Issue 
A&A
Volume 556, August 2013



Article Number  A100  
Number of page(s)  10  
Section  Stellar structure and evolution  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201321870  
Published online  02 August 2013 
Closebinary evolution
I. Tidally induced shear mixing in rotating binaries
^{1}
College of Science, Guizhou University,
Guiyang, 550025
Guizhou Province
PR China
email: songhanfeng@163.com; sci.hfsong@gzu.edu.cn
^{2}
Geneva Observatory, Geneva University,
1290
Sauverny,
Switzerland
^{3}
National Astronomical Observatories/Yunnan Observatory, the
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, 650011
Yunnan Province, PR
China
^{4}
Key Laboratory for the Structure and Evolution of Celestial
Objects, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 650011
Kunming, PR
China
Received:
10
May
2013
Accepted:
27
June
2013
Context. Tides are known to play an important role in binary evolution, leading in particular to synchronization of axial and orbital rotations and to binary mass transfer.
Aims. We study how tides in a binary system induce some specific internal shear mixing that can substantially modify the evolution of close binaries prior to mass transfer.
Methods. We constructed numerical models accounting for tidal interactions, meridional circulation, transport of angular momentum, shears and horizontal turbulence. Furthermore, we considered a variety of orbital periods and initial rotation velocities.
Results. Depending on orbital periods and rotation velocities, tidal effects may spin down (spindown case) or spin up (spinup case) the axial rotation. In both cases, tides may induce a high internal differential rotation. The resulting tidally induced shear mixing is so efficient that the internal distributions of angular velocity and chemical elements are highly influenced. The evolutionary tracks are modified, and in for spin down as well as for spin up, large amounts of nitrogen can be transported to the stellar surfaces before any binary mass transfer. Meridional circulation, when properly treated as a advection, always tends to counteract the tidal interaction, tending to spin up the surface when it is braked down and vice versa. As a consequence, the times needed for the axial angular velocity to become equal to the orbital angular velocity may be longer than given by typical synchronization timescales. Moreover, because of the meridional circulation some differential rotation remains in tidally locked binary systems.
Key words: binaries: close / stars: rotation / stars: abundances / stars: evolution
© ESO, 2013
1. Introduction
Rotation is an important factor to be considered in the evolution of massive stars (Kippenhahn & Thomas 1970; Endal & Sofia 1976; Meynet & Maeder 1997; Langer 1998). The centrifugal force not only gives the star an oblate shape, but it also induces many instabilities, leading to the mixing of chemical elements in the stellar interiors (Maeder & Meynet 2000; Heger et al. 2000a; Huang 2004a,b). In addition to convection and semiconvection, there are several processes that may contribute to the mixing of the chemical elements in stellar interiors, such as shears generated by internal differential rotation, meridional circulation, magnetic instabilities, and magnetic braking at the surface of the star, which favors high shears (Chaboyer & Zahn 1992; Zahn 1992; Maeder & Meynet 2001, 2005; Meynet et al. 2011; Mathis et al. 2004a,b). These physical processes are active in both single and binary stars. They may have important consequences on observable properties (Langer & Maeder 1995; Heger & Langer 2000b; Song et al. 2009, 2011). They can mix the material of the core and envelope, leading, among other consequences, to nitrogen enrichment at the stellar surface. Many B and Otype stars show nitrogen excesses (Walborn 1976; Heap et al. 2006; Hunter et al. 2009; Przybilla et al. 2010) and the mentioned instabilities may play a role in this.
Recent results suggest that half of the massive stars in the Tarentula region may exchange mass with a binary companion, which potentially strongly affects the course of stellar evolution through tides, mass transfer and mergers (Sana et al. 2013; de Mink et al. 2013). The fraction of binary systems and the fraction of shortperiod Otype stars vary considerably in different clusters (Mahy et al. 2009); the binary properties are possibly related to the density of the clusters.
Many physical effects studied in the context of singlestar evolution need also to be considered in the framework of binary evolution. Here we concentrate on the interaction of some effects of rotation, such as meridional circulation, shears, and horizontal turbulence, with binary evolution. In particular, the tidally induced shear mixing (TISM) may be important in binary evolution. The tidal interactions produce braking, particularly in the outer stellar layers, and thus may enhance the internal differential rotation. The instabilities associated to high shears result in a significant transport of the chemical elements. In the present work we aim to investigate how the tidal braking and its related effects, in particular TISM, can affect the evolution of close binaries.
On top of that, meridional circulation, when correctly treated as a circulation and not as a diffusion, often reacts in a interesting way, by even being able to transport angular momentum from regions with low rotation to regions where rotation is fast (Maeder 2009). Thus, by studying TISM in the framework of models where meridional circulation is consistently treated, we may see the reactions of the star to the interaction of meridional circulation and tidal braking. These effects, which were not predicted, appear to play a significant role in binary evolution.
The paper is organized as follows: the tidal braking is presented in Sect. 2. The equations expressing internal transport of chemical elements and angular momentum are presented in Sect. 3. In Sect. 4, the results of numerical calculation are described and discussed in detail. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Sect. 5.
2. Tidal interactions in rotating binaries
One may distinguish the equilibrium and dynamical tides (Zahn 1966, 1975). For not yet synchronized systems that are subject to the effects of dynamical tides, the dissipation mechanisms play a major role. These are typically the viscous effect of turbulence in stars with a convective envelope and the radiative damping for stars with a radiative envelope (Zahn 1977). A new expression for the tidal synchronization timescale due to a turbulent medium has been proposed by Toledano et al. (2007), (1)where a is the separation between the two components in a binary system, f_{turb} ~ 1 depends on the structure of the star. Equation (1) can be applied to stars with an envelope hosting a strong turbulence due to convection and, maybe, due to rotational instabilities, such as the horizontal turbulence proposed by Zahn (1992). However, the adequation of this expression to this last case is still under question, since the viscous effect of horizontal turbulence is about eight orders of magnitude smaller than the viscosity of classical convection in massive stars.
The dynamical synchronization timescale due to radiative damping for stars with a radiative envelope, without the contribution of the equilibrium tide, has been given by (Zahn 1977), (2)Here, q = M′/M is the mass ratio, M′ is the mass of the companion star, R and M are the radius and mass of the primary star considered here, G is the gravity constant, β = I_{e}/MR^{2} is the socalled gyration radius, I_{e} is the moment of inertia of the external layers where tidal energy is dissipated, and E_{2} is the tidal coefficient, which is sensitive to the structure of the star, in particular to the size of the convective core. It can be expressed by (Yoon et al. 2010) (3)where R_{conv} is the convectivecore radius.
A comparison of the above two dissipation timescales (Eqs. (1) and (2)) for the turbulent and radiative cases has been performed by de Mink et al. (2009).
In the present work, the change of the spin angular momentum due to tidal interaction is computed using Eq. (5.6) from Zahn (1977): (4)where I_{e}Ω is the angular momentum of the external layers where tidal energy is dissipated, and Ω and ω_{orb} are the angular velocity of axial and orbital rotation, respectively. Tidal interactions spin the star down when Ω > ω_{orb} and up when Ω < ω_{orb}.
