Free Access
Volume 552, April 2013
Article Number A109
Number of page(s) 4
Section Extragalactic astronomy
Published online 10 April 2013

© ESO, 2013

1. Introduction

Bassani et al. (2012) identified the soft gamma-ray source IGR J12319−0749 found by the INTEGRAL satellite as a radio- and X-ray-emitting object. Based on its optical spectrum, the source is a quasar at z = 3.12 (Massetti et al. 2012). From the broad emission lines, the mass of the central black hole is estimated to be 2.8 × 109M. Bassani et al. (2012) collected several other pieces of evidence that suggest the source is an extreme blazar, a flat-spectrum radio quasar with powerful jets. If this is the case, the source is the second most distant blazar detected by INTEGRAL so far. The X-ray source located within the INTEGRAL error circle has been recently followed up with the Swift satellite’s X-ray telescope (XRT), and UV-optical telescope (UVOT). The X-ray image confirms that the object coincides with a National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) Very Large Array (VLA) Sky Survey (NVSS) radio source (Condon et al. 1998, VLA D configuration, flux density 60.4 mJy at 1.4 GHz). The radio source is also listed as an unresolved object (<5″) in the VLA Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty-cm (FIRST) survey catalogue (White et al. 1997, VLA B configuration, 62.9 mJy flux density and 61.0 mJy/beam peak brightness at 1.4 GHz). No other radio measurements (at frequencies other than 1.4 GHz, and with better resolution) are known. The X-ray flux seems variable over a period of a few months (Bassani et al. 2012). From the sparsely available, non-simultaneous data and upper limits, Bassani et al. (2012) tried to reconstruct the spectral energy distribution of IGR J12319−074, and concluded that it is similar to that of another high-redshift blazar, IGR J22517+2218 (at z = 3.668; Falco et al. 1998).

Here we report on our high-resolution radio interferometric observation of the radio counterpart of IGR J12319−0749, using the technique of very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) with the European VLBI Network (EVN). This is an excellent tool for confirming with imaging that a source is indeed a blazar with compact radio emission on milli-arcsecond (mas) angular scale; VLBI is also capable of determining the accurate astrometric position of a compact radio-emitting object.

2. EVN observations and data reduction

The EVN observation of IGR J12319−0749 (or J1231−0747, the name derived from the more accurate coordinates of the radio counterpart, and used in this paper hereafter) took place on 2012 June 19 at 5 GHz frequency. We utilized the electronic VLBI (e-VLBI) mode (Szomoru 2008) where, unlike the conventional VLBI, the signals are not recorded at the telescope sites, but are transmitted to the correlator via wide-band optical fibre networks. The real-time correlation of the data took place at the EVN Data Processor at the Joint Institute for VLBI in Europe (JIVE), Dwingeloo, The Netherlands. At the maximum recording rate of 1024 Mbit s-1, eight antennas of the radio telescope network participated in the experiment: Effelsberg (Germany), Jodrell Bank Mk2 telescope (UK), Medicina, Noto (Italy), Toruń (Poland), Onsala (Sweden), Hartebeesthoek (South Africa), and the phased array of the Westerbork Synthesis Radio Telescope (WSRT, The Netherlands). Inter-continental baselines up to the length of ~8100 km were provided by the Hartebeesthoek antenna. Our short exploratory e-EVN experiment (project code RSF06) lasted for 2 h. Eight intermediate frequency channels (IFs) were used in both left and right circular polarisations. The total bandwidth was 128 MHz per polarisation.

The target source J1231−0747 was observed in phase-reference mode (e.g. Beasley & Conway 1995). We did not have prior information about the expected correlated flux density of J1231−0747. For a successful detection, we planned sufficiently long coherent integration time to be spent on the source to improve the sensitivity of the observations. Phase-referencing involves regular nodding of the radio telescopes between the target and a nearby bright and compact reference source. We used J1233−1025 as the phase-reference calibrator, at separation from our target. The target-reference cycles of ~6 min allowed us to spend ~4.5 min on the target source in each cycle, leading to ~80 min accumulated integration time on J1231−0747. The absolute astrometric position of the reference source is listed in the catalogue of the current realisation of the International Celestial Reference Frame (ICRF2, Fey et al. 2009). Phase-referencing is suitable for accurately determining the position of the target source with respect to the reference source.

