Table 7
“Well-fit” YSO candidates compared to YSO candidate lists from W08, GC09, Chen et al. (2009, 2010), and Romita et al. (2010).
| Region | NewCa | Wb | C+W | GCc | C+GC | W+GC | C+W+GC | Od | C+O | W+O | C+W+O | GC+O | C+GC+O | W+GC+O | C+W+GC+O | Totale |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| N11 | 218 | 7 | 5 | 3416 | 103 | 99 | 94 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29232 |
| N44 | 115 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2717 | 124 | 43 | 53 | 18728 |
| N51 | 96 | 6 | 1 | 206 | 4 | 51 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1347 |
| N105 | 84 | 1 | 0 | 154 | 51 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1116 |
| N113 | 95 | 7 | 1 | 166 | 52 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1269 |
| N120 | 50 | 3-1 | 0 | 135 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 675 |
| N144 | 29 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 432 |
| N160 | 188 | 12-1 | 2 | 295,−1 | 113 | 32 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 178 | 61 | 0 | 21 | 27720 |
| N206 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 124 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 75 | 19 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1664 |
|
|
||||||||||||||||
| Totals | 918 | 40 | 14 | 14846 | 4110 | 2815 | 195 | 89 | 21 | 2 | 3 | 4625 | 215 | 53 | 84 | 1403 113 |
Notes. We classify 127 previously identified candidates as well-fit, another two-hundred forty-four as poorly fit. One-hundred-nine have insufficient SAGE photometry for fitting.Subscripted numbers indicate the number of sources spectroscopically confirmed by Seale et al. (2009), Shimonishi et al. (2008), or Woods et al. (2011). Note that not all of the spectroscopic sources are within these photometric lists. Three of the listed candidates were found to be non-embedded sources by Seale et al. (2009) and are subscripted “ − 1”.
O: refers to other list Chen et al. (2009) in N44, Chen et al. (2010) in N160, and Romita et al. (2010) in N206.
Total number of candidates in this paper, W08, GC09, Chen et al. (2009, 2010), and/or Romita et al. (2010).
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.