Strictly speaking, the effect of tidal braking should be applied to the whole radiative envelope. Because some differential rotation is generally present, there may be some deviations from the above current expressions for tidal braking. However, some approximations are justified. In our current models, we treat a limited fraction of the outer layers (about 3% of the total mass) with the assumptions of constant chemical abundances X_{i} = const., constant luminosity L = const., and angular velocity Ω = const. These homogeneous outer layers of smallmass content may encompass about 30% of the total radius, which implies that about 92% of the total tidal effect (going like R^{6}) is deposited in these layers (for a value of 20% of the radius, the deposited fraction would be 79%). This means that most of the energy dissipated by the tidal torque is deposited in the outer layers, where the angular velocity is taken as a constant. Therefore, the various approximations made in the models are internally consistent.
Assuming I_{e} and ω_{orb} are constant in Eq. (4), we can obtain, t_{rot}, the typical timescale for a decrease by a factor e of the difference between Ω and ω, (5)with (6)The synchronization rate is a function of both the strength of the perturbing potential as measured by the quantity in brackets , and of the tidal frequency .
In the remainder of the paper, we shall t_{rot}, the synchronization timescale (implicitly estimated on the zero age mainsequence, ZAMS), while the time, given by our evolutionary models, in which Ω = ω_{orb} is named the effective synchronization time. The two times may be quite different because they do not encompass the same physics: t_{rot} only accounts for the change of Ω due to the tidal interaction and is estimated for initial values on the ZAMS, while the synchronization time accounts for the changes with time of Ω − ω_{orb} and for the evolutions with time of all the quantities involved in the expressions of t_{rot}, as well as for all the other processes (in addition to tidal interactions) that modify the surface angular velocity of the star (changes of the radius of the star and all the processes redistributing the angular momentum inside the star).
For a circular orbit, the orbital angular momentum of a binary with an orbital separation a is given by (7)so that (8)where a dot indicates time derivation.
3. Internal transport of chemical elements and of angular momentum
3.1. Equation for angular momentum transport
The transport of angular momentum inside a star is implemented following the prescription of Zahn (1992). This prescription was complemented by Talon & Zahn (1997) and Maeder & Zahn (1998). In the radial direction, it obeys the equation (9)The first term on the righthand side of this equation is the divergence of the advected flux of angular momentum, while the second term is the divergence of the diffused flux. D is the total diffusion coefficient in the vertical direction, taking into account the various instabilities that transport angular momentum. The effects of expansion or contraction are automatically included in a Lagrangian treatment. During the evolution, central density increases and the core spins faster, the second term allows, for example, the transport of angular momentum from the core to the surface. It will also transmit the external braking to the interior of the star. The meridional circulation is most efficient for such transports, its velocity was determined by Zahn (1992) and Maeder & Zahn (1998), (10)where C_{P} is the specific heat at constant pressure, is the adiabatic gradient, , and is the ratio of the variation of the density to the average density on an equipotential. Both ϕ and δ arise from the equation of state in the form , and E_{Ω} and E_{μ} are terms that depend on the Ω and μdistributions, respectively. The quantities and E_{μ} are given by (Maeder 2009) (11)with (12)where the quantities have the same significations as in Maeder & Zahn (1998). We have taken the same boundary conditions as Talon et al. (1997; see also Denissenkov et al. 1999; Meynet & Maeder 2000).
3.2. Equation for the transport of chemical species
The horizontal turbulence competes efficiently with the advective term of meridional circulation for transporting the chemical species (Chaboyer & Zahn 1992). The horizontal flow tends to homogenize the layers in such a way that the resulting transport of chemical species by both meridional circulation and horizontal turbulence can be computed as a diffusive process with the coefficient D_{eff}. The change of the abundance for a given chemical element i in the shell with coordinate r is thus (Zahn 1992) (13)where D is the same as in Eq. (9) and is the total diffusion coefficient in the vertical direction, taking into account the instabilities that transport the chemical elements. The last term accounts for the change in abundances produced by nuclear reactions. We can then define an effective diffusion coefficient, D_{eff} that combines the effects of horizontal diffusion and of the meridional circulation (Chaboyer & Zahn 1992), (14)We have applied the shellularrotation hypothesis, which postulates that in differentially rotating stars the angular velocity Ω is constant on isobars. This results from the strong horizontal turbulence, which is expected because there is no restoring force in the horizontal (isobaric) direction, as the buoyancy force (the restoring force of the density gradient) acts in the vertical direction. Zahn (1992) related the diffusion coefficient to the viscosity caused by horizontal turbulence (15)where c_{h} is a constant on the order of 1, V(r) is the horizontal component of the meridional circulation velocity, U(r) its vertical component (see Eq. (9)), and in this expression .
Differential rotation induces shear turbulence at the interface of layers that have different rotational velocities. A layer remains stable if the excess of kinetic energy due to differential rotation is inferior to the energy needed to overcome the stabilizing density gradient in radiative zones (this is expressed by the Richardson criterion). The effects of thermal dissipation, which reduce the buoyancy force, are accounted for. The coefficient of diffusion by shear turbulence was determined by Maeder (1997) (16)where is the thermal diffusivity, and with f_{energy} ≈ 1, and .
4. Physical ingredients of the models
The treatment of rotation was developed in a series of papers published previously by the Geneva group (Maeder 1999, 1997; Maeder & Meynet 2000; Maeder & Zahn 1998; Meynet & Maeder 1997, 2000; see also the recent review by Maeder & Meynet 2012).
The initial abundances of H, He, and metals were set to X = 0.720, Y = 0.266, and Z = 0.014. The mixture of heavy elements was that by Asplund et al. (2005) except for the Ne abundance, which was taken from Cunha et al. (2006). The nuclear reaction rates were generated with the NetGen tool^{1}. They originate mainly from the Nacre database (Angulo et al. 1999), although some have been redetermined more recently and have been updated (see Ekstrm et al. 2012, for more details). The convective zones were determined with the Schwarzschild criterion. For the H and Heburning phases, the convective core was extended by overshooting over a distance d_{over} = 0.10H_{p}, with H_{p} the local pressure scale height.
The evolution of a binary system consisting of a 15 and a 10 M_{⊙} star is investigated in this paper. We assumed that the orbit is circular and that the spin axis of the model stars is perpendicular to the orbital plane. We focused on the evolution of the primary star. From Eq. (8), assuming that the mass loss by stellar winds is negligible before any mass transfer, one has for the cases considered here that (17)therefore the variation of the orbital separation between the two components is negligible and was assumed to keep a constant value during the evolution of the binary system.
The evolution is followed from the onset of central H burning to the moment of Roche lobe overflow (RLOF). Starting from an initial solidbody rotation, we then calculated the evolution of the angular velocity inside the model, consistently accounting for the various transport mechanisms presented in Sect. 3 and for the tidal interactions between the two stars.
Unlike stellar winds, the tidal braking does not only spin down the star, but it may also spin it up. We modeled the tidal mixing in two series of evolutionary sequences:

