EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 555 (July 2013) A&A, 555 (2013) A17 Full HTML
Free Access
Issue
A&A
Volume 555, July 2013
Article Number A17
Number of page(s) 6
Section Stellar structure and evolution
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321645
Published online 20 June 2013

© ESO, 2013

1. Introduction

Low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs, Hasinger & van der Klis 1989) consist of a compact object and a donor companion star with a mass typically not exceeding one solar mass. In these systems, the compact object is, in most cases, a neutron star that accretes matter from the donor via Roche-lobe overflow. Because of angular momentum conservation, an accretion disk around the neutron star is formed. X-ray emission from LMXBs is complex, and most likely, different components emerge from different regions. Generally, the spectrum is well reproduced by one or two thermal components in combination with a Comptonized component at higher energies (e.g. Piraino et al. 2012). The origin of the different spectral components is still a matter of debate. Currently, two main models are widely used to describe the LMXB spectrum: the eastern model (Mitsuda et al. 1984, 1989) and the western or Birmingham model (Church & Balucinska-Church 1995, 2004).

In addition, if the accretion disk is illuminated by radiation from the neutron star, reflection features might appear in the spectrum. Indeed, several objects of the class show evidence for broad fluorescence iron Kα lines as well as for other lines, which could originate from reflection from an accretion disk. Relativistically, broadened fluorescence iron lines were first detected in observations of active galactic nuclei (MCG-6-30-15, Tanaka et al. 1995; Fabian et al. 2000, for a review) and in binary systems containing stellar mass black holes (Cyg X-1, Barr et al. 1985). Actual relativistic models for lines, such as the well-known disk-line model (Fabian et al. 1989, implemented in XSPEC as diskline) were introduced to explain the asymmetry of the line observed in Cygnus X-1. More recently, improvements in detection techniques allowed evidence for an asymmetric shape of the iron Kα line also in LMXBs with neutron stars (Piraino et al. 2000) to be found. To date, a relativistic origin of the fluorescence iron line profile has been discussed in more than ten LMXBs (Bhattacharyya & Strohmayer 2007; Cackett et al. 2008, 2010; di Salvo et al. 2009; D’Aì et al. 2010; Iaria et al. 2009; Pandel et al. 2008; Piraino et al. 2012). We have to observe, however, that Ng et al. (2010), analyzing a large sample of sources observed with XMM-Newton, have stressed the importance of the correct instrument pile-up treatment to answer the question whether the iron line is relativistically broadened or not. Very recently, Piraino et al. (2012) and Egron et al. (2013) found that the asymmetry is robust against pile-up effects in the analysis of GX 3+1 and 4U 1705-44, respectively, even when pile-up effects are rigorously taken into account. The superposition of different relativistic effects, such as gravitational redshift and relativistic beaming, shapes the line. These effects strongly depend on the radius where the line is formed and the inclination under which the system is seen.

The presence of such a relativistically broadened line is debated for the LMXB 4U 1735-44. The system is located at a distance of 6.5±1.0 kpc (Galloway et al. 2008) and consists of a neutron star and a companion star with a mass of 0.53   ±   0.44 M⊙ (Casares et al. 2006). Matter is accreted by the compact object via Roche-lobe overflow from the companion, leading to a flux in the 2–10 keV range of about 4 × 10-9 erg cm-2 s-1. The orbital period has been measured to be 4.564 ± 0.005 h by Corbet et al. (1989). van Paradijs et al. (1988) first observed irregular type I X-ray bursts. Analyzing data of the RXTE satellite, Wijnands et al. (1996, 1998) found a high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) close to 1150 Hz. Subsequently, Ford et al. (1998) found two simultaneous kHz QPOs with a varying frequency separation of about 300 Hz. Hasinger & van der Klis (1989) classified 4U 1735-44 as an atoll source because of its characteristic behavior in a color−color diagram.

