Table 7
Orbital solution considered in this paper.
| Parameter | A | B | C |
|
|
|||
| Pb (yr) | 449.7 | 448.44 | 448.44 |
| ib (°) | 28.0 | 20.07 | 20.07 |
| Ωb (°) | 35.5 | 22.52 | 22.53 |
| e b | – | – | – |
| ωb (°) | – | – | – |
| T0b (yr) | 1997.55 | 2015.37 | 2015.37 |
| ab (AU) | 68.08 | 67.94 | 67.94 |
|
|
|||
| Pc (yr) | 224.9 | 224.21 | 224.22 |
| ic (deg) | 28.0 | 27.78 | 27.78 |
| Ωc (°) | 35.5 | 45.86 | 45.86 |
| e c | – | – | – |
| ωc (°) | – | – | – |
| T0c (yr) | 1844.10 | 1838.89 | 1838.89 |
| ac (AU) | 42.89 | 42.80 | 42.80 |
|
|
|||
| Pd (yr) | 112.4 | 112.11 | 112.11 |
| id (°) | 28.0 | 40.43 | 40.43 |
| Ωd (°) | 35.5 | 36.76 | 36.76 |
| e d | 0.10 | – | – |
| ωd (°) | 80.2 | – | – |
| T0d (yr) | 1992.31 | 1965.20 | 1965.20 |
| ad (AU) | 27.01 | 26.97 | 26.97 |
|
|
|||
| Pe (yr) | 44.96 | 56.05 | 44.84 |
| ie (°) | 28.0 | 31.13 | 20.09 |
| Ωe (°) | 35.5 | -62.81 | 43.39 |
| e e | – | – | – |
| ωe (°) | – | – | – |
| T0e (yr) | 1987.08 | 1996.70 | 1986.14 |
| ae (AU) | 14.66 | 16.99 | 14.64 |
|
|
|||
| Mstar (M⊙) | 1.56 | 1.56 | 1.56 |
Notes. Case A: Orbital solution from Soummer et al. (2011) + our fit for planet e (circular orbit, coplanar with other planets and in 5:2 mean motion resonance with planet d). Case B: best fit orbital solution imposing circular orbits and 8:4:2:1 mean motion resonance. Case C: best fit orbital solution imposing circular orbits and 4:2:1 mean motion resonance for planets bcd and 5:2 for de.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.