EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 518 (July-August 2010) A&A, 518 (2010) L116 Full HTML
Issue
A&A
Volume 518, July-August 2010
Herschel: the first science highlights
Article Number L116
Number of page(s) 5
Section Letters
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014654
Published online 16 July 2010
A&A 518, L116 (2010)

Herschel: the first science highlights

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

SPIRE spectroscopy of the prototypical Orion Bar photodissociation region[*]

E. Habart1 - E. Dartois1 - A. Abergel1 - J.-P. Baluteau2 - D. Naylor13 - E. Polehampton13,14 - C. Joblin5,6 - P. Ade3 - L. D. Anderson2 - P. André4 - H. Arab1 - J.-P. Bernard6 - K. Blagrave11 - S. Bontemps18 - F. Boulanger1 - M. Cohen7 - M. Compiegne11 - P. Cox8 - G. Davis9 - R. Emery14 - T. Fulton17 - C. Gry2 - M. Huang10 - S. C. Jones13 - J. Kirk3 - G. Lagache1 - T. Lim14 - S. Madden4 - G. Makiwa13 - P. Martin11 - M.-A. Miville-Deschênes1 - S. Molinari12 - H. Moseley16 - F. Motte4 - K. Okumura4 - D. Pinheiro Gonçalves11 - J. Rodon2 - D. Russeil2 - P. Saraceno12 - S. Sidher14 - L. Spencer13 - B. Swinyard14 - D. Ward-Thompson3 - G. J. White14,15 - A. Zavagno2

1 - Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, UMR 8617, CNRS/Université Paris-Sud 11, 91405 Orsay, France
2 - Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille (UMR 6110 CNRS & Université de Provence), 38 rue F. Joliot-Curie, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France
3 - Department of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
4 - CEA, Laboratoire AIM, Irfu/SAp, Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
5 - CESR, Université de Toulouse, UPS, CESR, 9 Av. du colonel Roche, 31028 Toulouse Cedex 4, France
6 - CNRS, UMR5187, 31028 Toulouse, France
7 - University of California, Radio Astronomy Laboratory, Berkeley, 601 Campbell Hall, US Berkeley CA 94720-3411, USA
8 - Institut de Radioastronomie Millimétrique (IRAM), 300 rue de la Piscine, 38406 Saint-Martin-d'Hères, France
9 - Joint Astronomy Centre, University Park, Hilo, USA
10 - National Astronomical Observatories, PR China
11 - Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3H8, Canada
12 - Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario, INAF, via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy
13 - Institute for Space Imaging Science, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada
14 - The Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot OX11 0QX, UK
15 - Department of Physics & Astronomy, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK7 6AA, UK
16 - NASA - Goddard SFC, USA
17 - Blue Sky Spectrosocpy Inc, Lethbridge, Canada
18 - CNRS/INSU, Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, UMR 5804, BP 89, 33271 Floirac Cedex, France

Received 31 March 2010 / Accepted 14 May 2010

Abstract
Aims. We present observations of the Orion Bar photodissociation region (PDR) obtained with the SPIRE instrument on-board Herschel.
Methods. We obtained SPIRE Fourier-transform spectrometer (FTS) sparse sampled maps of the Orion bar.
Results. The FTS wavelength coverage and sensitivity allow us to detect a wealth of rotational lines of CO (and its isotopologues), fine structure lines of C and N+, and emission lines from radicals and molecules such as CH+, CH, H2O or H2S. For species detected from the ground, our estimates of the column densities agree with previously published values. The comparison between 12CO and 13CO maps shows particularly the effects of optical depth and excitation in the molecular cloud. The distribution of the 12CO and 13CO lines with upper energy levels indicates the presence of warm ($\sim $100-150 K) CO. This warm CO component is a significant fraction of the total molecular gas, confirming previous ground based studies.

