Issue |
A&A
Volume 521, October 2010
Herschel/HIFI: first science highlights
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | L11 | |
Number of page(s) | 7 | |
Section | Letters | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015087 | |
Published online | 01 October 2010 |
Herschel/HIFI: first science highlights
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Herschel observations
of ortho- and para-oxidaniumyl (H2O+) in
spiral arm clouds toward Sagittarius B2(M)
,![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.png)
P. Schilke1,2 - C. Comito2 - H. S. P. Müller1 - E. A. Bergin3 - E. Herbst14 - D. C. Lis4 - D. A. Neufeld20 - T. G. Phillips4 - T. A. Bell4 - G.A. Blake 5 - S. Cabrit24 - E. Caux6,7 - C. Ceccarelli8 - J. Cernicharo9 N. R. Crockett3 - F. Daniel9,10 - M.-L. Dubernet11,12 - M. Emprechtinger4 - P. Encrenaz10 - E. Falgarone10 - M. Gerin10 - T. F. Giesen1 - J. R. Goicoechea9 - P. F. Goldsmith13 - H. Gupta13 - C. Joblin6,7 - D. Johnstone15 - W. D. Langer13 - W. B. Latter16 - S. D. Lord16 - S. Maret8 - P. G. Martin17 - G. J. Melnick18 - K. M. Menten2 - P. Morris16 - J. A. Murphy19 - V. Ossenkopf12,21 - L. Pagani24 - J. C. Pearson13 - M. Pérault 10 - R. Plume22 - S.-L. Qin13 - M. Salez 24 - S. Schlemmer 1 - J. Stutzki 1 - N. Trappe 19 - F. F. S. van der Tak21 - C. Vastel6,7 - S. Wang3 - H. W. Yorke13 - S. Yu13 - N. Erickson23 - F. W. Maiwald13 - J. Kooi4 - A. Karpov4 - J. Zmuidzinas4 - A. Boogert4 - R. Schieder1 - P. Zaal21
1 - I. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Str. 77,
50937 Köln, Germany
2 - Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121
Bonn, Germany
3 - Department of Astronomy, University of Michigan, 500 Church Street,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
4 - California Institute of Technology, Cahill Center for Astronomy and
Astrophysics 301-17, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
5 - California Institute of Technology, Division of Geological and
Planetary Sciences, MS 150-21, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
6 - Centre d'Étude Spatiale des Rayonnements, Université de Toulouse
[UPS], 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
7 - CNRS/INSU, UMR 5187, 9 avenue du Colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse
Cedex 4, France
8 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de l'Observatoire de Grenoble, BP 53,
38041 Grenoble, Cedex 9, France
9 - Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC/INTA), Laboratiorio de Astrofísica
Molecular, Ctra. de Torrejón a Ajalvir, km 4, 28850 Torrejón
de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain
10 - LERMA, CNRS UMR8112, Observatoire de Paris and École Normale
Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75231 Paris Cedex 05, France
11 - LPMAA, UMR7092, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
12 - LUTH, UMR8102, Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France
13 - Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
14 - Departments of Physics, Astronomy and Chemistry, Ohio State
University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
15 - National Research Council Canada, Herzberg Institute of
Astrophysics, 5071 West Saanich Road, Victoria, BC V9E 2E7, Canada
16 - Infrared Processing and Analysis Center, California Institute of
Technology, MS 100-22, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
17 - Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, University of
Toronto, 60 St George St, Toronto, ON M5S 3H8, Canada
18 - Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street,
Cambridge MA 02138, USA
19 - National University of Ireland Maynooth. Ireland
20 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University,
3400 North Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
21 - SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, PO Box 800, 9700
AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
22 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, 2500
University Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
23 - University of Massachusetts, Astronomy Dept., 710 N. Pleasant St.,
LGRT-619E, Amherst, MA 01003-9305, USA
24 - LERMA & UMR8112 du CNRS, Observatoire de Paris, 61 Av. de
l'Observatoire, 75014 Paris, France
Received 30 May 2010 / Accepted 28 June 2010
Abstract
H2O+ has been observed in
its ortho- and para- states
toward the massive star forming core Sgr B2(M),
located close to the Galactic center. The observations show absorption
in all spiral arm clouds between the Sun and Sgr B2. The
average o/p ratio of H2O+
in most velocity intervals is 4.8, which corresponds to a
nuclear spin temperature of 21 K. The relationship of this
spin temperature to the formation temperature and current physical
temperature of the gas hosting H2O+
is discussed, but no firm conclusion is reached. In the velocity
interval 0-60 km s-1, an ortho/para
ratio of below unity is found, but if this is due to an artifact of
contamination by other species or real is not clear.
