Issue |
A&A
Volume 505, Number 2, October II 2009
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 811 - 823 | |
Section | The Sun | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912100 | |
Published online | 11 August 2009 |
Multi-wavelength fine structure and mass flows in solar microflares![[*]](/icons/foot_motif.png)
S. Berkebile-Stoiser1 - P. Gömöry1,2 - A. M. Veronig1 - J. Rybák2 - P. Sütterlin3
1 - Institute of Physics, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, 8010 Graz, Austria
2 - Astronomical Institute, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 05960 Tatranská Lomnica, Slovakia
3 - Institute for Solar Physics, The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Alba Nova University Center, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Received 18 March 2009 / Accepted 30 July 2009
Abstract
Aims. We study the multi-wavelength characteristics at high spatial resolution, as well as chromospheric evaporation signatures of solar microflares. To this end, we analyze the fine structure and mass flow dynamics in the chromosphere, transition region and corona of three homologous microflares (GOES class <A9/0.7 with/without background), which occurred on July 4, 2006 in AR 10898.
Methods. A multi-wavelength analysis using temporally and spatially highly resolved imaging data from the Dutch open telescope (H,
Ca II H), the transition region and coronal explorer (17.1 nm), the extreme-ultraviolet imaging telescope (19.5 nm), and the Reuven Ramaty high energy solar spectroscopic imager (
3 keV) was carried out. EUV line spectra provided by the coronal diagnostic spectrometer are searched for Doppler shifts in order to study associated plasma flows at chromospheric (He I,
K), transition region (e.g. O V,
K), and coronal temperatures (Si XII,
K). RHESSI X-ray spectra provide information about non-thermal electrons.
Results. The multi-wavelength appearance of the microflares is in basic agreement with the characteristics of large flares. For the first event, a complex flare sequence is observed in TRACE 17.1 nm images (
MK), which show several brightenings, narrow loops of enhanced emission, and an EUV jet. EIT 19.5 nm data (
MK) exhibit similar features for the third event. DOT measurements show finely structured chromospheric flare brightenings for all three events, loop-shaped fibrils of increased emission between H
brightenings, as well as a similar feature in Ca II. For all three events, a RHESSI X-ray source (3-8 keV,
MK) is located in between two chromospheric brightenings situated in magnetic flux of opposite polarity. We find the flow dynamics associated with the events to be very complex. In the chromosphere and transition region, CDS observed downflows for the first (
km s-1), and upflows for the second event (
km s-1). During the third microflare, we find upflows of
20 km s-1 and also weak downflows of
20 km s-1 in two separate brightenings. For all three microflares, multi-component fitting is needed for several profiles of He I, O V, and Ne VI lines observed at the flare peaks, which indicate spatially unresolved, oppositely directed flows of
180 km s-1. We interpret these flows as twisting motions of the flare loops. Loop-shaped fibrils in between H
brightenings showing opposite flow directions (
km s-1) are also observed in DOT H
Dopplergrams. RHESSI X-ray spectra show evidence of non-thermal bremsstrahlung for two of the three microflares. The electron beam flux density deposited in the chromosphere for these events is estimated to straddle the threshold heating flux between gentle and explosive evaporation.
Key words: Sun: flares - Sun: chromosphere - Sun: corona
1 Introduction
Solar flares are believed to be powered by magnetic reconnection in
the corona where the magnetic energy released is to a great part
used up for energizing particles beyond the thermal range.
Non-thermal electrons travel towards the solar surface and finally
encounter dense plasma in the transition region and chromosphere
where they deposit the bulk of their energy via Coulomb collisions
with the ambience. Because of the strong energy input the chromospheric
plasma is heated to temperatures 107 K and expands
upwards into the corona. This process was termed ``chromospheric
evaporation'' (see Sturrock 1973). According to
hydrodynamic simulations, hot upflows reaching supersonic velocities
of several hundred km s-1 should be detectable in the impulsive
phase of solar flares
(see Abbett & Hawley 1999; Fisher et al. 1985b; Allred et al. 2005; Fisher et al. 1985c,a). A downward push of the lower chromosphere is also
expected during times of large energy input into the chromosphere,
which establishes momentum balance with the hot upflows
(Fisher 1989). Whereas this sequence called ``explosive
evaporation'' is suggested for flares that deposit high non-thermal
electron flux density in the chromosphere, simulations also suggest
that evaporation can be ``gentle'' for flares with lower electron flux
density. For gentle evaporation, the chromosphere is expected to
slowly expand upwards at several tens of km s-1 to adjust to a
new equilibrium position.
