The long-wavelength emission of interstellar PAHs: characterizing the spinning dust contribution

N. Ysard; L. Verstraete

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912708

Home

All issues

Volume 509 (January 2010)

A&A, 509 (2010) A12

Full HTML

Free Access

Issue		A&A Volume 509, January 2010


Article Number		A12
Number of page(s)		13
Section		Interstellar and circumstellar matter
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912708
Published online		12 January 2010

A&A 509, A12 (2010)

The long-wavelength emission of interstellar PAHs: characterizing the spinning dust contribution

N. Ysard - L. Verstraete

Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale, UMR 8617, Université Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France

Received 17 June 2009 / Accepted 24 September 2009

Abstract
Context. The emission of cold dust grains at long wavelengths will soon be observed by the Planck and Herschel satellites and will provide new constraints on the nature of interstellar dust. In particular, the microwave galactic anomalous foreground detected between 10 to 90 GHz, proposed as coming from small spinning grains (PAHs), should help to define these species better. Moreover, understanding the fluctuations of the anomalous foreground quantitatively over the sky is crucial for CMB studies.
Aims. We focus on the long-wavelength emission of interstellar PAHs in their vibrational and rotational transitions. We present here the first model that coherently describes the PAH emission from the near-IR to microwave range.
Methods. We take quantum effects into account to describe the rotation of PAHs and compare our results to current models of spinning dust to assess the validity of the classical treatment used. Between absorptions of stellar photons, we followed the rovibrational radiative cascade of PAHs. We used the exact-statistical method of Draine & Li to derive the distribution of PAH internal energy and followed a quantum approach for the rotational excitation induced by vibrational (IR) transitions. We also examined the influence of the vibrational relaxation scheme and of the low-energy cross-section on the PAH emission. We study the emissivity of spinning PAHs in a variety of physical conditions (radiation field intensity and gas density), search for specific signatures in this emission that can be looked for observationally, and discuss how the anomalous foreground may constrain the PAH size distribution.
Results. Simultaneously predicting the vibrational and rotational emission of PAHs, our model can explain the observed emission of the Perseus molecular cloud from the IR to the microwave range with plausible PAH properties. We show that for $\lambda \geq 3$ mm the PAH vibrational emission no longer scales with the radiation field intensity (G₀), unlike the mid-IR part of the spectrum (which scales with G₀). This emission represents less than 10% of the total dust emission at 100 GHz. Similarly, we find the broadband emissivity of spinning PAHs per carbon atom to be rather constant for $G_0\leq 100$ and for proton densities $n_{\rm H}<100$ cm^-3. In the diffuse ISM, photon exchange and gas-grain interactions play comparable roles in exciting the rotation of PAHs, and the emissivity of spinning PAHs is dominated by the contribution of small species (bearing less than 100 C atoms). We show that the classical description of rotation used in previous works is a good approximation and that unknowns in the vibrational relaxation scheme and low-energy cross-section affect the PAH rotational emissivity around 30 GHz by less than 15%.
Conclusions. The contrasted behaviour of the PAH vibrational and rotational emissivities with G₀ provides a clear prediction that can be tested against observations of anomalous and dust mid-IR emissions: this is the subject of a companion paper. Comparison of these emissions complemented with radio observations (21 cm or continuum) will provide constraints on the fraction of small species and the electric dipole moment of interstellar PAHs.

Key words: ISM: general - dust, extinction - radiation mechanisms: general

1 Introduction

The mid-IR spectrum of the interstellar medium (ISM) shows prominent bands from 3 to 17 $\mu$ m, which account for one third of the energy emitted by interstellar dust. Such bands are emitted by very small (subnanometric-sized) dust particles during internal energy fluctuations triggered by the absorption of a stellar photon (Sellgren 1984). The positions of these bands suggest there are aromatic, hydrogenated cycles in these grains. Léger & Puget (1984) and Allamandola et al. (1985) proposed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as the carriers of these bands. Despite two decades of experimental and theoretical efforts, the match (band positions and intensities) between data only available on small species and observations still remains elusive, as illustrated recently by the work of Peeters et al. (2002) and Kim & Saykally (2002). Given their important role in the ISM (e.g., gas heating, Habart et al. 2001; UV extinction, Joblin et al. 1992), it is necessary to find other ways to constrain the properties of interstellar PAHs.

The Planck and Herschel data will soon trace the emission of cold interstellar grains in the interstellar medium. Due to their small size, PAHs are heated sporadically (every few months in the diffuse ISM) by absorption of stellar photons and have a high probability of being in low-energy states (Draine & Li 2001). Interstellar PAHs may thus contribute significantly to the emission at long wavelength ( $\lambda > 1$ mm). In this context, an unexpected emission excess called anomalous foreground, correlated to dust emission, has been discovered between 10 and 90 GHz (de Oliveira-Costa et al. 2002; Leitch et al. 1997). In this spectral range, several galactic emission components (synchrotron, free-free, and thermal dust) contribute with a comparable magnitude, and only recently has the anomalous foreground been separated in WMAP data (Miville-Deschênes et al. 2008). Spinning, small dust grains were first proposed by Draine & Lazarian (1998) (hereafter DL98) as a possible origin to this anomalous component. Since then, analysis of observations has suggested that the anomalous foreground is correlated to small grain emission (Casassus et al. 2006; Lagache 2003).

In this paper, we study the emission of PAHs with particular emphasis on the long-wavelength part of the spectrum. In this spectral range, the emission is dominated by species in low-energy states for which each photon exchange represents a large energy fluctuation. To derive the internal energy distribution of PAHs, we use here the exact statistical method described in Draine & Li (2001). We include low-frequency bands to the vibrational mode spectrum of interstellar PAHs and examine the influence of the internal vibrational redistribution hypothesis (see Sect. 3) often used to describe their vibrational relaxation. We describe the rotation of PAHs with a quantum approach where specific processes in the rovibrational relaxation are naturally included (molecular recoil after photon emission; rovibrational transitions that leave the angular momentum of the molecule unchanged or Q bands). We present in a variety of interstellar phases the rovibrational (IR) and broadband rotational (spinning) emission of PAHs in a consistent fashion. Our model results are compared to observations of the interstellar emission from the IR to the microwave range and show how the size distribution and electric dipole moments of interstellar PAHs may be constrained.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 describes the properties of PAHs adopted in this work. Section 3 discusses the internal energy distribution of PAHs and associated rovibrational emission. Sections 4 and 5 discuss the rotational excitation and emission of PAHs. In Sect. 6, we apply our model to the case of a molecular cloud in the Perseus arm. Finally, conclusions and observational perspectives are given in Sect. 7.

2 The properties of interstellar PAHs

In the ISM, the stablest PAHs are found to be compact species (Le Page et al. 2003; Léger et al. 1989). Small PAHs are planar, but above some poorly known size threshold (40 to 100 C atoms), interstellar formation routes may favour three-dimensional species (bowl- or cage-shaped) containing pentagonal cycles (see Moutou et al. 2000, and references therein). As we see later, small PAHs (containing less than 100 C atoms) dominate the rotational emission, so we assume that interstellar PAHs are planar with a hexagonal ( $D_{\rm 6h}$ ) symmetry. The PAH radius is thus $a({\rm\AA}) = 0.9\sqrt{N_{\rm C}}$ , where $N_{\rm C}$ is the number of carbon atoms in the grain (Omont 1986). The formula for such molecules is C $_{6{\rm p}^{2}}{\rm H}_{\rm 6p}$ , and their hydrogen-to-carbon ratio is $\frac{\rm H}{\rm C} = f_{\rm H} \sqrt{\frac{6}{N_{\rm C}}}$ , where $f_{\rm H}$ is the hydrogenation fraction of PAHs. In this work, we assume that PAHs are fully hydrogenated ( $f_{\rm H}=1$ ).

2.1 Absorption cross-section

The excitation, cooling, and emission of PAHs depend on their absorption cross-section (Sect. 3), which we describe now. We took the visible-UV cross-section from Verstraete & Léger (1992) and applied their size-dependent cut-off for electronic transitions in the visible-NIR range. The resulting cross-section compares well to the available data (Joblin et al. 1992). In Appendix A, we discuss the mid-IR bands considered in this work. Each vibrational mode is assumed to be harmonic, and the corresponding band profile has a Drude shape (Draine & Li 2001). The width $\Delta\nu$ is inferred from astronomical spectra, and the peak value $\sigma$ is chosen so that the integrated cross-section $\sigma\Delta\nu$ is equal to the value measured in the laboratory. By adopting the observed bandwidth, we empirically account for the complex molecular relaxation and band broadening (Mulas et al. 2006; Pech et al. 2002) in interstellar PAHs. We adopt here the band strengths given in Pech et al. (2002) that were inferred from laboratory data. Different definitions of the PAH IR cross-sections have been proposed by Rapacioli et al. (2005), Flagey et al. (2006), and Draine & Li (2007).

We used the database of Malloci et al. (2007) to define an average broadband cross-section of the far-IR vibrations of PAHs. At frequencies below 500 cm^-1, each species features many modes. However, for compact species, modes accumulate in three definite frequency ranges: modes with a frequency of less than 100 cm^-1, modes between 100 and 200 cm^-1, and modes between 200 and 500 cm^-1. We therefore model the far-IR cross-section of compact PAHs with 3 modes (Table 1). The frequency of each mode is the average of all modes falling within the given energy range, weighted by their corresponding integrated cross-sections. We find that the frequency of the lowest energy mode depends on the molecular size as $N_{\rm C}^{-1}$ (see Fig. 1). Conversely, for the two other modes, the average energy is instead independent of the size. The integrated cross-section for these 3 modes was estimated as follows. From the Mallocci database, we first derived the fraction of $\sigma\Delta\nu$ for each of the 3 modes. Then, we assumed that the total $\sigma\Delta\nu$ below 500 cm^-1 is given by the integral of the absorption cross-section of Schutte et al. (1993): $\sigma_{\rm FIR}=4.3\times 10^{-20}\;\lambda^{-1.24}$ cm² per C-atom. The integrated cross-sections of each of the 3 modes was finally obtained by multiplying the former value by the $\sigma\Delta\nu$ fractions inferred from the database.

The parameters of the far-IR bands adopted here are given in Table 1, and the full cross-section is displayed in Fig. 2. We show in Sect. 3 that this set of IR bands provides a good match to observed interstellar spectra. Finally, we note that the in-plane or out-of-plane character of each vibrational band is important because of the different associated weights in the rotational excitation (Sect. 4.1). This character is indicated in Tables A.1 for the mid-IR bands (Socrates 2001). In the case of the far-IR bands, this character is not as well known and we assume that 1/3 (2/3) of the oscillator strength come from out-of-plane (in-plane) transitions respectively (Table 1).

Table 1: Far-IR rovibrational bands of PAH cations adopted in this work, with the percentage of the total oscillator strength in each band.