Spindown case: the orbital periods and the initial rotation velocities were chosen so that tidal interaction spinsthe primary down. The initial velocity was chosen asυ_{ini}/υ_{crit} = 0.6, υ_{ini} is the equatorial surface velocity on the ZAMS and υ_{crit} is the critical velocity at the same stage (the critical velocity is defined as the equatorial velocity such that the centrifugal acceleration exactly balances the gravity at the equator). The consequences of tidal braking were explored for different initial orbital periods ranging from 1.1 to 1.8 days. For comparison, a model starting with υ_{ini}/υ_{crit} = 0.6 on the ZAMS that does not account for tidal braking, was also computed.

Spinup case: the orbital periods and the initial rotation velocities were chosen so that tidal interaction spins the primary up. The initial velocity was taken as υ_{ini}/υ_{crit} = 0.2. The initial orbital periods were chosen between 0.9 and 1.4 days. A model without tidal interaction with υ_{ini}/υ_{crit} = 0.2 was also computed.
5. Spindown case: tidal braking
5.1. Impact on rotation
Fig. 1 Evolution as a function of time of the surface equatorial velocity for a 15 M_{⊙} star with υ_{ini} = 0.6υ_{crit} and a 10 M_{⊙} companion for different initial orbital periods. The case without any tidal interaction is also shown. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 2 Variation of the angular velocity as a function of the radius in solar units. The continuous lines refer to the spindown case with an orbital period equal to 1.8 days. The dashed curves correspond to the spindown case with an orbital period equal to 1.1 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The curve corresponding to an age of 119 000 years is the same for the model in the system with an orbital period P of 1.1 days and in the one with an orbital period of 1.8 days. 

Open with DEXTER 
The time evolution of the surface velocity is plotted for various orbital periods in Fig. 1. We see the rapid decrease of the velocities due to tidal braking. Synchronization is realized near the minimum of the curves. After that point, the angular velocity Ω at the surface is maintained approximately at the value imposed by the orbital angular velocity and thus remains constant. Because during the mainsequence phase the radii of the star progressively increase, the surface velocities also slightly increase after synchronization. From Fig. 1, we also see that

The surface velocity of tidally braked stars is much lower at a given age than the surface velocity of an isolated star starting its evolution on the ZAMS with the same initial velocity. This illustrates the wellknown fact that for these orbital periods, the tidal interactions are very strong.

Synchronization timescales are shorter in orbital systems with shorter periods, because tidal torques are stronger.