The broad-band spectrum of the source was discussed by Seon et al. (1997), who performed a combined analysis of Ginga and ROSAT data. The spectrum was fitted with a combination of a single blackbody and a Comptonization model. Line features were modeled with Gaussian lines. Recently, Lei et al. (2013) analyzed RXTE PCA data with the focus on the timing behavior of the source. The data do not cover the energy range below 2 keV, and compared with BeppoSAX and XMM-Newton the spectral resolution of the PCA instrument is insufficient for investigating the region of the iron line. Cackett et al. (2009) and Torrejón et al. (2010) found no evidence for an iron line at all based on Chandra observations at a luminosity range of 2.77−3.37   ×   1037 erg s-1. On the other hand, Ng et al. (2010) found a broad iron Kα line, with an equivalent width of 43   ±   13 eV and a centroid line energy of 6.74   ±   0.10 keV, investigating an XMM-Newton observation taken at a luminosity of 3.98   ×   1037 erg s-1.

In this paper, we present for the first time a study of the broad-band spectrum of 4U 1735-44 using data of four BeppoSAX observations performed in 2000. We also report on the XMM-Newton observation of a broad iron line in the spectrum of the source, investigating the effects of instrumental pile-up on the line shape. We finally suggest a possible source geometry capable of explaining the origin of the observed continuum components and the region where the line formation takes place.

Table 1

Summary of the analysed observations.

2. Observations

We analyzed data obtained with the X-ray observatories BeppoSAX and XMM-Newton. The observations are summarized in Table 1. To extract the data products, we followed the corresponding user handbooks of XMM-Newton1 and BeppoSAX2. The sax tools that were included in the HEASOFT v.5.33 were used to extract the BeppoSAX data. The XMM-Newton data products were extracted with the help of the Science Analysis Software (SAS) version 12.04.

BeppoSAX consists of four narrow field instruments, the Low Energy Concentrator Spectrometer (LECS, Parmar et al. 1997), the Medium Energy Concentrator Spectrometer (MECS, Boella et al. 1995), the High Pressure Gas Scintillation Proportional Counter (HPGSPC, Giarrusso et al. 1995) and the Phoswich Detector System (PDS, Frontera et al. 1995). They allow broad-band X-ray observations in an energy range from 0.2–200 keV, with an effective area of 150 cm2 at 6 keV (MECS).

Unfortunately, we were unable to use the PDS data in our analysis because of systematic effects above 20 keV. These are due to the location of 4U 1735-44 close to the galactic plane. During the off-pointing of the PDS collimator, the galactic plane fell into the field of view, resulting in an increased number of background-contaminating sources.

The LECS and MECS spectra and light curves were used and spectra for the two instruments were extracted from an 8′ and 4′ region around the source center. The MECS units 2 and 3 were combined and the MECS unit 1 was not used because it developed problems with the voltage supply in 1997.

The four BeppoSAX observations have a total exposure time of ~40 ks for the LECS, ~120 ks for the MECS and ~82 ks for the HPGSPC. The LECS and MECS background spectra were extracted from event lists of empty-field observations that are provided by the instrument teams. Since in three of the four observations the collimator of the HPGSPC was not rocking anymore, we summed spectra obtained during Earth occultation to produce a background spectrum, as suggested by the hardware team. This was compared with the off-minus spectrum, the standard background, of the first observation and matched very well. The summed background spectrum provided much better statistics and was therefore used for background subtraction in all four observations. The observation performed with the EPIC-PN instrument of XMM-Newton (Strüder et al. 2001) had an exposure time of 5.3 ks. The EPIC-PN CCD detector is sensitive in the range of 0.1–15 keV and is placed in the focus of an X-ray telescope that offers an effective area of 1500 cm2 at 6 keV. To cope with the expected high count rate of the source, the EPIC-PN camera was operated in timing mode, which offers a time resolution close to 30 μs. In timing mode, ten pixels are collapsed to one macropixel, with the spatial resolution limited to one dimension. Despite the relatively high time-resolution of the EPIC-PN camera, pile-up effects had to be properly treated given the high flux of the source. The inner region of the source should be removed from the extraction, if an observation is affected by pile-up, following the suggestion of the hardware team.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Epatplot of region 1 (All columns). Shown are the fractions of the different pattern types (singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples. The observed pattern fractions are compared with the expected ones (smooth lines). A deviation is an indication of pile-up. Above 7 keV a clear excess of double events can be seen.
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 2