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg1.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Frequencies of the first (lowest energy) vibrational mode versus $N_{\rm C}$ for PAH cations (black diamonds) and PAH neutrals (grey circles) from the Mallocci database (see text). The solid line is the relationship we adopt between the band position of cations and $N_{\rm C}$ , and the dashed line shows the case of neutrals. The dotted lines show extreme cases for this relationship.
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg2.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: Absorption cross-section of PAH cations per carbon atom (1 Mb = 10^-18 cm²). The solid, dotted, dashed, and dot-dashed lines show the cases for $N_{\rm C}$ = 24, 54, 96, and 216, respectively.
Open with DEXTER

2.2 The rigid rotor model

While describing the rotation of a molecule, the relevant operator is the total angular momentum ${\vec J}$ , which includes the electrons and nuclei contributions without the spin. We note that $D_{\rm A}$ , $D_{\rm B}$ , and $D_{\rm C}$ are the principal axis of inertia. We assumed that PAHs are oblate symmetric top molecules with the axis $D_{\rm C}$ perpendicular to the plane of the molecule and parallel to Oz. We called $I_{\rm C}$ the inertia moment with respect to $D_{\rm C}$ and $I_{\rm A}$ , $I_{\rm B}$ the inertia moments with respect to $D_{\rm A}$ and $D_{\rm B}$ , which were taken to be parallel to Ox and Oy. The rotational Hamiltonian is then

$\begin{displaymath}H = \frac{J_{x}^{2}}{2I_{\rm A}}+\frac{J_{y}^{2}}{2I_{\rm B}}+\frac{J_{z}^{2}}{2I_{\rm C}} \end{displaymath}$

(1)

where J_x, J_y, and J_z are the projections of ${\vec J}$ along the three inertia axis. Given the large number of carbon atoms in interstellar PAHs, we assume here that they are uniform disks with $I_{\rm A} = I_{\rm B} = \frac{Ma^{2}}{4} = \frac{I_{\rm C}}{2}$ (symmetric tops), where M is the molecular mass. With $D_{\rm C} \parallel Oz$ , we get

$\begin{displaymath}H = \frac{J^{2}}{2I_{\rm B}} + J_{z}^{2}\left(\frac{1}{2I_{\rm C}}-\frac{1}{2I_{\rm B}}\right) , \end{displaymath}$

(2)

and the rotational energy is

$\begin{displaymath} E_{\rm rot} = BJ(J+1)+(C-B)K^{2} \end{displaymath}$

(3)

where $B/hc = \frac{\hbar}{4\pi cI_{\rm B}} = 7 \ N_{\rm C}^{-2}$ cm^-1 (neglecting the contributions of H to the molecular mass) and C = B/2 are the rotational constants associated to $D_{\rm B}$ and $D_{\rm C}$ . The quantum number K is the absolute value of the J_z-eigenvalues. For a symmetric top molecule, the selection rules for rovibrational electric dipole transitions are $\Delta J = 0, \pm 1$ and $\Delta K = 0, \pm 1$ . By defining the dipole moment as ${\vec\mu} = {\vec\mu_{z}} + {\vec\mu_{\rm B}}$ , with ${\vec\mu_{z}}$ along $D_{\rm C}$ and ${\vec\mu_{\rm B}}$ in the molecular plane along $D_{\rm B}$ (Townes & Schawlow 1975), two kinds of transitions can be distinguished. First, the parallel transitions with $\Delta K = 0$ for which the change of dipole moment in the transition is parallel to the top axis ( $D_{\rm C}$ ) of the molecule. Second, the perpendicular transitions with $\Delta K = \pm 1$ , for which the change of dipole moment is perpendicular to $D_{\rm C}$ . Parallel transitions thus correspond to out-of-plane vibrations, whereas perpendicular transitions correspond to in-plane vibrations.

Since the available microwave data are broadband observations ( $\lambda/\Delta\lambda$ of the order of a few), we make several simplifying assumptions in the description of the rotational motion of PAHs. We thus assume that the rotational constant B is the same in all vibrational levels, and within the framework of a rigid rotor model, we neglect the centrifugal distortion terms in the energy equation that are usually small for large molecules (Lovas et al. 2005; Herzberg 1968ab).

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg3.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Symmetric top molecule: $D_{\rm A}$ , $D_{\rm B}$ , and $D_{\rm C}$ are the principal axis of inertia and J the total angular momentum of the molecule with K its projection along $D_{\rm C}$ .
Open with DEXTER

2.3 Electric dipole moment

The rotational emission of PAHs depends on their permanent electric dipole moment, $\mu$ . Symmetric ( $D_{\rm 6h}$ ), neutral, and fully hydrogenated PAHs have $\mu\sim 0$ . Spectroscopic analysis of their IR emission bands suggests that interstellar PAHs can hqve a cationic form that is partially hydrogenated (Le Page et al. 2003), and maybe also substituted (Peeters et al. 2002,2004a). For instance, a PAH having lost one H atom has $\mu\sim 0.8$ to 1 D, and a PAH cation where a C atom has been substituted by N would also have $\mu\sim 0.1$ to 1.5 D depending on its size (Pino, private communication). Moreover, it has been proposed that non-planar PAHs containing pentagonal rings may exist in the ISM (see Moutou et al. 2000, and references therein): such species are known to have large dipole moments as recently measured on coranulene, C $_{20}{\rm H}_{10}$ , $\mu = 2$ D (Lovas et al. 2005). In this work, we express the electric dipole moment of interstellar PAHs as in DL98:

$\begin{displaymath} \mu (N_{\rm C}) = m\sqrt{N_{\rm at}} + 4.3\times 10^{-2} \sqrt{N_{\rm C}} Z \simeq m\sqrt{N_{\rm at}} \;\;\;\; {\rm (Debye)} \end{displaymath}$

(4)

where $N_{\rm at}$ is the total atoms number in the molecule, Z is its charge, and m a constant. Unless otherwise stated, we will use m=0.4 D.

3 Internal energy distribution and rovibrational IR emission of isolated interstellar PAHs

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708fg4.eps}} \end{figure}$

Figure 4:

Internal energy distribution of PAHs with $N_{\rm C} = 24$ (solid line and box for P(0)) and $N_{\rm C} = 216$ (dashed line and triangle) in the case of a) an MC ( G₀=10^-2), b) the diffuse ISM (G₀ = 1) and c) the Orion Bar (the radiation field is the sum of the CMB, the ISRF and a blackbody at 37 000 K corresponding to G₀ = 14 000). To illustrate the effect of the radiation field hardness, we show in b) the case of an Orion Bar type radiation field scaled down to G₀=1 (grey lines).

Open with DEXTER

After the absorption of a visible-UV photon, a PAH cools off by emitting IR rovibrational photons. These photons reduce its angular momentum and also may increase it by recoil (a purely quantum effect, see Sect. 4.1). Previous studies have mostly used a thermal description of molecular cooling. In fact, since PAHs spend a large fraction of their time at low internal energies (see Fig. 4), their emission at long wavelengths cannot be considered as a negligible fluctuation compared to their total internal energy. While estimating the emission of PAHs at low temperatures, the validity of a thermal approach is questionable. Because of the rapid energy redistribution between interactions (photon exchange or collision with gas phase species), PAHs rapidly reach thermodynamical equilibrium while isolated (Léger et al. 1989). To describe this situation, we used the exact-statistical method of Draine & Li (2001) to derive the stationary internal energy distribution of PAHs.

The energy distribution, P(E), depends on (a) the energy density of the exciting radiation field $u_{\rm E}=4\pi\nu I_{\nu}$ (where $I_{\nu}$ is the brightness); (b) the absorption cross-section, $\sigma$ , of interstellar PAHs; and (c) their rovibrational density of states, $\rho(E)$ . For the stellar contribution, we used the local interstellar radiation field (ISRF, Mathis et al. 1983) or a blackbody. We sometimes scale this stellar radiation field with a factor, G₀, equal to 1 in the case of the Mathis field. Throughout this work, the contribution of the CMB is included in the radiation field. The vibrational absorption cross-section used has been described previously, and for simplicity, we did not include rotational bands. Unless otherwise stated, we took the cross-section of PAH cations. The density of states was obtained by first deriving the vibrational mode spectrum from a Debye model and then applying the algorithm of Beyer & Swinehart (1973) for each molecular size (see Appendix B).

$\begin{figure} { \begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=9cm]{12708fg5.eps} & \includegraphics[width=9cm]{12708fg6.eps}\\ \end{tabular}}\end{figure}$

Figure 5:

Left: dust IR emission of the DIM (solid black lines and symbols) with $N_{\rm H} \sim 10^{20}$ cm^-2 (Boulanger 2000). The model dust emission is overlaid in bold grey. MRN type size distributions are used for all dust populations. The PAH vibrational contribution (dashed line) is from the present model with $N_{\rm C} = [18,96]$ , a 1:3 mixture of neutrals and cations, full hydrogen coverage, and 43 ppm of carbon. The contributions of larger grains are from the model described in Compiègne et al. (2008). The dotted line is the contribution of graphitic very small grains of radii a=0.9 to 4 nm containing 39 ppm of C. The dot-dashed line is the contribution of silicate big grains with a=0.4 to 250 nm using 37 ppm of Si. Right: dust emission from the Orion Bar (the noisy black line is the ISO-SWS spectrum) with $N_{\rm H} \sim 1.8\times 10^{21}$ cm^-2. The model dust parameters are as above but for PAHs less abundant (18 ppm of C) and more ionized (82% are cations).

Open with DEXTER

After each absorption of a stellar photon, we assume that the excitation energy of the PAH is rapidly redistributed among all the vibrational modes (Mulas et al. 2006). This radiationless and isoenergetic process is called internal vibrational redistribution (IVR). The energy distribution is then computed according to the exact-statistical formalism described in Draine & Li (2001). The energy scale (referenced to the zero point energy) is divided into bins of energy E_i and width $\Delta E_{i}$ with i = 0, 1, ..., M (M = 500) with $0 \leq E_i \leq 2E_{\rm L}$ where $E_{\rm L}=1.1 \times 10^5$ cm^-1 is the Lyman limit. When its energy is below that of the first excited vibrational state, the molecule is in a rotational state. Letting P_i be the probability of having a PAH in the energy bin i we have

$\begin{displaymath}\frac{{\rm d}P_{i}}{{\rm d}t} = \sum_{j \ne i}^{M} \; T_{j \r... ...i}P_{j} \; - \; \sum_{i \ne j}^{M} \; T_{i \rightarrow j}P_{i} \end{displaymath}$

(5)

where $T_{j \rightarrow i}$ is the transition rate from the state j to the state i for a molecule. We solve this equation in the stationary case. More details can be found in Draine & Li (2001). Figure 4 shows the energy distribution for three different radiation fields, representative of a molecular cloud, the diffuse interstellar medium (DIM), and the Orion Bar. We see that the most probable energy increases when the radiation field intensity G₀ increases, as expected for PAHs whose cooling by IR emission is interrupted more frequently by absorption events. The sharp cut-off at $\sim$ $1.1\times 10^5$ cm^-1 stems from the Lyman limit of photon energies in neutral regions. We also observe a tail at higher energies that comes from to multiphoton events, i.e., absorption of a second photon while the PAH has not completely cooled off. This tail becomes more significant as absorption events are more frequent, i.e., for large PAHs or intense radiation fields. Conversely, we show in Fig. 4b that the radiation field hardness has little influence on P(E). To estimate the effect of the rotational absorption that we neglected, we included a band centred at 1 cm^-1 of width 1 cm^-1 and corresponding to J=150 ( $\sigma/N_{\rm C}\sim 9\times 10^{-22}$ cm²/C, see Sects. 4.2 and 4.3): we found P(E) to be twice as large between 1 and 10 cm^-1 and unchanged otherwise. This would change the emission around 1 cm at very low flux levels. The rotational excitation rates (Sect. 4.2), which depend on the populations of excited vibrational levels, are unaffected by this hypothesis.

