Issue 
A&A
Volume 546, October 2012



Article Number  A99  
Number of page(s)  15  
Section  Planets and planetary systems  
DOI  https://doi.org/10.1051/00046361/201219719  
Published online  11 October 2012 
Lowmass planets in nearly inviscid disks: numerical treatment
^{1}
Institut für Astronomie & Astrophysik, Universität
Tübingen,
Auf der Morgenstelle 10,
72076
Tübingen,
Germany
email: wilhelm.kley@unituebingen.de
^{2}
Instituto de Astronomía Teórica y Experimental, IATE (CONICET),
Observatorio Astronómico, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba,
Laprida 854, X5000BGR,
Córdoba,
Argentina
^{3}
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México, Apdo. Postal
483, 62251
Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
Received: 30 May 2012
Accepted: 9 August 2012
Context. Embedded planets disturb the density structure of the ambient disk, and gravitational backreaction possibly will induce a change in the planet’s orbital elements. Lowmass planets only have a weak impact on the disk, so their wake’s torque can be treated in linear theory. Larger planets will begin to open up a gap in the disk through nonlinear interaction. Accurate determination of the forces acting on the planet requires careful numerical analysis. Recently, the validity of the often used fast orbital advection algorithm (FARGO) has been put into question, and special numerical resolution and stability requirements have been suggested.
Aims. We study the process of planetdisk interaction for lowmass planets of a few Earth masses, and reanalyze the numerical requirements to obtain converged and stable results. One focus lies on the applicability of the FARGOalgorithm. Additionally, we study the difference of two and threedimensional simulations, compare global with local setups, as well as isothermal and adiabatic conditions.
Methods. We study the influence of the planet on the disk through two and threedimensional hydrodynamical simulations. To strengthen our conclusions we perform a detailed numerical comparison where several upwind and Riemannsolver based codes are used with and without the FARGOalgorithm.
Results. With respect to the wake structure and the torque density acting on the planet, we demonstrate that the FARGOalgorithm yields correct a correct and stable evolution for the planetdisk problem, and that at a fraction of the regular cputime. We find that the resolution requirements for achieving convergent results in unshocked regions are rather modest and depend on the pressure scale height H of the disk. By comparing the torque densities of two and threedimensional simulations we show that a suitable vertical averaging procedure for the force gives an excellent agreement between the two. We show that isothermal and adiabatic runs can differ considerably, even for adiabatic indices very close to unity.
Key words: accretion, accretion disks / planetdisk interactions / methods: numerical / hydrodynamics / protoplanetary disks
© ESO, 2012
1. Introduction
Very young planets that are still embedded in the protoplanetary disk will disturb the ambient density by their gravity. This will lead to gravitational torques that can alter the orbital elements of the planet. For massive enough planets, the wake becomes nonlinear, and gap formation sets in. In numerical simulations of embedded planets, different length scales have to be resolved, in particular when studying lowmass planets. On the one hand, the global structure has to be resolved to be able to obtain the correct structure of the wakes, i.e. the spiral arms generated by the planet, which requires a sufficiently large radial domain. The libration of coorbital material on horseshoe streamlines requires a full azimuthal extent of 2 π radians to be properly captured. On the other hand, the direct vicinity of the planet has to be resolved to study detail effects, such as horseshoe drag or accretion onto the planet.
To ease computational requirements, often planetdisk simulations are performed in the twodimensional (2D) thin disk approximation, because a full threedimensional (3D) treatment with high resolution is still very timeconsuming. However, even under this reduced dimensionality, the problem is still computationally very demanding. The main reason is the strongly varying timestep size caused by the differentially rotating disk. Because the disk is highly supersonic with (azimuthal) Mach numbers of about 10 to 50, the angular velocity at the inner disk will limit the timestep of the whole simulation, even though the planet or other regions of interest are located much farther out. Changing to a rotating coordinate system will not help too much owing to the strong differential shear. To solve this particular problem and speed up the computation, Masset (2000a) has developed a fast orbital advection algorithm (FARGO). This method consists of an analytic, exact shift in the hydrodynamical quantities by approximately the average azimuthal velocity. The transport step utilizes only the residual velocity, which is close to the local sound speed. Depending on the grid layout and the chosen radial range, a very large speedup can be achieved, while at the same time the intrinsic numerical diffusion of the scheme is highly reduced (Masset 2000a,b).
The original version of the algorithm has been implemented into the public code FARGO, which is very often used in planetdisk and related simulations. The accuracy of the FARGOalgorithm has been demonstrated in a detailed planetdisk comparison project utilizing embedded Neptune and Jupiter mass planets (de ValBorro et al. 2006). There, it has been shown that it leads to identical density profiles near the planet and total torques acting on the planet. Meanwhile, similar orbital advection algorithms have been implemented into a variety of different codes in two and three spatial dimensions, e.g. NIRVANA (Ziegler & Yorke 1997; Kley et al. 2009), ATHENA (Gardiner & Stone 2008; Stone & Gardiner 2010), and PLUTO (Mignone et al. 2007, 2012). Despite these widespread applications, it has been claimed recently that usage of the FARGOalgorithm (here in connection with ATHENA) may lead to an unsteady behavior of the flow near the planet, which even affects the wake structure of the flow farther away from the planet (Dong et al. 2011b).
In the same paper, Dong et al. (2011b) note that a very high numerical grid resolution is required to obtain a resolved flow near the planet. In particular, they analyze the smooth, unshocked wake structure close to the planet and infer that a minimum spatial resolution of about 256 gridcells per scale height H, of the disk is needed to obtain good agreement with linear studies. New simulations with a moving mesh technique also seem to indicate the necessity of very high resolutions (Duffell & MacFadyen 2012).
Because a robust, fast, and reliable solution technique is mandatory in these types of simulations, we decided to address the planetdisk problem for a well defined standard setup, which is very close to the one used in Dong et al. (2011b). To answer the question of the validity of the FARGOalgorithm and estimate the resolution requirements, we applied several different codes to an identical problem. These range from classical secondorder upwind schemes (e.g. RH2D, FARGO) to modern Riemannsolvers such as PLUTO. The characteristics of these codes are specified in Appendix A.
Another critical issue in planetdisk simulations is the selection of a realistic treatment of the gravitational force between the disk and the planet. Because the planet is typically treated as a pointmass and located within the numerical grid, regularization of the potential is required. In addition, physical smoothing is required to account for the otherwise neglected vertical thickness of the disk. The magnitude of this smoothing is highly relevant, since it influences the torques acting on the planet (Masset 2002), and the smoothing parameter has even entered analytical torque formulas (Masset & Casoli 2009; Paardekooper et al. 2010). Because the 2D equations are obtained by a vertical averaging procedure, the force should be calculated by a suitable vertical integration as well. This approach has been undertaken recently by Müller et al. (2012), who show that the smoothing length is indeed determined by the vertical thickness of the disk, and is roughly on the order of 0.7 H. They show in addition that the change of the disk thickness induced by the presence of the planet has to be taken into account. Because in recent simulations very short smoothing lengths have been used in 2D simulations (Dong et al. 2011b; Duffell & MacFadyen 2012), we compare our 2D results on the standard problem to an equivalent 3D setup and infer the required right amount of smoothing.
Finally, we performed additional simulations for different equations of state. The first set of simulations deals with the often used locally isothermal setup, while in comparison simulations we explore the outcome of adiabatic runs. This is important because some codes may not allow for treating an isothermal equation of state. Here, we use different values for the ratio of specific heat γ. In particular, a value of γ very close to unity has often been quoted as closely resembling the isothermal case. We show that this statement can depend on the physical problem. In particular, in flows where the conservation of the entropy along streamlines is relevant, there can be strong differences between an isothermal and an adiabatic flow, regardless of the value chosen for γ. For the planetdisk problem this has already been shown by Paardekooper & Mellema (2008).
In the following Sect. 2 we describe the physical and numerical setup of our standard model, and present the numerical results in Sect. 3. The validity of the FARGOalgorithm is checked in Sect. 4. Alternative setups (nearly local, 2D versus 3D, adiabatic) are discussed in Sect. 5. The transition of the wake into a shock front is discussed in Sect. 6, and in the last section, we summarize our results.