Epatplot of region 3 (without the innermost three columns). Above 10 keV, an excess of double events is still visible.
Open with DEXTER

To investigate the presence of pile-up we show in Figs. 1 and 2 the so-called epatplot results obtained with the SAS analysis software. The epatplot shows the fractions of the different pattern types compared with those expected from a pile-up free observation. As can be seen in Fig. 1, a clear deviation from a pile-up free observation is observed for data extracted within a box with a width of 15 columns (region 1) centered on the source position (Col. 38). This is indeed expected for a count rate of ~1146 counts per second. In a second step, we excluded the three inner Cols. 37−39 of the box in the extraction. The epatplot shown in Fig. 2 still showed small deviations from the expected pattern distribution above 10 keV. The resulting count rate of ~470 counts per second is in the border area in which pile-up effects occur. To compare the effects of pile-up, we also extracted a spectrum without the inner five columns. For this extraction region, there is no evidence for pile-up in the epatplot. Finally, we extracted the spectra from four different extraction regions, region 1 with all columns used, region 2 without the innermost column, region 3 without three columns, and region 4 without five columns. To extract the spectra, we used single and double events in an energy range of 0.2–12 keV. The response and the ancillary response file were produced with rmfgen and arfgen, respectively, following the instructions for piled-up observations in the SAS user handbook.

The other two cameras onboard XMM-Newton (the MOS cameras, Turner et al. 2001) were both operated in partial window mode, which can handle a source flux of two counts per second. We checked the data for pile-up and found that the observation is piled-up to an extremely high degree, therefore we were unable to use the MOS data in our analysis.

3. Data analysis and observational results

The spectral fittings were all performed using the spectral analysis package XSPEC v.12.7.0 (Arnaud 1996).

thumbnail Fig. 3

Color–color diagram for the BeppoSAX observation. One point represents 400 s of observation. The boxes are discussed at the end of Sect. 3.1.
Open with DEXTER

thumbnail Fig. 4

Whole RXTE ASM light curve. The BeppoSAX observations are marked with blue points and the XMM-Newton with red triangles. The Chandra observations analyzed by Cackett et al. (2009) are marked with green diamonds to compare the luminosities.
Open with DEXTER

3.1. BeppoSAX

To study the spectral variation as a function of the source state, we produced a color−color diagram (Fig. 3) of all observations, plotting the hard color (Flux(7–10 keV)/Flux(3–7 keV)) against the soft color (Flux(3–7 keV)/Flux(1–3 keV)). During all observations, the source was in the so-called banana state of the atoll sources. To check time variability on timescales shorter than those of the color−color diagram, light curves of the MECS and HPGSPC data were produced. As can be seen in Fig. 5, no bursts or dips were found. Although slight changes in the count rate are observed, transitions between different states cannot be unequivocably identified.

To study the intensity of the source on long timescales, the overall light curve of the All Sky Monitor (ASM, Levine et al. 1996) onboard RXTE is plotted in Fig. 4. The ASM data indicate that the source was in a similar intensity state during the BeppoSAX and the XMM observations, in 2000 and 2001 respectively. Furthermore, the Chandra observations, performed in 2006 and 2007, were also taken at a similar ASM intensity and were found to be in the banana state by Cackett et al. (2009). We are therefore confident that all observations were performed when the source was in the banana branch.