Knowing the internal energy distribution of PAHs, we can deduce their IR emission from the upper state u by summing the contributions of all lower vibrational modes l (Draine & Li 2001):

$\displaystyle \nu F_{\nu} = \frac{2h\nu^{4}}{c^{2}} \; \sigma(\nu) \; P(h\nu) \; \left( 1 + \frac{u_{E}}{8\pi h^3 \nu^{3}} \right)$

(6)

$\displaystyle {\rm where} \; P(h\nu) = \sum_{l} \; P_{l} \; \sum_{u=0}^{l-1} \;... ...}(h\nu) + \sum_{l} \; P_{l} \; \left(1 \; - \; \frac{h\nu}{\Delta E_{l}}\right)$

(7)

is the number of rovibrational photons emitted at energy $h\nu$ . The G_ul functions are defined in Draine & Li (2001). The degeneracies g_u and g_l are the numbers of energy states in bins u and l, respectively (see Appendix B). Figure 5 shows a comparison between mid-IR observations and our model results with a power law size distribution $n_s(a)\sim a^{-3.5}$ (as in Mathis et al. (1977) hereafter MRN) that provides a simple representation of the actual n_s(a) (Kim et al. 1994). We see that the IR emission from the DIM is explained well with a standard abundance of carbon in PAHs and as large fraction of cations as in Flagey et al. (2006). A similarly good match is obtained for the Orion Bar spectrum with strong PAH depletion probably reflecting an efficient photodestruction in this excited environment. Figure 6a shows the behaviour of the PAH vibrational emission with the radiation field intensity G₀: whereas the IR part scales with G₀, the mm-range ( $\lambda>3$ mm) does not. The emission in this spectral range is produced mostly by PAHs in low-energy states for which the dominant heating source is absorption of CMB photons, and this is why this part of the spectrum does not vary with G₀. Finally, we emphasize that at low energies ( $\lambda>20\;\mu$ m), our model shows the broadband behaviour of the PAH vibrational emission. When a detailed vibrational mode spectrum is used, the PAH emission at $\lambda >20 ~ \mu$ m is a superposition of numerous narrow bands that may be detectable with some of the instruments onboard Herschel (Mulas et al. 2006).

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg7.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: PAH rovibrational emissivity for a MRN size distribution with $N_{\rm C}=18{-}216$ . In a) we show the case of radiation field intensities corresponding to G₀=1 and 100 and in b) we illustrate the effect of IVR breakdown in case 1 (dotted line) and case 2 (dot-dashed line) (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER

3.1 Decoupling of vibrational modes

Our derivation of P(E) assumes an efficient energy redistribution between vibrational modes (IVR) during the PAH relaxation. The IVR thus involves a coupling between vibrational modes via intramolecular transitions. However, it is known that IVR is no longer efficient when the excitation energy of the molecule is below some threshold $E_{\rm dec}$ (Mulas et al. 2006), and we will then speak of IVR breakdown. When $E<E_{\rm dec}$ , the excitation of energetically accessible vibrational modes is frozen according to microcanonical statistics at energy $E_{\rm dec}$ . The molecule then continues to cool via emission of the excited vibrational modes. To study the influence of decoupling on the long-wavelength emission, we consider two extreme cases for the relaxation at $E<E_{\rm dec}$ :

-: case 1: no IVR, cooling by IR forbidden modes. We assume these modes to be defined like those of Table 1 but with an oscillator strength 10⁴ lower and;
-: case 2: no IVR, cooling only by the first vibrational mode at $2040/N_{\rm C}$ (cm^-1) as defined in Table 1,

and compare them to our model with no decoupling (IVR always fulfilled). We take $E_{\rm dec}$ to be constant and equal to 500 cm^-1, a value relevant for PAHs containing 20 to 30 carbon atoms (Joblin & Mulas 2008). Actually, $E_{\rm dec}$ is expected to decrease with molecular size because of the increasing density of states at a given energy (Mulas 1998): the former cases therefore provide an upper limit to the variations in the PAH long-wavelength emissivity. Figure 6b shows that, as expected, case 1 provides a lower limit to the long-wavelength emission of PAHs, whereas case 2 is an upper limit. The model assuming IVR is close to case 2. A comparison of our model band fluxes (with IVR) with the Monte-Carlo simulations of Joblin & Mulas (2008), in the case of the coronene cation (C₂₄H₁₂⁺), shows good general agreement, especially for the low-energy modes. We conclude that the IVR hypothesis provides an upper limit to the PAH vibrational emission at $\lambda>3$ mm and that the conclusions of the former section hold.

4 Angular momentum distribution

Building the angular momentum distribution of interstellar PAHs is driven by photon exchanges and gas-grain interactions (DL98). In the DIM, pervaded by the ISRF, and for a PAH bearing 50 carbon atoms, the mean time between absorptions of visible-UV photons ( $\sim$ 0.2 yr) is comparable to the mean time between emissions of rotational photons, as well as to the mean time between PAH-hydrogen collisions (for a gas density of 100 cm^-3 and a temperature of 100 K). Photons absorbed in the visible-UV have a weak effect on the total angular momentum; indeed, each photon exchanged carries a unit angular momentum, and the numerous IR photons emitted overwhelm the influence of the photon absorbed. To estimate the angular momentum distribution, we take the following processes into account:

-: IR rovibrational photon emission;
-: purely rotational photon emission;
-: H₂ formation;
-: collisions with gas (neutral atoms and ions);
-: plasma drag;
-: photoelectric effect.

All these processes lead to a change in the angular momentum of the molecule, some of them excite the rotation, and others damp it. For the radiative processes we adopt a quantum approach where each rotational state is treated individually and transition rules applied. As discussed by Rouan et al. (1997), the building of the angular momentum distribution, n(J), can be considered as a stationary random walk in a potential well with a minimum for J = J₀, for which the rate of J-change is zero:

$\begin{displaymath} \left( \sum_{i} \left( \tau^{-1} \Delta J \right)_{i} \right)_{J_{0}} = 0 \end{displaymath}$

(8)

with $\Delta J$ the change of J produced by the event number i, and $\tau$ the mean time between two events i. As in Rouan et al. (1992), we assume an efficient intramolecular vibration to rotation energy transfer (IVRET). We take n(J) to be the same for all vibrational levels, equal to a Maxwell distribution $n(J)=n_0~J^2~\exp(-J^2/J_0^2)$ , where n₀ is a normalization factor. Indeed, Mulas (1998) and Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009) show that this form of n(J) is a good approximation. In the following, we establish the rate of J-change due to the rovibrational emission of isolated PAHs modelled in Sect. 3. We also present the rate of purely rotational photon emission, while the contribution of the gas-grain interactions is described in Appendix D.

4.1 Rovibrational transitions

The rovibrational IR emission can be both an exciting and a damping process for the rotation of a PAH. Assuming that the interstellar PAHs are symmetric top molecules, the selection rules for the emission of an IR rovibrational photon are: $\Delta J = 0, \pm 1$ , and $\Delta K = 0, \pm 1$ . Transitions corresponding to $\Delta J = +1,-1$ , and 0 are called the P, Q, and R-bands, respectively. As seen in Sect. 2.2, two types of transitions are possible: parallel ones (out-of-plane vibrational motion) with $\Delta K = 0$ and perpendicular ones (in-plane vibrational motion) with $\Delta K = \pm 1$ . The type of each transition is given in Tables A.1 and 1. For a rovibrational transition, $(v, J, K) \rightarrow (v-1, J+\Delta J, K+\Delta K)$ , the rate is proportional to the spontaneous emission coefficient and to the probability for the grain to lose the corresponding transition energy. The spontaneous emission rate is proportional to the A_KJ factors, which represent the angular part of the transition probability. Formulae for these factors are given in Appendix C. Expressed in terms of cross-section, the transition rate is (with $\nu_{i}$ and $\Delta\nu_{i}$ in cm^-1):

$\begin{displaymath} W^{\pm /0}_{i} = 8\pi c \; (\sigma_{i}\Delta\nu_{i}) \; \sum... ...\nu_{i}^{\pm /0})^{2} \; A_{KJ}^{\pm /0} \; P(h\nu_i^{\pm /0}) \end{displaymath}$

(9)

where the $W^{\pm /0}_{i}$ give the transition rate for $\Delta J = 0, \pm 1$ , and for the vibrational mode i at a frequency $\nu_{i}^{\pm /0}$ . This frequency depends on $\nu_{i0}$ (the frequency of the vibrational transition for J=0) and on J and K (see Appendix C). Since the J- and K-terms, in $\nu_{i}^{\pm /0}$ , are always much smaller than $\nu_{i0}$ , we take $P(h\nu_i^{\pm /0})\simeq P(h\nu_{i0})$ . We note that the in-plane transitions provide higher (by a factor $\sim$ 2) rates than the out-of-plane ones, as a consequence of the A_KJ sum values. The total transition rates are obtained by summing over all bands: $W^{\pm /0} = \sum_{i} \; W^{\pm /0}_{i}$ . Finally, the rate of change in J due to rovibrational transitions is $(\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{IR} = W^{+}-W^{-}$ . Rotational excitation dominates at low J, whereas damping is the dominant process for high J-values. For vibrational modes at higher frequency, W⁺-W^- is smaller because the rotational terms are smaller in $\nu_{i}$ (see Appendix C): $(\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm IR}$ is therefore dominated by the contribution of vibrational modes at low-frequencies.

