Cluster | Age | Total | RV | Binaries | |
(Myr) | survey | Confirmed | Candidates | ||
NGC3603 | 1.3 ![]() |
3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
Carina | 1.5 ![]() |
3 | 3 | 2 | 0 |
HM-1 | 2.2 ![]() |
2 | 0 | - | 0 |
NGC6231 | 2.7 ![]() |
1 | 0 | - | 0 |
Arches | 2.5 ![]() |
13 | 0 | - | 3 |
Wd 2 | 2.6 ![]() |
2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Bochum 7 | 2.8 ![]() |
1 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
R136/30 Dor | >2 | 23 | 23 | 8 | 1 |
Total | 48 | 31 | 14 | 5 |
The cluster list
follows that of Crowther et al. (2006), supplemented with the WNLh rich Arches (Figer et al. 2002)
and 30 Dor (Walborn & Blades 1989) clusters. Column 4 summarises
the number of stars in each cluster for which a RV survey has been carried out. Confirmed binaries were
identified via photometric or spectroscopic evidence, while candidate binaries were selected if
erg s-1 and/or kT >4 keV, noting that such strict criteria
would exclude known spectroscopic binaries such as WR20a and WR22 (Table 4).
Given the different sensitivities of current RV and X-ray surveys (e.g. Pollock 1987; Pollock et al.
1995; Ignace et al. 2000; Oskinova 2005)
we present results for individual clusters.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.