Key words: infrared: ISM - ISM: lines and bands - ISM: molecules - evolution - submillimeter: ISM - ISM: general

1 Introduction

The Orion Bar located between the Orion molecular cloud and the HII region surrounding the Trapezium stars is one of the best-studied photodissociation regions (PDRs) in the Galaxy. Much of the emission from massive star-forming regions will originate from these interfaces, which are responsible for reprocessing the energy output from stars and reemitting this energy at infrared-millimetre wavelengths including a rich mixture of gas lines (i.e., Hollenbach & Tielens 1999). Visible-ultraviolet stellar radiation governs the chemical and thermal state of the gas in these regions. The impinging radiation field on the Bar is $\chi = (0.5{-}2.5) \times 10^4 \chi _0$ (Marconi et al. 1998; Tielens & Hollenbach 1985), where $\chi _0$ is the Solar neighbourhood far-UV interstellar radiation field as given by Draine (1978). The UV field varies as a function of depth within the cloud, providing a unique opportunity to study how the dust populations and the molecular content evolve with the excitation and physical conditions. This is important for the evolution of the cloud and its associated star formation.

The ESA Herschel Space Observatory (Pilbratt et al. 2010) offers a unique opportunity to observe continuously between $\sim $55 and 672 $\mu $m. This range includes most of the PDR gas lines and dust components emission and will provide a fundamental step in our understanding of the evolution of the interstellar matter. Here, we present a first analysis of Fourier-transform spectrometer (FTS) observations of the Orion Bar obtained with the SPIRE instrument (Griffin et al. 2010) on-board Herschel.

2 Observations with the FTS

\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{14654fg1.eps}\hspace*{2.5m... ...cludegraphics[angle=90,width=11cm,clip]{14654fg2.ps} \vspace*{-4mm} \end{figure} Figure 1:

Left: map of the Orion Bar obtained with Spitzer (IRAC at 3.8 $\mu $m) with the SPIRE SLW (large circle) and SSW (small circle) array positions marked. The PDR is wrapped around the HII region created by the Trapezium stars (right corner) and changes from a face-on to an edge-on geometry where the emission peaks. Right: averaged apodized FTS spectra over the three arrays on the Bar (yellow large and small circles). The blue and red dotted lines delinate the 12CO and 13CO lines position respectively.

Open with DEXTER

The SPIRE FTS simultaneously measures the source spectrum across two wavebands: spectrometer long wavelength (SLW), covering 14.9-33.0 cm-1 (303-671 $\mu $m) and spectrometer short wavelength (SSW) covering 32.0-51.5 cm-1 (194-313 $\mu $m). Each band is imaged with a hexagonal bolometer array with pixel spacing of approximately twice the beam-width. The FWHM beam-widths of the SLW and SSW arrays vary between 29-42'' and 17-21'' respectively. The source spectrum, including the continuum, is obtained by taking the inverse transform of the observed interferogram. For more details on the FTS calibration and data reduction procedures, the reader is referred to the article by Swinyard et al. (2010).

Our observations are part of the ``Evolution of Interstellar dust'' key program of the SPIRE consortium (Abergel et al. 2010). The Orion Bar was observed with a single pointing in the high-resolution mode of the SPIRE FTS on 2009 September 13 (Herschel observation ID, 1342183819). Two scan repetitions were observed which gave an on-source integration time of 266.4 seconds. The pointing centre was at a right ascension and declination (J2000) of 05$^{\rm h}$35$^{\rm m}$22.83$^{\rm s}$ and -05$^\circ$24'57.67'' (see Fig. 1). The unapodized spectral resolution was 0.04 cm-1 (1.2 GHz). After apodization (using extended Norton-Beer function 1.5; Naylor & Tahic 2007) the FWHM of the resulting instrument line shape is 0.0724 cm-1 (2.17 GHz).

While unapodized FTS spectra provide the highest spectral resolution, the instrument line shape, which for an ideal FTS is the classical sinc function, is characterized by relatively large secondary oscillations with negative lobes. An iterative spectral-line fitting routine was developed to extract line parameters from unapodized FTS spectra (Jones et al. 2009). This algorithm fits a continuum (either a low order polynomial or a blackbody variant) and a series of lines with the Levenberg-Marquardt least-squares method. The fitting procedure weights the spectral intensity at a given frequency of an averaged spectrum by the statistical uncertainty at that frequency. The fitting routine returns the line centres, intensities, and line widths, together with their associated errors.