Key words: astrochemistry - line: profiles - molecular processes
1 Introduction
Simple di- and triatomic molecules and ions are fundamental constituents of interstellar chemistry which eventually leads to the formation of complex molecules. Many of these species have ground state transitions at submillimeter- and THz wavelengths, and are therefore either difficult or not at all observable from the ground, yet they constitute the building blocks of chemistry, and are therefore fundamental to its understanding in various environments. Among those are spiral arm clouds, located in the plane of the Galactic disk, where the line-of-sight toward a strong continuum source passes through by chance. This setup allows sensitive absorption measurements, and the clouds have been observed by this method against the Sgr B2, W31c, W49, W51 and CasA millimeter continuum sources using molecular species such as CO, HCN, HCO+, CS, CN, SO, and c-C3H2 etc (e.g. Menten et al. 2010; Tieftrunk et al. 1994; Ossenkopf et al. 2010; Greaves & Williams 1994; Gerin et al. 2010; Greaves & Nyman 1996). The results demonstrate that spiral arm clouds have low gas density and low excitation temperatures, and represent diffuse and translucent clouds.
One of the best sources for these absorption studies is
Sgr B2, located close to the Galactic center, 100 pc
from Sgr A
in projection, and one of the strongest submillimeter sources in the
Galaxy (e.g. Pierce-Price
et al. 2000). The dense cores Sgr B2(N) and
Sgr B2(M) within the cloud are at different evolutionary
stages, and constitute well-studied massive star forming regions in our
Galaxy. The flux ratio of the continuum between Sgr B2(M) and
Sgr B2(N) is less than unity at 1 mm and rises at
shorter wavelengths so that Sgr B2(M) dominates above
500 GHz
(Lis &
Goldsmith 1991; Goldsmith et al. 1990).
Sgr B2(M) also shows fewer molecular emission lines than
Sgr B2(N) (Nummelin
et al. 1998), hence less confusion and therefore is
better suited for absorption studies. The line-of-sight toward the
Sgr B2(M) continuum will pass almost all the way to the center
of our Galaxy, providing a more complete census in studying physical
and chemical conditions towards the Galactic center clouds and all
spiral arm clouds simultaneously. HIFI, the Heterodyne Instrument for
the Far-Infrared (de Graauw
et al. 2010) on board the Herschel
Space Observatory (Pilbratt
et al. 2010) is an ideal instrument for making these
observations.
2 Observations
Full spectral
scans of HIFI bands 1a, 1b, and 4b towards Sgr B2(M) (
and
)
have been carried out respectively on March 1, 2, and 5 2010, providing
coverage of the frequency range 479 through
637 GHz and 1051 through 1121 GHz.
HIFI spectral scans are carried out in dual beam switch (DBS)
mode, where the DBS reference beams lie approximately 3apart. The
wide band spectrometer (WBS) is used as a back-end,
providing a spectral resolution of 1.1 MHz over a 4-GHz-wide
intermediate frequency (IF) band. A HIFI spectral scan consists
of a number of double-sideband (DSB) spectra, tuned at different local
oscillator (LO) frequencies, where the spacing between one LO setting
and the next is determined by the ``redundancy'' chosen by the
observer Comito & Schilke
(2002). The molecular spectrum of Sgr B2(M) in
band 1a and 4b has been scanned
with a redundancy of 4, that of band 1b with a redundancy of 8, which
means that every frequency has been observed respectively 4
and 8 times in each sideband. Multiple observations of the same
frequency at different LO
tunings are necessary to separate the lower-sideband (LSB) from the
upper-sideband (USB) spectrum.
