5 and 6. These slitless devices are sensitive in the range between 310 and 950 nm, approximately. During the main flare, most of the emission lines in the spectrum were saturated, and therefore the signal obtained at that stage was of limited use. To analyze this spectrum we employed our CHIMET software, which calibrated the signal in wavelengths by identifying typical lines that appear in meteor spectra (Madiedo et al. 2011). Thus, according to multiplet numbers given by Moore (1945), this calibration was performed by means of the Na I-1, Mg I-2, Fe I-41, Ca I-2, and Fe I-15 multiplets. Then, the signal was corrected by taking into account the spectral sensitivity of the recording device. The calibrated spectrum corresponding to the instant immediately before that flare, when the fireball was located at a height of about 87 km above the ground level, is plotted in Fig. 4. The main lines identified in the signal are highlighted. The strongest emission corresponds to the Na I-1 doublet at 588.9 nm, followed by several Fe I multiplets (mainly the Fe I-41 line at 441.5 nm and the Fe I-4 multiplet at 389.9 nm). The contribution from the Mg I-2 triplet (517.2 nm) is also very noticeable.
![]() |
Fig. 4 Calibrated emission spectrum of the SPMN130413 bolide. |
4.4. Afterglow spectrum
A persistent train is often formed at the position of a bright meteor flare, and the brightness of these trains, which can exceed magnitude −5, decreases quickly during the so-called afterglow phase (Borovicka 2006). Thus, as a consequence of the brightest flare exhibited by this fireball, a persistent train (Fig. 1b) was observed with the naked eye by casual witnesses during several minutes. During the first 0.8 s after this flare took place, the afterglow was bright enough to produce an emission spectrum that was recorded by one of our video spectrographs. Figure 5 shows the afterglow spectrum recorded 0.4 s after the flare took place. Afterglow spectra can provide useful information about physical processes that occur in persistent meteor trains. However, such spectra are not abundant in the literature (Borovička & Jenniskens 2000; Jenniskens et al. 2000; Abe et al. 2005).
The afterglow spectrum of the SPMN130413 bolide was also calibrated in wavelengths by following the same procedure as employed for the previously discussed fireball spectrum. In the signal we identified the emission from Na I-1, Mg I-2, Ca I-2 and several Fe I multiplets. Multiplets indicated in Fig. 5 are well above the noise level of the images.
5. Discussion
![]() |
Fig. 5 Calibrated afterglow spectrum at t = 0.4 s after the main flare exhibited by the SPMN130413 bolide. |
The radiant and orbital data (Table 2) confirm the sporadic nature of this event, since they do not fit any known meteoroid stream and the radiant is well outside the antihelion source region. The Tisserand parameter with respect to Jupiter yields TJ = 2.3 ± 0.2 and the period of revolution of the meteoroid was P = 8.9 ± 1.7 years. This means that this particle was following a Jupiter family comet (JFC) orbit before impacting our planet. To find the potential parent comet of the meteoroid we employed the Orbital Association Software (ORAS), which performs a search among the objects listed in the NeoDys1 and Minor Planet Center2 databases. This software, which was developed by the first author and is described in detail in Madiedo et al. (2013b), can employ the dissimilarity criteria proposed by Southworth & Hawkins (1963), Drummond (1981), Jopek (1993), Valsecchi et al. (1999), and Jenniskens (2008). No parent body was found among the objects currently included in these databases, however, which means that the Serranillos del Valle meteoroid might be part of a relatively high-inclination JFC that has not yet been discovered. With a mass of 40 ± 5 kg, the diameter of this meteoroid yields 31 ± 1 cm for a bulk density of 2.4 g cm-3. For a bulk density of 3.7 g cm-3 this size would be 27 ± 1 cm. However, according to the empirical end height criterion proposed by Ceplecha & McCrosky (1976), the fireball would be classified as type IIIB. These events are produced by the most fragile and weakest cometary meteoroids, which have an average bulk density of about 0.3 g cm-3. According to this, the diameter of the Serranillos del Valle meteoroid would be 63 ± 3 cm.