3 Results

3.1 Detected gas lines

The averaged apodized FTS spectra over the three SLW/SSW detectors aligned on the Bar and corrected for obliquity effects[*] are presented in Figs. 1 and 2. The FTS wavelength coverage allows us to detect a wealth of rotational lines of CO (and its isotopologues), fine structure lines of C and N+, and emission lines from several radicals and molecules. The expected line positions for detected species are marked in Figs. 1 and 2. The 12CO transitions, which appear as the bright narrow lines, are here seen for the first time together from J = 4-3 to 13-12 in a single spectrum. The 13CO lines are clearly detected from J = 5-4 to 13-12. Most of the C18O lines are visible but blended with the 13CO lines; some C17O lines are detected. One emission line at about 359 $\mu $m lies at the position of the fundamental rotational transition of CH+ (Naylor et al. 2010). This detection can be related to the observation of the CH lambda doublet transitions at about 556.5 $\mu $m and 560.7 $\mu $m, although it is possibly blended with an HCO+ $J=6 \rightarrow 5$ line. The ortho-H2O 1 $_{10} \rightarrow 1_{01}$ line at $\sim $538 and para-H2 2 $_{11} \rightarrow 2_{02}$ at 398 $\mu $m are clearly detected. The $\sim $269 $\mu $m para-H2O 1 $_{11} \rightarrow 0_{00}$ line was also detected, but the signal-to-noise ratio is low. Some other H2O lines may be blended. The H2S 2 $_{12} \rightarrow 1_{01}$ line at $\sim $407 $\mu $m is detected, while other fainter H2S lines at shorter wavelengths are only marginally detected. Some features related to the emission of HCO+, HCN, CN and C2H are observed as expected (e.g., van Der Wiel et al. 2009; Hogerheijde et al. 1995; Young Owl et al. 2000; Teyssier et al. 2004; Simon et al. 1997), but to help distinguish the spectral confusion for fainter lines or unresolved k-ladder transitions from species such as methanol, the actual signal-to-noise ratio will be improved as the SPIRE FTS response is better understood and, scheduled deeper observations will also help.

\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.5cm,clip]{14654fg3.ps}\par\... ...fg4.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.5cm,clip]{14654fg5.ps} \end{figure} Figure 2:

Zoom of the averaged apodized FTS spectra continuum substracted. Dotted lines show the positions where specific gas lines are expected, excluding the 12CO and 13CO lines shown in Fig. 1. The corresponding lines and wavelengths are marked on the right. Lines between brackets are only possibly detected at this level of analysis.

Open with DEXTER

3.2 Mapping gas lines

Figure 3 presents sparse sampled[*] maps of nearly the complete CO and 13CO band measured. Off-axis calibrations are not guaranteed because both detector arrays have not yet been fully characterised. The comparison between these maps shows the effects of optical depth and excitation in the molecular cloud particularly well. The emission of the less abundant 13CO isotopologue probes the denser shielded regions, while the 12CO optically thick emission likely comes from the less dense surface layers (Lis et al. 1998). The highest rotational lines, which are very sensitive to both gas densities and temperatures, show strong and peaked emission on the Bar, while they are not visible in the off Bar positions. Emission lines of species such as C, N+ or CH+ show spatially extended emission.

\begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=2.2cm,clip]{14654fg6.ps}\includegraphics[w... ...}\\ \includegraphics[width=2.2cm,clip]{14654fg22.ps}\vspace*{-3mm} \end{figure} Figure 3:

Sparse sampled maps in the 12CO and 13CO lines measured, except for the 13CO J=12-11 at $\sim $227 and J=13-12 at 209 $\mu $m lines. Scales are in 105 erg s-1 cm-2 sr-1. Contour levels are drawn at 10, 20,..., 90% of the maximum intensity.

Open with DEXTER

3.3 Molecular column densities

We used the observed line intensities and the CASSIS software[*] to estimate the beam-averaged molecular column densities. We list in Table 1 column densities estimated for a volume density of 105 cm-3 as applicable to the extended molecular gas in the Bar (Hogerheijde et al. 1995) and in the high-density limit, because some of the line emission may originate from dense clumps[*]. We adopt the mean molecular gas temperature towards the Bar of $\sim $85 K for kinetic temperatures as determined from the ground Hogerheijde et al. (1995), and the more extreme 50 to 150 K range values that probe different zones of the PDR (Lis & Schilke 2003; Batrla & Wilson 2003). The line widths were taken equal to 3 km s-1, following previous higher resolution observations (Johnstone et al. 2003; Hogerheijde et al. 1995).