4.2 Rotational emission

We consider here the spontaneous emission of purely rotational photons. The selection rules for such transitions are $\Delta J = -1$ and $\Delta K = 0$ (Townes & Schawlow 1975). No change in K occurs because, for rotational transitions, the dipole moment of a symmetric top molecule necessarily lies along its symmetry axis. The transition rate is then simply related to the spontaneous emission coefficient A_J,
J-1:

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm rot}$	=	- A_J,J-1	(10)
A_J,J-1	=	$\displaystyle \frac{512\pi^{4}}{3h^4c^3} B^3\mu^2 J^{3} \frac{(2J+1)^{2}-(J+2)}{3(2J+1)^2} \; \; \ \rm {s}^{-1}$	(11)

where $\mu$ is the electric dipole moment of the molecule and the factor A_KJ- has been used (Appendix C). In the high-J limit, $h\nu\times A_{J,J-1}$ tends to the classical expression of Larmor. Finally, the damping rate due to rotational emission is

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm rot} = - 1.8 \times 10^{-14} \left(\fra... ... {D}}\right)^{2} J^{3} \frac{(2J+1)^{2}-(J+2)}{(2J+1)^2} \; \; \ \rm {s}^{-1} .$

(12)

4.3 Equilibrium angular momentum J₀

Table 2: Physical parameters for the typical interstellar phases considered.

We estimate damping and excitation rotational rates for the interstellar phases described in Table 2. When solving Eq. (8), we obtain the equilibrium angular momentum J₀. Figure 7 shows J₀ for the DIM and the Orion Bar. In all cases, J₀ increases with $N_{\rm C}$ because there are more steps in the random walk; indeed, the cross-section and absorption rate scale with $N_{\rm C}$ (see Fig. 2), so more IR photons are emitted for larger $N_{\rm C}$ . Similarly, J₀ reaches higher values when the radiation field intensity or the gas density increases (see Fig. 8).

In the DIM, the excitation comes from gas-grain collisions, whereas the damping is dominated by the emission of rotational photons for $N_{\rm C} < 140$ and by IR photon emission for larger PAHs ( $(\tau^{-1}\Delta J)_{\rm rot} \propto N_{\rm C}^{-5}$ , whereas $(\tau^{-1}\Delta J)_{\rm IR} \propto N_{\rm C}$ ). We note similar J₀-values for the CNM, WNM and WIM (Fig. 7a) in spite of the large differences in gas density and temperature (see Table 2). In the Orion Bar, because of the intense radiation field, the excitation is driven by the photoelectric effect, whereas the damping is dominated by the emission of IR photons. For the case of MCs (not shown), J₀ also rises and reaches high values (J₀=1300 for $N_{\rm C}=200$ ). Indeed, the damping by IR photon emission is no longer efficient ( $G_0\sim 0.01$ ), while the gas-grain rates are strong because of higher density. We show in Fig. 7b the influence of different choices of the vibrational mode spectrum (or cross-section) on J₀: changes are below 20% and affect only the large sizes ( $N_{\rm C}>100$ ), which make a minor contribution to the rotational emissivity (see Sect. 5). We found comparable variations of J₀ for the vibrational relaxation (IVR) cases 1 and 2, discussed in Sect. 3.1.

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{8.8cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708fg8.eps}} \end{figure}$

Figure 7:

J₀ versus $N_{\rm C}$ for PAH cations. In a) we show the case of the diffuse medium. Solid line shows the CNM, dashed line the WNM and dotted line the WIM. In b) we illustrate the influence of the absorption cross-section in the CNM: cations (solid line), neutrals (dashed line) and extreme behaviours (grey lines) for the first vibrational mode versus $N_{\rm C}$ (see Fig. 1) are shown. In c), we present the case of the Orion Bar.

Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} { \begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708fg9.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f10.eps}\end{tabular}}\end{figure}$

Figure 8:

a) Effect of varying G₀ on J₀ for PAH cations with $N_{\rm C} = 20$ , 30, 40, and 100 ( from bottom to top). The values for $N_{\rm C} = 100$ (triangles) have been divided by 2. The gas density is 30 cm^-3 and the other physical parameters for the gas are determined using CLOUDY (Ferland et al. 1998). b) Same as a) but for varying $n_{\rm H}$ at G₀ = 1. In both cases the radiation field is a blackbody with $T_{\rm eff} = 22~000$ K and the gas parameters have been obtained with CLOUDY at thermal equilibrium (see text).

Open with DEXTER

The processes contributing to the rotation of PAHs depend on the intensity of the radiation field (G₀) and on the gas density ( $n_{\rm H}$ ). We now examine the influence of these parameters on J₀. Other important quantities (gas temperature; electron, proton, and C⁺ abundances) are obtained at thermal equilibrium with CLOUDY (Ferland et al. 1998). To study the influence of G₀, we took the radiation field to be a blackbody of effective temperature 22 000 K and scaled it in order to vary G₀ between 10^-2 and 10⁵. The shape of the radiation field is then always the same. Figure 8a shows J₀ as a function of G₀ for different PAH sizes. As discussed before, J₀ increases with G₀ because the excitation rate from IR emission (which scales with G₀) is dominant. This rise becomes steeper for larger PAHs because the frequency of the first vibrational mode decreases (as $N_{\rm C}^{-1}$ ) and requires lower values of G₀ to be excited (the maximum of P(E) moves to higher energies as G₀ increases, see Fig. 4c). However, we note that J₀ is affected little by variations of G₀ over the range 0.01-100. The result of varying $n_{\rm H}$ is shown in Fig. 8b. In all cases, the incident radiation field is a blackbody with $T_{\rm eff} = 22$ 000 K and G₀ =1. The gas-grain processes become dominant for $n_{\rm H}>30$ cm^-3 and $N_{\rm C} > 50$ . At lower gas densities, radiative processes prevail (excitation by IR emission and damping by rotational emission), and J₀ does not change. We therefore expect the rotational excitation of small PAHs to hardly be variable in the DIM as found by Davies et al. (2006).

4.4 Modelling the rotational excitation by IR emission

Following the absorption of a stellar visible-UV photon, the rovibrational cascade of PAHs is a complex process that involves many states. Molecular, state-to-state models require a detailed database, use Monte-Carlo simulations (see Mulas et al. 2006, for references), and so far do not include the gas-grain interactions that are important. Given our incomplete knowledge of interstellar PAHs and the fact that their rotational emission may so far be seen in broadband data, former models of spinning dust (DL98 and Ali-Haïmoud et al. 2009) made simplifying assumptions to describe radiative processes and performed a classical treatment of the gas-grain interactions. We assess here the impact of these assumptions on the rotational emissivity of PAHs.

First, the internal energy distribution of PAHs was derived in the thermal approximation. As discussed in Sect. 4, this is a questionable assumption for describing the long-wavelength emission of PAHs and the change in angular momentum it induces. Moreover, the excitation rate by IR emission (the recoil due to emission of individual photons), which is a purely quantum effect, has been described as a random walk of the angular momentum starting with a non-rotating grain. Finally, an efficient vibrational redistribution (IVR, see Sect. 3.1) was assumed throughout the energy cascade following a photon absorption. In this work, we improve on the first aspect by deriving the internal energy distribution of isolated PAHs using a microcanonical formalism and including the rotational density of states. Next, we follow a quantum approach to treat the rovibrational emission where the recoil due to photon emission and selection rules are naturally included. In Fig. 9a, we compare the absolute value of our rate of angular momentum change by rovibrational IR emission $\vert(\tau^{-1}\Delta J)_{\rm IR}\vert = \vert W^+ - W^-\vert$ (see Sect. 4.1) to former works. For a PAH containing 24 carbon atoms, all rates decrease with the angular momentum and cross zero for J between 100 and 150 (singular points in our logarithmic representation). The main difference with previous models is that the excitation-to-damping transition (the zero value) occurs at higher J-values in our case. This discrepancy diminishes with increasing sizes, and identical IR rates are found for species with more than 100 C atoms.

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f11.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: Rate of J-change due to rovibrational emission for a PAH with $N_{\rm C} = 24$ and heated by the ISRF. a) Comparison with former models: our rate (solid line), the rate of DL98 corrected as in Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009) (dashed line) and the rate of Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009) (dotted line). b) Effect of IVR breakdown, case 1 and 2 (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER

$\begin{figure} {\begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f12.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f13.eps}\end{tabular}}\end{figure}$

Figure 10:

Rotational emissivity of PAH cations. We take 430 ppm of carbon in PAHs, $N_{\rm C}=24{-}216$ and assume m = 0.4 Debye. Panel a): effect of changing the fraction of large PAHs (decreasing with $\alpha =0$ to 6). The case of a log-normal distribution centered around $N_{\rm C}=44$ and width 0.4 is also shown. Panel b): rotational emission spectrum in different environments with a power law size distribution and $\alpha =3.5$ .

Open with DEXTER

We show in Fig. 9b the effect of relaxation schemes other than IVR. Between extreme cases 1 and 2 (see Sect. 3.1), the damping IR rate is multiplied by a factor 2, which leads to a balance at a lower J-value. Variations in $(\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm IR}$ are in fact quite similar to those induced by the other approximations discussed above. All these variations affect the rotational emissivity of PAHs, around 30 GHz, by at most 15% (in the CNM and including the gas-grain interactions). We conclude that, in spite of the assumptions made, former spinning dust models (which are fast computationally) provide a sufficiently accurate rotational emissivity.

5 Spinning dust emission

The power emitted by a PAH containing $N_{\rm C}$ carbon atoms in a rotational transition from state J to J-1 is equal to

$\begin{displaymath}P(J) = A_{J,J-1} \times 2BJ , \end{displaymath}$

(13)

when taking the spontaneous emission rate A_J,J-1 from Eq. (10) and with the transition energy $h\nu=2BJ$ ( $\Delta K = 0$ for rotational transitions). With $B\propto N_{\rm C}^{-2}$ and $\mu^2\propto N_{\rm C}$ , we find that $P(J)\propto N_{\rm C}^{-7}$ : small PAHs will therefore have a dominant contribution to the rotational emission. For instance, the peak value of the rotational emissivity of a PAH with $N_{\rm C}=96$ is 10 times lower than for a species with $N_{\rm C} = 24$ (see also Ali-Haïmoud et al. 2009). With n_s, the size distribution of PAHs (the number of PAHs of a given size a or $N_{\rm C}$ per proton), and the angular momentum distribution $n(N_{\rm C},J)$ , we get

$\displaystyle S_{\nu} = \frac{N_{\rm H}}{4\pi} \int_{N_{\rm min}}^{N_{\rm max}}... ... \; n(N_{\rm C},J) \; \frac{2BJ}{2Bc} \; n_{s}(N_{\rm C}) \; {\rm d}N_{\rm C} .$

(14)

Since we are interested in a broadband spectrum, we take the rotational bandwidth to be 2Bc. As discussed before, we assume that $n(N_{\rm C},J)$ is described correctly by a Maxwell distribution. Given the relationship $J_0(N_{\rm C})$ (Fig. 7) and the size distribution, the emission of spinning PAHs can be calculated from Eq. (14). It scales with $m^2\times~ S_{\rm PAH}$ . We illustrate the relative significance of small species in Fig. 10a by changing the index of the power law size distribution, $n_s(a)\sim a^{-\alpha}$ . Defining small PAHs by $N_{\rm C}\lesssim 100$ , they represent 50% (97%) of the total abundance for $\alpha =0$ (6). As expected, the rotational emissivity for $\alpha=6$ is highest. It is also blueshifted by 5 GHz and broadened by about the same amount with respect to the $\alpha =0$ case. Figure 10b shows the case of different interstellar environments and illustrate the influence of the gas-grain processes, which become strong in the CNM (while subdominant in the WIM/WNM).