Upflows of hot plasma were indeed found in flares observed in
soft X-ray emission lines by the bent crystal spectrometer on board
the solar maximum mission (SMM/BCS; Acton et al.
1980) and the Bragg crystal spectrometer on the
Yohkoh satellite (Culhane et al. 1991). In flares observed with these
instruments, strongly blueshifted lines appeared that indicated
upflow velocities 100 km s-1 (e.g. Doschek et al. 1980;
Feldman et al. 1980;
Antonucci et al. 1982;
Fludra et al. 1989;
Antonucci et al. 1990;
Mariska et al. 1993;
Brosius & Phillips 2004). As these
observations were disk-integrated and did not feature any spatial
resolution, a direct comparison between flare kernels and the
position where the plasma flows originated was impossible. The
coronal diagnostic spectrometer (CDS; Harrison et al.
1995) on the solar and heliospheric observatory
(SOHO; Domingo et al. 1995), on the
other hand, allows us to study flows at chromospheric to coronal
temperatures at excellent time and spatial resolution.
Although CDS lacks the possibility studying the hottest part of the flare plasma, it has been successfully used for a couple of flare studies which aimed at deriving the characteristics of evaporation flows during flares. Of special importance in this context are observations where the slit is situated directly at the flare energy deposit site. In one of the first CDS flare studies, Czaykowska et al. (1999) find downflows at the end of bright post flare loops but also strong, hot upflows at their outer edge even in the late phase of an M class flare. Brosius (2003) also finds upflows in the impulsive phase and ``warm rain'' due to cooling flare plasma in an important flare. The observed flow velocities in comparison with predictions of hydrodynamic simulations were studied by Brosius & Phillips (2004), who report observations of a flare jointly observed by CDS and Yohkoh/BCS suggesting momentum balance between up- and downward flowing material in the impulsive phase. Teriaca et al. (2006) find an order of magnitude agreement of the momenta of cospatial, oppositely directed flows in a small two ribbon flare. The combination of flare X-ray spectra and images and CDS Doppler velocities enabled Milligan et al. (2006) to demonstrate observations in rough agreement with simulations of explosive chromospheric evaporation.
At the lower end of the energy distribution of solar flares range
micro- and nanoflares which are named after the fraction of thermal
plasma energy they contain compared with the largest observed events
(Aschwanden 2004). In the micro- and nanoflare coronal heating
model, a multitude of such small flares are proposed to supply the
energy to heat the solar corona to the observed temperatures of
1-3 MK (e.g. Parker 1988). Additionally to heating
plasma, there also has to be a mechanism to constantly transport
matter into the corona which would otherwise disappear due to solar
wind flows. This could in principle be achieved by chromospheric
evaporation associated with micro- and nanoflares
(Aschwanden et al. 2007; Stoiser et al. 2008). Observations show that
microflares behave very similar to large flares with respect to
their multi-wavelength and X-ray spectral properties (see
e.g. Krucker et al. 2002; Liu et al.
2004; Kundu et al. 2006;
Stoiser et al. 2007). This suggests that
the same dynamic processes like chromospheric evaporation due to
fast electron beams also occur in microflares. However, evidence of
mass flows and their characteristics like the speed and flow
direction in different parts of the solar atmosphere for microflares
is extremely rare. Brosius & Holman (2009) studied a compact RHESSI microflare
(GOES class A5) and found upflows
20 km s-1 in
chromospheric and coronal lines which are consistent with gentle
evaporation. Analyzing small C-class flares, Falchi et al. (2006) and Milligan (2008) report
evidence for conductive evaporation and direct heating to create
hot, coronal flare plasma instead of beam driven chromospheric
evaporation. As mainly observations of
strong ``microflares'' (GOES C) have been reported, the basic
properties of plasma flows in the smallest microflares compared with
the theoretically expected behavior as outlined by flare simulations
still needs to be established. Also, the amount of plasma
transported into the corona due to evaporation flows remains
unclear.