According to the values listed in Table 3 this, the brightest phase of the fireball (which corresponded to the first flare) took place under an aerodynamic pressure of (1.8 ± 0.3 × 103 Pa. This value is about one order of magnitude lower than that corresponding to the average tensile strength determined for sporadic meteoroids and one order of magnitude higher than the strength exhibited by meteoroids belonging to the October Draconid stream (Trigo-Rodríguez & Llorca 2006, 2007). In any event, the value is consistent with the cometary nature of the impactor.
We investigated the nature of the meteoroid by analyzing the relative intensity of the Na I-1, Mg I-2, and Fe I-15 multiplets in the fireball spectrum (Borovička et al. 2005). For this purpose, the intensity of the corresponding emission lines was measured frame by frame in the video that contains the spectrum and then corrected for the instrumental efficiency. Frames where the spectrum was saturated because of the high luminosity of the fireball were ignored. The contributions in each unsaturated frame were then added to obtain the integrated intensity for each line along the meteor path. In this way, we obtained a Na/Mg intensity ratio of 1.32 ± 0.09 and a Fe/Mg ratio of 1.53 ± 0.11. The Na/Mg intensity ratio fits the result expected for meteoroids with chondritic composition fairly well when the meteor velocity is of about 19 km s-1 (Fig. 5 in Borovička et al. 2005). We have plotted the Na I-1, Mg I-2, and Fe I-15 relative intensities in a ternary diagram (Fig. 6). The solid curve in this diagram corresponds to the expected relative intensity, as a function of meteor velocity, for chondritic meteoroids (Borovička et al. 2005). This plot reveals that, according to the classification given by Borovička et al. (2005), the emission spectrum of the Serranillos del Valle fireball can be considered normal. Thus, the position of the point that describes the fireball spectrum in this ternary diagram confirms the chondritic nature of the parent meteoroid. In fact, this point agrees very well with the expected relative intensity for a meteor velocity of about 19 km s-1.
![]() |
Fig. 6 Solid line: expected relative intensity, as a function of meteor velocity in km s-1, of the Mg I-2, Na I-1 and Fe I-15 multiplets for chondritic meteoroids (Borovička et al. 2005). Cross: experimental relative intensity obtained from the spectrum of the “Serranillos del Valle” fireball. The circle corresponds to the uncertainty in the determination of this point. |
![]() |
Fig. 7 Evolution with time of the relative intensity of the main emission lines identified in the afterglow spectrum. |
![]() |
Fig. 8 Dependence of the decay exponent B in Eq. (4) on the excitation potential. |
In the afterglow spectrum (Fig. 5), the contribution of FeO “orange arc” emission between 550 and 650 nm is very likely, as was previously found by Jenniskens et al. (2000) in the afterglow spectrum of a Leonid fireball. In addition, a broadening of lines with respect to the fireball spectrum (Fig. 4) is evident, especially for the Na I-1 and Mg I-2 multiplets. This effect is mostly related to the slitless nature of the spectrograph and the fact that the volume in the atmosphere of the emitting plasma was larger after the final flare took place. Therefore, this broadening would not be the result of the Doppler effect from thermal motions of ions and free electrons. Since the spectrograph that recorded the afterglow spectrum is based on an 8 bits (256 gray levels) CCD device, the main lines in this signal were saturated at the beginning of the train formation. For this reason, the actual intensity of these lines could not be obtained until after some time. Figure 7 shows the variation with time of the relative intensity (after it