Notes. Columns: (1) Identification. (2) Half-light radius from the 2MASS K-band image using GALFIT. (3) Half-light radius from the 2MASS K-band image using the A/2 method (see text). (4) Comments associated with the 2MASS images determinations, according to the following code: 1- large uncertainties when applying the A/2 method due to galaxy decomposition; 2- uncertainty due to background value, field stars, and/or complex structure; 3- GALFIT could not obtain a reliable fit; 4- disc with b/a < 0.4, leading to discrepancies between the two methods; 5- unreliable estimates due to background and/or complex structure; 6- point-like source dominating the (unreliable) radius determination; 7- FWHM of the bulge component close to the value for the PSF, making the radii estimates uncertain. (5) Half-light radius from the HST H-band image using GALFIT. (6) Half-light radius from the HST H-band image using the A/2 method. (7) Comments associated with the HST determinations, according to the following code: a- severely limited by FoV; b- very uncertain results due to bad background definition; c- limited by FoV; d- HST image obtained with WFC3 or NIC3 (instead of NIC2); e- bad GALFIT fit; f- rich structure in the HST image; g- uncertainties when applying the A/2 method due to galaxy decomposition; h- point-like source dominating the (unreliable) radius determination. (8) Adopted values. (9) Code indication if the individual values in columns 2, 3, 5, and 6 were used in the adopted value (0 = not used, 1 = used). (10) Previous determinations with the following code: (a) Scoville et al. (2000), model fitting (de Vaucoulers or exponential) to F160W images; (b) Hinz & Rieke (2006).