In this paper, we report on 3 microflares (GOES class <A9/A1 with/without background) for which imaging and spectroscopic observations of the chromosphere, transition region and corona with high temporal and spatial resolution were achieved. As far as we are aware, these are the smallest flare events so far studied for chromospheric evaporation flows. Imaging of the chromosphere at a resolution as high as 0.2'' by the Dutch open telescope as well as images of the transition region and corona provided by the transition region and coronal explorer (resolution of 1'') reveal the fine structure of the microflares in the entire solar atmosphere. The analysis of EUV line spectra recorded directly at the flare sites by CDS allows us to identify plasma flows in the chromosphere, transition region and corona. The energy input into the chromosphere by non-thermal electrons is studied with RHESSI X-ray spectra. With our data set, we are able to give a detailed picture of the processes in selected microflares. Such comprehensive case studies are important in the frame of the micro-and nanoflare coronal heating model as well as for the understanding of the flare process in general.
2 Instrument description and data reduction
2.1 Observing campaign and ground based instruments
In this paper, we present data acquired during a coordinated
observing campaign performed in the period June 28-July 12, 2006
which aimed to explore the dynamics of microflares and the
chromospheric network. The SOHO joint observing program
JOP 171 included the operation of selected instruments onboard SOHO
and the transition region and coronal explorer
(TRACE; Handy et al. 1999). The space instruments were supported by
the ground-based Dutch open telescope (DOT;
Hammerschlag & Bettonvil 1998). DOT
provided tomographic (nearly simultaneous) filtergrams of the Sun's
photosphere and chromosphere in the blue and red continuum (432 and
651 nm), the G Band (430.5 nm), the Ca II H line (396.8 nm)
and the H
line (656.3 nm,
0.35Å). Speckle
reconstruction of the data served to achieve the telescope
diffraction limit of 0.2'' for a subfield sized from
to
.
The spatial resolution of
0.2'' applies to images recorded in the G Band whereas the
resolution is already slightly lower for H
filtergrams
(0.3''). The time cadence of the speckeled images used here was
better than 26 s. DOT Doppler maps were reconstructed from the
H
wing intensities. For each pixel, the difference of
normalized intensities observed in the DOT passbands set in the
H
red and blue wing
(
)
was
used as a proxy for flow speeds. Details on the telescope, the DOT
tomographic multi-wavelength imaging and data acquisition system,
speckle reconstruction and reduction procedures are provided in
Sütterlin et al. (2001) and Rutten et al. (2004).
2.2 Space-borne instruments
Space-borne instruments coordinated with the DOT during JOP 171 were SOHO/CDS, the Michelson Doppler imager (SOHO/MDI; Scherrer et al. 1995) and TRACE. For our study we also use data of the extreme-ultraviolet imaging telescope (SOHO/EIT; Delaboudinière et al. 1995) and the Reuven Ramaty high energy solar spectroscopic imager (RHESSI; Lin et al. 2002).
The normal incidence spectrometer (NIS) on CDS (Harrison et al. 1995)
provided simultaneous EUV line spectra of six chromospheric,
transition region and coronal lines which were used to determine
line of sight flow speeds in the observed microflare kernels. We
selected emission lines of the following ions, and give their
nominal wavelength and formation temperature: He I (58.43 nm,
K), O III (59.96 nm,
K), O V (62.97 nm,
K), Ne VI (56.28 nm,
K), Mg IX (36.8 nm,
K)
and Si XII (52.07 nm,
K). The CDS slit
(
,
pixel size
)
was set fixed in a
sit-and-stare mode for
5.45 h acquiring observations at a
cadence of 15 s (10 s exposure plus
5 s read-out
time). Four raster scans, i.e. 20 successive steps of the slit in
x-direction corresponding to a 40
map were
obtained before/after the 1D observing sequence. These
rasters were used for the co-alignment of the CDS data with the
other data sets. Raw 1D and 2D data were corrected for the CCD bias,
deviations in exposure time, flat-field and cosmic ray hits by
standard calibration software available in the solar software tree (SSW).
As the wavelength axis of CDS is not absolute it has to be
calibrated before Doppler shifts to the wavelength at rest can be
determined. For this purpose, a mean line profile was
calculated from the pixels in the nearest raster image. Pixels with
intensities above a threshold assumed to constitute the highest
emission coming from the quiet sun were excluded. Thus, bright
features like sunspot plumes and their associated flows do not
influence the wavelength calibration (see
e.g. Maltby et al. 1999). The thus obtained mean profile was supposed to
be unshifted, i.e. all up- and downflows in the image were assumed
to balance each other. The wavelength of this profile was set to the
laboratory wavelength of the considered line according to
MacPherson & Jordan (1999) corrected by the deviations suggested by
Peter & Judge (1999). These corrections account for the constantly
observed transition region and coronal blue and redshifts in the
solar atmosphere (see Gömöry et al. 2006). The largest
correction was applied to the O V line for which a constant
redshift of 10 km s-1 is assumed, whereas the
chromospheric He I line is presented to be close to
unshifted by Peter & Judge (1999). For all other lines, the correction
into the red or blue are
6 km s-1. We estimate the
error in the velocity calibration to range within
10 km s-1. The calibrated line spectra were fitted with
a single broadened Gaussian
.