was corrected for the instrumental efficiency) of the unsaturated emission lines corresponding to the multiplets Na I-1 (588.9 nm), Mg I-2 (517.2 nm), Ca I-2 (422.6 nm), and Fe I-41 (441.5 nm). We found an exponential decrease with time of the intensity of these lines. This behavior was also found for the lines in the afterglow spectrum of Leonid fireballs (Borovička & Jenniskens 2000). Therefore the relative intensity I of the above-mentioned lines was fitted to this equation: (4)The values obtained for the parameters I0 and B in Eq. (4) are summarized in Table 3 for each line appearing in Fig. 7. As this table suggests, the decay rate B depends on the excitation potential Ek, with the slowest decays corresponding to the lowest values of Ek. This suggests that the observed decrease in intensity during the first 0.8 s in the afterglow spectrum is mainly controlled by a temperature-driven mechanism in the meteor train (Borovička & Jenniskens 2000). The dependence of B on Ek for the multiplets listed in Table 3 can be clearly seen in Fig. 8. Within the experimental uncertainty, this dependence can be considered to be linear, as the continuous line in this plot shows. Therefore we fitted the values of the decay exponent B to the following equation:
(5)where the parameters B0 and D yield −3.91 s-1 and −0.10 s-1 eV-1, respectively. A similar behaviour was found by Borovička & Jenniskens (2000) from the analysis of a mag. −13 Leonid fireball. Thus, the afterglow spectrum of this bolide, which was produced by a 1 kg meteoroid with an initial (preatmospheric) velocity of 72 km s-1, also evolved according to a temperature driven mechanism with D = −1.5 s-1 eV-1.
Calculated values of the parameters in Eq. (4) for the main multiplets identified in the afterglow spectrum.
6. Conclusions
We have studied a bright fireball observed over Spain on April 13, 2013. From the analysis of this event, which was named Serranillos del Valle, we found that the parent meteoroid had an initial mass of 40 ± 5 kg and penetrated the atmosphere to a final height of 68.1 ± 0.5 above the ground level. The survival of meteorites was discarded. The event exhibited several flares along its trajectory. The maximum luminosity of the bolide, corresponding to an absolute magnitude of −13.0 ± 0.5, occurred during the first of these flares. The calculated orbit, atmospheric penetration, and tensile strength of the meteoroid are consistent with a cometary origin for this particle. In particular, the orbital elements reveal that the meteoroid had a sporadic origin and was following a JFC orbit before impacting the Earth. No potential parent comet was found among the objects currently listed in the NeoDys and Minor Planet Center databases, however, which points to the existence of a relatively high-inclination JFC that has not yet been discovered. The results also indicate that the meteoroid was very fragile, with a bulk density of about 0.3 g cm-3.
The analysis of the emission spectrum produced by the fireball revealed the chondritic nature of the progenitor meteoroid. In addition, several emission lines produced by Na, Mg, Ca, and Fe were identified in the afterglow spectrum. The brightness of these lines decreased exponentially with time. Our results reveal that this decrease was controlled by a temperature-driven mechanism.
Acknowledgments
Meteor stations at Sevilla, La Hita, Huelva and El Arenosillo have been funded by the first author. We acknowledge support from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Projects AYA2009-13227 and AYA2011-26522). We also thank the AstroHita Foundation for its support in the establishment and operation of the automated meteor observing station located at La Hita Astronomical Observatory (La Puebla de Almoradiel, Toledo, Spain).