The US National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO) Astronomical Image Processing System (aips) was used for the data calibration in a standard way (e.g. Diamond 1995). The visibility amplitudes were calibrated using the antenna gains, and the system temperatures measured at the antennas during the experiment. Fringe-fitting (Schwab & Cotton 1983) was performed for the phase-reference calibrator (J1233−1025), and the fringe-finder sources (J1125+2610, J1159+2914). The data were then exported to the Caltech Difmap package (Shepherd et al. 1994) for imaging. The conventional mapping procedure involving several iterations of Cleaning (Högbom 1974) and phase (then amplitude) self-calibration resulted in the images and brightness distribution models for the calibrators. Overall antenna gain correction factors (typically ~10% or less) were determined and applied to the visibility amplitudes in Aips. Then fringe-fitting was repeated in aips, now taking the clean component model of the phase-reference calibrator into account. The residual phase corrections resulting from the non-pointlike structure of the phase-reference calibrator were considered this way. The solutions obtained were interpolated and applied to the target source data. Then the visibility data of J1231−0747 were also exported to Difmap for imaging. The phase-referenced image obtained was used for determining the position of the brightness peak with the aips task maxfit. The right ascension and the declination have accuracies of 0.7 mas and 1 mas, respectively, estimated from the phase-reference calibrator source position accuracy, the target-calibrator separation, the angular resolution of the interferometer array, and the signal-to-noise ratio.

thumbnail Fig. 1

Naturally-weighted 5-GHz e-EVN image of the quasar J1231−0747 (IGR J12319−0749). The lowest contours are drawn at ±0.27 mJy/beam, corresponding to ~3σ image noise. The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The peak brightness is 84.1 mJy/beam. The Gaussian restoring beam is 8.8 mas × 2.0 mas with major axis position angle 75°. The restoring beam (FWHM) is indicated with an ellipse in the lower-left corner. The image is centered on the brightness peak at right ascension and declination .

From the phase-referenced data, it turned out that the target source itself is sufficiently bright and compact for fringe-fitting. Therefore, we applied the aips task fring for J1231−0747, as was done earlier for the phase-reference source and the fringe-finders. This way the absolute position information is lost for the target. However, the final naturally-weighted image (Fig. 1) obtained in Difmap with the standard hybrid-mapping cycles of Cleaning, and phase and amplitude self-calibration is somewhat more sensitive than the phase-referenced image.

3. Results and discussion

Our 5-GHz VLBI image (Fig. 1) shows J1231−0747 (IGR J12319−0749) as a compact radio source without any extended feature above the brightness limit of ~0.5 mJy/beam (5σ) at mas or 10-mas angular scales. The radio source appears practically unresolved with the e-EVN on baselines up to ~136 million wavelengths (Mλ), i.e. from the European antennas to Hartebeesthoek. To physically characterise the source, we used Difmap to fit a circular Gaussian brightness distribution model directly to the self-calibrated visibility data. The best-fit model component has 84.6 ± 4.2 mJy flux density and 0.24 ± 0.01 mas diameter (full width at half maximum, FWHM). This size can be compared with the minimum resolvable angular size (e.g. Kovalev et al. 2005; Lobanov 2005) that can be obtained in this VLBI experiment, assuming natural weighting (1)Here bψ is the half-power beam size along a given position angle ψ, and S/N the signal-to-noise ratio, i.e. the ratio between the peak brightness and the image noise. A source is considered unresolved if its measured visibility amplitude at the longest baseline differs from that of a point source of the same flux density by not more than the 1-σ uncertainty. This method is often applied to determine the minimum resolvable size of compact VLBI-detected components (e.g. Lee et al. 2008; Savolainen et al. 2008; Reynolds et al. 2009; Abdo et al. 2011; O’Sullivan et al. 2011). In our case, S/N = 829, and the beam size varies between 2.0 mas and 8.8 mas, corresponding to the FWHM of the elongated elliptical Gaussian restoring beam in the direction of its minor and major axes, respectively (Fig. 1). The resulting minimum resolvable angular size is the largest in the direction of the major axis, ϑlim,maj = 0.29 mas. Our fitted model component size (0.24 mas) is similar but somewhat smaller than this value.

With a more conservative approach, we adopt the 3-σ image noise level which reduces the signal-to-noise ratio to 276. In this case, the minimum resolvable angular size in the major axis direction becomes ϑlim,maj = 0.50 mas. We can use our modelfit result as the size estimate in the minor axis direction (ϑmin = 0.24 mas) since it still exceeds the minimum resolvable size along this position angle.

The measured parameters allow us to estimate the apparent brightness temperature (Tb) of the compact radio-emitting region (Condon et al. 1982) in the rest frame of the source (2)where S is the flux density (Jy) and ν the observing frequency (GHz). For J1231−0747, we obtain Tb = (1.42 ± 0.09)  × 1011 K. Because of the unresolved nature of the radio source, this value can be considered a lower limit to the brightness temperature.