For the LECS spectrum, we used the energy bins from 0.2−3.0 keV, for the MECS 1.7−10.0 keV, and for the HPGSPC from 7.0−24.0 keV. Above 24 keV, the HPGSPC data were dominated by the background, so we did not use them. To cope with the uncertainties of the calibration and background subtraction, a systematic error of 2% was applied to the HPGSPC data.

thumbnail Fig. 5

Light curve of the MECS detector with 16 s time binning (red) and the HPGSPC light curve with a 196 s time binning (green).
Open with DEXTER

The broad-band continuum was modeled with a photoelectric absorbed (phabs) combination of a multicolor disk blackbody (diskbb, Mitsuda et al. 1984) and a thermally Comptonized component (Nthcomp, Zdziarski et al. 1996; Zycki et al. 1999). The shape of the disk blackbody is determined by the temperature at the inner disk radius Tin. Given the source distance, it is possible to calculate the inner disk radius from the normalization defined as k = (Rin[km]/D[10 kpc])2cos   θ. The Comptonization component depends on the power-law photon index Γ, the electron temperature kTe, the seed photon temperature kTbb, and the normalization. Furthermore, the Nthcomp model allows one to choose between blackbody and disk blackbody seed photons.

thumbnail Fig. 6

BeppoSAX observation 2083600200 with three instruments: LECS (black), MECS (red), and HPGSPC (green). In the upper panel the unfolded spectra multiplied by E2 of the best-fit model (phabs*(diskbb + nthcomp + reflionx)) are shown. In the middle panel the residuals above the continuum are plotted, and in the lower panel the residuals after adding the reflionx model to the continuum.
Open with DEXTER

The fit of observation 1 resulted in a reduced χ2 of 2.39 (χ2/d.o.f. = 409/171) and some line-like features appeared in the residuals together with an excess above 10 keV. The most prominent feature appeared at energies between 5 and 7 keV, as clearly seen in the middle panel of Fig. 6. Since reflection from the accretion disk is observed in LMXBs, we used the reflionx model (Ross & Fabian 2005), which models reflection by an optically thick atmosphere, which approximates the surface of an accretion disk well. In fact, the reflection model has recently been used in the analysis of other LMXBs (see Reis et al. 2009; Egron et al. 2011). The spectrum of the reflection depends on the abundance of iron relative to the solar value (Fe/solar). The abundances of the other elements are set to their solar values (Morrison & McCammon 1983). The model also depends on the photon index Γ of the illuminating power-law spectrum, which was fixed in our fits to the Γ of the Nthcomp because we expect that the illuminating photons originate from regions close to the neutron star. Another free-fit parameter is the ionization, defined as ξ = 4πF/n, where F is the total illuminating flux and n the hydrogen number density. The best-fit results for the four BeppoSAX observations are summarized in Table 2 and the best-fit residuals as well as the unfolded spectrum are shown in Fig. 6.

Table 2

Best-fit results for the four BeppoSAX observations.

For all four observations, statistically meaningful fit results were obtained. All line-like features were properly modeled and the residuals showed no need for an additional model component. We also tried to model the line-like features with Gaussian lines, obtaining higher values of χ2 and therefore concluding that the reflionx model describes the source spectrum better. We also searched for spectral variations along the path of the color−color diagram. Three spectra were obtained by summing the individual spectra of the three boxes defined in Fig. 3. The best-fit results slightly changed, but are still within the error range. Hence, no significant spectral variation was detected as a function of the source position in the color−color diagram.

3.2. XMM-Newton

For the nominal energy range of 0.7–10 keV of the EPIC-PN data, the fit showed a broad feature at ~1 keV. This feature was found in each of the sources analyzed by Ng et al. (2010). Additionally, features are present in the range of Si and Au absorption, which were adressed in an EPIC-PN calibration note5. To avoid effects on the fit parameters, we decided to remove the energy bins below 2.4 keV as was done before by e.g. Piraino et al. (2012). In addition, energy bins above 10 keV were not used, as is standard in EPIC-PN observations.

thumbnail Fig. 7

Upper panel: the residuals of all four extraction regions obtained by just using the continuum model. Shown here are region 1 (all columns, blue), region 2 (without one column, red), region 3 (without three columns, black) and region 4 (without five columns, green). Middle panel: a Gaussian is added to the continuum model. Lower panel: the diskline model is used instead of a Gaussian.
Open with DEXTER

