Free Access

Table 10

MV and  [Fe/H] ZW estimates for other clusters in the literature for which these parameters were calculated through Fourier decomposition of the light curves of RR Lyrae stars.

NGC # Messier # M V  [Fe/H] ZW M V  [Fe/H] ZW Reference Distance
(RR0) (RR0) (RR1) (RR1) scale

NGC 1904 M 79 0.41 ± 0.07 −1.60 ± 0.15 0.58 ± 0.01 −1.73 ± 0.06 This work a
NGC 6981 M 72 0.62 ± 0.00 −1.48 ± 0.03 0.57 ± 0.01 −1.66 ± 0.15 Bramich et al. (2011) a
NGC 5024 M 53 0.46 ± 0.05 −1.72 ± 0.06 0.49 ± 0.05 −1.84 ± 0.13 Arellano Ferro et al. (2011) a
NGC 5286 0.52 ± 0.04 −1.68 ± 0.15 0.57 ± 0.04 −1.71 ± 0.23 Zorotovic et al. (2010) b
NGC 5053 0.49 ± 0.06 −1.76 ± 0.13 0.55 ± 0.05 −1.97 ± 0.18 Arellano Ferro et al. (2010) a
NGC 6266 M 62 0.63 ± 0.03 −1.31 ± 0.11* 0.51 ± 0.03 −1.23 ± 0.09 Contreras et al. (2010) b
NGC 5466 0.52 ± 0.11 −1.81 ± 0.12 0.53 ± 0.06 −1.92 ± 0.21 Arellano Ferro et al. (2008b) a
NGC 6366 0.66 ± 0.04 −0.87 ± 0.14 Arellano Ferro et al. (2008a) c
NGC 7089 M 2 0.51 ± 0.10 −1.64 ± 0.11* 0.51 ± 0.06 −1.74 ± 0.19* Lázaro et al. (2006) b
NGC 7078 M 15 0.47 ± 0.03 −1.92 ± 0.17* 0.52 ± 0.03 −2.10 ± 0.11* Arellano Ferro et al. (2006) b
NGC 5272 M 3 0.60 ± 0.02 −1.59 ± 0.08* 0.57 ± 0.04 Cacciari et al. (2005) a,d
NGC 4147 0.60 ± 0.06 −1.47 ± 0.22* 0.52 ± 0.07 Arellano Ferro et al. (2004) b
NGC 6388 0.66 ± 0.14 −1.40 ± 0.16 0.82 ± 0.06 −0.74 ± 0.23 Pritzl et al. (2002) b 1
NGC 6441 0.68 ± 0.03 −1.30 ± 0.13 0.79 ± 0.03 −0.80 ± 0.24 Pritzl et al. (2001) b 1
NGC 6362 0.66 ± 0.01 −1.26 ± 0.03* Olech et al. (2001) b
NGC 6934 0.61 ± 0.01 −1.53 ± 0.04 Kaluzny et al. (2001) b
NGC 5904 M 5 0.61 ± 0.01 −1.47 ± 0.01* Kaluzny et al. (2000) b
NGC 6333 M 9 0.48 ± 0.03 −1.85 ± 0.06* Clement & Shelton (1999a) b
NGC 6809 M 55 0.53 ± 0.09 −1.61 ± 0.20* Olech et al. (1999) b

Notes. All values of MV were converted to a value consistent with the distance scale of Cacciari et al. (2005) if another scale was used. Distance scales used in the original publication are:

(c)

Cacciari et al. (2005) but with a shift of 0.18 mag rather than 0.2 mag compared to Kovács (1998);

(d)

Cacciari et al. (2005) but with a shift of 0.23 mag rather than 0.2 mag compared to Kovács (1998).

(1)

The values of MV for these two clusters were not shifted because of uncertainty as to whether the shift given by Cacciari et al. (2005) applies to metal-rich clusters.

(*)

Those metallicity values were published on the scale of Jurcsik (1995); values listed here are on the ZW scale and were converted using Eq. (7).

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.