A reasonable assumption about the intrinsic brightness temperature (Tb,int) of the source would lead to an estimate of the Doppler-boosting factor δ = Tb/Tb,int (Readhead 1994) in the jet. It is customary to assume the equipartition value, Tb,int = Teq ≃ 5 × 1010 K (Readhead 1994; Lähteenmäki et al. 1999) as a good approximation of the intrinsic brightness temperature of compact AGN (e.g. Jorstad et al. 2006; Hovatta et al. 2009; Veres et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2012). This is valid if the energy in the radiating particles is equal to the energy stored in the magnetic field. Departure from equipartition is certainly possible for sources in their maximum brightness state, which could increase Tb,int (Homan et al. 2006). On the other hand, VLBI studies of large samples found that for the majority of objects the typical Tb,int measurements are ~2−3 × 1010 K, very close to but somewhat below the canonical equipartition value (e.g. Kellermann et al. 2004; Homan et al. 2006).

Bearing in mind that there is always an uncertainty in the determination of Doppler factors from single-epoch brightness temperature measurements, we follow the general practice and adopt Tb,int = 5 × 1010 K for J1231−0747. In this case δ ≳ 2.8. It can naturally be explained in the framework of the standard orientation-based unified model for radio-loud active galactic nuclei (Urry & Padovani 1995), i.e. with synchrotron emission of the plasma in an approaching relativistic jet pointing close to our line of sight. A rough estimate of the jet inclination angle with respect to the line of sight θ can be given by assuming a typical bulk Lorentz factor found for quasar jets, Γ = 10 (e.g. Kellermann et al. 2004). Using (3)the jet inclination is θ ≈ 14°, which becomes smaller if the Doppler factor and/or the Lorentz factor are higher than assumed here. The compact high-resolution radio structure of J1231−0747 and its measured brightness temperature are consistent with the VLBI imaging data for most radio-loud quasars at around z = 3 (e.g. Gurvits et al. 1992, 1994; Frey et al. 1997; Paragi et al. 1999; O’Sullivan et al. 2011).

Our VLBI experiment provides the first spectral data point available for the source at 5 GHz. The measured S5 = 84.6 ± 4.2 mJy is a lower limit to the total flux density of J1231−0747 if there is any extended emission around the central compact source that is resolved out by the EVN. This value is higher than the 1.4-GHz flux densities from the NVSS and FIRST surveys (consistently ~60 mJy), which may indicate an inverted power-law spectrum of this quasar in the observed GHz frequency range. Note that the emitted (rest-frame) frequencies are higher by a factor of (1 + z) because of the expansion of the Universe. In our case, νobs  =  5 GHz corresponds to νem = 20.6 GHz. Since the different flux density measurements are made at widely separated epochs, it is also possible that J1231−0747 shows significant flux density variations. Both the flat or slightly inverted radio spectrum and the variability are characteristic to compact blazars.

4. Conclusions

Our e-EVN observation of the suspected radio counterpart of IGR J12319−0749 (J1231−0747), the second-highest redshift soft gamma-ray blazar detected with the INTEGRAL satellite, provided strong additional support for its blazar nature suggested by Bassani et al. (2012). The derived position of the compact radio source is consistent with the less accurate a-priori coordinates taken from the FIRST survey (White et al. 1997) within the errors, thus strengthening the identification of the gamma-ray source with the radio source, the only compact source within the FIRST beam. We found that J1231−0747 is a ~85-mJy radio source with sub-mas angular size. The slightly inverted radio spectrum or the flux density variability implied by our measurement at 5 GHz are expected from a blazar.

With the usual assumption of energy equipartition between the magnetic field and the relativistic particles in the jet (Readhead 1994), we estimated the lower limit to the brightness temperature of J1231−0747. It indicates a Doppler-boosted radio jet inclined within ~14° to the line of sight. The size of the radio source and the parameters of the jet could be better constrained with future higher-resolution VLBI imaging observations, in particular with longer interferometric baselines in the east-west direction. Simultaneous multi-frequency observations with large radio telescopes or interferometers would reveal the radio part of the SED and determine the turnover frequency in the radio spectrum. Flux density monitoring would shed light on the variability properties of this blazar, possibly providing additional constraints on the physical parameters of its jet.

From an observational point of view, its sufficiently high brightness and compactness make J1231−0747 an ideal new phase-reference calibrator object for any future VLBI experiment studying nearby weak radio sources.


We are grateful to the chair of the EVN Program Committee, Tom Muxlow, for granting us short exploratory e-VLBI observing time. We thank the two anonymous referees for their suggestions. The EVN is a joint facility of European, Chinese, South African, and other radio astronomy institutes funded by their national research councils. e-VLBI research infrastructure in Europe is supported by the European Community’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement RI-261525 NEXPReS. The research leading to these results has received funding from FP7 under grant agreement No. 283393 (RadioNet3), the Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA, grant No. K104539), and the China–Hungary Collaboration and Exchange Programme by the International Cooperation Bureau of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. T. An is grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of Science and Technology of China (2013CB837901).