The best fit of the continuum spectral component was achieved by combining an absorbed multicolor disk blackbody diskbb and a single blackbody bbody. Replacing the single blackbody with a Comptonization model, such as nthcomp or compTT (Titarchuk 1994), provided an unsatisfactory fit. This is not surprising given the limited energy range of the EPIC-PN data, which leads to problems in constraining the parameters. After modeling of the continuum, line-like residuals are apparent in the energy range of 5–7 keV, as shown in the upper panel of Fig. 7 for all four chosen extraction regions. Unfortunately, we could not use the reflionx model to describe the line features given the limited energy range of the XMM-Newton data. This is why we used a simple Gaussian model. The resulting residuals are shown in the middle panel of Fig. 7. This model gave acceptable fits with a reduced χ2 close to 1 for all four regions. Similar statistically acceptable results were also obtained using the model for relativistically broadened iron lines diskline (Fabian et al. 1989) (see residuals in the lower panel of Fig. 7). Since we obtained similar results with both models, we cannot distinguish a relativistic line profile with respect to a simpler Gaussian broadening. It is worth noting that the radius at which the line is produced is larger than 15 Schwarzschild radii for the diskline model. The photoelectric absorption was fixed to 0.30   ×   1022 cm-2, the value was obtained with the help of the BeppoSAX data since we did not use energy bins below 2.4 keV, which leads to problems in defining the absorption. The best-fit results for the four different extraction regions are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3

Best-fit results for the four XMM-Newton extraction regions.

4. Discussion

We have presented the analysis of four broad-band (0.2–24 keV) BeppoSAX observations of the LMXB 4U 1735-44. The broad-band spectra were modeled according to the eastern model based on Mitsuda et al. (1984, 1989). The continuum fit suggested the presence of a multicolor disk blackbody, originating from the disk, and a Comptonized component, most likely due to a corona of hot electrons close to the neutron star in the central region of the accretion disk. From the BeppoSAX data, we also concluded that a reflection component can model the residuals of the continuum fit and especially the line-like features well. The most prominent feature was found at 6.7 keV and originates from the iron Kα fluorescence line. Although the line is broad, relativistic blurring is not needed to model the line. This indicates that the production site of the observed line is not in the proximity of the neutron star. The inner radius of the accretion can be estimated from the normalization of the diskbb continuum model. We assumed an inclination angle of 60°, which was found as an upper limit by Casares et al. (2006) and is also supported by the absence of dips in the light curve. The hardening factor κ (Shimura & Takahara 1995) was set to 1.7 while the correction for inner boundary conditions was ξ = 0.412 (Kubota et al. 1998). Eventually, an inner disk radius of 18 to 23 km was estimated from the BeppoSAX observations. The inner disk radius is, therefore, between four to six times the Schwarzschild radius for a typical 1.4 M⊙ neutron star. If we assume a neutron star radius between 10 and 15 km (based on the equation of state summarized in Lattimer & Prakash 2007), this indicates that the accretion disk neither reaches the surface of the compact object nor the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO), which is three times the Schwarzschild radius. However, if the mass of the neutron star is 2.0 M⊙, the Schwarzschild radius will be 5.9 km and the 18 km will match the ISCO.

In our analysis of XMM-Newton data, we analyzed the line profile, carefully taking into account pile-up and investigating the resulting effects. Ng et al. (2010) claimed that pile-up can produce an asymmetric profile of the iron line. In our analysis, we found no evidence for an asymmetry or broadening of the iron line caused by pile up. On the contrary, we calculated a maximum line width of 0.430 eV (equivalent width of 53.2 eV) after removing the five innermost columns, compared with 0.389 eV (32.4 eV) with all columns. Interestingly, the continuum spectrum became softer when more columns were excluded, which is expected because pile-up hardens the spectrum. The result obtained for the diskline model, a production site radius of more than 15 Schwarzschild radii (>60 km), confirms that the line production does not take place in the innermost regions of the accretion disk. Moreover the diskline model produced an inclination value close to 60°, which supports the assumption used for the BeppoSAX data.