We emphasize here that the level, peak position and width of the rotational emission spectrum depend on (a) the fraction of small PAHs ( $N_{\rm C}\leq 100$ ), (b) m the scaling factor for the dipole moment, and (c) the physical parameters of the gas along the line of sight (temperature, density, and ionization). Microwave observations alone cannot constrain all these unknowns. A quantitative description of the spinning dust emission will require near-IR data (to constrain the fraction of small PAHs) and radio maps (21 cm and continuum) to derive the physical state of the gas.

6 The case of the molecular cloud G159.6-18.5

We present here a comparison of our model results with observations of the anomalous microwave foreground and IR emission. We show how these data can be explained with a coherent description of the IR and rotational emission of PAHs, and also discuss how the size distribution of PAHs can be constrained.

The COSMOSOMAS experiment has delivered maps of large sky fractions with an angular resolution of 1 degree in four frequency bands: 10.9, 12.7, 14.7, and 16.3 GHz. In this survey, Watson et al. (2005) studied the region G159.6-18.5 located in the Perseus molecular complex. Figure 11 shows the spectrum of this region from 3 to to 4000 GHz (COSMOSOMAS, WMAP, and DIRBE data). From mid to far-IR, the Perseus molecular complex is dominated by a molecular ring (G159.6-18.5) surrounding an HII region. Unfortunately, the COSMOSOMAS resolution does not allow these two phases to be separated. The molecular ring is centred on the star HD 278942 (Andersson et al. 2000; Ridge et al. 2006). Its stellar wind is responsible for the HII region dug into the parent molecular cloud. To describe the emission spectrum of G159-18.5, we assume it includes an MC component for the ring and a WIM component for the HII region. We discuss below the physical parameters of both phases.

According to Ridge et al. (2006), HD278942 is a B0 V star: its radiation field is modelled by a blackbody with $T_{\rm eff} \sim 30~000$ K, scaled to get $G_0 \sim 1.6$ at the radius of the ring (G₀ is obtained from IRAS data). The radius of the HII region is approximately 2.75 pc (Andersson et al. 2000) and implies a WIM density $n_{\rm H}\sim 1$ cm^-3 (Ridge et al. 2006). We obtained the WIM temperature from CLOUDY: 7500 K. Andersson et al. (2000) estimated the density and temperature of the gas in the molecular ring to be $n_{\rm H} \sim 560$ cm^-3 and $T = (20\pm10)$ K. For the WIM and MC phases, we derived the abundances of electrons, protons and C⁺, and the gas temperature with CLOUDY. We took the total column density (MC+WIM) to be $N_{\rm H} = 1.3\times 10^{22}$ cm^-2 (Watson et al. 2005). From 12 $\mu$ m IRAS data and our PAH emission model, we estimated the total PAH abundance to represent $(240\pm 40)$ ppm of carbon.

Following Watson et al. (2005), we took the thermal dust emission to be a grey body at 19 K with an emissivity index $\beta=1.55$ . Our best-fit parameters for the spinning PAH contribution (assuming a size distribution $n_s(a)\sim a^{-3.5}$ ) are then (model A) $N_{\rm C}=50-216$ and $N_{\rm H}=4.6 \times 10^{21}$ cm^-2 for the MC, $N_{\rm C}=24{-}216$ and $N_{\rm H}=8.1\times 10^{21}$ cm^-2 for the WIM. In both media, we took m=0.6 D (Eq. (4)). Larger PAHs are required in the MC, possibly as a consequence of grain-grain coagulation. However, the results of Dupac et al. (2003) indicate that emission of dust around 20 K requires a higher emissivity index, close to 2. When adopting $\beta=2$ and a dust temperature of 18 K (model B), we find an equally good fit of this region in the far-IR (Fig. 11). In this case, the flux around 100 GHz is not explained. We speculate here that it may come from an additional and less abundant population of small PAHs in the MC component with: $N_{\rm C}=24{-}50$ , m=0.1 D and $N_{\rm H} = 1.25 \times 10^{21}$ cm^-2 (for the larger PAHs in the MC phase, $N_{\rm H} = 4.25\times 10^{21}$ cm^-2). The corresponding spinning emission is shown in Fig. 11 (model B). The PAH size distribution would thus be bimodal, as already suggested by Le Page et al. (2003). As can be seen in Fig. 11, both models provide a good fit to the data. Discrimiting tests of these scenarios will be soon possible with the Planck polarized data. Small grains or PAHs are expected to be poorly aligned (Lazarian & Draine 2000; Martin 2007), whereas big grains are fairly well-aligned with a polarization fraction of 5 to 10%.

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f14.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 11: Comparison to observations (symbols) of the Perseus molecular cloud G159.6-18.5. The dashed lines show the free-free (low frequency) and big grains (high-frequency) emissions. The PAH rovibrational emission is represented by the dot-dashed line. Dotted lines show the PAH rotational emission. The black model is model A, and the grey model is model B. See text for details.
Open with DEXTER

7 Summary

The Planck and Herschel data will soon reveal the emission of interstellar dust at long wavelengths. Thanks to their small size, interstellar PAHs spend most of their time at low internal energy and can spin at frequencies of a few tens of GHz. The emission of PAHs is therefore expected to make a significant contribution at long wavelength. Recent observations have shown the existence of a 10-100 GHz emission component (the anomalous foreground), related to the smallest dust grains. As suggested by DL98, the anomalous foreground may trace the emission of spinning PAHs.

In this work, we built the first model that coherently describes the emission of interstellar PAHs from the near-IR to the centimetric range and focused on the long wavelength part of this emission. To do so, we derived the internal energy of isolated PAHs down to low energies. We included low-frequency vibrational bands ( $\lambda>20\;\mu$ m), through which PAHs cool at intermediate to low energies. They are important for their rotational emission. In the cooling cascade that follows the absorption of a stellar photon by a PAH, we treated rovibrational transitions in a quantum approach and examined the possibility that the hypothesis of vibrational redistribution (IVR) is not always fulfilled. Purely quantum effects (recoil due to photon emission; transitions that do not change the angular momentum or Q-bands) are thus naturally included in our description of the rovibrational cascade. We obtained the rotational emission of PAHs from a random-walk formalism, including all processes participating in excitation and damping, namely, rovibrational and pure rotational transitions and gas-grain interactions.

We have shown that the rovibrational emission of PAHs above $\sim$ 3 mm does not depend on the intensity of the radiation field (represented by G₀), unlike the mid-IR part of the spectrum that scales linearly with it. In the diffuse interstellar medium, PAHs may contribute up to 10% of the dust emission around 100 GHz. We also found the rotational emissivity of PAHs is dominated by small species (bearing less than 100 C atoms) and is hardly sensitive to G₀ over the range 0.1-100. Using plausible PAH properties, our model can explain both the IR and microwave emissions of a molecular cloud in the Perseus arm where the anomalous foreground is conspicuous. The level, peak position and width of the rotational emission spectrum depend on the fraction of small PAHs, the dipole moment distribution (m-factor), and the physical parameters of the gas phases present along the line of sight. A quantitative description of the emission of spinning PAHs will therefore involve observations at IR and radio wavelengths (21 cm and continuum). Comparing the rotational excitation rate obtained from our quantum treatment of the rovibrational cascade to former works, we showed that the classical approximation used so far has little effect on the rotational emissivity (the peak value varies by at most 15%). Similarly, departures from the IVR hypothesis lead to similar emissivity changes. We therefore conclude that a classical description of rovibrational transitions and the IVR hypothesis are good approximations for describing the rotational emission of PAHs.

Our results on the influence of the radiation field intensity led to a specific prediction that can be tested observationally. If the anomalous microwave foreground comes from spinning PAHs, it is expected to be correlated with the dust emission in the 12 $\mu$ m-IRAS band, mostly carried by PAHs. In regions where G₀ varies significantly, this correlation should improve when the 12 $\mu$ m flux is divided by G₀, indeed, the IR emission of PAHs scales with G₀, whereas their rotational emission is independent of G₀. This prediction was tested in a companion paper with WMAP and IRAS data (Ysard et al. 2010).

Acknowledgements

We thank an anonymous referee whose comments helped us to significantly improve the content of this paper. We gratefully acknowledge stimulating discussions with B. Draine, C. Joblin, E. Dartois, T. Pino, and O. Pirali. We are grateful to M. Compiègne for his help in the dust SED modelling.

Appendix A: Mid-IR absorption cross-section

In Table A.1 we give the parameters defining the mid-IR vibrational bands considered in this work. In all cases we assume their profile to have a Drude shape. The bands at 3.3, 6.2, 7.7, 8.6, 11.3, and 12.7 $\mu$ m are defined as follows. For the PAH cations, we start from the integrated cross-sections, $\sigma\Delta\nu$ , of Pech et al. (2002) that have been derived from laboratory data. The corresponding band profiles, however, do not provide a detailed match of observations. We therefore use band positions and widths as deduced from fits of ISO-SWS spectra of a number of interstellar regions (Verstraete et al. 2001). As indicated by these observations and others (Peeters et al. 2002), we include a broad band at 6.9 $\mu$ m and split the 7.7 $\mu$ m into three sub-bands at 7.5, 7.6, and 7.8 $\mu$ m, where we use the observed $\sigma\Delta\nu$ of each sub-band as weights in defining their integrated cross-sections. In addition, we introduce a band at 8.3 $\mu$ m to fill the gap between the 7.8 and 8.6 $\mu$ m bands, and multiply the 8.6 $\mu$ m band by a factor 3 to match observations. For neutral PAHs, we use the laboratory integrated cross-section of Joblin et al. (1995), and assume the same band profiles as for the cations. Furthermore, spectroscopic data (ISO-SWS, Spitzer -IRS and UKIRT) reveal other bands at 5.25 and 5.75 $\mu$ m, which have been ascribed to combinations of PAH vibrational modes involving the 11.3 $\mu$ m band and IR-forbidden modes at 9.8 and 11.7 $\mu$ m, respectively (Tripathi et al. 2001; Roche et al. 1996). For the 5.25 $\mu$ m, we use the width and intensity ratio to the 11.3 $\mu$ m band given in Roche et al. (1996). The 5.75 $\mu$ m band has been derived from the observed spectrum of the Orion Bar (Verstraete et al. 2001). We also add the 17.1 $\mu$ m band recently seen in Spitzer data (Werner et al. 2004; Smith et al. 2004) and recognized as arising from PAHs (Peeters et al. 2004b; Smith et al. 2007).

