Issue |
A&A
Volume 507, Number 3, December I 2009
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | L41 - L43 | |
Section | Letters | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913136 | |
Published online | 04 November 2009 |
A&A 507, L41-L43 (2009)
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Interaction of interplanetary dust particles with magnetic clouds
Effects on the orbital evolution
M. Wagner1 - R. F. Wimmer-Schweingruber2
1 - Sternwarte Hamburg, University of Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
2 -
Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics, University of Kiel,
Leibnitzstrasse 11, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Received 18 August 2009 / Accepted 21 October 2009
Abstract
Context. The interaction of the solar wind with
interplanetary dust in the inner solar system appears to result in the
formation of inner-source pickup ions. The flux of these ions is
roughly two orders of magnitude larger than expected based on
established dust particle profiles. This discrepancy can be resolved,
if a population of very small (
)
dust particles exists in the vicinity of the Sun (within 0.2 AU). The
encounter with a magnetic cloud exerts a sudden magnetic perturbation
on the orbital parameters of charged interplanetary dust particles
(IDPs) of sizes
,
which may expel them from the solar system.
Aims. The grains gain additional velocity components caused by
the Lorentz force. Depending on the orientation of the fluxrope towards
the dust grain's undisturbed orbital motion, the deflection can
increase the orbital eccentricity or the inclination.
Methods. The degree of orbital disturbance for each encounter is calculated numerically.
Results. The ``blow-out distance'' can be approximated as a function of the grain radius, s, alone:
.
On the other hand, the change in inclination depends on both the heliocentric distance, r, as well as the size of the grain:
.
The interaction of magnetic clouds with IDPs can contribute to the dust flux and acts as a sink for small dust grains.
Key words: Sun: coronal mass ejections (CMEs) - solar wind - magnetic fields
1 Introduction
A magnetic field, carried within a magnetic cloud, perturbs the orbital
evolution of charged dust grains. interplanetary dust particles (IDP's)
can range in size from a few centimeters down to a few molecules and
are most commonly charged up to positive surface potentials of a
few V (+5V as a typical value for a
sized
dust grain). As a result of this surface charge, dust grain orbits are
influenced by the Lorentz-force. While the slowly varying
interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) exhibits a near-constant force on
the dust grain, a swept-by magnetic cloud acts as a sudden magnetic
perturbation. Magnetic clouds can be approximated by a force-free
magnetic fluxrope model as introduced by, e.g., Lepping et al. (1990).
The different components of the magnetic field deflect the charged
grain into different directions. The degree of deflection depends on
the grain's charge and the relative direction and velocity with which
it is hit by the magnetic cloud. Trajectories of charged dust grains
typically smaller than
experience this deflection.
The CMEs originate in closed field-line regions under the source surface and travel with average speeds up to 2000 km s-1
through interplanetary space. They are able to compress the frozen-in
magnetic field in the IMF up to 4 times its average value.
Dust grain orbits are mainly influenced by gravity, but for grains with radii
,
other forces become important, in particular those with decreasing
heliocentric distance. Radiation pressure, Poynting-Robertson and
plasma-Poynting-Robertson effects, sublimation, and rotational bursting
determine the grains' lifetimes. Thus, all forces have to be considered
in a timescale comparison to then be certain that it is reasonable to
model the effect of a sudden magnetic cloud encounter exclusively.
Depending on the orientation and speed of the fluxrope relative to the
particle's orbital movement, the interaction of magnetic clouds with
charged IDPs can cause major changes in the orbital eccentricity, e, and inclination, i. Both e and i
increase with increasing heliocentric distance and decreasing grain
size. This first approach to the topic has been processed using highly
idealized models. Here results for how magnetic clouds influence the
population of very small dust particles close to the Sun are presented.
These have consequences for the production of inner-source pickup ions
(Wimmer-Schweingruber et al. 2003).
We could find a relation between grain size and the heliocentric
distance at which small grains can be expelled from their orbit by
magnetic clouds we call the ``blow-out distance'', as well as a
relation for the gain in orbital inclination with respect to the
orientation of the magnetic cloud at encounter, the ``inclination
drift''.