According to our results, the model suggested by Sakurai et al. (2012) and Matsuoka & Asai (2013, see Fig. 8 might well explain the emission geometry of 4U 1735-44. In the soft state of the source, we observed a Comptonization region of electrons with an average energy of 3 keV located close to the region between the neutron star and the disk. The seed photons are provided by the blackbody, which is emitted at the equatorial region of the neutron star and the inner parts of the accretion disk. Furthermore, we observed a multicolor blackbody spectrum from the disk and the reflection component, which originates from regions of the disk far from the neutron star. The direct emission from the neutron star could not be seen due to the Comptonization region marked blue in Fig. 8. Although the model is based on the eastern model, the hot plasma close to the neutron star is similar to the accretion disk corona (ADC) proposed by Church & Balucinska-Church (2004). However, the hot plasma region does not spread as far as the ADC. It remains to be investigated why no line can be found in the analysis of Chandra data. The luminosity was similar to the observations presented in this work and the width of the line exceeded the upper limit given by Cackett et al. (2009, 40 eV).

thumbnail Fig. 8

Possible geometry of the system. Illustration is based on Matsuoka & Asai (2013). A Comptonization region of electrons with an energy of around 3 keV is located close to the neutron star (marked in blue). The accretion takes place at the equatorial regions of the neutron star. The disk emits a multicolor blackbody.

Open with DEXTER

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie through the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt (DLR, grants FKZ 50 OG 1001 and 50 OG 1301). We wish to thank Mrs Sarah Suchy for the careful reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. J. J. Barnes, ASP Conf. Ser., 101, 17 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barr, P., White, N. E., & Page, C. G. 1985, MNRAS, 216, 65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bhattacharyya, S., & Strohmayer, T. E. 2007, ApJ, 664, L103 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boella, G., Chiappetti, L., Conti, G., et al. 1995, in SPIE Conf. Ser. 2517, ed. S. Fineschi, 223 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cackett, E. M., Miller, J. M., Bhattacharyya, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 674, 415 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cackett, E. M., Miller, J. M., Homan, J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1847 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cackett, E. M., Miller, J. M., Ballantyne, D. R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 205 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Casares, J., Cornelisse, R., Steeghs, D., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1235 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Church, M. J., & Balucinska-Church, M. 1995, A&A, 300, 441 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Church, M. J., & Balucinska-Church, M. 2004, MNRAS, 348, 955 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Corbet, R., Smale, A., Charles, P., et al. 1989, MNRAS, 239, 533 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. D’Aì, A., di Salvo, T., Ballantyne, D., et al. 2010, A&A, 516, A36 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. di Salvo, T., D’Aí, A., Iaria, R., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2022 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Egron, E., di Salvo, T., Burderi, L., et al. 2011, A&A, 530, A99 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Egron, E., Di Salvo, T., Motta, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A5 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fabian, A. C., Rees, M. J., Stella, L., & White, N. E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C. S., & Young, A. J. 2000, PASP, 112, 1145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ford, E., Van DER Klis, M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 508, L155 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Frontera, F., Costa, E., Dal Fiume, D., et al. 1995, in International Cosmic Ray Conference, 2, 41 [Google Scholar]
  20. Galloway, D., Muno, M., Hartman, J., Psaltis, D., & Chakrabarty, D. 2008, ApJS, 179, 360 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Giarrusso, S., Santangelo, A. E., Fazio, G., et al. 1995, in SPIE Conf. Ser. 2517, ed. S. Fineschi, 234 [Google Scholar]
  22. Hasinger, G., & van der Klis, M. 1989, A&A, 225, 79 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  23. Iaria, R., D’Aí, A., di Salvo, T., et al. 2009, A&A, 505, 1143 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kubota, A., Tanaka, Y., Makishima, K., et al. 1998, PASJ, 50, 667 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Lattimer, J. M., & Prakash, M. 2007, Phys. Rep., 442, 109 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lei, Y. J., Zhang, H. T., Zhang, C. M., et al. 2013 [arXiv:1301.5725] [Google Scholar]
  27. Levine, A. M., Bradt, H., Cui, W., et al. 1996, ApJ, 469, L33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Matsuoka, M., & Asai, K. 2013, PASJ, 65, 26 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Nakamura, N., & Tanaka, Y. 1989, PASJ, 41, 97 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  31. Morrison, R., & McCammon, D. 1983, ApJ, 270, 119 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ng, C., Díaz Trigo, M., Cadolle Bel, M., & Migliari, S. 2010, A&A, 522, A96 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pandel, D., Kaaret, P., & Corbel, S. 2008, ApJ, 688, 1288 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parmar, A. N., Martin, D. D. E., Bavdaz, M., et al. 1997, A&AS, 122, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  35. Piraino, S., Santangelo, A., & Kaaret, P. 2000, A&A, 360, L35 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  36. Piraino, S., Santangelo, A., Kaaret, P., et al. 2012, A&A, 542, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  37. Reis, R. C., Fabian, A. C., & Young, A. J. 2009, MNRAS, 399, L1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. Ross, R. R., & Fabian, A. C. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 211 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sakurai, S., Yamada, S., Torii, S., et al. 2012, PASJ, 64, 72 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  40. Seon, K., Min, K., Yoshida, K., et al. 1997, ApJ, 479, 398 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shimura, T., & Takahara, F. 1995, ApJ, 445, 780 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  43. Tanaka, Y., Nandra, K., Fabian, A. C., et al. 1995, Nature, 375, 659 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Titarchuk, L. 1994, ApJ, 434, 570 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Torrejón, J. M., Schulz, N. S., Nowak, M. A., & Kallman, T. R. 2010, ApJ, 715, 947 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  46. Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  47. van Paradijs, J., Penninx, W., Lewin, W. H. G., Sztajno, M., & Truemper, J. 1988, A&A, 192, 147 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wijnands, R. A. D., van der Klis, M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1996, IAU Circ., 6447, 1 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  49. Wijnands, R., van der Klis, M., Mendez, M., et al. 1998, ApJ, 495, L39 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zdziarski, A. A., Johnson, W. N., & Magdziarz, P. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 193 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  51. Zycki, P. T., Done, C., & Smith, D. A. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 561 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Tables