At the time of synchronization, lower surface velocities are evidently obtained in systems with longer orbital periods.
The evolution of the angular velocity inside models of different ages and in systems with various orbital periods is shown in Fig. 2 up to 4 × 10^{6} yr. We can see in the model with an orbital period, P_{orb} = 1.1 days how tidal braking imposes an angular velocity at the surface converging around 6.6 × 10^{5} s ( s) after about 1 million years. The same kind of convergence occurs in the various models, but at later times. Clearly, the angular velocity is decreased everywhere in the interior of the star by tidal braking, not only at the surface (compare the continuous and dashed curves in Fig. 2, which show the differences due to different tidal torques; when the braking is stronger, the core is also more strongly slowed down). This comes from the coupling due mainly to meridional currents. Most interestingly, some gradient of Ω is maintained in the star at the time of synchronization as a result of meridional circulation, as discussed below.
We may also compare the gradients of Ω in the models with and without tidal interactions (see Figs. 3 and 4). First, we note from Fig. 4 that at the beginning of the braking, the gradients of Ω are stronger in the tidally braked models. This will imply stronger mixing of the chemical elements before synchronization. Second, we see that after synchronization (after about 3.0 × 10^{6} years), the gradients of Ω are shallower in the tidal braked models.
This last situation results from the interplay of many physical processes. Indeed, there is an impressive number of effects influencing Ω inside the models: the structural changes, the convective transport, the shear turbulence that tends to erode the Ωgradients, the meridional circulation that can smooth or build the Ωgradients up, the tidal effects that can remove or bring angular momentum. Mass loss can also remove angular momentum, especially when a magnetic field is present in outer layers. One of these effects may be dominant at a given moment at some point inside the star, while part of these effects or all can interact in other periods/regions of the star, so it is very difficult to identify a clearcut cause for the shallower Ωgradients in postsynchronized systems.
Fig. 3 Variation of the angular velocity ([s^{1}]) as a function of the radius and age inside a 15 M_{⊙} model with υ_{ini}/υ_{crit}= 0.6 computed without tidal interaction. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 4 Same as Fig. 3 for a 15 M_{⊙} model with tidal braking. The companion is a 10 M_{⊙} star and the orbital period is 1.4 days. Note that the maximum radius is not coinciding with the total radius of the star, only a portion of the interior is represented. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 5 Amplitude of the vertical component of the meridional circulation velocity in cm per second in a 15 M_{⊙} model at various stages. The dashed lines correspond to a rotating model with υ_{ini} = 0.6 υ_{crit} and are computed without tidal interaction. The continuous lines show the situation when tidal interactions are accounted for, assuming a close companion of 10 M_{⊙} orbiting the primary with an initial period of 1.4 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER 
We carefully examined the effects and behavior of the meridional circulation in relation with tidal effects. In Fig. 5, the variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass of U_{2}^{2} is shown for the spindown Case with an initial orbital period of 1.4 days (the continuous lines). A negative value of U_{2}(r) corresponds to a net transport of angular momentum from the core to the envelope. A positive value corresponds to the reverse situation, i.e., to a net transport of angular momentum from the envelope to the core. We see that at the beginning of evolution (curves for the ages 1 and 3 × 10^{6} years in Fig. 5), the meridional circulation transports angular momentum from the core to the envelope. Thus, while tidal braking slows down the envelope, circulation tends to counteract this effect by accelerating it. After about 5 × 10^{6} years, meridional circulation changes sign and the transport of angular momentum is from the envelope to the core, favoring the increase of the ratio between Ω in the core and that in the envelope at a time where synchronization tends to homogenize the internal rotation.
Comparing the variation of U_{2} in the models with and without tidal interaction, one sees important differences. In the model without tidal interaction, U_{2} is always very negative for the range of ages considered thus there is a net transport of angular momentum from the rapidly spinning core to the slowly rotating envelope. This process acts in the same direction as a diffusive process. In the model with tidal interactions, meridional circulation transports angular momentum from the core to the envelope in a first period until ~5 × 10^{6} years, as in the model without tidal interaction, but with much higher negative velocities, as can be seen in Fig. 5. Then, as the circulation changes sign, the transport of angular momentum goes from the envelope to the core. This last process can no longer be modeled through a diffusive process. Thus, it is essential to describe circulation currents as an advective process.
This redistribution of the angular momentum inside the star by meridional circulation has consequences for the synchronization time. Since circulation tends to counteract the braking of the surface by the tidal torque, it increases the time needed for achieving synchronization. In Table 1, two times are indicated. In the second column t_{rot} is given for the various initial orbital periods and for ZAMS values. The third column shows the effective time at which Ω = ω_{orb} as given by our evolutionary stellar models.
The values of t_{rot} are extremely short, much shorter than 1% of the mainsequence lifetime of a 15 M_{⊙} star. This is quite consistent with the very short timescales obtained by de Mink et al. (2009) and also with the very rapid decrease of the surface velocity shown in our models (see Fig. 1).
The effective time at which Ω = ω_{orb} is much longer than t_{rot} by large factors greater than 70. The main reason for this is the outward transport of angular momentum by circulation, which counteracts tidal braking. It must be noted, however, that looking at Fig. 1, the decrease of the equatorial surface velocity is quite fast, and from an observational point of view the star may be considered as synchronized well before the time at which one has a strict equality Ω = ω_{orb}. Thus, our results do not contradict the observed fact that all binaries of the sample of Btype stars observed by Abt et al. (2002) with periods shorter than 2.4 days (18 stars) are synchronized.
The main consequences of these findings are that

tidal braking has a strong impact on meridional currents, which inturn redistribute the angular momentum inside the star;

t_{rot} as defined above greatly underestimates the time needed for Ω to become equal to ω_{orb};

