Transition probabilities in Te II and Te III spectra

Home

All issues

Volume 551 (March 2013)

A&A, 551 (2013) A136

Full HTML

Free Access

Table 3

Illustration in Te II of the complementarity between the criteria of the gauges agreement and the cancellation factor in the estimation of the A-value accuracy in the four possible cases.

Transition	MCDHF			HFR+CPOL
	gA_B (s^-1)^a	C/B^b	CF	gA(s^-1)	CF

5s²5p³⁴S−5s²5p²(¹D)5d ²F_5/2	2.29(+6)	0.66	2(−5)	6.51(+7)	6(−3)
5s²5p²(¹D)5d ²S_1/2−5s²5p²(¹D)6p ²P	2.70(+7)	0.56	0.15	6.15(+6)	0.22
5s²5p²(³P)5d ²P_1/2−5s²5p²(³P)6p ²S	1.60(+6)	1.04	0.04	1.83(+6)	0.08
5s²5p²(³P)6s ⁴P_1/2−5s²5p²(³P)6p ⁴D	3.29(+8)	0.96	0.63	3.06(+8)	0.64

Notes.Only the last transition is to be retained in the MCDHF calculation. The corresponding HFR+CPOL transition probabilities and CF values are listed for comparison.

^(a)

Babushkin gauge corrected using the experimental level energies.

^(b)

Coulomb to Babushkin ratio. A(B) stands for A × 10^B.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.