Table A.1: Mid-IR bands of interstellar PAHs adopted in this work for cations and neutrals.

Appendix B: Vibrational modes and density of states of interstellar PAHs

B.1 Vibrational modes

Symmetric top ( $D_{\rm 6h}$ symmetry) type PAHs, with $N_{\rm C}$ carbon atoms and $N_{\rm H} = \sqrt{6N_{\rm C}}$ hydrogen atoms, have $3(N_{\rm C}+N_{\rm H}-2)$ vibrational modes that can be divided into the following types: $(N_{\rm C}-2)$ out-of-plane (op) CC modes, $2(N_{\rm C}-2)$ in-plane (ip) CC modes, $N_{\rm H}$ out-of-plane CH bending modes, $N_{\rm H}$ in-plane CH bending modes, and $N_{\rm H}$ CH stretching (st) modes. Following Draine & Li (2001), we approximate the mode spectrum of each type of vibration with a two-dimensional Debye model of maximum energy $k\Theta$ , where $\Theta$ is the Debye temperature. We derive the mode spectra from the following expressions:

-

for the CC modes:

$\begin{displaymath}\hbar\omega_{i} = k\Theta_{t} \sqrt{\frac{i-\delta^{t}_{i}}{N_{t}}} \;~ {\rm for} \;~ i = 1, N_{t} \end{displaymath}$

(B.1)

where $t=\rm op,ip$ is the type of mode and N_t is the number of CC modes of a given type with $\Theta_{\rm op} = 876$ K and $\Theta_{\rm ip} = 2318$ K with:

$\displaystyle \delta^{\rm op}_{i}$	=	$\displaystyle 3/2 \; {\rm for} \; ~ i = 2, 3 \;\;\;\;\; {\rm and} \;\;\;\; \delta^{\rm ip}_{i} = 1 \; {\rm for}\; ~ i = 2, 3$
	=	$\displaystyle 3/4 \; { \rm otherwise} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;~ = 1/2 \; \rm {otherwise}$	(B.2)

-

for the CH modes:

$\begin{displaymath}\hbar\omega_{i} = k\Theta_{t} \sqrt{\frac{3i}{2N_{t}}} \;~ {\rm for} \;~ i = 1, N_{t} \end{displaymath}$

(B.3)

where $t=\rm op,ip, st$ , and N_t is the number of CH modes of a given type with $\Theta_{\rm op} = 1281$ K, $\Theta_{\rm ip} = 1672$ K and $\Theta_{\rm st} = 4375$ K.

To this mode spectrum, we add the mode at lowest energy as described in Sect. 2.1. Figure B.1 shows that our Debye mode spectra agree with that derived from the Malloci et al. (2007) database.

B.2 Density of states and degeneracies

We estimate the PAH density of harmonic vibrational states from direct counts, a mode-to-mode convolution method proposed by Beyer & Swinehart (1973). We start from the rotational density of states, classically given by $\rho_{\rm rot} (E) = \sqrt{8E}/B^{3/2}$ with E and B in cm^-1 and for a symmetric top (Baer & Hase 1996). We then obtain the rovibrational density of states $\rho(E)$ with the convolution method. The molecule's zero-point energy has been chosen as the zero of the energy scale, and the calculation was made for bins with finite width of 1 cm^-1. To calculate the internal energy distribution of PAHs P(E), we grouped this very large number of points into broader energy bins $[E^{\rm min}_i,E^{\rm max}_i]$ with i=1 to 500. Each energy bin i thus contains many states and its degeneracy, g_i, is estimated as (with g₁ = 1)

$\begin{displaymath}g_{i} = \int_{E^{\rm min}_{i}}^{E^{\rm max}_{i}} \rho(E) {\rm d}E \;\;\;\; {(i} > 1\rm {)} . \end{displaymath}$

(B.4)

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708f15.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure B.1: Cumulative distribution of vibrational modes for coronene ( $\rm C_{24}H_{12}$ ), ovalene ( $\rm C_{32}H_{14}$ ) and circumovalene ( $\rm C_{66}H_{20}$ ), from the Malloci et al. (2007) database (solid lines) and with our Debye model (dotted lines).
Open with DEXTER

Appendix C: Lines intensities in the rotational bands

In the case of symmetric top molecules, we give below the Hönl-London factors for the angular part of rovibrational transition rates, as well as the corresponding transition energies (Herzberg 1968ab). The frequency of the vibrational mode i is noted $\nu_{i0}$ .

-

for $\Delta J = 0, \pm 1$ and $\Delta K = 0$ (parallel transitions or out of plane transitions):

A_KJ⁺	=	$\displaystyle \frac{2\left( (J+1)^{2}-K^{2} \right)}{(J+1)(2J+1)^2} \;\;\; {\rm and} \;\;\; \nu_i^{+} = \nu_{i0}-2B(J+1)$
A_KJ^-	=	$\displaystyle \frac{2(J^{2}-K^{2})}{J(2J+1)^2} \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\; {\rm and} \;\;\; \nu_i^{-} = \nu_{i0}+2BJ$
A_KJ⁰	=	$\displaystyle \frac{2K^{2}}{J(J+1)(2J+1)} \;\;\;\; {\rm and} \;\;\; \nu_i^0 = \nu_{i0}$

-

for $\Delta J = 0, \pm 1$ and $\Delta K = \pm 1$ (perpendicular or in plane transitions):

$\begin{displaymath}\left\{ \begin{array}{l} \displaystyle A_{KJ^{+}} = \frac{(J+... ...i^{+} = \nu_{i0}-2B(J+1)+(B-C)(1 \pm 2K)\\ \end{array}\right. \end{displaymath}$

$\begin{displaymath}\left\{ \begin{array}{lcl} \displaystyle A_{KJ^{-}} = \frac{(... ...\nu_i^{-} = \nu_{i0}+2BJ+(B-C)(1 \pm 2K)\\ \end{array}\right. \end{displaymath}$

$\begin{displaymath}\left\{ \begin{array}{lcl} \displaystyle A_{KJ^{0}} = \frac{(... ...\\ \nu_i^{0} = \nu_{i0}+(B-C)(1 \pm 2K)\\ \end{array}\right. \end{displaymath}$

Appendix D: Rate of angular momentum change for gas-grain interactions

We describe below the gas-grain interactions considered in our model of PAH rotation and the rate of change of Jthey induce, $(\tau^{-1}\Delta J)$ .

D.1 Collisions with gas atoms and plasma drag

For the collisions with gas neutrals and ions, as well as the plasma drag, we apply the results of DL98 to planar PAHs. In the case where $J \gg 1$ , we use the correspondence principle to write $\hbar J = I_{\rm c}\omega$ and obtain the following rates:

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1}\Delta J) = - 5.2\times 10^{-11} \sqrt{\frac{T}{100~\rm {K}}} \left(\frac{n_{\rm H}}{100~\rm {cm}^{-3}}\right)\times J \times F$

(D.1)

for the damping contribution, and

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1}\Delta J) = 3.9\times 10^{-6}\left(\frac{T}{100~\rm {K}... ...cm}^{-3}}\right)\left(\frac{N_{\rm C}}{50}\right)^{2} \times\frac{1}{J}\times G$

(D.2)

for the exciting contribution, where F and G are normalized rates defined in the Appendix B of DL98. We use the formalism of Bakes & Tielens (1994) to estimate the average charge of PAHs of a given size.

D.2 Rocket effect

Ejection of H or H₂ from the edges of PAHs may yield a significant rotational excitation if it occurs asymmetrically, thus generating a systematic torque by the rocket effect (Rouan et al. 1992). We note below $E_{\rm ej}$ the kinetic energy of the ejected fragment. In the case of H₂, this will happen if this molecule forms on preferential sites by chemisorption, and if the distribution of these sites on the PAH is asymmetric as a result of dehydrogenation. We calculate the change of J assuming that H₂ molecules are ejected from the edge of the PAH with a cosine law:

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm H_{2}}$	=	$\displaystyle 3.4 \times 10^{-8} \; \left(\frac{N_{\rm C}}{50}\right)^{3/2} \; \left(\frac{n_{\rm H}}{100 \ \rm {cm}^{-3}}\right)$
		$\displaystyle \times \sqrt{\frac{T}{100\ \rm {K}}} \; \sqrt{\frac{E_{\rm ej}}{1.5\ \rm {eV}}} \; (1-f_{\rm H}) \; \; \rm {s}^{-1} .$	(D.3)

The above numerical values are based on the following assumptions: (i) all molecular hydrogen is formed on PAHs with $[{\rm C/H}]_{\rm PAH} = 4\times10^{-5}$ , a H₂ formation rate $R_{f} = 3 \times 10^{-17} (T/70 \rm {K})^{1/2}$ cm³ s^-1 (Jura 1975) and $E_{\rm ej} = 1.5$ eV ; (ii) the distribution of formation sites has an asymmetry of 1 site and we assume that the site in excess is always at the same location on the molecule; (iii) we neglect the influence of cross-over events that may reduce the angular momentum (Lazarian & Draine 1999). With all these assumptions, the spin rate due to H₂ formation estimated here is an upper limit. This rate, however, remains small compared to the other gas-grains processes.

D.3 Photoelectric effect

Stellar UV photons can pull out electrons from grains. These photoelectrons carry away a significant kinetic energy ( $\sim$ 1 eV) that heats the interstellar gas and impulses grain rotation. If we assume that the photoelectrons leave the grain surface with a cosine law distribution, we have

$\displaystyle (\tau^{-1} \Delta J)_{\rm pe} = \tau_{\rm pe}^{-1} \times 0.15 \ ... ..._{\rm C}}{50}} \ \sqrt{\frac{E_{\rm e-}}{1\ \rm {eV}}} \; \; \ \ \ \rm {s}^{-1}$

(D.4)

where $\tau_{\rm pe}^{-1}$ is the rate of photoelectrons ejections calculated with the formalism of Bakes & Tielens (1994) ( $\tau_{\rm pe}^{-1} = 1.6 \times 10^{-8}$ s^-1 for $N_{\rm C} = 50$ in the DIM).

Appendix E: Rotational temperature

A rotational temperature T_J can be defined from the Maxwell distribution of angular momentum, $n(J)=n_0\exp(-J^2/J_0^2)$ :

$\begin{displaymath}T_J({\rm K}) = \frac{BJ_0^2}{k_B} = 10 \times N_{\rm C}^{-2}J_0^2 . \end{displaymath}$

(E.1)

Figure E.1 shows this temperature as a function of PAH size for several interstellar environments. We see that T_J is subthermal in the case of the DIM, and suprathermal for MCs and the Orion Bar. These results are in good agreement with Rouan et al. (1997). The rotational temperature is a relevant parameter in the study of the width of PAH vibrational or electronic transitions. The latter have been proposed as the origin of some unidentified diffuse interstellar bands (DIBs).

