Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066381]


Issue
A&A
Volume 531, July 2011
Article Number C1
Number of page(s) 2
Section Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/20066381e
Published online 08 June 2011

thumbnail Fig. 4

Combined H.E.S.S. gamma-ray spectrum of RX J1713.7−3946 generated from data of 2003, 2004, and 2005 (Data set III, Table 1). Data are corrected for the variation in optical efficiency. Error bars are  ± 1σ statistical errors. These data might be described by a power law with exponential cutoff of the form dN/dE = I0   E − Γ   exp( − (E/Ec)β). The best-fit result (black solid line) is given here for β = 0.5 (fixed), Γ = 1.8, and Ec = 3.7 TeV (cf. Table 4 for the exact values). Note that the fit function extends as dashed black line beyond the fit range for illustration. For comparison, the best fit of a power law with exponential cutoff and β = 1, obtained solely from the 2004 data (Aharonian et al. 2007), is shown as dashed red line. A model-independent upper limit, indicated by the black arrow, is determined in the energy range from 113 to 300 TeV.

Table 5

Flux points including relevant event statistics are listed for the spectrum of the combined H.E.S.S. data set, shown in Fig. 4.

The differential fluxes given in Table 5 of Aharonian et al. (2007) were overestimated by 19%. When the energy correction factors (discussed in the main text) were originally applied to the spectrum data, no correction was made to the calculation of the differential fluxes for the increased widths of the energy bins. The correct flux values are now given in Table 5. We also note that the incorrect flux units given in the original table have been corrected.

The corresponding flux points plotted in Fig. 4 of Aharonian et al. (2007) are, however, correct, except for the upper limit, which is also overestimated by 19%. Figure 4 shows the differential flux spectrum with the correct upper limit. All other numbers given in Aharonian et al. (2007), including the fit parameters given in Table 4, are unaffected.

References

  1. Aharonian et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration) 2006, A&A, 449, 223 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aharonian et al. (H.E.S.S. Collaboration) 2007, A&A, 464, 235 [Google Scholar]
  3. Li, T.-P., & Ma, Y.-Q. 1983, ApJ, 272, 317 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

© ESO, 2011

All Tables

Table 5

Flux points including relevant event statistics are listed for the spectrum of the combined H.E.S.S. data set, shown in Fig. 4.

All Figures

thumbnail Fig. 4

Combined H.E.S.S. gamma-ray spectrum of RX J1713.7−3946 generated from data of 2003, 2004, and 2005 (Data set III, Table 1). Data are corrected for the variation in optical efficiency. Error bars are  ± 1σ statistical errors. These data might be described by a power law with exponential cutoff of the form dN/dE = I0   E − Γ   exp( − (E/Ec)β). The best-fit result (black solid line) is given here for β = 0.5 (fixed), Γ = 1.8, and Ec = 3.7 TeV (cf. Table 4 for the exact values). Note that the fit function extends as dashed black line beyond the fit range for illustration. For comparison, the best fit of a power law with exponential cutoff and β = 1, obtained solely from the 2004 data (Aharonian et al. 2007), is shown as dashed red line. A model-independent upper limit, indicated by the black arrow, is determined in the energy range from 113 to 300 TeV.

In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.