the gradient of Ω is not flat when synchronization is achieved.
Synchronization timescales, t_{rot}, as given by Eq. (6) for ZAMS values and using the moment of inertia of the whole star and time at which Ω = ω_{orb} from the numerical models for 15 M_{⊙} starting with an initial equatorial velocity on the ZAMS equal to 390 km s^{1}.
Fig. 6 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the shear diffusion coefficient in the radiative envelope of our 15 M_{⊙} model. The continuous lines refer to the spin down case with an initial orbital period of 1.8 days. The dashed lines show the case when the initial orbital period is equal to 1.1 days. The curves for the periods equal to 1.1 and 1.8 days, corresponding to an age of 119 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. The different colors has the same significations as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 7 Variation as a function of time of the ratio in number at the surface of nitrogen to hydrogen for 15 M_{⊙} stellar models with (spindown case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER 
5.2. Impact on the chemical composition and evolutionary tracks
Vertical shear turbulence is the main driver for chemical mixing. We now consider see how the shear diffusion coefficient varies as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate in models with different tidal interactions (Fig. 6). At the beginning, the diffusion is quite low since the Ωgradients are very faint. Then the braking produces a strong shear and the diffusion increases. One notes that after about 0.2 Myr, the shear diffusion coefficient is slightly higher in the model with the longer orbital period, indicating that stronger Ωgradients are produced by tidal interactions in these systems. This probably comes from the fact that torques in longerperiod systems are active over longer durations than in shorterperiod systems.
As a result of the Ωgradients induced by the tidal interactions, the surface becomes enriched in nitrogen (see Fig. 7). In stars with tidal braking a given enrichment is reached for higher values of the surface gravity than in single stars starting with the same initial rotation, indicating a much more efficient mixing. Interestingly enough, these models produce relatively high nitrogen abundances for high log g values, but low surface velocities (see Fig. 1). Thus, tidal mixing strongly changes the correlation between surface velocity, nitrogen abundance and surface gravity with respect to the correlations obtained in models without tidal mixing.
Fig. 8 Variation as a function of time of the surface helium mass fraction for 15 M_{⊙} with (spindown case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 9 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the mass fraction of hydrogen in 15 M_{⊙} models with (spindown case) and without tidal interaction at the same age during the mainsequence phase. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 10 Evolutionary tracks for 15 M_{⊙} models with (spindown case) and without tidal interaction. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. For close binaries, only the part of the track corresponding to the period before the Roche lobe overflow is plotted. 