2. The physical setup
We study planetdisk interaction for planets of the very low masses that are embedded in a protoplanetary disk. Most of our results shown refer to 2D simulations, using the vertically integrated hydrodynamic equations. For validation and comparison purposes, some additional full 3D models were performed using a similar physical setup. In all cases, we assumed that the disk lies in the z = 0 plane and used, for the 2D models, a cylindrical coordinate system (r,ϕ,z), while in the 3D case we used spherical polar coordinates (R,ϕ,θ).
We considered locally isothermal, as well as adiabatic models. In the first case, the thermal structure of the disk was kept fixed, and for the standard model we chose a constant aspect ratio, h = H/r. Here r is the distance to the star and H the local vertical scale height of the disk (1)where c_{s} is the isothermal sound speed and Ω_{K} = (GM_{ ∗ }/r^{3})^{1/2} is the Keplerian angular velocity around the star. During the computations the orbital elements of the planet remained fixed at their initial values; i.e., we assumed no gravitational backreaction of the disk on the planet or the star. This allows the problem to be formulated scale free in dimensionless units. The planet, whose mass is specified in terms of its mass ratio q = M_{p}/M_{ ∗ }, is placed on a circular orbit at the distance r = 1 and has angular velocity Ω_{p} = 1; i.e., one planetary orbit in these units is 2π. The initial surface density Σ_{0} is constant and can be chosen arbitrarily since it scales out of the equations.
In the 2D case, the basic equations for the flow in the r − φ plane are given by equation of continuity (2)the momentum equation (3)and the equation of energy (4)Here, e is the energy density (energy per surface area), and P = (γ − 1)e denotes the vertically integrated pressure. In the isothermal case the energy equation is not evolved and the pressure reduces to , where c_{s}(r) is a given function. The external force (5)contains the gravitational specific forces (accelerations) exerted by the star, the planet, and the inertial specific forces due to the accelerated and rotating coordinate system.
For the gravitational force generated by the central star and the inertial part of the force, we use standard expressions. The planetary force is more crucial because it influences, for example, the magnitude of the torque generated by the planet. In our 2D standard model, we derive it from a smoothed potential and use the very common form (6)where s is the distance from the planet to the gridpoint under consideration, and ϵ_{p} the smoothing length to the otherwise point mass potential. It is introduced to avoid numerical problems at the location of the planet. Then, . Alternatively, we use in the 2D simulations a vertically averaged version of F_{p}, following Müller et al. (2012), which we outline in more detail below.
Even though we use a nonzero but very low viscosity, we do not specify those terms explicitly in the above equations, as for example in Kley (1999). The viscosity is so low, that it does not influence the flow on the relevant scales but is just included to enhance stability and smoothness of the flow. In the inviscid case, the dynamical evolution of the system is controlled by the planettostar massratio q and the pressure scale height H. A dimensional analysis by Korycansky & Papaloizou (1996) has shown that the relevant quantity is the nonlinearity parameter (7)
2.1. The standard model
Physical and numerical parameter for the 2D standard model, which consists of a locally isothermal, 2D disk with an embedded planet.
The standard model refers to a 2D disk with a locally isothermal setup, where the temperature is a given function of radius, which does not evolve in time. The parameters for our standard model are specified in Table 1. The first two quantities, the mass and the aspect ratio, determine the problem physically. Since we intend to model the linear case in the standard model, we chose a small planet with q = 6 × 10^{6}, which refers to a 2M_{Earth} planet for a solarmass star. We assume h = 0.05 for the disk’s thickness. For later purposes, we list the nonlinearity parameter in the third row, which is 0.36 here. All results are a function of q and H only, if we assume a vanishing viscosity. In the present situation, where we indeed model the inviscid case, we nevertheless chose a small nonzero kinematic viscosity ν = 10^{8}, given in units of . This is equivalent to an αvalue of 4 × 10^{6} for a H/r = 0.05 disk, a value that is considered to be much lower than even a purely hydrodynamic viscosity in the disk. We opted for the very low nonzero value for numerical purposes. For the planetary gravitational potential , we chose a value of ϵ = 0.1H in the standard model. We selected this small value for ϵ, primarily for comparison reasons to make contact to the recent simulations of Dong et al. (2011b,a), who suggest a very small smoothing length. Below we demonstrate that, for physical reasons, a much larger smoothing is required, which can be obtained by a suitable vertical averaging procedure (Müller et al. 2012).
A whole annulus is modelled with a radial range from r_{min} = 0.6 to r_{max} = 1.4. We chose this domain size to capture all of the torqueproducing region, which has a radial range of typically a few vertical scale heights, see e.g. D’Angelo & Lubow (2010). The computational domain is covered by an equidistant grid that has 256 × 2004 gridcells. This results in a resolution of H/16 at the location of the planet for the standard model. To reduce or even avoid reflection from the inner and outer boundaries we applied a damping procedure where, within a specified radial range, all dynamical variables are damped towards their initial values. Specifically, we used the prescription described in de ValBorro et al. (2006), and write (8)where X ∈ { Σ,u_{r} } , and R(r) is a ramping function increasing quadratically from zero to unity (at the actual boundary) within the radial damping regions. The relaxation time τ is given by a fraction of the orbital periods T_{orb} at r_{min} and r_{max}. Here, we use a value of τ = 0.03T_{orb}. For more details on the procedure, see de ValBorro et al. (2006). We note that it is sufficient to only damp the radial velocity u_{r} (plus u_{θ} in 3D simulations), which may be useful in radiative simulations where the density stratification may not be known a priori. In test simulations (not displayed here) that use a wider radial range, we have found identical results for the torque and wake structure induced by the planet.
2.2. Initial setup and boundary conditions
The initialization of the variables Σ,T,u_{r},u_{φ} was chosen such that without the planet the system would be in an equilibrium state. Here, we chose a constant Σ_{0}, and a temperature gradient such that the aspect ratio h = H/r is constant. That results in T(r) ∝ r^{1}, which is fixed for the (locally) isothermal models. The radial velocity is zero initially, u_{r} = 0, and for u_{φ} we assume a nearly Keplerian azimuthal flow, corrected by the pressure gradient (9)The planet with mass ratio q is placed at r = 1 and φ = π, i.e. in the middle of the computational domain. For some models the gravitational potential of the planet is slowly switched on within the first five orbital periods, while others do not use this ramping procedure for the potential. For lowmass planets, the results that are typically evaluated at 30 T_{orb} (i.e. t = 30 ·2π), and there is no difference between these two options.
Near the inner and outer radial boundaries the solution is damped towards the initial state, using the procedure as described above. In addition we use reflecting boundaries directly at r_{min} and r_{max}. In the azimuthal direction we use periodic boundaries.
2.3. Numerical methods and codes
Because one goal of this paper is to verify the accuracy of numerical methods, we applied several different codes to this physical problem. The 2D case was run using the following codes FARGO, NIRVANA, RH2D, and PLUTO. All of these are finite volume codes utilizing a secondorder spatial discretization. Additionally, all are empowered with the orbital advection speedup known as the FARGOalgorithm, as developed by Masset (2000a), but can be used without this algorithm as well. The first three codes in the list have been used and described in de ValBorro et al. (2006). The last code, PLUTO, is a multidimensional Riemannsolver based code for magnetohydrodynamical flows (Mignone et al. 2007), which has been empowered recently with the FARGOalgorithm (Mignone et al. 2012).
In the standard 2D setup, the simulations were performed in a cylindrical coordinate system that corotates with the embedded planet, and the star is located at the origin. This implies that inertial forces, such as Coriolis and centrifugal force, as well as an acceleration term to compensate for the motion of the star, have to be included in the external force term F_{ext}. Additionally, the FARGOalgorithm is applied, which leads to a speedup of around ten for the standard model, and possibly even more for the higher resolution models. For testing purposes the FARGOalgorithm can be alternatively switched on or off.
The 3D models are run in spherical polar coordinates. For reference we quote the inertial terms and their conservative treatment in Appendix C. These are run using the following codes FARGO3D, NIRVANA, and PLUTO, where FARGO3D is a newly developed 3D extension of FARGO. For a description see Appendix A. For the timestep we typically use 0.5 of the Courant number (CFL). In Sect. 4 we describe the outcome of the comparison in more detail.