The data have been calibrated through the standard pipeline
released with
version 2.9 of HIPE Ott
et al. (2010), and subsequently exported to
CLASS using the HiClass task
within HIPE. Deconvolution of
the DSB data into single-sideband (SSB) format has been performed on
CLASS. All the HIFI data presented here, spectral features and
continuum emission, are deconvolved SSB spectra. Although both
horizontal (H) and vertical (V) polarizations have been
obtained, we will show
only H-polarization spectra. The intensity scale
is main-beam temperature, and results from applying a beam efficiency
correction of 0.69 for band 1a, 0.68 for band 1b, and 0.669 for band 4b
(Roelfsema et al. 2010).
3 Spectroscopy of H2O+
Removal of an electron from oxidane, H2O, also
known as water, yields oxidaniumyl, H2O+.
Its bond lengths and bond angle are slightly larger than those of H2O,
see e.g. Strahan
et al. (1986). Quantum-chemical calculations (Weis et al. 1989)
yielded a ground state dipole moment of 2.4 D, considerably larger than in H2O.
The transitions are of b-type, meaning
mod 2.
The electronic ground state changes from 1A1
in the neutral to 2B1
in the cation which leads to a reversal of the ortho
and para levels with respect to water.
Ka + Kc
is even and odd for ortho- and para-H2O+,
respectively.
The para levels do not show any hyperfine splitting
while the ortho levels are split into three because
of the 1H hyperfine structure. The strong lines
have
,
i.e. they do not involve a spin-flip. At low quantum numbers
spin-flipping transitions have appreciable intensity.
Further details of the spectroscopy of H2O+ are discussed in the Appendix. Table A.1 provides calculated rest frequencies for the two rotational transitions discussed in the present investigation. Figure A.1 shows the lowest energy levels of H2O+ with allowed transitions.
4 Results
Determining the opacities and thus column densities of absorption lines
is traditionally done using the line-to-continuum ratio. In the present
case, this is not straightforward, because the ortho-H2O+-line
has hyperfine structure with closeby components (Fig. 1), which distorts the
simple correspondence of line-to-continuum ratio with column density at
a given velocity, and also because the line background of the
Sgr B2(M) core cannot necessarily be neglected. We therefore
fitted the lines using the XCLASS
program, which performs an LTE fit using the molecular data discussed
in Sect. 3,
using the automated fitting routine provided by MAGIX
. For all velocity
components, an excitation temperature of 2.7 K was assumed.
For molecules that react strongly with H2 (see
the discussion in Stäuber
& Bruderer 2009; Black 1998), the collisional
processes in diffuse gas are unimportant relative to radiative
excitation in controlling the excitation temperatures of observed
transitions of species with high dipole moments such as H2O+,
since inelastic collisions with H, H2 and
electrons compete with reactive collisons. The excitation temperature
employed here may still not be entirely correct, since particularly at
1115 GHz the general FIR background of the Galaxy contributes
to a radiation temperature of 4.8 K even in the vicinity of
the Sun, and for the spiral arm clouds one expects similar or slightly
higher values (Wright
et al. 1991; Paladini et al. 2007).
Our analysis is not affected however if the excitation temperature is
dominated by this radiation field, and stays significantly smaller
compared with the upper level energies for the para-
and ortho-H2O+
ground state lines
and 54 K, respectively, which is a well justified assumption.
The maximum opacities of the ortho-H2O+
line are about 2, so the lines are only moderately opaque.