Our values for the column densities agree for species detected from the ground with previously published values to within a factor of 2-3: Hogerheijde et al. (1995) for C18O and HCO+; Johnstone et al. (2003) for C17O; and Leurini et al. (2006) for H2S. Beam dilution effects could introduce a significant factor. To convert the observed C18O J=8-7 and C17O J=8-7 line intensities to a total H2 column density, we assume isotopic ratios 16O/ $^{18}{\rm O} \sim 560$, 16O/ $^{17}{\rm O} \sim 1800$ (Wilson & Rood 1994) and a relative CO abundance to H2 of $1.1 \times 10^{-4}$ as applicable for the Orion Bar PDR (Johnstone et al. 2003). We find N(H $_2 ) \sim 9 \times 10^{22}$ cm-2 assuming $T \sim 85$ K, which implies the following molecular abundances on the Bar: x(ortho-H2O) $\le$ 3.3 $^{+3.3}_{-1.7} \times 10^{-7}$; x(para-H2O) $\le$ 5 $^{+11.7}_{-3.1} \times 10^{-7}$; x(HCO+) $\le$ 3.9 $^{+8.3}_{-2.1} \times 10^{-9}$; x(CH $^+)=7.2^{+2.6}_{-0.7} \times 10^{-11}$; x(H2S) = 3.4 $^{+2.3}_{-1} \times 10^{-10}$.

H2O is extremely sensitive to the local physical conditions in molecular clouds: close to the surface, molecules are photodissociated, while deeper into the cloud molecules freeze onto grain surfaces (i.e., Hollenbach et al. 2009). Desorption of ices (Seperuelo Duarte et al. 2009; Westley et al. 1995) could supply gas-phase species. The high abundances of sulphur species remain an interesting puzzle for interstellar chemistry (i.e., Goicoechea et al. 2006). The observed abundance of species such as H2S are difficult to interpret in models. H2S results from a mixed chemistry involving gas-phase reactions and grain-related processes.

Table 1:   Beam-averaged molecular column densities.

3.4 CO excitation

Figure 4 shows the distribution of the 12CO and 13CO line intensities as a function of the upper energy levels. The observed intensities of the optically thick 12CO lines provide an estimate of the temperature of about $\sim $85 K across the bar, consistent with many observed transitions from the ground. However, the 12CO J=12-11 and J=13-12 transitions do not agree with that temperature (intensities higher by a factor of 2 and 4 respectively), which is consistent with ground data of the J=14-13 transition dominated by warmer CO (Tauber et al. 1994; Stacey et al. 1993). Similarly, the distribution of the 13CO lines cannot be described by a single temperature. A dense and warm ($\sim $100-150 K) component with a significant column density (about 15% of the total column) is required to fit the observed line intensities with $J_u\ge9$. We find that the 13CO lines become optically thin for $J_u\ge9$, while all the 12CO lines are optically thick.

We computed PDR models for the Bar with an updated version of the Meudon PDR code described in Le Petit et al. (2006) solving in an iterative way the chemical and thermal balances at each point of the cloud. Adopting $\chi=10^4~\chi _0$, a constant gas density of 105 cm-3 or constant thermal gas pressure of $8 \times 10^7$ K cm-3 (Allers et al. 2005), the models predict a gas temperature of about $\sim $50-80 K for the CO emitting gas. Consequently, it cannot explain the observed warm CO. One explanation is that the warm CO originates from dense clumps at the PDR surface (Tauber et al. 1994). An alternative solution are additional heating mechanisms for the interior, like shocks (or turbulence) or cosmic ray heating (Pellegrini et al. 2009). Out-of-equilibrium effects such as advection of molecular gas from the shielded cloud interior to the warm surface could also enhance the column densities of warm CO. Progress is expected from the spectroscopy of additional cooling lines, to be obtained from Herschel PACS and HIFI instruments. In particular, observations of gas cooling lines at high spectral resolution with HIFI will provide missing information about the gas velocity within the PDR and allow us to assign some lines that could be merged in the lower resolution SPIRE spectra.

\begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=0,height=5cm]{14654fg23.ps} \end{figure} Figure 4:

Distribution of the 12CO (black) and 13CO (red) line intensities as a function of the upper energy levels. The squares show the FTS data complemented by ground-based measurements shown by triangles (van Der Wiel et al. 2009; Stacey et al. 1993; Tauber et al. 1994; Hogerheijde et al. 1995; White & Sandell 1995). Error bars are small compared to the symbol size. The arrows indicate upper limits. The empty circles show the RADEX calculation for T = 85 K, n=105 cm-3, N(12CO) = 1019 cm-2 and N( $^{13}{\rm CO})=1.3\times 10^{17}$ cm-2. The full circles show the LTE calculation for T=120 K and N(13CO) =  $2\times~10^{16}$ cm-2.