3. Results for the standard case
To set the stage and illustrate the important physical effects, we first present the results of our simulations for the 2D standard case using the parameters according to Table 1. For the simulations in this section we used the RH2D code unless otherwise stated. Below, we discuss the variations from the standard model.
After the insertion of the planet, the planet’s gravitational disturbance generates two wakes in the form of trailing spiral arms. The basic structure of the surface density, Σ, is shown in Fig. 1. As seen from the plot, the damping procedure ensures that reflections by the radial boundaries are minimized. There is indication of vortex formation as can be seen by the additional structure on the righthand side of Fig. 1. Vortices induced by the planet occur for lowviscosity disks and have already been seen in earlier simulations (see e.g. Li et al. 2005; de ValBorro et al. 2006; Li et al. 2009). Here, we do not discuss this issue any further.
The relevant quantity to study the physical consequences of the interaction of the embedded planet with the ambient disk is the gravitational torque exerted on the planet by the disk. For that purpose it is very convenient to calculate the radial torque distribution per unit disk mass, dΓ(r)/dm, which we define here, following D’Angelo & Lubow (2010), through the definition of the total torque, Γ_{tot}, acting on the planet (10)Here, dΓ(r) is the torque exerted on the planet by a disk annulus of width dr located at the radius r and having mass dm. Because dΓ(r)/dm scales with the mass ratio squared and as (H/r)^{4}, we rescale our results accordingly in units of (11)where the index p denotes that the quantities are evaluated at the location of the planet, which has the semimajor axis a_{p}.
Fig. 1 Density structure of the 2D standard model as generated by an embedded planet with q = 6 × 10^{6} in a disk having the aspect ratio H/r = 0.05. Shown is the configuration after 30 T_{orb}. The density is scaled linearly. 
Fig. 2 Total torque, Γ_{tot}, in units of Γ_{0} (see Eq. (12)), acting on the planet vs. time for the 2D standard model. Shortly after insertion, the torque is positive and approximately constant between 10 and 40 orbits. At later times it saturates due to mixing of the material within the horseshoe region. 
Fig. 3 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 and 200 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model. The torque enhancement and spike near r = 1 at t = 30 T_{orb} is due to the unsaturated corotation torque. At later times, here shown at t = 200 T_{orb}, only the Lindblad contributions due to the spiral arms remain. 
The time evolution of the total torque, Γ_{tot}, is displayed in Fig. 2 for the first 500 orbits. The total torque is stated in units of (12)In this simulation, the planetary potential has been ramped up during the first five orbits. After insertion of the planet, the total torque becomes first positive and remains constant at this level for about 30 orbits. In this phase the coorbital torque, in particular the horseshoe drag, is fully unsaturated and gives rise to a total positive torque. In our situation of an isothermal disk this comes about because of a nonvanishing vortensity gradient across the horseshoe region, which generates a strong positive corotation torque (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979) in this case. The vortensity, which is defined as vorticity divided by surface density, is given here by (13)As can be seen from this definition, the radial gradient of ζ is ∝ r^{−3/2} for a constant Σ disk, which leads to the strong vortensityrelated torque. However, owing to the different libration speeds, the material within the corotation region mixes, and the gradients of potential vorticity and entropy are wiped out in the absence of viscosity (Balmforth & Korycansky 2001; Masset 2001). Consequently, the torques drop again and oscillate on timescales close to the libration time towards a negative equilibrium value, which is given by the Lindblad torques generated by the spiral arms. This saturation of the vortensityrelated torque related torque has been analyzed, for example, by Ward (2007) through an analysis of streamlines within the horseshoe region for an inviscid disk, and later through 2D hydrodynamic simulations by Masset & Casoli (2010) and Paardekooper et al. (2011). The strength of the (positive) corotation torque depends strongly on the smoothing of the gravitational potential. For the chosen small ϵ = 0.1 this results in a positive total torque. For more realistic values of ϵ ≈ 0.6−0.7, Γ_{tot} will usually be negative, see Sect. 5.2.
To study the spatial origin of the torques we analyzed the radial torque density for the standard model. In Fig. 3 the torque density dΓ/dm, according to Eq. (11) is displayed vs. radius in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0}. Two snapshots are displayed, one at t = 30 T_{orb} where the torque is fully unsaturated and one at t = 200 T_{orb} where the torque is saturated. We note that, for the torque calculation, we used a tapering function near the planet to avoid contributions of material that is bound to the planet, or is so close that it yields large torque fluctuations due to numerical discretization effects. We use the form as given in Crida et al. (2008) which reads as (14)with a tapering length of r_{t} = 0.8 R_{H}. Here, R_{H} = (q/3)^{1/3}a_{p} is the Hill radius of the planet. Such tapering is particularly useful for massive planets that form a disk around them (Crida et al. 2009). Around lower mass planets, with ℳ ≲ 0.6, circumplanetary disks do not form (Masset et al. 2006) and a large tapering is not required. Indeed, we found that for values of r_{t} in the range of 0.4−1.0 R_{H} there is not a large difference in the measured torques in equilibrium. For example, the variations in the total torque in Fig. 2 are less than 5%.
The torque density in the fully saturated phase, at t = 200 T_{orb} (Fig. 3, blue line), is positive inside of the planet and negative outside of the planet. The positive contribution of this Lindblad torque comes from the inner spiral arm, and the negative part from the outer one. The distribution at the earlier time, t = 30 T_{orb}, shows an additional contribution and spike just inside of the planet. This part is due to the horseshoe drag, which is subject to the described saturation process.
Fig. 4 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the inner and outer wakes at radial distances ± 4/3H away from the planet at 30 T_{orb} for the isothermal 2D standard model. The coordinates x and y refer to local Cartesian coordinates, see Eq. (15). The “plus” sign in the xaxis label refers to the blue curve at r_{p} − 4/3H, and the “minus” sign to the red curve at r_{p} + 4/3H. The upstream side of the wake is to the left for both curves. 
To study the wake properties generated by the planet, we used here a quasiCartesian local coordinate system centered on the planet to allow direct comparison to previous linear results. Specifically, we define (15)In Fig. 4 the relative density perturbations for the inner and outer wakes are shown along the azimuth. They are displayed at a radial distance of x = ± 4/3H from the location of the planet. For the normalization of the perturbed density we first define the thermal mass of the planet (16)where the quantities have to be evaluated at the location of the planet. Then, the ratio of the planet mass to the thermal mass is given by (17)Now, we follow Dong et al. (2011b) and scale δΣ = Σ(φ) − Σ_{0} by the planet mass (in units of M_{th}) and normalize by x/H.
Owing to the radial temperature variation and the cylindrical geometry, the inner and outer wake differ in their appearance. However, the general shape and magnitude are very similar to the linear results that have been obtained for the local shearing sheet model (see Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Dong et al. 2011b). Differences in the amplitude are presumably due to a different normalization. Because our results (in all simulations and with all codes) are consistently by a factor of 3/2 greater than those of Dong et al. (2011b), we suspect that they might have used the normalization of M_{th} as given by Goodman & Rafikov (2001), which differs exactly by this factor. At the displayed distance from the planet, the wake is expected to be in the linear regime, which results in a smooth maximum. For this reason we do not expect a strong dependence on the numerical resolution. In the following, we only use the outer wake to check for possible variations due to setup, numerical methods, and resolution.
4. Testing numerics
To validate our results and demonstrate that the FARGOalgorithm yields accurate results, we varied the numerical setup, and used several different codes on the same physical problem. In this section we describe our studies in more detail.
Fig. 5 Radial torque density of the 2D standardproblem in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for different codes at the standard resolution. 
4.1. Using different codes on the 2D standard model
To support our findings on the torque density and wake form and to demonstrate the accuracy of the used codes, we ran the 2D standard model in the isothermal and the adiabatic version using all of the above codes. All simulations use the FARGOsetup and were run in the same (standard) resolution. The isothermal results for the torque density are shown in Figs. 5 and 6, where the latter displays an enlargement of the first. Clearly, the results agree extremely well between the different codes. This includes the standard Lindblad torques, as well as the detailed structure of the corotation torque. The FARGO3D code was used in its 2D version for this test.
