Fig.3

Comparison of Y500 from extraction using the baseline pressure profile with that from the best fitting REXCESS cool core and morphologically disturbed pressure profiles given in Appendix C of Arnaud et al. (2010). Cool core systems are marked as blue stars, other systems as black dots. Top: universal pressure profile vs. cool-core pressure profile; Bottom: universal pressure profile vs. morphologically-disturbed pressure profile. The trend with R500 is due to the inability of the Planck beam to resolve different profiles at small angular size. The effect is small (maximum ~10 per cent) and quasi-symmetric (as expected), so no bias is introduced.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.