Open with DEXTER

4 Conclusions

We have analysed the first spectral survey taken in the Orion Bar by the FTS of SPIRE. A wealth of rotational lines of CO (and its isotopologues), fine structure lines of C and N+, and emission lines from radicals and molecules were found. We present the first sparse sampled maps, which illustrate FTS line mapping capabilities. We discussed the CO excitation and emphasized the need for complementary spectroscopic data.

Acknowledgements
We are grateful to J. R. Goicoechea and M. Gerin for relevant comments and suggestions. SPIRE has been developed by a consortium of institutes led by Cardiff Univ. (UK) and including Univ. Lethbridge (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, LAM (France); IFSI, Univ. Padua (Italy); IAC (Spain); Stockholm Observatory (Sweden); Imperial College London, RAL, UCL-MSSL, UKATC, Univ. Sussex (UK); Caltech, JPL, NHSC, Univ. Colorado (USA). This development has been supported by national funding agencies: CSA (Canada); NAOC (China); CEA, CNES, CNRS (France); ASI (Italy); MCINN (Spain); SNSB (Sweden); STFC (UK); and NASA (USA).

References

  1. Abergel, A., Arab, H., Compiègne, M., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L96 Allers, K. N., Jaffe, D. T., Lacy, J. H., Draine, B. T., & Richter, M. J. 2005, ApJ, 630, 368 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Batrla, W., & Wilson, T. L. 2003, A&A, 408, 231 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  3. Draine, B. T. 1978, ApJS, 36, 595 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goicoechea, J. R., Pety, J., Gerin, M., et al. 2006, A&A, 456, 565 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  5. Griffin, M. J., Abergel, A., Abreu, A, et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L3 [Google Scholar]
  6. Hogerheijde, M. R., Jansen, D. J., & Van Dishoeck, E. F. 1995, A&A, 294, 792 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hollenbach, D. J., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1999, Rev. Modern Phys., 71, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hollenbach, D., Kaufman, M. J., Bergin, E. A., & Melnick, G. J. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1497 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnstone, D., Boonman, A. M. S., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2003, A&A, 412, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones, S., Naylor, D., Gom, B., & Spencer, L. 2009, Proc. 30th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing [Google Scholar]
  11. Le Petit, F., Nehmé, C., Le Bourlot, J., & Roueff, E. 2006, ApJS, 164, 506 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  12. Leurini, S., Rolffs, R., Thorwirth, S., et al. 2006, A&A, 454, L47 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lis, D. C., & Schilke, P. 2003, ApJ, 597, L145 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lis, D. C., Serabyn, E., Keene, J., et al. 1998, ApJ, 509, 299 [Google Scholar]
  15. Marconi, A., Testi, L., Natta, A., & Walmsley, C. M. 1998, A&A, 330, 696 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  16. Naylor, D., & Tahic, M. 2007, J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 24, 3644 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Naylor, D., Dartois, E., Habart, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pellegrini, E. W., Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Shaw, G., & Heathcote, S. 2009, ApJ, 693, 285 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pety, J., Teyssier, D., Fossé, D., et al. 2005, A&A, 435, 885 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pilbratt, G. J., Riedinger, J. R., Passvogel, T., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L1 [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  21. Seperuelo Duarte, E., Boduch, P., Rothard, H., et al. 2009, A&A, 502, 599 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  22. Simon, R., Stutzki, J., Sternberg, A., & Winnewisser, G. 1997, A&A, 327, L9 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  23. Stacey, G. J., Jaffe, D. T., Geis, N., et al. 1993, ApJ, 404, 219 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Swinyard, B. M., Ade, P., Baluteau, J.-P., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L4 [Google Scholar]
  25. Tauber, J. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., Meixner, M., & Foldsmith, P. F. 1994, ApJ, 422, 136 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Teyssier, D., Fossé, D., Gerin, M., et al. 2004, A&A, 417, 135 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  27. Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Hollenbach, D. 1985, ApJ, 291, 722 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. van Der Tak, F. F. S., Black, J. H., Schoeier, F. L., Jansen, D. J., & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2007, A&A, 468, 627 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  29. van Der Wiel, M. H. D., van Der Tak, F. F. S., Ossenkopf, V., et al. 2009, A&A, 498, 161 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  30. Westley, M. S., Baragiola, R. A., Johnson, R. E., & Baratta, G. A. 1995, Nature, 373, 405 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. White, G. J., & Sandell, G. 1995, A&A, 299, 179 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson, T. L., & Rood, R. 1994, ARA&A, 32, 191 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Young Owl, R. C., Meixner, M. M., Wolfire, M., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Tauber, J. 2000, ApJ, 540, 886 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Footnotes