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f16.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure E.1: Rotational temperature for PAH cations as a function of their size for several insterstellar environments: CNM (black line), WNM (gray dashed line), WIM (gray line), MC (black dotted line) and the Orion Bar (black dashed line).
Open with DEXTER

References

Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Hirata, C. M., & Dickinson, C. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1055 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1985, ApJ, 290, L25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Andersson, B.-G., Wannier, P. G., Moriarty-Schieven, G. H., & Bakker, E. J. 2000, AJ, 119, 1325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Baer, T., & Hase, W. 1996, Unimolecular reaction dynamics: theory and experiments (Oxford university press) [Google Scholar]
Bakes, E. L. O., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Beyer, T., & Swinehart, D. 1973, Comm. of the ACM, 16 [Google Scholar]
Boulanger, F. 2000, in ESA SP-455: ISO Beyond Point Sources: Studies of Extended Infrared Emission, ed. R. J. Laureijs, K. Leech, & M. F. Kessler, 3 [Google Scholar]
Casassus, S., Cabrera, G. F., Förster, F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 639, 951 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Compiègne, M., Abergel, A., Verstraete, L., & Habart, E. 2008, A&A, 491, 797 [Google Scholar]
Davies, R. D., Dickinson, C., Banday, A. J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Draine, B. T., & Lazarian, A. 1998, ApJ, 508, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2001, ApJ, 551, 807 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Dupac, X., Bernard, J.-P., Boudet, N., et al. 2003, A&A, 404, L11 [Google Scholar]
Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761 [Google Scholar]
Flagey, N., Boulanger, F., Verstraete, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 969 [Google Scholar]
Herzberg, G. 1968a,b, Diatomic Molecules (a), IR and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules (b) (Van Norstand) [Google Scholar]
Joblin, C., Leger, A., & Martin, P. 1992, ApJ, 393, L79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Joblin, C., Boissel, P., Leger, A., D'Hendecourt, L., & Defourneau, D. 1995, A&A, 299, 835 [Google Scholar]
Joblin, C., & Mulas, G. 2008, in School on dust, Les Houches, ed. F. Boulanger (EAS Publication Series) [Google Scholar]
Jura, M. 1975, ApJ, 197, 575 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kim, H.-S., & Saykally, R. J. 2002, ApJS, 143, 455 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Kim, S.-H., Martin, P. G., & Hendry, P. D. 1994, ApJ, 422, 164 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lagache, G. 2003, A&A, 405, 813 [Google Scholar]
Lazarian, A., & Draine, B. T. 1999, ApJ, 516, L37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Le Page, V., Snow, T. P., & Bierbaum, V. M. 2003, ApJ, 584, 316 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Léger, A., & Puget, J. L. 1984, A&A, 137, L5 [Google Scholar]
Léger, A., D'Hendecourt, L., & Defourneau, D. 1989, A&A, 216, 148 [Google Scholar]
Leitch, E. M., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., & Myers, S. T. 1997, ApJ, 486, L23 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Lovas, F. J., McMahon, R. J., Grabow, J.-U., et al. 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 4345 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Malloci, G., Joblin, C., & Mulas, G. 2007, Chem. Phys., 332, 353 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Ysard, N., Lavabre, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 490, 1093 [Google Scholar]
Mulas, G. 1998, A&A, 338, 243 [Google Scholar]
Mulas, G., Malloci, G., Joblin, C., & Toublanc, D. 2006, A&A, 460, 93 [Google Scholar]
Omont, A. 1986, A&A, 164, 159 [Google Scholar]
Pech, C., Joblin, C., & Boissel, P. 2002, A&A, 388, 639 [Google Scholar]
Peeters, E., Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 1089 [Google Scholar]
Peeters, E., Allamandola, L. J., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., et al. 2004a, ApJ, 604, 252 [Google Scholar]
Peeters, E., Mattioda, A. L., Hudgins, D. M., & Allamandola, L. J. 2004b, ApJ, 617, L65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Rapacioli, M., Joblin, C., & Boissel, P. 2005, A&A, 429, 193 [Google Scholar]
Ridge, N. A., Schnee, S. L., Goodman, A. A., & Foster, J. B. 2006, ApJ, 643, 932 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Roche, P. F., Lucas, P. W., & Geballe, T. R. 1996, MNRAS, 281, L25 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]
Rouan, D., Leger, A., Omont, A., & Giard, M. 1992, A&A, 253, 498 [Google Scholar]
Rouan, D., Leger, A., & Le Coupanec, P. 1997, A&A, 324, 661 [Google Scholar]
Schutte, W. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Allamandola, L. J. 1993, ApJ, 415, 397 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Smith, J. D. T., Dale, D. A., Armus, L., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Socrates, G. 2001, IR and Raman characteristic group frequencies: Tables and charts (John Wiley & Sons) [Google Scholar]
Townes, C., & Schawlow, A. 1975, Microwave Spectroscopy (Dover Publications) [Google Scholar]
Tripathi, A. K., & Sahasrabudhe, A., Mitra, R., et al. 2001, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 449 [Google Scholar]
Verstraete, L., & Léger, A. 1992, A&A, 266, 513 [Google Scholar]
Verstraete, L., Pech, C., Moutou, C., et al. 2001, A&A, 372, 981 [Google Scholar]
Watson, R. A., Rebolo, R., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 624, L89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Werner, M. W., Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Ysard, N., Miville-Deschênes, M. A., & Verstraete, L. 2010, A&A, 509, L1 [Google Scholar]

Footnotes

The molecules considered are perylene (C₂₀H₁₂), benzo[g, h, i]perylene (C₂₂H₁₂), coronene (C₂₄H₁₂), bisanthene (C₂₈H₁₄), dibenzo[bc, ef]coronene (C₃₀H₁₄), ovalene (C₃₂H₁₄), circumbiphenyl (C₃₈H₁₆), circumanthracene (C₄₀H₁₆), cirumpyrene (C₄₂H₁₆), and circumovalene (C₆₆H₂₀).
... field: G₀ scales the radiation field intensity integrated between 6 and 13.6 eV. The Mathis radiation field, G₀=1, corresponds to an intensity of $1.6\times 10^{-3}$ erg/s/cm².
... numerous: Energy conservation implies that 40 IR photons are emitted after each absorption.
... approximation: With this form of n(J) it is possible to define a rotational temperature (see Appendix E).
... is: In the limit $J \gg 1$ , we estimated that the stimulated emission and absorption of CMB photons represent less than 20% of the spontaneous emission rate.
...(Ferland et al. 1998): We assumed 130 (320) ppm of carbon (oxygen) to be in the gas phase. Parameters were taken from the optically thin zone of isochoric simulations with CLOUDY.
... same: We also varied the shape of the blackbody keeping G₀ constant (as well as $n_{\rm H}$ ). Similar J₀ values were found for $T_{\rm eff}$ between 10⁴ and $5\times10^4$ K.
... interactions: These models can also be applied to describe the rotational emission of other grain types.
... grain: Conversely, the damping part is correctly described by a classical model when $J \gg 1$ (Ali-Haïmoud et al. 2009).
... interactions): A correction of the same order was found by Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009), who used the Fokker-Planck equation to derive n(J) instead of a Maxwell distribution.

All Tables

Table 1: Far-IR rovibrational bands of PAH cations adopted in this work, with the percentage of the total oscillator strength in each band.

Table 2: Physical parameters for the typical interstellar phases considered.

Table A.1: Mid-IR bands of interstellar PAHs adopted in this work for cations and neutrals.

All Figures

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg1.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 1: Frequencies of the first (lowest energy) vibrational mode versus $N_{\rm C}$ for PAH cations (black diamonds) and PAH neutrals (grey circles) from the Mallocci database (see text). The solid line is the relationship we adopt between the band position of cations and $N_{\rm C}$ , and the dashed line shows the case of neutrals. The dotted lines show extreme cases for this relationship.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg2.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 2: Absorption cross-section of PAH cations per carbon atom (1 Mb = 10^-18 cm²). The solid, dotted, dashed, and dot-dashed lines show the cases for $N_{\rm C}$ = 24, 54, 96, and 216, respectively.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg3.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 3: Symmetric top molecule: $D_{\rm A}$ , $D_{\rm B}$ , and $D_{\rm C}$ are the principal axis of inertia and J the total angular momentum of the molecule with K its projection along $D_{\rm C}$ .
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708fg4.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 4: Internal energy distribution of PAHs with $N_{\rm C} = 24$ (solid line and box for P(0)) and $N_{\rm C} = 216$ (dashed line and triangle) in the case of a) an MC ( G₀=10^-2), b) the diffuse ISM (G₀ = 1) and c) the Orion Bar (the radiation field is the sum of the CMB, the ISRF and a blackbody at 37 000 K corresponding to G₀ = 14 000). To illustrate the effect of the radiation field hardness, we show in b) the case of an Orion Bar type radiation field scaled down to G₀=1 (grey lines).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} { \begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=9cm]{12708fg5.eps} & \includegraphics[width=9cm]{12708fg6.eps}\\ \end{tabular}}\end{figure}$	Figure 5: Left: dust IR emission of the DIM (solid black lines and symbols) with $N_{\rm H} \sim 10^{20}$ cm^-2 (Boulanger 2000). The model dust emission is overlaid in bold grey. MRN type size distributions are used for all dust populations. The PAH vibrational contribution (dashed line) is from the present model with $N_{\rm C} = [18,96]$ , a 1:3 mixture of neutrals and cations, full hydrogen coverage, and 43 ppm of carbon. The contributions of larger grains are from the model described in Compiègne et al. (2008). The dotted line is the contribution of graphitic very small grains of radii a=0.9 to 4 nm containing 39 ppm of C. The dot-dashed line is the contribution of silicate big grains with a=0.4 to 250 nm using 37 ppm of Si. Right: dust emission from the Orion Bar (the noisy black line is the ISO-SWS spectrum) with $N_{\rm H} \sim 1.8\times 10^{21}$ cm^-2. The model dust parameters are as above but for PAHs less abundant (18 ppm of C) and more ionized (82% are cations).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708fg7.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 6: PAH rovibrational emissivity for a MRN size distribution with $N_{\rm C}=18{-}216$ . In a) we show the case of radiation field intensities corresponding to G₀=1 and 100 and in b) we illustrate the effect of IVR breakdown in case 1 (dotted line) and case 2 (dot-dashed line) (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{8.8cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708fg8.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 7: J₀ versus $N_{\rm C}$ for PAH cations. In a) we show the case of the diffuse medium. Solid line shows the CNM, dashed line the WNM and dotted line the WIM. In b) we illustrate the influence of the absorption cross-section in the CNM: cations (solid line), neutrals (dashed line) and extreme behaviours (grey lines) for the first vibrational mode versus $N_{\rm C}$ (see Fig. 1) are shown. In c), we present the case of the Orion Bar.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} { \begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708fg9.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f10.eps}\end{tabular}}\end{figure}$	Figure 8: a) Effect of varying G₀ on J₀ for PAH cations with $N_{\rm C} = 20$ , 30, 40, and 100 ( from bottom to top). The values for $N_{\rm C} = 100$ (triangles) have been divided by 2. The gas density is 30 cm^-3 and the other physical parameters for the gas are determined using CLOUDY (Ferland et al. 1998). b) Same as a) but for varying $n_{\rm H}$ at G₀ = 1. In both cases the radiation field is a blackbody with $T_{\rm eff} = 22~000$ K and the gas parameters have been obtained with CLOUDY at thermal equilibrium (see text).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f11.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 9: Rate of J-change due to rovibrational emission for a PAH with $N_{\rm C} = 24$ and heated by the ISRF. a) Comparison with former models: our rate (solid line), the rate of DL98 corrected as in Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009) (dashed line) and the rate of Ali-Haïmoud et al. (2009) (dotted line). b) Effect of IVR breakdown, case 1 and 2 (see Sect. 3.1).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} {\begin{tabular}{cc} \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f12.eps} & \includegraphics[width=8.5cm]{12708f13.eps}\end{tabular}}\end{figure}$	Figure 10: Rotational emissivity of PAH cations. We take 430 ppm of carbon in PAHs, $N_{\rm C}=24{-}216$ and assume m = 0.4 Debye. Panel a): effect of changing the fraction of large PAHs (decreasing with $\alpha =0$ to 6). The case of a log-normal distribution centered around $N_{\rm C}=44$ and width 0.4 is also shown. Panel b): rotational emission spectrum in different environments with a power law size distribution and $\alpha =3.5$ .
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f14.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure 11: Comparison to observations (symbols) of the Perseus molecular cloud G159.6-18.5. The dashed lines show the free-free (low frequency) and big grains (high-frequency) emissions. The PAH rovibrational emission is represented by the dot-dashed line. Dotted lines show the PAH rotational emission. The black model is model A, and the grey model is model B. See text for details.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics[angle=90]{12708f15.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure B.1: Cumulative distribution of vibrational modes for coronene ( $\rm C_{24}H_{12}$ ), ovalene ( $\rm C_{32}H_{14}$ ) and circumovalene ( $\rm C_{66}H_{20}$ ), from the Malloci et al. (2007) database (solid lines) and with our Debye model (dotted lines).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

