Table A.1
Results of the spectral fits of the XMM-Newton observations of our sample.
Source | 2–10 keV continuum | Narrow Fe Kα line | Broad Fe Kα line | Molecular torus | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | ||||
Model | Γ | log f 2 − 10 | log L 2 − 10 | E Kα | EW | log fKα | log LKα | p | EW | f obs |
![]() |
Ref. | ||||
[ erg cm-2 s-1] | [ erg s-1] | [keV] | [eV] | [ erg cm-2 s-1] | [ erg s-1] | [eV] | [ cm-2] | |||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||
B2 2201+31A | A |
![]() |
![]() |
45.05 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
43.05 | 13% | – | 0.09 | 23.76 | 1 | |||
IC 4329A – I | E |
![]() |
![]() |
44.00 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.76 | 4% | – | 0.24 | 24.45 | 2 | |||
IC 4329A – II | G |
![]() |
![]() |
43.75 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.47 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 3227 – I | F |
![]() |
![]() |
41.67 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
39.98 | ~ 0% | – | 0.86 | 24.63 | 2 | |||
NGC 3227 – II | F |
![]() |
![]() |
42.06 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.02 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – I | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.26 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.61 | > 99% |
![]() |
0.16 | 24.57 | 2 | |||
NGC 4151 – II | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.22 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.63 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – III | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.22 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.64 | 98% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – IV | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.88 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.75 | 97% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – V | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.87 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.78 | 96% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – VI | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.95 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.79 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – VII | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.35 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.79 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 4151 – VIII | C |
![]() |
![]() |
42.62 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
40.70 | 96% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
NGC 6814 | B |
![]() |
![]() |
42.29 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
![]() |
40.08 | 91% | – | 0.13 | 23.67 | 3 | |||
NGC 7469 – I | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.16 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.34 | ~ 0% | – | 0.20 | 24.64 | 2 | |||
NGC 7469 – II | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.39 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.22 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
NGC 7469 – III | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.40 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.29 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
NGC 7469 – IV | F |
![]() |
![]() |
43.29 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.24 | 92% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 0050+124 – I | B |
![]() |
![]() |
43.88 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.45 | > 99% |
![]() |
0.63 | 23.31 | 1 | |||
PG 0050+124 – II | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.63 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.05 | > 99% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
PG 0157+001 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.80 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
![]() |
42.16 | 56% | – | 0.53 | 23.86 | 1 | |||
PG 0838+770 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.40 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.96 | ~ 0% | – | 0.48 | 23.71 | 1 | |||
PG 0953+414 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.70 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.8 | ≤ 42.43 | ~ 0% | – | 0.10 | 23.98 | 1 | |||
PG 1004+130 | B |
![]() |
![]() |
43.75 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 14.20 | ≤ 42.04 | 63% | – | 0.20 | 23.50 | 1 | |||
PG 1116+215 – I | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.45 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.6 | ≤ 42.34 | 85% | – | 0.23 | 23.60 | 1 | |||
PG 1116+215 – II | C |
![]() |
![]() |
44.76 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.24 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1116+215 – III | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.48 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.4 | ≤ 42.59 | 88% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1116+215 – IV | C |
![]() |
![]() |
44.88 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.5 | ≤ 42.44 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1116+215 – V | C |
![]() |
![]() |
44.80 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.14 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1116+215 – VI | C |
![]() |
![]() |
44.65 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.24 | ~ 0% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1126−041 – I | D |
![]() |
![]() |
43.20 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
![]() |
41.14 | 51% | – | 0.37 | 23.88 | 1 | |||
PG 1126−041 – II | D |
![]() |
![]() |
43.56 |
![]() |
![]() |
≤ − 13.4 | ≤ 41.54 | 55% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1126−041 – III | D |
![]() |
![]() |
43.59 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.5 | ≤ 41.44 | 21% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1126−041 – IV | D |
![]() |
![]() |
43.35 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.74 | 98% |
![]() |
// | // | // | |||
PG 1229+204 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.48 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.49 | 35% | – | 0.31 | 23.97 | 1 | |||
PG 1244+026 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.07 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.4 | ≤ 41.34 | 42% | – | 0.33 | 23.93 | 1 | |||
PG 1309+355 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.80 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.07 | 44% | – | 0.16 | 23.92 | 1 | |||
PG 1411+442 | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.20 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.5 | ≤ 41.80 | > 99% |
![]() |
0.48 | 23.46 | 1 | |||
PG 1426+015 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.18 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.06 | ~ 0% | – | 0.33 | 23.89 | 1 | |||
PG 1435−067 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.03 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
![]() |
41.94 | 65% | – | 0.32 | 23.17 | 1 | |||
PG 1440+356 – I | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.56 |
![]() |
![]() |
≤ − 13.7 | ≤ 41.46 | 86% | – | 0.36 | 23.53 | 1 | |||
PG 1440+356 – II | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.65 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.6 | ≤ 41.56 | 88% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1440+356 – III | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.54 |
![]() |
![]() |
≤ − 13.7 | ≤ 41.46 | 71% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1440+356 – IV | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.41 | 6.4 f |
![]() |
≤ − 13.7 | ≤ 41.46 | 80% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1448+273 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
43.30 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.30 | 61% | – | 0.15 | 23.99 | 1 | |||
PG 1613+658 – I | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.29 |
![]() |
![]() |
≤ − 13.1 | ≤ 42.61 | 5% | – | 0.45 | 23.69 | 1 | |||
PG 1613+658 – II | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.39 |
![]() |
![]() |
≤ − 12.9 | ≤ 42.81 | 5% | – | // | // | // | |||
PG 1626+554 | A |
![]() |
![]() |
44.12 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
42.36 | 4% | – | 0.18 | 23.32 | 1 | |||
PG 2214+139 | C |
![]() |
![]() |
43.71 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
41.63 | 6% | – | 0.13 | 23.77 | 1 |
Notes. (1) Model used for the fit (for details see Table A.2 and Sect. 3); (2) photon index of the power-law continuum; (3) flux and (4) luminosity of the 2–10 keV power-law continuum; (5) energy; (6) equivalent width; (7) flux; and (8) luminosity of the narrow component of the iron Kα line; (9) probability of the presence of a broad relativistic component of the iron Kα line and (10) its equivalent width. The table also lists the characteristics of the molecular torus obtained by fitting MIR spectra of AGN: (11) covering factor and (12) equatorial column density of the torus (calculated using Eq. (2), the values are ~6 times higher if calculated with Eq. (3)); (13) bibliographical reference for the value.
energy of the line fixed to 6.4 keV. The values of the torus parameters were taken from: (1) Mor et al. (2009); (2) Alonso-Herrero et al. (2011); (3) Ramos Almeida et al. (2011). Typical uncertainties on the torus parameters are about 30%.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.