![]() |
Figure 1: ortho-H2O+, as already shown in Ossenkopf et al. (2010). The data are shown in black, the fit in red, in blue the hfs pattern is depicted, and in green the predicted contamination by other molecules. |
Open with DEXTER |
For para-H2O+, only the 607 GHz line was used to perform the fit, since this is the strongest and least contaminated para-line, but it can be seen from Fig. 2 that predictions from this reproduce the other para lines rather well. To predict contamination, we used the fit of all species in Sgr B2(M) (Qin et al., in prep.) as background. This is a preliminary version of the fit, and we cannot exclude the existence of additional contamination by unknown lines. Thus we estimate the error of the fit due to uncertainties of this nature very conservatively to be 20%, but in the presence of strong unknown lines it could be larger at certain frequencies. This is particularly true for the possible D2O contamination of the para-H2O+-line at 607 GHz. The relatively small variation of the ortho/para ratio in the absorption cloud range (see below) argues against contamination by a strong unknown line however. All para-H2O+ components are optically thin. In the following, we make the assumption that the excitation of all upper levels can be approximated as LTE with an excitation temperature of 2.7 K, and that thus the ortho- and para-H2O+ column densities can be measured by observations of the ground state. This assumption is reasonable for the spiral arm clouds, but most likely violated for the clouds associated with the Sgr B2(M) envelope (see below).
It appears that the absorption lines of different species toward Sgr B2(M) cannot be fitted with a unique set of physical components of fixed velocity and velocity width. This probably reflects the different origins of the species in atomic, low density molecular and high density molecular gas with a different velocity structure. A detailed study of the different distributions will have to await the complete data set of the survey. Apart from that, particularly in species which have hyperfine structure and are very abundant, that is in species which absorb at all velocities, the decomposition into basically Gaussian components would not necessarily be unique. The fit rather represents a deconvolution of the hyperfine pattern. We therefore prefer to present the results as depicted in Fig. 3, as column densities/velocity interval and ratio as a function of velocity, as a sum over the components. The component of the Sgr B2(M) envelope, which is located at 64 km s-1, is most uncertain, because here the para-H2O+ 607 GHz line is most contaminated, and there the assumption of uniformly low excitation temperature for all levels is most likely to be violated, since this is warm and dense gas with a strong FIR field which may dominate the excitation.
![]() |
Figure 2: para-H2O+ lines in Sgr B2, with the predicted contamination by other molecules in green, as in Fig. 1. The position of the D2O ground state line is indicated. |
Open with DEXTER |
Since H2O+ is expected to
originate in mostly atomic gas at the edge of diffuse and translucent
clouds, giving abundances relative to H2 or H
does not make sense, since it exists neither in purely atomic, nor in
purely molecular gas. Menten
et al. (2010) and Qin
et al. (2010) give column densities of H2
of typically a few times 1021 cm-2
and H column densities of typically 1020 cm-2,
so the average H2O+
abundance relative to the number of H nuclei is a few times 10-8,
but could be much higher locally. The o/p ratio was calculated using
the column densities, and has a mean of
for the spiral arm clouds, with little variation.
We calculated the nuclear spin temperature using
![]() |
(1) |
with


In the velocity range from about 0 to 60 km s-1, the o/p ratio drops to unity, much below the high-temperature limit of 3. This does not reflect any thermal equilibrium and cannot be explained by any known formation mechanism: at low temperatures, the o/p ratio is extremely high, since all the molecules are in their lowest (ortho) state, and at high temperatures the limit 3 is reached, given by the nuclear spin statistics. We can only speculate about the cause of this unexpected result: it could be either a measurement error, or a real effect. If it is a measurement error, either the ortho-H2O+ column density is underestimated, which could be caused by contamination from a strong emission line, or the para-H2O+ column density is overestimated, which could be due to contamination from another absorption line, or the excitation temperatures deviate from the 2.7 K we assumed in such a way to produce this effect. The latter could e.g. be produced by a bright FIR field at the location of the clouds. Taking the measured ratio at face value as the o/p ratio would imply that a process exists which produces ortho-H2O+ and para-H2O+ in equal amounts.
