Table 9
Fit results using the functions similar to Vikhlinin et al. (2006) (defined in Sect. 4.2) for our sample and the Leccardi & Molendi (2008) sample together, obtained by fixing a = 0.045 and the relative normalization xi0 = 0.45.
Fit function | χ2/d.o.f. | A | α 0 | ξ 0 | β 0 | η | ζ |
|
|||||||
Eq. (3) (b = 0.4) | 1719.0/384 | 1.15 ± 0.01 | 1.66 ± 0.35 | 0.41 ± 0.06 | 0.49 ± 0.08 | – | – |
|
|||||||
Eq. (4) (b = 0.4; ζ = 0) | 1663.9/383 | 1.13 ± 0.04 | 3.13 ± 1.04 | 0.32 ± 0.05 | 0.17 ± 0.04 | 0.29 ± 0.11 | – |
Eq. (4) (b = 0.4) | 1662.6/382 | 1.14 ± 0.05 | 3.85 ± 1.79 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.16 ± 0.04 | 0.23 ± 0.11 | 0.17 ± 0.09 |
Notes. The meaning of the fit parameters is the same as in Table 4.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.