Open with DEXTER 
In Fig. 8, the analog of Fig. 7 is shown but for the surface enrichments in helium. One sees the same qualitative behavior as for nitrogen, but with smaller amplitudes that are likely not observable.
The different mixings undergone by the stars produce internal compositions that greatly differ at a given age. This can be seen in Fig. 9 where the variations of the mass fraction of hydrogen in our 15 M_{⊙} are shown at a given age for various efficiencies of the tidal braking. We see that in shortperiod systems, the hydrogen profiles is less affected than in longer period systems. This directly results from the point raised above, indicating that shear mixing is more efficient in longerperiod systems.
The consequences of these various hydrogen compositions on the evolutionary tracks in the HR diagram can be seen in Fig. 10. All tracks with tidal interactions are shifted to the blue with respect to the track without tidal interaction. The longer the initial period, the greater the blueshift, consistent with stronger mixing in longerperiod systems. The massageluminosity relation is significantly influenced by tidal mixing, in the sense of an overluminosity for a given mass in the case of tidal braking.
6. Spinup case: tidal acceleration
6.1. Impact on rotation
Fig. 11 Evolution as a function of time of the surface equatorial velocity for a 15 M_{⊙} star with υ_{ini} = 0.2υ_{crit} and a 10 M_{⊙} companion for different initial orbital periods. The case without any tidal interaction is also shown. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 12 Variation of the angular velocity as a function of the radius in solar units. The continuous lines refer to the spinup case with an orbital period equal to 1.4 days. The dashed curves correspond to the spinup case with an orbital period equal to 1.0 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The curves for the periods equal to 1.0 and 1.4 days, corresponding to an age of 113 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 13 Same as Fig. 1 for a 15 M_{⊙} model with υ_{ini} = 0.2 υ_{crit}. The continuous lines show the situation when tidal interactions are accounted for assuming, a close companion of 10 M_{⊙} orbiting the primary with an initial period of 1.4 days. The dashed lines correspond to a rotating model computed without tidal interaction. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER 
Now we discuss situations when the primary is spun up by tidal interactions. Figure 11 shows how the surface velocity varies as a function of time for tidal spin up. The models with tidal interactions rapidly become fast rotators under the influence of their companions. As expected, when the orbital period is short, the surface velocity increases very rapidly and reaches a high value.
The evolution of Ω inside different tidally spinup models are shown in Fig. 12. We can see how tidal interaction forces the surface angular velocity to approach the value of the orbital velocity which is 7.26 × 10^{6} s^{1} for the system with an orbital period of 1.0 days, and 5.19 × 10^{6} s^{1}, for the system with an orbital period of 1.4 days. These systems even reach Roche lobe overflow before they are synchronized.
We see that the gradient of Ω eventually increases slightly.
In Fig. 13, the radial component of the vertical velocity of meridional circulation is shown. During the whole period considered, circulation transports angular momentum from the envelope to the core. Thus, we obtain the same kind of general behavior for tidal spin up as for tidal spin down: meridional circulation counteracts the effect of the tidal interaction. When the surface is spun down, circulation tends to accelerate it, and when the surface is spun up, it tends to slow it down. Thus, for both tidal spin up and down, the synchronization times are increased due to the redistribution of the angular momentum inside the star by meridional circulation.
From Table 2, we see that the synchronization timescale t_{rot} is much shorter than the time at which the RLOF occurs. On the other hand, the RLOF occurs before the effective time when Ω = ω_{orb}. That means that the values shown in the third column of Table 2 are a lower limit for the times t(Ω = ω_{orb}). Thus we have a very similar situation as for spin down, where t_{rot} is much shorter than the time at which Ω = ω_{orb}. In contrast, however, with the spin down case, here we cannot say that Ω converges very rapidly toward values near ω_{orb}. It does therefore appear more difficult to reach synchronization in tidally spinup systems.
The reason is likely that following ones an inward transport of a given mass carries more angular momentum than an outward transport of the same mass, because the specific angular momentum increases as a function of the distance to the center. Thus, it is easier for the circulation to slow down the surface when it is accelerated by the tidal interaction than for the opposite situation in the case of spin down.
Synchronization timescales t_{rot} as given by Eq. (6) for ZAMS values and using the moment of inertia of the whole star and time at which a RLOF occurs for 15 M_{⊙} starting with an initial equatorial velocity on the ZAMS equal to 130 km s^{1}.
Fig. 14 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the shear diffusion coefficient in the radiative envelope of our 15 M_{⊙} model. The continuous lines refer to the spinup case with an initial orbital period of 1.4 days. The dashed lines show the case when the initial orbital period is equal to 1.0 days. The curves for the periods equal to 1.0 and 1.4 days, corresponding to an age of 113 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER 
For of tidal spinup, we also see that a proper advective treatment of meridional circulation is needed for the whole period. A diffusive treatment would not account for the direction of the transport of angular momentum at any moment and thus would even produce effects with the wrong sign. Incidentally, Fig. 13 also shows that the velocity of the circulation currents tends to decrease with time. This reflects the fact that the gradient of Ω eventually increases slightly (see Fig. 12).
Fig. 15 Variation as a function of time of the ratio, in number, of nitrogen to hydrogen at the surface of a 15 M_{⊙} stellar model with (spinup case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER 
6.2. Impact on the chemical composition
Tidal acceleration boosts the shear diffusion and the surface nitrogen enrichments, as can be seen in Figs. 14 and 15. From Fig. 14, one sees that the shear diffusion coefficient is higher in shorterperiod systems. This is the reverse of what is obtained in systems that are tidally spun down. In spindown system, we had larger D_{shear} in longerperiod systems as a result of a weaker, but longer active torque acting on the surface. In spinup systems, we have higher D_{shear} in shorterperiod systems as a result of a shorter active, but stronger torque acting on the surface.
As a consequence of the shears in tidally interacting systems, strong surface enrichments in nitrogen result, as can be seen in Fig. 15. A given nitrogen enhancement is obtained earlier, i.e., for lower surface gravity values in shorterperiod systems. The surface helium enrichments reflect the same trend, but with limited amplitudes (see Fig. 16). The variations of the mass fraction of hydrogen are shown in Fig. 17. Consistently with other results, we see that for shorter initial periods, the effects of the tidal spinning up are stronger, again due the higher Ωgradients.
The impact on the evolutionary tracks can be seen in Fig. 18. There is a shift of tidally accelerated models toward redder positions than for the model without tidal interaction for periods shorter than about 1.2–1.3 days. This is because globally the stars are rapidly spun up and the centrifugal acceleration becomes considerable. The centrifugal acceleration balances the gravity. This tends to make the star to follow an evolution corresponding to a lower initial mass, thus with a lower luminosity and a higher redshift. For the period 1.4 days, one sees that the track is only very slightly overluminous with respect to the track without tidal interaction. In that case, the hydrostatic effects and those of chemical mixing are more or less compensating for each other. This produces a track not far from the one computed without tidal interaction.
Fig. 16 Variation as a function of time of the surface helium mass fraction for 15 M_{⊙} with (spinup case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 17 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the mass fraction of hydrogen in 15 M_{⊙} models with (spinup case) and without tidal interaction at the same age during the mainsequence phase. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. 

Open with DEXTER 
Fig. 18 Evolutionary tracks for 15 M_{⊙} models with (spin up case) and without tidal interaction. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. For close binaries, only the part of the track corresponding to the period before the Roche Lobe Overflow is plotted. 

Open with DEXTER 
7. Conclusions and observable consequences
From the above results, we can deduce some interesting general trends and consequences:

1)
At least up to the RLOF, the direction of the meridionalcirculation is always in a sense that counteracts the effects of thetidal interaction. Meridional currents are spinning up the surfacewhen it is braked down (spindown case), and are braking it downwhen it is accelerated (spinup case). This illustrates howcirculation is driven by what happens at the surface, tending torestore previous equilibrium. These trends seem to be a generalproperty of meridional circulation.

2)
To correctly model the effects of tidal interactions, a proper account of the transport of angular momentum by advection through meridional currents is essential.

3)
The effective time for obtaining Ω = ω_{orb} may extend over periods that cover a significant fraction of the mainsequence lifetime.

4)
Whatever tides brake down the surface or spin it up, they boost the shear diffusion coefficient and the surface nitrogen enrichments.

5)
How these effects vary as a function of the initial period depends on whether tidal interactions brake down or spin up the star. For braking down, the effects obtained at the end of synchronization on the surface enrichments are enlarged when the initial period increases. The contrary occurs for tidal spin up.
From the point of view of possible interesting observable consequences of tidal interactions, we can note that

1)
Spinup systems studied here encounter RLOF before they aresynchronized.