2 Simulation
![]() |
Figure 1:
Effects of magnetic cloud encounters on the orbital evolution of charged dust grains.
a):
the basic configuration of the fluxropes orientation towards the
particles orbital motion is displayed in Fig. 2 and refers to a
fluxrope rotation angle of |
Open with DEXTER |
A code was set up to compute the changes in the orbital parameters of a
dust grain after encountering magnetic clouds. A magnetic cloud is the
only subset of interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICME's).
Richardson & Cane (2003)
observe that nearly 100% of the near-Earth ICMEs are magnetic
clouds around solar minimum conditions. Around solar maximum, only
about 15% of all ejecta appear to be magnetic clouds. The
idealized magnetic field structure in a magnetic cloud is force-free
.
The magnetic field inside the fluxrope can be modeled by the use of zero- and first-order Bessel functions (
and
).
The axial field of the fluxrope is proportional to the zeroth-order
Bessel function, and the tangential field to the first-order Bessel
function. A Heaviside step function was used to cut off
and
at the first root of
at
2.4. The variable edge determines the precision of the cut-off and
.
![]() |
(1) | ||
![]() |
![]() |
(2) | ||
![]() |
The CMEs can be ejected from the Sun in a variety of possible orientations, which we accounted for. At 1 AU and an ICME speed of 1000 km s-1, a particle would spend one day or less than a day inside of the magnetic cloud, depending on the declination of the fluxrope's axis of symmetry towards the particle. This is short compared to other timescales resulting from, e.g., the Poynting-Robertson- and plasma PR-drag, sputtering, sublimation and rotational bursting. As a result, these forces can be neglected for the ``short'' timespan of an ICME encounter.
All simulations were done at heliocentric distances between 0.2 and 1 AU and ICME-speeds of 500-2000 km s-1 for a dust grain population of
,
with s = grain radius. A surface potential of
for all grain sizes was chosen with the surface charge according to
(
the permittivity of the vacuum). The magnetic field magnitude
(see
Eqs. (1) and (2)) within the fluxrope was assumed to be
20 nT at all times, which is a very simplified assumption. The
average magnetic field magnitude within ICMEs decreases with increasing
heliocentric distance (Richardson et al. 2005),
so this is just a first approach and the dependence of the fluxropes
magnetic field should be taken into account in future calculations. The
assumption of a constant B0 of 20 nT limits
the use of the code right now, but close to the sun where magnetic
field magnitudes are higher than assumed, the results are still
reasonable.
![]() |
Figure 2:
Basic configuration of particle injection into the fluxrope. The axial-symmetric component |
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 2 shows the wound-up fieldlines within the fluxrope. The -component
is rotational-symmetric. The deflection reaches its maximum in the
middle of the fluxrope and decreases towards the border. The result is
an offset when the particle leaves the fluxrope. The Bz-component
causes an acceleration perpendicular to the direction of particle
injection and the magnetic-field direction (right hand rule). The grain
will, thus, leave the fluxrope with an offset in its position and an
additional velocity component.
Basically, all perturbations increase with increasing heliocentric distance and decreasing grain size. Again, it has to be mentioned that the decrease in the magnetic field within the fluxrope is not yet included. Assuming they are perfect spheres with a surface charge derived from a potential of +5V, small grains suffer more from magnetic perturbation due to their lower masses. An enhanced flight time induces a larger interval of exposure by the grain to the fluxrope's magnetic field, which contributes to an increase in magnetic perturbation at greater heliocentric distances.
The perturbation of dust grain orbits can take on two extreme cases,
depending on the rotation angle of the fluxrope towards the particle.
To describe the simplest scenario, inclination reaches its maximum with
the fluxropes
-component
pointing in the direction of the grains orbital motion, as displayed in
Fig. 2. Rotating the fluxrope in this plane, a power law for the
change in orbital inclination emerged, this ``inclination drift'',
,
is a function of the heliocentric distance, r, and the grain radius, s:
![]() |
(3) |
Equation (3) is derived from numerical simulation and therefore just valid for simulated grain sizes of





The maximal change in orbital eccentricity occurs, when the fluxropes z-axis
as displayed in Fig. 2 is pointing towards or away from us. The
relation between grain size and the heliocentric distance, at
which e becomes unity for
(the particle is expelled from the solar system) will further be denoted as the ``blow-out distance'',
:
![]() |
(4) |
From 0.2 AU up to 0.55 AU, the blow-out distance behaves linearly.