... region[*]
Herschel is an ESA space observatory with science instruments provided by European-led Principal Investigator consortia and with important participation from NASA.
... effects[*]
The obliquity effect is important at the highest frequencies, where a significant error in the line position is introduced.
... sampled[*]
The present FTS science demonstration phase observations sparsely samples the field of view and do not allow us to present fully sampled maps.
... software[*]
Based on analysis carried out with the CASSIS software and CDMS, JPL spectroscopic databases and RADEX (van Der Tak et al. 2007) molecular databases. CASSIS has been developed by CESR-UPS/CNRS (http://cassis.cesr.fr).
... clumps[*]
The clumpiness of the PDR inferred by Hogerheijde et al. (1995) was confirmed by interferometric data of Young Owl et al. (2000); Lis & Schilke (2003). Clump densities up to 107 cm-3 were derived by Lis & Schilke (2003), while the density of the interclump medium should fall between a few 104 cm-3 (Young Owl et al. 2000) and $2 \times 10^5$ cm-3 (Simon et al. 1997).
Copyright ESO 2010

All Tables

Table 1:   Beam-averaged molecular column densities.

All Figures

  \begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[width=5.5cm,clip]{14654fg1.eps}\hspace*{2.5m... ...cludegraphics[angle=90,width=11cm,clip]{14654fg2.ps} \vspace*{-4mm} \end{figure} Figure 1:

Left: map of the Orion Bar obtained with Spitzer (IRAC at 3.8 $\mu $m) with the SPIRE SLW (large circle) and SSW (small circle) array positions marked. The PDR is wrapped around the HII region created by the Trapezium stars (right corner) and changes from a face-on to an edge-on geometry where the emission peaks. Right: averaged apodized FTS spectra over the three arrays on the Bar (yellow large and small circles). The blue and red dotted lines delinate the 12CO and 13CO lines position respectively.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.5cm,clip]{14654fg3.ps}\par\... ...fg4.ps}\par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=8.5cm,clip]{14654fg5.ps} \end{figure} Figure 2:

Zoom of the averaged apodized FTS spectra continuum substracted. Dotted lines show the positions where specific gas lines are expected, excluding the 12CO and 13CO lines shown in Fig. 1. The corresponding lines and wavelengths are marked on the right. Lines between brackets are only possibly detected at this level of analysis.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=2.2cm,clip]{14654fg6.ps}\includegraphics[w... ...}\\ \includegraphics[width=2.2cm,clip]{14654fg22.ps}\vspace*{-3mm} \end{figure} Figure 3:

Sparse sampled maps in the 12CO and 13CO lines measured, except for the 13CO J=12-11 at $\sim $227 and J=13-12 at 209 $\mu $m lines. Scales are in 105 erg s-1 cm-2 sr-1. Contour levels are drawn at 10, 20,..., 90% of the maximum intensity.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=0,height=5cm]{14654fg23.ps} \end{figure} Figure 4:

Distribution of the 12CO (black) and 13CO (red) line intensities as a function of the upper energy levels. The squares show the FTS data complemented by ground-based measurements shown by triangles (van Der Wiel et al. 2009; Stacey et al. 1993; Tauber et al. 1994; Hogerheijde et al. 1995; White & Sandell 1995). Error bars are small compared to the symbol size. The arrows indicate upper limits. The empty circles show the RADEX calculation for T = 85 K, n=105 cm-3, N(12CO) = 1019 cm-2 and N( $^{13}{\rm CO})=1.3\times 10^{17}$ cm-2. The full circles show the LTE calculation for T=120 K and N(13CO) =  $2\times~10^{16}$ cm-2.

Open with DEXTER
In the text

Copyright ESO 2010

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.