![]() |
Figure 3:
Column density distribution of ortho-H2O+
and para-H2O+
( upper panel), o/p ratio ( central panel)
and |
Open with DEXTER |
5 Discussion
Since there are no fast radiative transitions between para-H2O+
and ortho-H2O+,
the derived nuclear spin temperature is thought to be determined by
chemical processes, either at formation or afterwards, since para-ortho
transformation can only occur accompanied with a proton exchange
reaction of one of the hydrogen nuclei. The only observed kinetic
temperature estimates in these clouds are from Tieftrunk et al. (1994),
based on NH3, and show values of K
in the -100 km s-1 component
(which is believed to originate in the Galactic center), below
20 K in the velocity range in the spiral arm clouds, while the
-10 to 20 km s-1 component
(also from the Galactic center) has temperatures exceeding
100 K (Gardner
et al. 1988), and is most likely shock heated. There
is no similarity to the more or less constant nuclear spin temperature
of 21 K we derive for H2O+
formation in this range, which suggests that H2O+
and NH3 trace very different gas components: H2O+
the warm outer photon dominated edge of clouds, NH3
either the shielded and cold interior, or hot shocked gas, which also
seems to be devoid of H2O+.
This picture of H2O+
formation at the edges of clouds, actually in regions where the gas is
mostly atomic, is supported by Gerin
et al. (2010) and Neufeld
et al. (2010) based on studies of OH+ and H2O+
with Herschel/HIFI. PDR models of diffuse clouds (Le Petit et al. 2006)
predict temperatures of 50 to 100 K for the formation region
of H2O+ in diffuse clouds
(
-3) with densities of about 102
and 103 cm-3
with radiation fields of 1-3 times ambient.
The relationship of nuclear spin temperature and formation or
ambient temperature needs to be discussed in somewhat more detail (see Flower et al. 2006,
for a discussion on this ratio for molecular hydrogen). H2O+
is a very reactive ion, and particularly it reacts exothermically with H2
to form H3O+, so the
reaction para-H2O+
+ H
H2,
which would equilibrate the o/p ratio to the
kinetic gas temperature, might not be relevant. If an equivalent
reaction with atomic hydrogen (para-H2O+
+ H
H) could happen, is unknown. If it does, it most likely will
equilibrate to the current gas temperature, if not, the observed o/p
ratio is the one established at formation.
How this depends on the kinetic temperature at formation is not well
understood. H2O+ is
produced by the highly exothermic reaction of OH+
with H2, so the variables determining the H2O+
o/p ratio are:
- 1.
- the o/p ratio of H2;
- 2.
- how much and in which way the excess energy of the exothermic reaction is available for o/p conversion of H2O+;
- 3.
- the temperature of the gas at the time of formation, typically above 50-100 K based on PDR models.
The latter two processes would push the o/p ratio down toward 3:1, the high temperature value, which means toward a spin temperature higher than the 21 K we measure. The influence of the o/p ratio of H2 is hard to assess: if the reaction proceeds by way of a collision complex, then the nuclear spin of H2 will have an effect on the nuclear spin of product H2O+, but not if the reaction proceeds through direct atom transfer. The measured o/p of H2 in diffuse clouds is about unity (Rachford et al. 2009; Savage et al. 1977). Clearly, this is an interesting area of molecular physics that needs further study. From our observations, it seems that we see an excess of ortho-H2O+ relative to what one would expect based on the formation temperature and available reaction energy in the spiral arm clouds and, if the measurement of an ortho-H2O+/para-H2O+ ratio in the 0 to 60 km s-1 region is real, an excess of para-H2O+ there. This velocity range nominally is assigned to the Sagittarius/Scutum arms (Vallée 2008), outside of the Galactic center, where no exotic conditions are expected. However, this velocity range is also bracketed by gas local to Sgr B2 at 0 to 10 km s-1 and around 60 km s-1, so it could represent diffuse gas belonging to this complex, which could be the cause of unusual excitation or chemical conditions, e.g. due to shocks. In the lower velocity range overlapping with this (-10 to 20 km s-1), Lis et al. (2010) also find water with an o/p ratio of 3, indicating high temperatures.
Lis et al. (2010) find an average spin temperature of 27 K for water toward the the spiral arms lines of sight. H2O in these clouds is formed in the gas phase, through dissociative recombination of H3O+, in a region where the gas is at about this temperature. The correspondence between physical temperature and spin temperature may be more easily traced by the more stable water molecule, although in general the contribution of grain surface chemistry for water complicates the issue (see discussion in Lis et al. 2010). From this study it is clear that by determining the ortho/para-ratio of H2O+ (and, by proxy, from other simple hydrides) one can learn a lot about the formation processes, but also that many fundamental physical and chemical processes are still not fully understood. We can look forward to the wealth of data HIFI will bring!