  1. Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 736, 131 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bassani, L., Landi, R., Marshall, F. E., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Beasley, A. J., & Conway, J. E. 1995, in Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, eds. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, & P. J. Napier, ASP Conf. Ser., 82, 327 [Google Scholar]
  4. Condon, J. J., Condon, M. A., Gisler, G., & Puschell, J. J. 1982, ApJ, 252, 102 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 1693 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Diamond, P. J. 1995, in Very Long Baseline Interferometry and the VLBA, eds. J. A. Zensus, P. J. Diamond, & P. J. Napier, ASP Conf. Ser., 82, 227 [Google Scholar]
  7. Falco, E. E., Kochanek, C. S., & Muñoz, J. A. 1998, ApJ, 494, 47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fey, A. L., Gordon, D., & Jacobs, C. S. 2009, IERS Technical Note 35 (Frankfurt am Main: Verlag des BKG) [Google Scholar]
  9. Frey, S., Gurvits, L. I., Kellermann, K. I., Schilizzi, R. T., & Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1997, A&A, 325, 511 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurvits, L. I., Kardashev, N. S., Popov, M. V., et al. 1992, A&A, 260, 82 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gurvits, L. I., Schilizzi, R. T., Barthel, P. D., et al. 1994, A&A, 291, 737 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  12. Högbom, J. A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 417 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  13. Homan, D. C., Kovalev, Y. Y., Lister, M. L., et al. 2006, ApJ, 642, L115 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hovatta, T., Valtaoja, E., Tornikoski, M., & Lähteenmäki, A. 2009, A&A, 494, 527 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jorstad, S. G., Marscher, A. P., Lister, M. L., et al. 2006, in Blazar Variability Workshop II: Entering the GLAST Era, eds. H. R. Miller, K. Marshall, J. R. Webb, & M. F. Aller, ASP Conf. Ser., 350, 149 [Google Scholar]
  16. Kellermann, K. I., Lister, M. L., Homan, D. C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 609, 539 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Kovalev, Y. Y., Kellermann, K. I., Lister, M. L., et al. 2005, AJ, 130, 2473 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lähteenmäki, A., Valtaoja, E., & Wiik, K. 1999, ApJ, 511, 112 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lee, S.-S., Lobanov, A. P., Krichbaum, T. P., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 159 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lobanov, A. P. 2005 [arXiv:astro-ph/0503225] [Google Scholar]
  21. Massetti, N., Parisi, P., Jiménez-Bailón, E., et al. 2012, A&A, 538, A123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. O’Sullivan, S. P., Gabuzda, D. C., & Gurvits, L. I. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3049 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Paragi, Z., Frey, S., Gurvits, L. I., et al. 1999, A&A, 344, 51 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  24. Readhead, A. C. S. 1994, ApJ, 426, 51 [Google Scholar]
  25. Reynolds, C., Punsly, B., Kharb, P., O’Dea, C. P., & Wrobel, J. 2009, ApJ, 706, 851 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Savolainen, T., Wiik, K., Valtaoja, E., & Tornikoski, M. 2008, in Extragalactic Jets: Theory and Observation from Radio to Gamma Ray, eds. T. A. Rector, & D. S. De Young, ASP Conf. Ser., 386, 451 [Google Scholar]
  27. Shepherd, M. C., Pearson, T. J., & Taylor, G. B. 1994, BAAS, 26, 987 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  28. Schwab, F. R., & Cotton, W. D. 1983, AJ, 88, 688 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Szomoru, A., 2008, Proc. Science, PoS(IX EVN Symposium), 040 [Google Scholar]
  30. Urry, C. M., & Padovani, P. 1995, PASP, 107, 803 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Veres, P., Frey, S., Paragi, Z., & Gurvits, L. I. 2010, A&A, 521, A6 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  32. White, R. L., Becker, R. H., Helfand, D. J., & Gregg, M. D. 1997, ApJ, 475, 479 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wu, Z., Jiang, D. R., & Gu, M. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2733 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 1

Naturally-weighted 5-GHz e-EVN image of the quasar J1231−0747 (IGR J12319−0749). The lowest contours are drawn at ±0.27 mJy/beam, corresponding to ~3σ image noise. The positive contour levels increase by a factor of 2. The peak brightness is 84.1 mJy/beam. The Gaussian restoring beam is 8.8 mas × 2.0 mas with major axis position angle 75°. The restoring beam (FWHM) is indicated with an ellipse in the lower-left corner. The image is centered on the brightness peak at right ascension and declination .

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.