Table 3
Physical properties of the sample inferred from their SED and metallicity.
Name | log M∗ (BC03) | log M∗ (M05) | E(B − V)∗ | log SFR (SED) | log SFR (Hβ) |
[M⊙] | [M⊙] | [mag] | [M⊙ yr-1] | [M⊙ yr-1] | |
|
|||||
CDFaC9 | 9.95![]() |
9.90![]() |
0.00 | 2.19![]() |
1.65![]() |
CDFS4414 | 10.35![]() |
10.25![]() |
0.20 | 1.82![]() |
1.80![]() |
CDFS4417 | 10.07![]() |
10.09![]() |
0.25 | 2.41![]() |
2.33![]() |
CDFS6664 | 9.26![]() |
9.07![]() |
0.10 | 1.31![]() |
1.36![]() |
CDFS16767 | 9.82![]() |
9.67![]() |
0.15 | 1.69![]() |
1.67![]() |
CDFS11991 | 9.47![]() |
9.42![]() |
0.10 | 1.51![]() |
1.23![]() |
CDFS2528 | 9.54![]() |
9.48![]() |
0.20 | 1.77![]() |
1.77![]() |
CDFS16272 | 8.97![]() |
9.00![]() |
0.10 | 1.22![]() |
1.46![]() |
CDFS9313 | 9.29![]() |
9.29![]() |
0.10 | 1.27![]() |
1.54![]() |
CDFS9340 | 8.86![]() |
8.85![]() |
0.10 | 0.84![]() |
1.37![]() |
CDFS12631 | 9.97![]() |
10.18![]() |
0.30 | 2.17![]() |
2.34![]() |
CDFS14411 | 9.28![]() |
9.30![]() |
0.15 | 1.62![]() |
1.88![]() |
CDFS5161 | 9.65![]() |
9.67![]() |
0.20 | 1.59![]() |
1.43![]() |
LnA1689-2a | 9.88![]() |
9.79![]() |
0.06 | 1.14![]() |
1.31![]() |
LnA1689-4a | 8.46![]() |
8.12![]() |
0.06 | 0.10![]() |
0.04![]() |
LnA1689-1a | 9.91![]() |
9.63![]() |
0.00 | 0.38![]() |
0.09![]() |
Q1422D88 | 10.60![]() |
10.43![]() |
0.00 | 0.94![]() |
1.36![]() |
3C324C3 | 9.67![]() |
9.62![]() |
0.20 | 1.72![]() |
1.53![]() |
Cosmic Eyea | 9.55![]() |
9.55![]() |
0.40 | 1.67![]() |
1.63![]() |
SSA22aM38 | 10.78![]() |
10.48![]() |
0.20 | 1.83![]() |
2.27![]() |
SSA22aD17 | 9.95![]() |
9.67![]() |
0.10 | 1.42![]() |
1.18![]() |
SSA22aaug96M16 | 10.06![]() |
9.92![]() |
0.06 | 1.39![]() |
1.20![]() |
SSA22aC16 | 10.61![]() |
10.46![]() |
0.35 | 2.58![]() |
2.84![]() |
SSA22aC36 | 10.10![]() |
10.08![]() |
0.25 | 2.06![]() |
1.91![]() |
DSF2237bC21 | 10.80![]() |
10.55![]() |
0.06 | 1.44![]() |
1.65![]() |
DSF2237bD29 | 10.72![]() |
10.55![]() |
0.00 | 1.35![]() |
0.66![]() |
Q0302C131* | 10.09![]() |
– | 0.15 | 1.11![]() |
1.00![]() |
Q0302C171* | 10.06![]() |
– | 0.10 | 1.00![]() |
0.70![]() |
Q0302M80* | 10.07![]() |
– | 0.30 | 1.54![]() |
1.11![]() |
SSA22aC30* | 10.33![]() |
– | 0.40 | 2.00![]() |
1.46![]() |
SSA22aC6* | 9.68![]() |
– | 0.40 | 1.73![]() |
1.36![]() |
SSA22aM4* | 9.41![]() |
– | 0.40 | 1.33![]() |
1.30![]() |
SSA22bC5* | 8.96![]() |
– | 0.25 | 0.93![]() |
1.18![]() |
DSF2237bD28* | 9.78![]() |
– | 0.30 | 1.33![]() |
1.15![]() |
Notes. Column 1, object name; Col. 2, stellar mass inferred from the galaxy templates of BC03; Col. 3, stellar mass inferred from the galaxy templates of M05; Col. 4, dust reddening that affects the stellar light, from the attenuation curve of Calzetti et al. (2000); Col. 5, star formation rate (from BC03); Col. 6, star formation rate (from Hβ flux). To compare our results with other studies using the Chabrier IMF, the masses and the star formation rates were calculated from the Salpeter IMF corrected for a factor of 1.7. The stellar mass, reddening, and star formation rate of the Cosmic Eye correspond to the best-fitting SED values reported in Coppin et al. (2007), the SFR(Hβ) was derived with the measured Hβ flux, and the reported extinction considering an error of ±0.15 mag.
Values corrected for a magnification factor of 43.5 ± 4.1, 6.7 ± 2.1, 5.9 ± 1.9 (see text), and 28 ± 3 (Smail et al. 2007), respectively.
LSD galaxies, all values have been taken from Mannucci et al. (2009).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.