To assume those extreme fluxrope rotation angles is highly theoretical,
since the average orientation of CME ejection relative to the ecliptic
plane is
,
due to the geometry of sunspot occurrence (Wimmer-Schweingruber, private communication).
Some possible IDP-orbits are displayed in Fig. 1a. Depending on
the orientation of the fluxrope at the encounter with the grain,
mixtures of inclination and eccentricity changes occur. Figure 1b
shows such a deflected orbit, after a flight of 70 years duration.
The Poynting-Robertson lifetime at 0.2 AU amounts to
70 years. This indicates a number of 6440 ICME encounters,
estimating two contacts per week. Consider that about 100% of the
ICMEs (at 1AU) are magnetic clouds during solar minimum and
about 15% during solar maximum conditions (Richardson et al. 2003),
this results in an average value of 57.5% magnetic clouds, hence the
contact with 3220 magnetic clouds. The fluxrope encounter angles
were generated randomly, so that the deflections partly canceled each
other out. The orbital eccentricity changed from a circular orbit to an
elliptical one with e=0.0043 and
gained
in inclination.
3 Conclusions
Charged interplanetary dust grains of sizes
are deflected by magnetic clouds. Even if the effect of magnetic
perturbation is simulated separately and gravity, the
Poynting-Robertson- and plasma Poynting-Robertson effect, radiation,
solar wind pressure, and other minor effects are neglected, the change
in the orbital parameters can be drastic.
The perturbing force that magnetic clouds exert on charged IDPs
increases with heliocentric distance and decreasing grain size, when
assuming a constant non-decreasing B0.
The dependence of the fluxropes magnetic field strength on heliocentric
distance should be taken into account, especially at greater
heliocentric distances. Still, the simulations confirm the existence of
a sink for small IDPs in a region 0.2 AU.
The heliocentric distance at which an IDP is blown out on a hyperbolic
orbit is almost exclusively a function of the grain radius. IDPs of
sizes
cannot be blown out by magnetic clouds below 1 AU.
For a high number of randomly oriented magnetic clouds, the resulting perturbations tend to smooth each other out. For a
grain, the effect of magnetic cloud interaction may be weak, but as the
grain is carried towards the Sun via PR-drag, continuous size-reducing
effects such as rotational bursting, sputtering, and sublimation start
to decrease the grain radius, and the perturbations by magnetic clouds
regain importance. A grain of
in radius is slightly deflected by magnetic could interaction, and a small grain of
is meanwhile expelled at a high degree of probability.
The grain radius is reduced by sputtering, rotational bursting, and sublimation close to the Sun. To find an expression for the dust flux that is caused by sudden magnetic perturbation only, the reduction of the grain radius should be taken into account in terms of a correction factor in future works.
References
- Lepping, R. P., Jones, J. A., & Burlaga, L. F. 1990, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 957 [CrossRef]
- Richardson, I. G., & Cane, H. V. 2003, J. Geophys. Res. 109, A09104, Academic Press 107, Icarus 134, 311 (1998)
- Richardson, I. G., Liu, Y., & Belcher, J. W. 2005, NATO Science Series II: Mathematics, Physics and Chemistry, 178
- Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., & Bochsler, P. 2003, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1077 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Crooker, N. U., Balogh, A., et al. 2006, Space Sci. Rev., 123, 177 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
Footnotes
- ... surface
- Source surface: this imaginary surface separates the region of complex magnetic field structure close to the Sun, where both open and closed lines are present from the outer region with solely open field lines that point radially outwards.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1:
Effects of magnetic cloud encounters on the orbital evolution of charged dust grains.
a):
the basic configuration of the fluxropes orientation towards the
particles orbital motion is displayed in Fig. 2 and refers to a
fluxrope rotation angle of |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
Basic configuration of particle injection into the fluxrope. The axial-symmetric component |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.