Fig. 8

sṀBH versus redshift. sṀBH is reported here with the two assumptions on black hole masses discussed on Fig. 6. The black filled squares are the local MBH–MGal assumption and the empty square the offset expected from (Nesvadba et al. 2011,see Sect. 6.2.3). We also report other QSO samples for comparison (as indicated in the legend; Willott et al. 2010; Urrutia et al. 2012). In addition, we compare our specific accretion rates with predictions of two models for the growth rate of MBH = 109 M⊙ black holes similar to our mass estimates (dashed and solid thick lines, see text for details; Shankar et al. 2013).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.