Recently, it has been shown by Dong et al. (2011b) and Rafikov & Petrovich (2012) that the torque density Γ(r) changes sign at a certain distance from the planet in contrast to the standard linear results (Goldreich & Tremaine 1979). Here, we show that this effect is reproduced in our simulations, for all codes. In Fig. 6 we show that this reversal occurs at a distance r_{ ± } ≈ 3.1H away from the planet in good agreement with the linear results of Rafikov & Petrovich (2012). Again, all codes agree well on this feature, with only FARGO3D showing small deviations.
The corresponding wake form at x = r_{p} + 4H is displayed in Fig. 7. It is identical for all four cases, which shows the consistency and accuracy of the results and codes.
4.2. The FARGO treatment
Fig. 6 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for the standard setup for various code. This is an enlargement of Fig. 5. 
Fig. 7 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for different codes at the standard resolution. 
Fig. 8 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for the code RH2D using different timesteps and a nonrotating frame. 
In Fig. 8 the wake form is analyzed for three different numerical uses of the FARGOalgorithm on the 2D standard setup. The first, a red curve, corresponds to the standard reference case using a corotating coordinate system and the FARGOalgorithm. For the second, the blue curve, the simulation was performed in the inertial frame and using FARGO. In the mechanism of the algorithm, the quantities in each ring are first shifted according to the overall mean angular velocity of the ring, and then advected using the residual velocity (Masset 2000a). As a result, theoretically it should not matter whether the coordinate system is rotating or not. This is exactly what we find in our simulations, since the blue curve is very similar to the red one. Small differences can be produced by the planetary potential, which is time dependent in the latter case, as the planet is moving, and it lies at different locations with respect to the numerical grid. Also, the number of timesteps used until 30 T_{orb} are identical for two runs (12 866 steps). The third, the green curve, corresponds to a model in the corotating frame without using the FARGOalgorithm. Because of the small timestep size in this case, over ten times more timesteps had to be used in this case (137 750 steps). Nevertheless, the wake form is identical. These runs indicate that the FARGOalgorithm captures the physics of the system correctly. At the same time, it comes with a much larger timestep, thereby much reducing the computational cost. This also applies to modern Riemannsolvers such as PLUTO, as shown in Sect. 5.4.
Fig. 9 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} using the FARGOcode at different resolutions. 
4.3. Testing numerical resolution
To estimate the effect of numerical resolution, we ran the 2D standard model using gridsizes ranging from 182 × 1418 all the way to 4096 × 32 064. This is equivalent to grid resolutions of H/10 to H/256. As shown in Fig. 9, the results are nearly identical at all resolutions. The first two, lower resolution cases have a slightly lower trough just in front of the wake and a smaller amplitude. As discussed later in Sect. 6, the results for the different resolutions are this similar because at this distance to the planet the wake is in the linear regime and has not steepened to a shock wave yet. The resolution requirements at the shock front is analyzed in Sect. 6.
Fig. 10 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} using the FARGOcode with different Courantnumbers (CFL). The physical setup differs slightly from the standard problem and is described in Sect. 4.4. In the upper panel the differences of the individual runs with respect to the standard, CFL = 0.5, are displayed. 
4.4. Testing timestep and stability
Finally, we would like to comment on possible timestep limitations due to the gravitational force generated by the planet. In our simulations we never found any unsteady evolution when using orbital advection. In contrast, the results of Dong et al. (2011b) indicate an unsteady behavior for longer timesteps. They attribute possible instabilities to a violation of an additional gravityrelated timestep criterion and advocate using very small timesteps, which would render the FARGOalgorithm inapplicable in very many cases.
To test this statement specifically, we performed a suite of simulations on a very similar setup to the one used by Dong et al. (2011b) in their Fig. 12. Owing to the difficulty of RH2D and FARGO to use a Cartesian local setup, we used here a computational domain exactly as before with a gridsize of 1024 × 8016, which gives a resolution of 64 gridcells per scaleheight H. The planet mass is 1.33 M_{Earth}, which is equivalent to a mass ratio q = 4 × 10^{6} or M_{p} = 3.2 × 10^{2} M_{th}. For the potential smoothing we chose ϵ = 0.08H, which yields a planetary potential that is nearly identical to that of Dong et al. (2011b). In Fig. 10 we display the results (using FARGO) for different timestep sizes as indicated by the corresponding Courantnumber. The CFL = 0.5 case corresponds to our standard case. We made the timestep longer (CFL = 0.8) as well as shorter, down to CFL = 0.05. All cases yield identical results and do not show any sign of instability. In the upper panel the differences of the individual runs with respect to the standard, CFL = 0.5, are displayed. The performed runs with the RH2D, FARGO, and FARGO3D codes yield identical results, again with no signs of unsteady behavior. Here, FARGO3D was run in the 2D version, both with the setup as indicated above and with the local setup of Table 3, with resolution h/64. For all our runs, past the first two orbits the wake profile at x = 1.33H has achieved convergence to better than the 1% level, regardless of the value of the timestep size. In Appendix B we reanalyzed possible stability requirements in the presence of gravity and find indeed stability for the timestep sizes used with the FARGOalgorithm.
For these runs we switched off the physical viscosity completely. We find that the result for the wake displayed in Fig. 10 is, in fact, due to the special scaling of the axes, identical to that of the standard problem as shown in the previous plots. Additionally, we have not seen any sign of unsteady behavior. All of this indicates that our low value of the kinematic viscosity, ν = 10^{8} (in dimensionless units), is essentially negligible.
5. Using alternative setups
To illustrate how variations in individual properties of the standard model influence the outcome, we performed additional simulations, which are described in this section.
Fig. 11 Total torque Γ_{tot}, in units of Γ_{0} (see Eq. (12)), acting on the planet vs. time. Shown are the 2D standard model (red) and a globally isothermal case (blue), with a different density profile, such that the potential vorticity gradient vanishes. 
5.1. Different radial stratification
As shown above, in the initial evolution after embedding the planet the total torque is positive owing to a strong positive horseshoe drag. The strength of this effect depends on the radial gradients of potential vorticity, entropy (for simulations with energy equation), and temperature (Baruteau & Masset 2012). To minimize this effect, we present an additional, alternative setup where the gradients of potential vorticity (vortensity) and temperature vanish exactly. For this reason, we chose a setup with a density gradient Σ ∝ r^{−3/2} and T = const. The time evolution of the total torque for this model is displayed with the standard case in Fig. 11. Clearly, after the short switchon period of the planet mass, the total torque is negative and constant throughout the evolution. This demonstrates that, for this density profile, Σ ∝ r^{−3/2}, which resembles (coincidently) the minimum mass solar nebula, there is indeed no corotation torque present, and the flow settles directly to the Lindblad torque. The final value for the total Lindblad torque differs slightly for the two models due to the different gradients in density and temperature. We note that for this setup, with a vanishing vortensity gradient, there are also no vortices visible during the initial evolution.
5.2. Comparing 2D and 3D simulations
The setup of the described standard case reduces the physical planetdisk problem to two dimensions. However, even though the disk may be thin, corrections are nevertheless expected because of its finite thickness. We investigated this by performing full 3D simulations using the same physical setup as in the standard 2D model. The treatment of the inertial forces is outlined in Appendix C. The additional numerical parameters are listed in Table 2. The spatial extent and numerical resolution are identical to the 2D model. The initialization of the 3D density was chosen such that the surface density is constant throughout. In the vertical direction the density profile was initialized with a Gaussian profile as expected for vertically isothermal disks. The temperature is constant on cylinders. For the gravitational potential of the planet we chose the socalled cubicform (Kley et al. 2009), which is exact outside a smoothing radius r_{sm} and smoothed by a cubic polynomial inside of r_{sm}. The advantage of this form lies in the fact that in 3D simulations the smoothing is required only numerically, and the cubic potential allows us to have the exact potential outside a specified radius, here r_{sm}. To calculate the torque the same tapering function (Eq. (14)) as has been used before.
Numerical parameter for the 3D standard model.
Fig. 12 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for 2D and 3D simulations of the standard setup. The red curve corresponds to that in Fig. 3, the blue line to a 2D model with a vertical integrated gravitational force, and the green to the 3D model (using NIRVANA). 