$\begin{figure} \par\resizebox{9cm}{!}{\includegraphics{12708f16.eps}} \end{figure}$	Figure E.1: Rotational temperature for PAH cations as a function of their size for several insterstellar environments: CNM (black line), WNM (gray dashed line), WIM (gray line), MC (black dotted line) and the Orion Bar (black dashed line).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.

Homepage

Table of Contents

Article contents

Database links

Metrics

Show article metrics

Services

Articles citing this article
CrossRef (78)
Same authors
- Google Scholar
- NASA ADS
- EDP Sciences database

Bookmarking

[1] Ali-Haïmoud, Y., Hirata, C. M., & Dickinson, C. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1055 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[2] Allamandola, L. J., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Barker, J. R. 1985, ApJ, 290, L25 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[3] Andersson, B.-G., Wannier, P. G., Moriarty-Schieven, G. H., & Bakker, E. J. 2000, AJ, 119, 1325 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[4] Baer, T., & Hase, W. 1996, Unimolecular reaction dynamics: theory and experiments (Oxford university press) [Google Scholar]

[5] Bakes, E. L. O., & Tielens, A. G. G. M. 1994, ApJ, 427, 822 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[6] Beyer, T., & Swinehart, D. 1973, Comm. of the ACM, 16 [Google Scholar]

[7] Boulanger, F. 2000, in ESA SP-455: ISO Beyond Point Sources: Studies of Extended Infrared Emission, ed. R. J. Laureijs, K. Leech, & M. F. Kessler, 3 [Google Scholar]

[8] Casassus, S., Cabrera, G. F., Förster, F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 639, 951 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[9] Compiègne, M., Abergel, A., Verstraete, L., & Habart, E. 2008, A&A, 491, 797 [Google Scholar]

[10] Davies, R. D., Dickinson, C., Banday, A. J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 370, 1125 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[11] de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Finkbeiner, D. P., et al. 2002, ApJ, 567, 363 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[12] Draine, B. T., & Lazarian, A. 1998, ApJ, 508, 157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[13] Draine, B. T., & Li, A. 2001, ApJ, 551, 807 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[14] Dupac, X., Bernard, J.-P., Boudet, N., et al. 2003, A&A, 404, L11 [Google Scholar]

[15] Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761 [Google Scholar]

[16] Flagey, N., Boulanger, F., Verstraete, L., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 969 [Google Scholar]

[17] Herzberg, G. 1968a,b, Diatomic Molecules (a), IR and Raman Spectra of Polyatomic Molecules (b) (Van Norstand) [Google Scholar]

[18] Joblin, C., Leger, A., & Martin, P. 1992, ApJ, 393, L79 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[19] Joblin, C., Boissel, P., Leger, A., D'Hendecourt, L., & Defourneau, D. 1995, A&A, 299, 835 [Google Scholar]

[20] Joblin, C., & Mulas, G. 2008, in School on dust, Les Houches, ed. F. Boulanger (EAS Publication Series) [Google Scholar]

[21] Jura, M. 1975, ApJ, 197, 575 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[22] Kim, H.-S., & Saykally, R. J. 2002, ApJS, 143, 455 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[23] Kim, S.-H., Martin, P. G., & Hendry, P. D. 1994, ApJ, 422, 164 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[24] Lagache, G. 2003, A&A, 405, 813 [Google Scholar]

[25] Lazarian, A., & Draine, B. T. 1999, ApJ, 516, L37 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[26] Le Page, V., Snow, T. P., & Bierbaum, V. M. 2003, ApJ, 584, 316 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[27] Léger, A., & Puget, J. L. 1984, A&A, 137, L5 [Google Scholar]

[28] Léger, A., D'Hendecourt, L., & Defourneau, D. 1989, A&A, 216, 148 [Google Scholar]

[29] Leitch, E. M., Readhead, A. C. S., Pearson, T. J., & Myers, S. T. 1997, ApJ, 486, L23 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[30] Lovas, F. J., McMahon, R. J., Grabow, J.-U., et al. 2005, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 127, 4345 [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[31] Malloci, G., Joblin, C., & Mulas, G. 2007, Chem. Phys., 332, 353 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[32] Mathis, J. S., Rumpl, W., & Nordsieck, K. H. 1977, ApJ, 217, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[33] Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Ysard, N., Lavabre, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 490, 1093 [Google Scholar]

[34] Mulas, G. 1998, A&A, 338, 243 [Google Scholar]

[35] Mulas, G., Malloci, G., Joblin, C., & Toublanc, D. 2006, A&A, 460, 93 [Google Scholar]

[36] Omont, A. 1986, A&A, 164, 159 [Google Scholar]

[37] Pech, C., Joblin, C., & Boissel, P. 2002, A&A, 388, 639 [Google Scholar]

[38] Peeters, E., Hony, S., Van Kerckhoven, C., et al. 2002, A&A, 390, 1089 [Google Scholar]

[39] Peeters, E., Allamandola, L. J., Bauschlicher, Jr., C. W., et al. 2004a, ApJ, 604, 252 [Google Scholar]

[40] Peeters, E., Mattioda, A. L., Hudgins, D. M., & Allamandola, L. J. 2004b, ApJ, 617, L65 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[41] Rapacioli, M., Joblin, C., & Boissel, P. 2005, A&A, 429, 193 [Google Scholar]

[42] Ridge, N. A., Schnee, S. L., Goodman, A. A., & Foster, J. B. 2006, ApJ, 643, 932 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[43] Roche, P. F., Lucas, P. W., & Geballe, T. R. 1996, MNRAS, 281, L25 [NASA ADS] [Google Scholar]

[44] Rouan, D., Leger, A., Omont, A., & Giard, M. 1992, A&A, 253, 498 [Google Scholar]

[45] Rouan, D., Leger, A., & Le Coupanec, P. 1997, A&A, 324, 661 [Google Scholar]

[46] Schutte, W. A., Tielens, A. G. G. M., & Allamandola, L. J. 1993, ApJ, 415, 397 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[47] Smith, J. D. T., Dale, D. A., Armus, L., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 199 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[48] Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[49] Socrates, G. 2001, IR and Raman characteristic group frequencies: Tables and charts (John Wiley & Sons) [Google Scholar]

[50] Townes, C., & Schawlow, A. 1975, Microwave Spectroscopy (Dover Publications) [Google Scholar]

[51] Tripathi, A. K., & Sahasrabudhe, A., Mitra, R., et al. 2001, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 3, 449 [Google Scholar]

[52] Verstraete, L., & Léger, A. 1992, A&A, 266, 513 [Google Scholar]

[53] Verstraete, L., Pech, C., Moutou, C., et al. 2001, A&A, 372, 981 [Google Scholar]

[54] Watson, R. A., Rebolo, R., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 624, L89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[55] Werner, M. W., Uchida, K. I., Sellgren, K., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 309 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

[56] Ysard, N., Miville-Deschênes, M. A., & Verstraete, L. 2010, A&A, 509, L1 [Google Scholar]

The long-wavelength emission of interstellar PAHs: characterizing the spinning dust contribution

1 Introduction

2 The properties of interstellar PAHs

2.1 Absorption cross-section

2.2 The rigid rotor model

2.3 Electric dipole moment

3 Internal energy distribution and rovibrational IR emission of isolated interstellar PAHs

3.1 Decoupling of vibrational modes

4 Angular momentum distribution

4.1 Rovibrational transitions

4.2 Rotational emission

4.3 Equilibrium angular momentum J0

4.4 Modelling the rotational excitation by IR emission

5 Spinning dust emission

6 The case of the molecular cloud G159.6-18.5

7 Summary

Appendix A: Mid-IR absorption cross-section

Appendix B: Vibrational modes and density of states of interstellar PAHs

B.1 Vibrational modes

B.2 Density of states and degeneracies

Appendix C: Lines intensities in the rotational bands

Appendix D: Rate of angular momentum change for gas-grain interactions

D.1 Collisions with gas atoms and plasma drag

D.2 Rocket effect

D.3 Photoelectric effect

Appendix E: Rotational temperature

References

Footnotes

All Tables

All Figures

4.3 Equilibrium angular momentum J₀