Table 3
Matches table.
| Region | SAGE_Designationa | W08_Designationb | GC09_Designation | S09_Designationc | Other_Designationd | Stagee | S09_Groupf | Other_Classificationg | ||
|
|
||||||||||
| N11 | J045850.69-660745.4 | J045850.66-660745.2 | NONE | NONE | NONE | iii | N/A | N/A | ||
| N44 | J052212.56-675832.1 | J052212.56-675832.2 | Y052212.57-675832.3 | Y052212.57-675832.3 | Chen_052212.6-675832.2h | i | SE | T1; H2O/CO2h | ||
| N51 | J052749.97-672540.1 | J052749.95-672540.2 | NONE | NONE | NONE | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||
| N113 | POOR MATCHi | NONE | Y051315.73-692135.9 | Y051315.73-692135.9 | NONE | N/A | PE | N/A | ||
| N120 | J051848.35-693334.7 | J051848.38-693334.7 | NONE | Y051848.36-693334.7 | NONE | N/A | ERO | N/A | ||
| N144 | J052613.39-684715.0 | J052613.40-684714.8 | Y052613.41-684714.9 | NONE | Woods_J052613.39-684715.0 | N/A | N/A | YSO4 | ||
| N160 | J053922.76-693011.6 | NONE | Y053922.74-693011.7 | NONE | Fleener_053922.74-693011.7 | i/ii | N/A | iij | ||
| N160 | J054050.87-695001.9 | J054050.81-695001.9 | NONE | NONE | Chen_054050.85-695001.9 | ii | N/A | iik | ||
| N206 | J052959.68-710436.8 | NONE | NONE | NONE | Romita_Y023 | iii | N/A | 3l | ||
Notes. Comparison of names and classifications for YSO candidates from W08, GC09, Seale et al. (2009), Chen et al. (2009), Romita et al. (2010), Chen et al. (2010), Fleener et al. (2010), Woods et al. (2011), or Shimonishi et al. (2008). Not all sources are well-represented in our SAGE photometry, and not all are well-fit. All matching between lists is performed with a 1″ radius. The full online table includes coordinates in degrees, J2000 epoch. Columns are also included for W08_Classification and GC09_Classification. W08 YSO candidates are designated as either high probability (YSO_hp) or not (YSO); GC09 as definiteYSO, probableYSO, or possibleYSO.
All W08_Designations begin “SSTISAGE1C J...” W08 numerical designations are also reported in the full table.
S09_Designations and groups are from Seale et al. (2009).
Designations from Chen et al. (2009) in N44 and Chen et al. (2010) in N159/N160 are preceded by Chen_... followed by the native designation; in N206 Romita_... for sources from Romita et al. (2010); Fleener et al. (2010) sources in NGC 2074 in N160 Fleener_...; two AKARI spectroscopic YSOs in N44 and N160 are from Shimonishi et al. (2008); SAGE-Spec YSOs from Woods et al. (2011) are in N11 and N144 and are denoted Woods_...
The full online table includes a C12_WellFit flag, 1 for well-fit sources, 2 for sources that can be well-fit as non-YSOs but are one of the other lists, and 0 for sources which are not fit or are poorly fit. C12_Stage is the Stage as used elsewhere in this paper. Sources with C12_WellFit=2 are ambiguous YSO and non-YSO fits, and their C12_Stages are listed as “ambFit”.
S09_Groups from Seale et al. (2009). Examples are SE (YSOs with strong silicate absorption and fine-structure emission), PE (YSOs with strong PAH and and fine-structure emission), and ERO (non-embedded, C-rich).
Other_Designation listed in the full online table for this source is “Chen_052212.6-675832.2; AKARI_J052212-675832”. It is classified as Type 1 by Chen et al. (2009) and as showing spectral features of both H2O and CO2 ice by Shimonishi et al. (2008).
SAGE_Designations are listed as NONE or POOR MATCH where there is too little SAGE photometry for an SED fit.
Fleener et al. (2010) classifies this as as Type ii source.
Type ii from Chen et al. (2010).
Romita et al. (2010) Stage iii.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.