Fig. 13 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for 2D and 3D simulations of the standard setup. The color coding is identical to Fig. 12. 
In Fig. 12 we show the normalized torque density dΓ/dm for 2D simulations in comparison to a full 3D simulation using the same physical setup. Due to the finite vertical extent, the torques of the 3D model are substantially less than for the corresponding 2D setup. As Müller et al. (2012) have shown recently, this discrepancy can be avoided by performing a suitable vertical averaging procedure of the gravitational force. Specifically, the force acting on each disk element in a 2D simulation is calculated from the projected force that acts in the midplane of the disk. Denoting the distance of the disk element to the planet with s, the force density (force per area) is given by (18)where Ψ_{p} is the physical 3D potential generated by the planet. For the vertical density stratification, a Gaussian density profile can be assumed for a vertically isothermal disk as a first approximation. However, the change in the vertical density as induced by the planet has to be taken into account. The results using this averaging prescription in an approximate way (Müller et al. 2012) is also shown additionally in Fig. 12. The overall behavior and magnitude is very similar to the full 3D results. For comparison, a 2D model using a fixed ϵ = 0.7H (instead of 0.1H of the standard model) for yields similar amplitude as the full 3D model but a slightly different shape (see Fig. 14).
In Fig. 13 we show the corresponding wake profile for the 2D and 3D setups. For the 3D case, the surface density is obtained by integration along the θ direction at constant spherical radii, R. Here, the wake amplitude of the full 3D model is again reduced in contrast to the flat 2D case, with ϵ = 0.1. The 2D model using the integrated force algorithm yields here again a better agreement. The 3D results displayed in these plots were obtained with NIRVANA, but using the new code FARGO3D yields identical results, as demonstrated in Fig. 14.
Fig. 14 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for the 3D and 2D simulations of the standard setup. Compared are two 3D simulations (using NIRVANA and FARGO3D) with a 2D simulation, using ϵ = 0.7. 
These results demonstrate clearly that the ϵparameter in the 2D planetary potential () cannot be chosen arbitrarily small, but has to be similar to the scale height H of the disk. Near the planet, a reduction is required to account for the reduced thickness, see Müller et al. (2012). As a result, the value of ϵ = 0.1 H as chosen for the standard setup is too small to yield good agreement with vertically stratified disks, and serves here only as a numerical illustration to connect to previous linear and numerical results (Goodman & Rafikov 2001; Dong et al. 2011b). As shown by Müller et al. (2012), a value of ϵ = 0.7 H yields similar amplitudes to the 3D case, in particular for the Lindblad torque, see Fig. 14. However, as can be seen from the figure, for the ϵpotential the relative strengths of the inner and outer torques differ from the full 3D and the 2D vertically integrated case.
5.3. Using a quasilocal setup
To demonstrate the agreement of our simulations with previously published local results, e.g. by Dong et al. (2011b,a), we changed the computational setup, which is listed briefly in Table 3. Despite using cylindrical coordinates, the setup is in fact identical to a model used by Dong et al. (2011b). The very small thickness H of the disk and the small planet mass minimize curvature effects and make the problem more local. The nonlinearity parameter for this local model is ℳ = 0.32, which is similar to the standard case. This quasilocal model was run in a 2D and 3D setup using FARGO3D. The 3D case was run again in spherical polar coordinates with the same spatial resolution as in the 2D setup of Table 3. For the gravitational smoothing a length of two gridcells was chosen, which is equivalent here to ϵ = 0.06 H. For the 2D simulations we used RH2D and FARGO, while for the 3D simulations we used NIRVANA and FARGO3D. All these codes are based on the standard ZEUSmethod and are enhanced with the FARGOspeedup, see Appendix A for details.
Setup for the alternative quasilocal model.
Fig. 15 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0}. The standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6},h = 0.05 at 200 T_{orb} is compared to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8},h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb}. The local calculation utilizes the FARGO3Dcode in the 2D setup. 
Fig. 16 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb}. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01. 
In Fig. 15 we compare the torque density of the 2D standard model to the quasilocal model. In a local setup any corotation torques saturate very quickly, possibly due to the very small (quasiperiodic) domain in the angular direction. To match this condition, the standard model is shown here at 200T_{orb} when the corotation torques have nearly saturated. The overall shape and magnitude of the two models is qualitatively in very good agreement, which supports the scaling with (dΓ/dm)_{0}. For the local models a symmetric shape with respect to the location of the planet is expected, while for standard model the outer torques are greater in magnitude. This can explain some differences.
In Fig. 16 we compare the wake form of the standard model (as shown in Figs. 4, 13) to the more local alternative model for the 2D setup. The two curves agree very well indeed, despite the huge difference in parameters for the planet mass and the disk scale height. We attribute the small differences to curvature effects. We note that, thanks to the local character of this setup, the curves for inner and outer wakes at r_{p} ± 4/3 look identical for the quasilocal model.
In Fig. 17 we compare the torque density of the 3D standard model to the 3D quasilocal model. As in the 2D case, now the overall shape and magnitude of the two models are again qualitatively in good agreement. The local model shows a symmetric shape with respect to the location of the planet, as expected. For both cases a similar reduction of amplitude is seen in comparison to the 2D case.
In Fig. 18 we compare the wake form of the standard model to the local alternative model for the full 3D setup. This time the two curves for the outer wake again agree very well, despite the huge difference in parameters. The profile for the inner wake of the standard model deviates from the outer wake as for the previous 2D setup. For the local model, inner and outer wakes are again identical, as expected.
5.4. Adiabatic simulations
Fig. 17 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} for full 3D models. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 at 30 T_{orb} (using NIRVANA) to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb} (using FARGO3D). 
Fig. 18 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer and inner wake at the radii r_{p} ± 4/3H for full 3D models. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 at 30 T_{orb} for the outer and inner wakes, to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb}, only at the outer wake. 
Fig. 19 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model for an isothermal and an adiabatic setup using γ = 1.01 and γ = 1.40. The units for (dΓ/dm)_{0} and H have been changed for the adiabatic runs, such that H → γH. 
The assumption of isothermality is only satisfied approximately in protoplanetary disks. Because cooling times can be long, it may be more appropriate to take the energy equation into account. To study the influence of the equation of state on the outcome, we performed purely adiabatic simulations, which solve the energy equation (Eq. (4)), together with an ideal equation of state. The result of such an approach is presented in Fig. 19, where the radial torque density is displayed for the standard isothermal model, along with two adiabatic models using γ = 1.4 and 1.01. The adiabatic results require rescaled units because the adiabatic sound speed is greater than the isothermal one by a factor . As a result, the pressure scale length is increased by the same factor, which enters (through H) the units for (dΓ/dm)_{0} and Γ_{0}. Obviously, there is a huge difference in the horseshoe torque between isothermal and adiabatic runs, while the Lindblad contributions are similar, once correctly scaled. The adiabatic runs yield similar results for the two γ values throughout. The strong torque enhancement in these adiabatic simulations comes from the entropyrelated part of the corotation torque, which is driven by a radial gradient of entropy across the horseshoe region (Baruteau & Masset 2008).
This result is interesting because sometimes an isothermal situation is mimicked with an adiabatic simulation using a γvalue very close to unity. In particular, this may be required by those Riemann solvers that do not allow isothermal conditions to be treated. Our results show that such an approach has to be treated very carefully, as shown already by Paardekooper & Mellema (2008). They argue that compressional heating near the planet plays an important role in determining the torques. Additionally, in an adiabatic situation the entropy is conserved along streamlines, which is not the case for isothermal flows. Reducing the value of γ even further yields the same results. In general, an adiabatic flow with γ → 1 approaches truly isothermal flow only in the the case of a globally constant temperature.