2)
The possibility through asteroseismology to probe the internal rotation rate of stars during their synchronization period or after synchronization (but before any RLOF) would provide extremely interesting constraints on the present models.

3)
Tidal braking produces stars that are strongly nitrogenrich, rotate slowly and present a high surface gravity. This braking can be invoked to explain some slow, nonevolved rotators with strong nitrogen enrichment.

4)
Tidal spinning up may produce fast rotators before the RLOF episode. After RLOF, the loss of the envelope will probably slow down the star considerably. Thus it will be likely not possible to produce fast rotators after a homogeneous evolution through tidal interaction. The process can be initiated by tidal spin up but, at a given point, RLOF will stop it.

5)
In tidal spin up, part of the angular momentum acquired by the primary will be locked into the core due to the redistribution of the angular momentum. Is there any link with gammaRay bursts? This has to be studied in more detail in forthcoming works.
We note that the results would be very different if some process would force the star to rotate as a solid body in its interior (this might be caused for instance by a strong internal magnetic field). We can suspect that the results would be qualitatively similar to those obtained when a magnetic braking is applied at the surface of a solid body rotating star (Meynet et al. 2011): a very fast change of the surface velocity (short time for obtaining Ω = ω) and no tidal mixing during the synchronization period. This will be studied in a forthcoming paper.
Acknowledgments
This work was sponsored by Key Laboratory for the Structure and Evolution of Celestial Objects, Chinese Academy of Sciences, (Grant No. OP201107), the Key Foundation at Guizhou education department (No. 2010002). We thank Patrick Eggenberger for having made available his routine for the change of angular momentum in the outer layers and for very useful remarks helping to improve this paper. We are very grateful to JeanPaul Zahn (referee) for his valuable suggestions and insightful remarks, which have improved this paper greatly.
References
 Abt, H. A., Levato, H., & Grosso, M. 2002, ApJ, 573, A359 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Angulo, C., & Descouvemont, P. 2001, Nucl. Phys. A, 690, 755 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Angulo, C., Arnould, M., Rayet, M., et al. 1999, Nucl. Phys. A, 656, 3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., & Sauval, A. J. 2005, in Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis, eds. T. G. Barnes, III, & F. N. Bash (San Francisco: ASP), ASPC, 336, 25 [Google Scholar]
 Chaboyer, B., & Zahn, J.P. 1992, A&A, 253, 173 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Cunha, K., Hubeny, I., & Lanz, T. 2006, ApJ, 647, L143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 de Jager, C., Nieuwenhuijzen, H., & van der Hucht, K. A. 1988, A&AS, 72, 259 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Denissenkov, P. A., Ivanova, N. S., & Weiss, A. 1999, A&A, 341, 181 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 de Mink, S. E., Cantiello, M., Langer, N., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 243 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 de Mink, S. E., Langer, N., Izzard, R. G., et al. 2013, ApJ, 764, 166 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Endal, A. S., & Sofia, S. 1976, ApJ, 210, 184 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ekström, S., Georgy, C., Eggenberger, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 537, A146 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Heap, S. R., Lanz, T., & Hubeny, I. 2006, ApJ, 638, 409 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Heger, A., & Langer, N. 2000, ApJ, 544, 1016 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Heger, A., Langer, N., & Woosley, S. E. 2000, ApJ, 528, 368 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Huang, R. Q. 2004a, A&A, 422, 981 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Huang, R. Q. 2004b, A&A, 425, 591 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Hunter, I., Brott, I., Langer, N., et al. 2009, A&A, 496, 841 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Kippenhahn, R., & Thomas, H.C. 1970, Stellar Rotation, Proc. IAU Colloq. 4, held at the Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 8–11 September, 1969, ed. A. Slettebak (Gordon and Breach Science Publishers), 20 [Google Scholar]
 Langer, N. 1998, A&A, 329, 551 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Langer, N., & Maeder, A. 1995, A&A, 295, 685 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A. 1997, A&A, 321, 134 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A. 1999, A&A, 347, 185 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A. 2003, A&A, 399, 263 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A. 2009, Physics, Formation and Evolution of Rotating Stars (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag) [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2000, ARA&A, 38, 143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2001, A&A, 373, 555 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2005, A&A, 440, 1041 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Meynet, G. 2012, Rev. Mod. Phys., 84, 25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Maeder, A., & Zahn, J.P. 1998, A&A, 334, 1000 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Mahy, L., Nazé, Y., Rauw, G., et al. 2009, A&A, 502, 937 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mathis, S., & Zahn, J.P. 2004, A&A, 425, 229 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Mathis, S., Palacios, A., & Zahn, J.P. 2004, A&A, 425, 243 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1997, A&A, 321, 465 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2000, A&A, 361, 101 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Meynet, G., Eggenberger, P., & Maeder, A. 2011, A&A, 525, L11 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Przybilla, N., Firnstein, M., Nieva, M. F., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 2010, A&A, 517, A38 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Sana, H., de Koter, A., de Mink, S. E., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A107 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Schaller, G., Schaerer, D., Meynet, G., & Maeder, A. 1992, A&AS, 96, 269 [Google Scholar]
 Song, H. F., Zhong, Z., & Lu, Y. 2009, A&A, 504, 161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Song, H. F., Lu, Y., & Wang, J. Z. 2011, PASJ, 63, 835 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Talon, S., & Zahn, J.P. 1997, A&A, 317, 749 [Google Scholar]