AcknowledgementsHIFI has been designed and built by a consortium of institutes and university departments from across Europe, Canada and the United States under the leadership of SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Groningen, The Netherlands and with major contributions from Germany, France and the US. Consortium members are: Canada: CSA, U. Waterloo; France: CESR, LAB, LERMA, IRAM; Germany: KOSMA, MPIfR, MPS; Ireland, NUI Maynooth; Italy: ASI, IFSI-INAF, Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri- INAF; Netherlands: SRON, TUD; Poland: CAMK, CBK; Spain: Observatorio Astronómico Nacional (IGN), Centro de Astrobiologìa (CSIC-INTA). Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology - MC2, RSS & GARD; Onsala Space Observatory; Swedish National Space Board, Stockholm University - Stockholm Observatory; Switzerland: ETH Zurich, FHNW; USA: Caltech, JPL, NHSC. Support for this work was provided by NASA through an award issued by JPL/Caltech. CSO is supported by the NSF, award AST-0540882.H.S.P.M. is very grateful to the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) for financial support aimed at maintaining the Cologne Database for Molecular Spectroscopy, CDMS. This support has been administered by the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR). We appreciate funding for the ASTRONET Project CATS through the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF).
We thank an anonymous referee for constructive comments which helped to clarify the discussion in this article.
References
- Black, J. H. 1998, Chemistry and Physics of Molecules and Grains in Space. Faraday Discussions, 109, The Faraday Division of the Royal Society of Chemistry, London, 257 [Google Scholar]
- Comito, C., & Schilke, P. 2002, A&A, 395, 357 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- de Graauw, Th., Helmich, F. P., Phillips, T. G., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L6 [Google Scholar]
- Flower, D. R., Pineau Des Forêts, G., & Walmsley, C. M. 2006, A&A, 449, 621 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, F. F., Boes, F., & Winnewisser, G. 1988, A&A, 196, 207 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Gendriesch, R., Lewen, F., Winnewisser, G., & Müller, H. S. P. 2001, J. Mol. Struct., 599, 293 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Gerin, M., De Luca, M., Black, J., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L110 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Goldsmith, P. F., Lis, D. C., Hills, R., & Lasenby, J. 1990, ApJ, 350, 186 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Greaves, J. S., & Nyman, L. 1996, A&A, 305, 950 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Greaves, J. S., & Williams, P. G. 1994, A&A, 290, 259 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Le Petit, F., Nehmé, C., Le Bourlot, J., & Roueff, E. 2006, ApJS, 164, 506 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Lis, D. C., & Goldsmith, P. F. 1991, ApJ, 369, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Lis, D. C., Phillips, T. G., Goldsmith, P. F., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L26 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Margulès, L., Herbst, E., Ahrens, V., et al. 2002, J. Mol. Spectrosc., 211, 211 [Google Scholar]
- Menten, K., Wyrowski, F., Belloche, A., et al. 2010, A&A, accepted [Google Scholar]
- Müller, H. S. P., Thorwirth, S., Roth, D. A., & Winnewisser, G. 2001, A&A, 370, L49 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Müller, H. S. P., Schlöder, F., Stutzki, J., & Winnewisser, G. 2005, J. Molec. Struct., 742, 215 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Mürtz, P., Zink, L. R., Evenson, K. M., & Brown, J. M. 1998, J. Chem. Phys., 109, 9744 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Neufeld, D. A., Goicoechea, J. R., Sonnentrucker, P., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L10 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Nummelin, A., Bergman, P., Hjalmarson, A., et al. 1998, ApJS, 117, 427 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Ossenkopf, V., Müller, H. S. P., Lis, D. C., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L111 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Ott, S. 2010, in Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XIX, ed. Y. Mizumoto, K.-I. Morita, & M. Ohishi, ASP Conf. Ser., in press [Google Scholar]
- Paladini, R., Montier, L., Giard, M., et al. 2007, A&A, 465, 839 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Pickett, H. M., Poynter, R. L., Cohen, E. A., et al. 1998, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf., 60, 883 [Google Scholar]
- Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J. S., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2000, ApJ, 545, L121 [Google Scholar]
- Pilbratt, G. L., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Qin, S.-L., Schilke, P., Comito, C., et al. 2010, A&A, 521, L14 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Rachford, B. L., Snow, T. P., Destree, J. D., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Roelfsema, P. R., Helmich, F. P., Teyssier, D., et al. 2010, A&A, submitted [Google Scholar]
- Savage, B. D., Bohlin, R. C., Drake, J. F., & Budich, W. 1977, ApJ, 216, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Stäuber, P., & Bruderer, S. 2009, A&A, 505, 195 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
- Strahan, S. E., Mueller, R. P., & Saykally, R. J. 1986, J. Chem. Phys., 85, 1252 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Tieftrunk, A., Pineau des Forêts, G., Schilke, P., & Walmsley, C. M. 1994, A&A, 289, 579 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
- Vallée, J. P. 2008, AJ, 135, 1301 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Weis, B., Carter, S., Rosmus, P., Werner, H., & Knowles, P. J. 1989, J. Chem. Phys., 91, 2818 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Wright, E. L., Mather, J. C., Bennett, C. L., et al. 1991, ApJ, 381, 200 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, R., Li, S., Hou, S., Huang, G., & Duan, C. 2008, Chin. Phys. B, 17, 4485 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Online Material
Appendix A: The spectroscopy of H2O+
The rotational spectrum of oxidaniumyl was measured by laser magnetic
resonance (LMR) (Mürtz et al.
1998; Strahan et al.
1986); further infrared and electronic spectral measurements
have been summarized in Zheng
et al. (2008). Observations of the
NKaKc
= 111-000,
J
= 1.5-0.5 fine structure component near 1115 GHz with Herschel/HIFI
(Ossenkopf
et al. 2010) as well as subsequent observations
raised the issue which of the two sets of spectroscopic parameters from
LMR measurements provide more reliable frequency predictions. Latest
observations as well as reinterpretations of older ones favor the
parameters from Mürtz
et al. (1998) even though there seem to be small
discrepancies of order of 5 MHz
or 1.35 km s-1 between various
observations for the specific transition mentioned above. Observations
carried out toward Sgr B2(M) or Orion KL for the
HEXOS program are probably less suited to derive rest frequencies than
certain other observations. Therefore, a preliminary catalog entry has
been constructed for the CDMS catalog (Müller et al. 2005,2001);
the final entry is intended to be a common CDMS and JPL (Pickett et al.
1998) catalog entry.
All infrared data and all ground state combination differences (GSCDs) derived from electronic spectra as summarized in Zheng et al. (2008) were used in the fit as long as they were deemed reliable. These data are uncertain to between 0.005 and 0.030 cm-1 or between 150 and 900 MHz. Mürtz et al. (1998) provided for their measured data extrapolated zero-field frequencies as well as residuals between observed and calculated frequencies along with uncertainties. From these data weighted averages of the hypothetical experimental zero-field frequencies and of their uncertainties were derived; these uncertainties were of order of 2 MHz with a considerable scatter. Strahan et al. (1986) do not give sufficient data for this purpose. However, Mürtz et al. (1998) published calculated frequencies for the 111-000 transition. Because of the importance of this transition for the astronomical observation as well as for the fit, these calculated frequencies were also used in the fit with presumable uncertainties corresponding to 2 MHz. The quantum numbers, calculated frequencies, and uncertainties for the two observed rotational transitions are given in Table A.1. Even though the LMR data fit well within their uncertainties, the calculated frequencies should be viewed with some caution because it is not clear how reliable the zero-field extrapolation is. Moreover, the large centrifugal distortion effects affecting the spectra of this ion require additional caution with respect to any extrapolation. It is worthwhile mentioning that the 111-000 transition frequencies in that table are essentially identical to the ones given in Mürtz et al. (1998). The situation is different for the 110 - 101 transition. The J = 1.5-1.5 fine structure splitting derived from term values given in Table V of Mürtz et al. (1998) differs from the value in Table A.1 by less than 4 MHz whereas the remaining fine structure intervals differ by up to 80 MHz. On the other hand, calculations directly from the Mürtz et al. (1998) parameters differ from values in Table A.1 by less than 10 MHz.