After a few libration times the horseshoe region is well mixed, and the entropy and potential vorticity gradients across the horseshoe regions are wiped out, so the horseshoe torques disappear and the Lindblad contributions remain. This situation is displayed in Fig. 20 for an evolutionary time of 500 orbits. Now, the isothermal model agrees well with the adiabatic one.
We also applied several codes on the adiabatic setup. In Fig. 21 we display the same results for the adiabatic situation using γ = 1.01. Again, all codes agree very closely, even though now the numerical methodology is vastly different, because some use a second order upwind scheme (RH2D and FARGO) while PLUTO uses a Riemannsolver. Only very near to the planet do the results differ slightly.
Fig. 20 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 500 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model for an isothermal and an adiabatic setup using γ = 1.01 and γ = 1.40. The units for (dΓ/dm)_{0} and H have been rescaled as in Fig. 19. 
Fig. 21 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 T_{orb} for the adiabatic standard model using an ideal equation of state with γ = 1.01. Three different codes have been used, RH2D and FARGO are 2ndorder upwind schemes and PLUTO is a Riemann solver. 
6. Shock formation
For the damping of the wake, it is important where the transition to a shock occurs. As a shock indicates a discontinuous change in the fluid variables, numerical codes often have difficulty resolving the structure in detail. To analyze this, we plot in Fig. 22 the maximum density in the wake as a function of radius for various resolutions of the computational grid. At the radius of the planet, the density obviously has its maximum, and it drops on both sides. The previous curves for the wake profile were taken near the minimum value of the density maximum. Here, all resolutions show an identical maximum of the wake amplitude. As we demonstrated in Sect. 4.3, the form of the wake thus does not depend very strongly on resolution at a distance of x = 4/3H.
Farther away from the planet, beyond a distance x ≳ 2H the curves begin to differ for the various resolutions. This clearly indicates the nonconvergence of the simulations. We attribute this to the formation of a shock wave. In fact, at a distance x_{s} ≈ 2H from the location of the planet, the speed of the wake becomes supersonic with respect to the local Keplerian flow. The criterion as given by Goodman & Rafikov (2001) indicates a shock formation at a distance of ≈ 2.9H from the planet for our nonlinearity parameter, ℳ = 0.36, which consistent with our findings. At very high spatial resolutions, i.e. above a grid resolution of 64 gridcells per scale height (1024 × 8016), the curves begin to converge in the shock region. Far away from the planet, the damping action of the boundary condition begins to set in beyond x ≈ 6H (r = 1.3), and the curves coincide again.
Fig. 22 Maximum of the density in the spiral wake as a function of radius for the 2D isothermal standard model at 30 T_{orb}. Different numerical resolutions are shown using FARGO. 
In Fig. 23 the azimuthal density profile is shown at a radial location r = r_{p} + 5H = 1.25. At this location the wake is expected to have turned into a shock wave. Owing to the trailing nature of the wake, we define the variable y here slightly different from before through
From the figure it is obvious that the wake has turned into a shock at this location. At our standard resolution (256 × 2004) there is no indication of any shock front. The overall form is very smooth with the presence of large oscillations behind the wake. With increasing numerical resolution the shock becomes resolved better and better, but only at the very highest resolution does the wake turn into a discontinuous jump. The oscillations behind the front diminish and move closer to the front with increasing resolution. Numerical experiments show that these oscillations can be damped out by increasing the strength of viscosity. However, this also smears out the shock front. It has been suggested that these oscillations stem from the chosen numerical scheme and occur for very weak shocks (Rein 2010).
7. Summary
Through a series of 2D and 3D simulations using different computational methods and codes we have explored in detail the numerical requirements for studies of the planetdisk problem. In our analysis we focused on the torque density acting on the planet and the structure of the wake generated by the planet.
With respect to the applicability of the fast orbital advection algorithm, FARGO, we have shown that it leads to consistent numerical results that agree extremely well with nonFARGO studies. The achievable gain in speed can be significant. For the setup used here we found a speedup of more than a factor of 10. The method works well in the presence of embedded planets, does not show any signs of unsteady behavior, and can be applied in two or three spatial dimensions. Since it is also applicable in conjunction with magnetic fields, new possibilities for numerical studies of turbulent accretion disks open up (Mignone et al. 2012).
We extend previous treatments of the gravitational potential of embedded planets (Masset 2002; Müller et al. 2012) to very lowmass planets in extremely thin disks. We confirmed that, for physical reasons, the planetary potential has to be smoothed in 2D simulations with about ϵ = 0.6 H – 0.7 H. Models where the gravitational force is obtained directly through a vertical integration always yield reasonable agreement with full 3D simulations. The use of very short smoothing lengths below ϵ = 0.6 H in 2D simulations is not recommended, because then the forces in the vicinity of the planet are strongly overestimated, which results in an unphysical enhancement of the torque and wakes that are too strong.
Fig. 23 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radii r_{p} + 5H at 30 T_{orb} for the 2D isothermal standard model. Different numerical resolutions are shown. 
Through a careful resolution study, we showed that the smooth wake structure at distances below about 2 H of the planet can be resolved well and consistently, already with the very low resolution of 8 to 16 cells per scale height. The results are clearly converged for 32 gridcells per H. For longer distances from the planet, the spiral wake turns into a shock wave, and much higher resolution may be required. We found that around a resolution of about 100 gridcells per H convergence can be achieved. Because this high resolution is only required near the spiral shocks and the flow is relatively smooth outside, numerical methods that adaptively refine this crucial region may be the method of choice in the future.
For adiabatic flows we confirmed earlier findings (Paardekooper & Mellema 2008) that the unsaturated horseshoe drag shows a strong deviation from the isothermal case. Using the appropriate scaling, the adiabatic corotation torques are independent of γ and do not converge to the isothermal case, even in the limit γ → 1. As a result, the procedure of modelling the isothermal case with simulations of γ close to unity has to be treated with care. In the final saturated case, where all the corotation effects have been wiped out, isothermal and adiabatic results agree perfectly, once the correction to the sound speed has been applied.
In Appendix B we show that we do not find any additional timestep criterion due to the planetary potential, and we also do not notice any unstable evolution in the case of using the orbital advection. The question why using the ATHENAcode instabilities occur in the simulations (Dong et al. 2011b) may be connected to the treatment of orbital advection in that code (Stone & Gardiner 2010), which is apparently different from the implementation in the FARGOcode. One should also notice that the conservative treatment of Coriolis forces is mandatory in such simulations to properly conserve angular momentum (Kley 1998).
We have demonstrated that the planetdisk interaction problem may be regarded as a very good test to validate an implementation of orbital advection, because it admits a nearly analytic solution to which a code output can be compared. This is not the case for simulations of turbulent disks, where no such known solutions exist. We hope that the presented results and comparison simulations may serve as a useful reference for other researchers in this field.
Acknowledgments
Tobias Müller received financial support from the CarlZeissStiftung. Wilhelm Kley acknowledges the support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) through grant KL 650/82 within the Collaborative Research Group FOR 759: The formation of Planets: The Critical First Growth Phase. Some simulations were performed on the bwGRiD cluster in Tübingen, which is funded by the Ministry for Education and Research of Germany and the Ministry for Science, Research and Arts of the state BadenWürttemberg, and the cluster of the Forschergruppe FOR 759 “The Formation of Planets: The Critical First Growth Phase” funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. Pablo BenítezLlambay acknowledges the financial support of CONICET and the computational resources provided by IATE. We acknowledge fruitful discussions with Ruobing Dong and Roman Rafikov.
References
 Balmforth, N. J., & Korycansky, D. G. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 833 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Baruteau, C., & Masset, F. 2008, ApJ, 672, 1054 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Baruteau, C., & Masset, F. 2012, in Tidal effects in Astronomy and Astrophysics, Lect. Notes Phys., to be published [Google Scholar]