References
- Abe, S., Ebizuka, N., Murayama, H., et al. 2005, Earth Moon Planets, 95, 265 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Babadzhanov, P. B., & Kokhirova, G. I. 2007, Adv. Space Res. 39, 533 [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J. 1993, A&A, 279, 627 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J. 1994, Planet. Space Sci., 42, 145 [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J. 2005, Earth Moon Planets 97, 279 [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J. 2006, J. RAS Canada, 100, 194 [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J., & Jenniskens, P. 2000, Earth Moon Planets, 8283, 399 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Borovička, J., Koten, P., Spurny, P., Boček, J., & Stork, R. 2005, Icarus, 174, 15 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Bronshten, V. A. 1981, Geophysics and Astrophysics Monographs (Dordrecht: Reidel) [Google Scholar]
- Ceplecha, Z. 1987, Bull. Astron. Inst. Cz., 38, 222 [Google Scholar]
- Ceplecha, Z., & McCrosky, R. E. 1976, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 6257 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Drummond, J. D. 1981, Icarus, 45, 545 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jenniskens, P. 2004, Adv. Space Res., 33, 1444 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jenniskens, P. 2007, Adv. Space Res., 39, 491 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jenniskens, P. 2008, Icarus, 194, 13 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Jenniskens, P., Lacey, M., Allan, B. J., Self, D. E., & Plane, J. M. C. 2000, Earth Moon Planets, 82, 429 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Jopek, T. J. 1993, Icarus 106, 603 [Google Scholar]
- Koten, P., Borovička, J., Spurny, P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1367 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M. 2014, Earth Planets & Space, 66, 70 [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., & Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M. 2008, Earth Moon Planets, 102, 133 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Ortiz, J. L., & Morales, N. 2010, Advances in Astronomy 2010, 1 [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., & Lyytinen, E. 2011, NASA/CP-2011-216469, 330 [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., et al. 2013a, 44th Lunar and Planetary Science Conf., LPI Contribution No. 1719, 1116 [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Williams, I. P., Ortiz, J. L., & Cabrera, J. 2013b, MNRAS, 431, 2464 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Lyytinen, E., et al. 2013c, MNRAS, 431, 1678 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Konovalova, N., et al. 2013d, MNRAS, 433, 571 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Madiedo, J. M., Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Ortiz, J. L., Castro-Tirado, A. J., Cabrera-Caño J. 2014, Icarus, in press [Google Scholar]
- Milley, E. P., Hawkes, R. L., & Ehrman, J. M. 2007, MNRAS, 382, L67 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Moore, C. E. 1945, in A Multiplet Table of Astrophysical Interest (Princeton NJ: Princeton University Observatory), Contribution No. 20 [Google Scholar]
- Southworth, R. B., & Hawkins, G. S. 1963, Smithson Contr. Astrophys., 7, 261 [Google Scholar]
- Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., & Llorca, J. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 655 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., & Llorca, J. 2007, MNRAS, 375, 415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M., Madiedo, J. M., Williams, I. P., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 569 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Standard Atmosphere 1976, NOA-NASA-USAF, Washington [Google Scholar]
- Valsecchi, G., Jopek, T., & Froeschlé, C. 1999, MNRAS, 304, 743 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Geographical coordinates of the meteor-observing stations that imaged the fireball discussed in this work.
Trajectory, radiant and orbital data obtained for the SPMN130413 fireball (J2000).
Calculated values of the parameters in Eq. (4) for the main multiplets identified in the afterglow spectrum.
All Figures
![]() |
Fig. 1 Video frames showing the brightest phase a) and afterglow b) of the fireball as imaged from La Hita Astronomical Observatory. c) Image taken from Calar Alto during the brightest phase of the fireball. d) Composite image of the event taken from Molina de Segura. e) Projection on the ecliptic plane of the heliocentric orbit of the meteoroid. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 2 Photograph taken by Leonor Ana-Hernández of the SPMN130413 fireball from La Hita Astronomical Observatory. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 3 Light curve (relative pixel intensity vs. time) of the SPMN130413 fireball. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 4 Calibrated emission spectrum of the SPMN130413 bolide. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 5 Calibrated afterglow spectrum at t = 0.4 s after the main flare exhibited by the SPMN130413 bolide. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 6 Solid line: expected relative intensity, as a function of meteor velocity in km s-1, of the Mg I-2, Na I-1 and Fe I-15 multiplets for chondritic meteoroids (Borovička et al. 2005). Cross: experimental relative intensity obtained from the spectrum of the “Serranillos del Valle” fireball. The circle corresponds to the uncertainty in the determination of this point. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 7 Evolution with time of the relative intensity of the main emission lines identified in the afterglow spectrum. |
In the text |
![]() |
Fig. 8 Dependence of the decay exponent B in Eq. (4) on the excitation potential. |
In the text |
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.