Table A.1:
Quantum numbers of rotational transitions of H2O+
described in the present work, calculated frequencies (MHz)
with uncertainties in parenthesesa;
lower state energies (K)
and Einstein A-values (10-3 s-1)
![]() |
Figure A.1: Detail of the energy level diagram of H2O+. Hyperfine splitting has been omitted for the ortho-levels. Rotational level assignments NKaKc are given below the levels, fine structure level assignments J to the side. Magenta arrows mark transitions observed in the course of the present investigation. All other transitions shown can be observed with HIFI. The thickness of the arrows indicates the relative strengths of the transitions and the numbers the approximate frequencies. Frequencies of the weaker components are given in parentheses. The only transitions connecting to levels with N = 1 which are not shown are 221-110 and 220-111 near 2.85 and 3.0 THz which are not observable with HIFI but with PACS. |
Open with DEXTER |



The mixing of ortho and para states can be mediated by terms such the off-diagonal electron spin-hydrogen nuclear spin coupling term Tab or the off0diagonal hydrogen nuclear spin coupling term Cab + Cba. The radical NH2 and PH2 are isoelectronic and isovalent to H2O+. Model calculations have shown the largest perturbations to occur between the 101 and 111 levels, but they are with less than 5 (Gendriesch et al. 2001) and less than 3 kHz (Margulès et al. 2002), respectively, rather small, maybe even negligible. Model calculations suggest that perturbations of the two rotational transitions described in the present study are less than 3 kHz. Slightly larger perturbations may occur at higher quantum numbers.
Table A.2: Partition functions for para- and ortho-H2O+, assuming LTE.
Footnotes
- ... Sagittarius B2(M)
- Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA.
- ...
- Appendix (pages 6, 7) is only available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
- ...
CLASS
- Continuum and Line Analysis Single-dish Software, distributed with the GILDAS software, see http://www.iram.fr/IRAMFR/GILDAS.
- ... XCLASS
- We made use of the myXCLASS program (https://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/projects/schilke/XCLASS), which accesses the CDMS (Müller et al. 2005,2001 http://www.cdms.de) and JPL Pickett et al. 1998 http://spec.jpl.nasa.gov) molecular data bases.
- ... MAGIX
- https://www.astro.uni-koeln.de/projects/schilke/MAGIX
All Tables
Table A.1:
Quantum numbers of rotational transitions of H2O+
described in the present work, calculated frequencies (MHz)
with uncertainties in parenthesesa;
lower state energies (K)
and Einstein A-values (10-3 s-1)
Table A.2: Partition functions for para- and ortho-H2O+, assuming LTE.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1: ortho-H2O+, as already shown in Ossenkopf et al. (2010). The data are shown in black, the fit in red, in blue the hfs pattern is depicted, and in green the predicted contamination by other molecules. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2: para-H2O+ lines in Sgr B2, with the predicted contamination by other molecules in green, as in Fig. 1. The position of the D2O ground state line is indicated. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
Column density distribution of ortho-H2O+
and para-H2O+
( upper panel), o/p ratio ( central panel)
and |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure A.1: Detail of the energy level diagram of H2O+. Hyperfine splitting has been omitted for the ortho-levels. Rotational level assignments NKaKc are given below the levels, fine structure level assignments J to the side. Magenta arrows mark transitions observed in the course of the present investigation. All other transitions shown can be observed with HIFI. The thickness of the arrows indicates the relative strengths of the transitions and the numbers the approximate frequencies. Frequencies of the weaker components are given in parentheses. The only transitions connecting to levels with N = 1 which are not shown are 221-110 and 220-111 near 2.85 and 3.0 THz which are not observable with HIFI but with PACS. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.