 Crida, A., Sándor, Z., & Kley, W. 2008, A&A, 483, 325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Crida, A., Baruteau, C., Kley, W., & Masset, F. 2009, A&A, 502, 679 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 D’Angelo, G., & Lubow, S. H. 2010, ApJ, 724, 730 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 de ValBorro, M., Edgar, R. G., Artymowicz, P., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 529 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dong, R., Rafikov, R. R., & Stone, J. M. 2011a, ApJ, 741, 57 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Dong, R., Rafikov, R. R., Stone, J. M., & Petrovich, C. 2011b, ApJ, 741, 56 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Duffell, P. C., & MacFadyen, A. I. 2012, ApJ, 755, 7 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Gardiner, T. A., & Stone, J. M. 2008, J. Comput. Phys., 227, 4123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Goldreich, P., & Tremaine, S. 1979, ApJ, 233, 857 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
 Goodman, J., & Rafikov, R. R. 2001, ApJ, 552, 793 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kley, W. 1989, A&A, 208, 98 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
 Kley, W. 1998, A&A, 338, L37 [Google Scholar]
 Kley, W. 1999, MNRAS, 303, 696 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Kley, W., Bitsch, B., & Klahr, H. 2009, A&A, 506, 971 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Korycansky, D. G., & Papaloizou, J. C. B. 1996, ApJS, 105, 181 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Li, H., Li, S., Koller, J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 624, 1003 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Li, H., Lubow, S. H., Li, S., & Lin, D. N. C. 2009, ApJ, 690, L52 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. 2000a, A&AS, 141, 165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S. 2000b, in Disks, Planetesimals, and Planets, eds. G. Garzón, C. Eiroa, D. de Winter, & T. J. Mahoney, ASP Conf. Ser., 219, 75 [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S. 2001, ApJ, 558, 453 [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S. 2002, A&A, 387, 605 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S., & Casoli, J. 2009, ApJ, 703, 857 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S., & Casoli, J. 2010, ApJ, 723, 1393 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Masset, F. S., D’Angelo, G., & Kley, W. 2006, ApJ, 652, 730 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Mignone, A., Bodo, G., Massaglia, S., et al. 2007, ApJS, 170, 228 [Google Scholar]
 Mignone, A., Flock, M., Stute, M., Kolb, S. M., & Muscianisi, G. 2012, A&A, 545, A152 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Müller, T. W. A., Kley, W., & Meru, F. 2012, A&A, 541, A123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Paardekooper, S.J., & Mellema, G. 2008, A&A, 478, 245 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
 Paardekooper, S.J., Baruteau, C., Crida, A., & Kley, W. 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1950 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Paardekooper, S.J., Baruteau, C., & Kley, W. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 293 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rafikov, R. R., & Petrovich, C. 2012, ApJ, 747, 24 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Rein, H. 2010, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge [arXiv:1012.0266] [Google Scholar]
 Stone, J. M., & Gardiner, T. A. 2010, ApJS, 189, 142 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
 Ward, W. R. 2007, in Lunar and Planetary Institute Science Conference Abstracts, 38, 2289 [Google Scholar]
 Ziegler, U., & Yorke, H. W. 1997, Comp. Phys. Commun., 101, 54 [Google Scholar]
Appendix A: The codes
For our comparison simulations we utilized the following codes:
NIRVANA: In its original (FORTRAN) version a ZEUSlike secondorder upwind scheme (Ziegler & Yorke 1997), with the option of fixed nested grids and magnetohydrodynamics (MHD). It can be used in two or three dimensions and can use different coordinate systems. Recently, it has been improved to include radiative transport and the FARGOtreatment (Kley et al. 2009).
RH2D: A 2D radiation hydrodynamics code for different coordinate systems, originally developed for treating the boundary layer in accretion disks (Kley 1989) and later adapted to the planet disk problem (Kley 1999).
FARGO: A 2D, special purpose code for disk simulations that first featured the FARGOalgorithm (Masset 2000a). The code is publicly available at: http://fargo.in2p3.fr/, and has been used frequently in planetdisk and related simulations.
FARGO3D: A code based on similar algorithms to the standard FARGOcode, but aimed at being more versatile, as it includes Cartesian, cylindrical and spherical geometries, in one, two or three dimensions, with arbitrary grid limits. Its hydrodynamical core has been written from scratch, and it includes an MHD solver based on the method of characteristics and constrained transport. It is parallelized using the Message Passing Interface (MPI) and a slab domain decomposition. It is intended in the near future to run distinctly on clusters of CPUs or GPUs, and it will be made publicly available as the successor to the FARGOcode.
PLUTO: A multidimensional Riemannsolver based code for MHD flows (Mignone et al. 2007), which can also be used in the purely hydrodynamic setup. Additionally, it has been empowered recently by the FARGOalgorithm (Mignone et al. 2012). PLUTO is also freely available at http://plutocode.ph.unito.it.
The first three codes in the list have been used and described in an earlier code comparison project on the planetdisk problem (de ValBorro et al. 2006). There, more massive planets of Neptune and Jupiter mass embedded in viscous and inviscid disks have been studied for a large number of codes, the focus was on the gap structure of the disk, and the total torques have been analyzed.
Appendix B: Timestep limitation in the presence of gravity
Numerically, we expect that possibly gravity might cause problems if, due to the gravitational acceleration g, a parcel of material travels more than about half a gridcell of length Δx in one timestep Δt. This requires the additional gravitational criterion (B.1)Using now the smoothed planetary potential of Eq. (6) we find that the maximum force is given by (B.2)with k = 2/3^{3/2} ≈ 0.4. To obtain the strongest limitation on Δt we substitute g_{max} in Eq. (B.1) and obtain (B.3)We compare this limit now to the regular Courant condition when using orbital advection which is given by (B.4)and find (B.5)If there should be no additional timestep limitation generated by the gravity then this ratio should be larger than one. Writing now for the grid resolution Δx = H/N we finally find that (B.6)for stability. With k = 0.4, ϵ = 0.1H, and ℳ = 0.36 we find for the necessary resolution N ≈ 10. This is indeed fulfilled even for our lowest resolution. We point out that this limit formally only applies to flows without pressure (dust). If around the planet the envelope is hydrostatic, no additional criterion is required. Switching on the planetary potential slowly will ensure stability throughout the evolution as will an initial atmosphere around the planet (Duffell & MacFadyen 2012).
Appendix C: The 3D hydrodynamic equations in a rotating frame
For reference we state here the 3D hydrodynamic equations in a rotating coordinate frame. In a coordinate system rotating with the (constant) angular velocity Ω, omitting pressure terms, any external forces (eg. gravitation) and viscosity, the momentum equation reads as(C.1)We now use spherical polar coordinates (r,ϕ,θ), where r is the radial coordinate, ϕ the azimuthal angle, and θ the usual polar coordinate measured from the zaxis. NOTE, that we use in this Appendix the same symbol r for the spherical radial coordinate. For rotation around the zaxis, Ω = Ωe_{z}, the individual equations are (C.2)(C.3)(C.4)Introducing the angular velocity ω through (C.5)we may write for the three equations (C.2–C.4) (C.6)(C.7)(C.8)One sees that in the radial and meridional (θ) momentum equation only the centrifugal part (ω + Ω) and occurs in the angular momentum (ϕ) equation only the Coriolis term (2Ω).
C.1. Conservative treatment of Coriolis terms in the angular momentum equation
Defining the total specific angular momentum (C.9)and using the continuity equation (in 3D) we may write (C.10)for the angular momentum Eq. (C.7). Expanding h_{t} this may be written as (C.11)The validity of (C.11) can be easily checked by expanding the terms and making use of the continuity equation. Then one arrives at Eq. (C.7). In a numerical method that evolves u_{ϕ}, Eq. (C.11) should be used to solve the angular momentum transport conservatively.
Appendix D: Comparing to linear results
Fig. D.1 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb}. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6},h = 0.05 and the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8},h = 0.01 to the linear theoretical results of Goodman & Rafikov (2001). 
After submission of the original manuscript, Ruobing Dong generously supplied us with the data of the linear results of Goodman & Rafikov (2001). In Fig. D.1 we compare their data to our results for the 2D simulations using the standard setup of Table 1 and the quasilocal setup of Table 3. The overall agreement of our full nonlinear results with the linear case is very good. The small differences between the results are comparable to what Dong et al. (2011b) found in their study. We note that their vertical scaling differs by a factor of 3/2.
All Tables
Physical and numerical parameter for the 2D standard model, which consists of a locally isothermal, 2D disk with an embedded planet.
All Figures
Fig. 1 Density structure of the 2D standard model as generated by an embedded planet with q = 6 × 10^{6} in a disk having the aspect ratio H/r = 0.05. Shown is the configuration after 30 T_{orb}. The density is scaled linearly. 