Table 1

Summary of the analysed observations.

In the text
Table 2

Best-fit results for the four BeppoSAX observations.

In the text
Table 3

Best-fit results for the four XMM-Newton extraction regions.

In the text

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Epatplot of region 1 (All columns). Shown are the fractions of the different pattern types (singles, doubles, triples, and quadruples. The observed pattern fractions are compared with the expected ones (smooth lines). A deviation is an indication of pile-up. Above 7 keV a clear excess of double events can be seen.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 2

Epatplot of region 3 (without the innermost three columns). Above 10 keV, an excess of double events is still visible.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 3

Color–color diagram for the BeppoSAX observation. One point represents 400 s of observation. The boxes are discussed at the end of Sect. 3.1.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 4

Whole RXTE ASM light curve. The BeppoSAX observations are marked with blue points and the XMM-Newton with red triangles. The Chandra observations analyzed by Cackett et al. (2009) are marked with green diamonds to compare the luminosities.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 5

Light curve of the MECS detector with 16 s time binning (red) and the HPGSPC light curve with a 196 s time binning (green).
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 6

BeppoSAX observation 2083600200 with three instruments: LECS (black), MECS (red), and HPGSPC (green). In the upper panel the unfolded spectra multiplied by E2 of the best-fit model (phabs*(diskbb + nthcomp + reflionx)) are shown. In the middle panel the residuals above the continuum are plotted, and in the lower panel the residuals after adding the reflionx model to the continuum.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 7

Upper panel: the residuals of all four extraction regions obtained by just using the continuum model. Shown here are region 1 (all columns, blue), region 2 (without one column, red), region 3 (without three columns, black) and region 4 (without five columns, green). Middle panel: a Gaussian is added to the continuum model. Lower panel: the diskline model is used instead of a Gaussian.
Open with DEXTER
In the text
thumbnail Fig. 8

Possible geometry of the system. Illustration is based on Matsuoka & Asai (2013). A Comptonization region of electrons with an energy of around 3 keV is located close to the neutron star (marked in blue). The accretion takes place at the equatorial regions of the neutron star. The disk emits a multicolor blackbody.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.