 Toledano, O., Moreno, E., Koenigsberger, G., Detmers, R., & Langer, N. 2007, A&A, 461, 1057 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Walborn, N. R. 1976, IAUS, 72, 153 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Yoon, S.C., Woosley, S. E., & Langer, N. 2010, ApJ, 725, 940 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Zahn, J.P. 1966, AnAp, 29, 489 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Zahn, J.P. 1975, A&A, 41, 329 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Zahn, J.P. 1977, A&A, 57, 383 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Zahn, J.P. 1992, A&A, 265, 115 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
All Tables
Synchronization timescales, t_{rot}, as given by Eq. (6) for ZAMS values and using the moment of inertia of the whole star and time at which Ω = ω_{orb} from the numerical models for 15 M_{⊙} starting with an initial equatorial velocity on the ZAMS equal to 390 km s^{1}.
Synchronization timescales t_{rot} as given by Eq. (6) for ZAMS values and using the moment of inertia of the whole star and time at which a RLOF occurs for 15 M_{⊙} starting with an initial equatorial velocity on the ZAMS equal to 130 km s^{1}.
All Figures
Fig. 1 Evolution as a function of time of the surface equatorial velocity for a 15 M_{⊙} star with υ_{ini} = 0.6υ_{crit} and a 10 M_{⊙} companion for different initial orbital periods. The case without any tidal interaction is also shown. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 2 Variation of the angular velocity as a function of the radius in solar units. The continuous lines refer to the spindown case with an orbital period equal to 1.8 days. The dashed curves correspond to the spindown case with an orbital period equal to 1.1 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The curve corresponding to an age of 119 000 years is the same for the model in the system with an orbital period P of 1.1 days and in the one with an orbital period of 1.8 days. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 3 Variation of the angular velocity ([s^{1}]) as a function of the radius and age inside a 15 M_{⊙} model with υ_{ini}/υ_{crit}= 0.6 computed without tidal interaction. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 4 Same as Fig. 3 for a 15 M_{⊙} model with tidal braking. The companion is a 10 M_{⊙} star and the orbital period is 1.4 days. Note that the maximum radius is not coinciding with the total radius of the star, only a portion of the interior is represented. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 5 Amplitude of the vertical component of the meridional circulation velocity in cm per second in a 15 M_{⊙} model at various stages. The dashed lines correspond to a rotating model with υ_{ini} = 0.6 υ_{crit} and are computed without tidal interaction. The continuous lines show the situation when tidal interactions are accounted for, assuming a close companion of 10 M_{⊙} orbiting the primary with an initial period of 1.4 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 6 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the shear diffusion coefficient in the radiative envelope of our 15 M_{⊙} model. The continuous lines refer to the spin down case with an initial orbital period of 1.8 days. The dashed lines show the case when the initial orbital period is equal to 1.1 days. The curves for the periods equal to 1.1 and 1.8 days, corresponding to an age of 119 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. The different colors has the same significations as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 7 Variation as a function of time of the ratio in number at the surface of nitrogen to hydrogen for 15 M_{⊙} stellar models with (spindown case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 8 Variation as a function of time of the surface helium mass fraction for 15 M_{⊙} with (spindown case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 9 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the mass fraction of hydrogen in 15 M_{⊙} models with (spindown case) and without tidal interaction at the same age during the mainsequence phase. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 10 Evolutionary tracks for 15 M_{⊙} models with (spindown case) and without tidal interaction. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. For close binaries, only the part of the track corresponding to the period before the Roche lobe overflow is plotted. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 11 Evolution as a function of time of the surface equatorial velocity for a 15 M_{⊙} star with υ_{ini} = 0.2υ_{crit} and a 10 M_{⊙} companion for different initial orbital periods. The case without any tidal interaction is also shown. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 12 Variation of the angular velocity as a function of the radius in solar units. The continuous lines refer to the spinup case with an orbital period equal to 1.4 days. The dashed curves correspond to the spinup case with an orbital period equal to 1.0 days. Different ages are plotted with different colors as indicated in the inset, for both the continuous and dashed lines. The curves for the periods equal to 1.0 and 1.4 days, corresponding to an age of 113 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 13 Same as Fig. 1 for a 15 M_{⊙} model with υ_{ini} = 0.2 υ_{crit}. The continuous lines show the situation when tidal interactions are accounted for assuming, a close companion of 10 M_{⊙} orbiting the primary with an initial period of 1.4 days. The dashed lines correspond to a rotating model computed without tidal interaction. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 14 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the shear diffusion coefficient in the radiative envelope of our 15 M_{⊙} model. The continuous lines refer to the spinup case with an initial orbital period of 1.4 days. The dashed lines show the case when the initial orbital period is equal to 1.0 days. The curves for the periods equal to 1.0 and 1.4 days, corresponding to an age of 113 000 years, are the same and thus are superposed. The different colors have the same meaning as in Fig. 2. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 15 Variation as a function of time of the ratio, in number, of nitrogen to hydrogen at the surface of a 15 M_{⊙} stellar model with (spinup case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 16 Variation as a function of time of the surface helium mass fraction for 15 M_{⊙} with (spinup case) and without tidal interactions. The curves are labeled with the values of the initial orbital period. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 17 Variation as a function of the Lagrangian mass coordinate of the mass fraction of hydrogen in 15 M_{⊙} models with (spinup case) and without tidal interaction at the same age during the mainsequence phase. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Fig. 18 Evolutionary tracks for 15 M_{⊙} models with (spin up case) and without tidal interaction. Curves for different initial orbital periods are shown. For close binaries, only the part of the track corresponding to the period before the Roche Lobe Overflow is plotted. 

Open with DEXTER  
In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.