In the text 
Fig. 2 Total torque, Γ_{tot}, in units of Γ_{0} (see Eq. (12)), acting on the planet vs. time for the 2D standard model. Shortly after insertion, the torque is positive and approximately constant between 10 and 40 orbits. At later times it saturates due to mixing of the material within the horseshoe region. 

In the text 
Fig. 3 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 and 200 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model. The torque enhancement and spike near r = 1 at t = 30 T_{orb} is due to the unsaturated corotation torque. At later times, here shown at t = 200 T_{orb}, only the Lindblad contributions due to the spiral arms remain. 

In the text 
Fig. 4 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the inner and outer wakes at radial distances ± 4/3H away from the planet at 30 T_{orb} for the isothermal 2D standard model. The coordinates x and y refer to local Cartesian coordinates, see Eq. (15). The “plus” sign in the xaxis label refers to the blue curve at r_{p} − 4/3H, and the “minus” sign to the red curve at r_{p} + 4/3H. The upstream side of the wake is to the left for both curves. 

In the text 
Fig. 5 Radial torque density of the 2D standardproblem in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for different codes at the standard resolution. 

In the text 
Fig. 6 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for the standard setup for various code. This is an enlargement of Fig. 5. 

In the text 
Fig. 7 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for different codes at the standard resolution. 

In the text 
Fig. 8 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for the code RH2D using different timesteps and a nonrotating frame. 

In the text 
Fig. 9 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} using the FARGOcode at different resolutions. 

In the text 
Fig. 10 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} using the FARGOcode with different Courantnumbers (CFL). The physical setup differs slightly from the standard problem and is described in Sect. 4.4. In the upper panel the differences of the individual runs with respect to the standard, CFL = 0.5, are displayed. 

In the text 
Fig. 11 Total torque Γ_{tot}, in units of Γ_{0} (see Eq. (12)), acting on the planet vs. time. Shown are the 2D standard model (red) and a globally isothermal case (blue), with a different density profile, such that the potential vorticity gradient vanishes. 

In the text 
Fig. 12 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for 2D and 3D simulations of the standard setup. The red curve corresponds to that in Fig. 3, the blue line to a 2D model with a vertical integrated gravitational force, and the green to the 3D model (using NIRVANA). 

In the text 
Fig. 13 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb} for 2D and 3D simulations of the standard setup. The color coding is identical to Fig. 12. 

In the text 
Fig. 14 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} at 30 T_{orb} for the 3D and 2D simulations of the standard setup. Compared are two 3D simulations (using NIRVANA and FARGO3D) with a 2D simulation, using ϵ = 0.7. 

In the text 
Fig. 15 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0}. The standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6},h = 0.05 at 200 T_{orb} is compared to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8},h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb}. The local calculation utilizes the FARGO3Dcode in the 2D setup. 

In the text 
Fig. 16 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb}. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01. 

In the text 
Fig. 17 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} for full 3D models. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 at 30 T_{orb} (using NIRVANA) to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb} (using FARGO3D). 

In the text 
Fig. 18 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer and inner wake at the radii r_{p} ± 4/3H for full 3D models. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6}, h = 0.05 at 30 T_{orb} for the outer and inner wakes, to the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8}, h = 0.01 at 30 T_{orb}, only at the outer wake. 

In the text 
Fig. 19 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model for an isothermal and an adiabatic setup using γ = 1.01 and γ = 1.40. The units for (dΓ/dm)_{0} and H have been changed for the adiabatic runs, such that H → γH. 

In the text 
Fig. 20 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 500 T_{orb} for the 2D standard model for an isothermal and an adiabatic setup using γ = 1.01 and γ = 1.40. The units for (dΓ/dm)_{0} and H have been rescaled as in Fig. 19. 

In the text 
Fig. 21 Radial torque density in units of (dΓ/dm)_{0} (see Eq. (11)) at 30 T_{orb} for the adiabatic standard model using an ideal equation of state with γ = 1.01. Three different codes have been used, RH2D and FARGO are 2ndorder upwind schemes and PLUTO is a Riemann solver. 

In the text 
Fig. 22 Maximum of the density in the spiral wake as a function of radius for the 2D isothermal standard model at 30 T_{orb}. Different numerical resolutions are shown using FARGO. 

In the text 
Fig. 23 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radii r_{p} + 5H at 30 T_{orb} for the 2D isothermal standard model. Different numerical resolutions are shown. 

In the text 
Fig. D.1 Normalized azimuthal density profile of the outer wake at the radius r_{p} + 4/3H at 30 T_{orb}. Compared is the standard setup with q = 6 × 10^{6},h = 0.05 and the quasilocal model with q = 3.2 × 10^{8},h = 0.01 to the linear theoretical results of Goodman & Rafikov (2001). 

In the text 
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (fulltext article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 4896 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.