Alternatively, as several profiles at the 3 events' peaks were clearly
composed of more than one component, we applied a two component
Gaussian fit in these cases. The line fits provided the intensities,
wavelength positions of the core and the width of the line. Of major
interest for our analysis are the Doppler velocities which were
calculated from the wavelength shift of the line centroid relative
to its nominal wavelength.
For our campaign, MDI white light maps and high resolution line of
sight magnetograms at a pixel resolution of 0.6'' and a time
cadence of 1 min were requested. Unfortunately, this observing mode
ceased to operate
45 min before the first microflare in the
present study occurred. Thus, a high resolution magnetogram
corrected for solar differential rotation was used to study the
magnetic context.
We also found one image showing one of our events in the EIT
19.5 nm line (Fe XII). EIT observed on this day at a time
cadence of 12 min and at a pixel resolution of
2.6''.
The dark current and flat field were corrected with SSW routines
prepared for EIT data analysis.
The TRACE satellite provided image sequences in
the 17.1 nm passband showing plasma at a temperature of 106 K. The filtergrams feature a high spatial resolution of
0.5''/pixel for a
511
field of view (FoV) and a time cadence of
90 s. The TRACE images were flat-fielded
and the dark current and cosmic ray hits were removed by using
standard SSW routines.
For identifying microflares, we used observations of the RHESSI instrument which observes
flare X-ray and -ray emission
3 keV for a full sun field of view.
RHESSI is capable of high resolution spectroscopy and imaging. At energies
100 keV, RHESSI features
excellent spatial (down to
2.3'') and spectral resolution
(
1 keV). Most importantly for our study, the RHESSI germanium detectors
are extraordinarily sensitive (Smith et al. 2002) and are able to observe small microflares
not detected by the GOES (geostationary operational
environmental satellites) X-ray detector used for flare
classification. The analysis of RHESSI data was carried out with
SSW software. Images were always reconstructed with the Pixon algorithm
(Hurford et al. 2002) and spectral fitting was done utilizing the OSPEX
package (Schwartz et al. 2002). The RHESSI detectors were not attenuated during the microevents which ensures highest sensitivity.
2.3 Data co-alignment
A lot of work was invested in order to carefully co-align this extensive data
set. The coordinate shift between different instruments was derived
by the 2-dimensional cross-correlation of images or CDS raster scans
taken in similar temperature ranges and recorded close in
time to each other. The reference coordinate system for our data set
was EIT. First, CDS He I 58.4 nm raster images were
coaligned with the EIT He II 30.4 nm full disk image closest in time.
TRACE 17.1 nm maps data were aligned with the EIT maps in the same
wavelength band, and the pointing information was used to update all
other TRACE filtergrams, thereby also accounting for the varying
field of view of the individual TRACE filters. The co-aligned
TRACE white light images were the reference for the MDI high
resolution white light and magnetogram maps. Images acquired in the
DOT Ca II H channel were co-aligned with TRACE 160 nm images and
served as reference for the remaining DOT channels. As DOT
tracked the major sunspot in its FoV during the observing run,
the cross-correlation of DOT data with TRACE images accounted not only for translation in x- and
y-direction (resolution of 0.5''), but also for the image tilt
(resolution of 0.1 deg). The errors to be expected in the obtained
co-alignment were estimated by repeating the procedure and choosing
a different order of instruments/filters. The thus derived
uncertainties for all instruments are
1.2''. For
RHESSI images, we did not apply a change of the coordinate system
but used the reconstructed images directly as the RHESSI pointing is accurate to <1'' (Lin et al. 2002).
3 Microflare fine structure
![]() |
Figure 1:
AR 10898 as observed by TRACE, MDI and DOT before the 08:26 UT microflare occurred. Panel a): TRACE white light image with the position of the CDS slit and the DOT FoV indicated by a black and grey frame, respectively. Panel b) shows an MDI high resolution longitudinal magnetogram recorded |
Open with DEXTER |
On July 4, 2006, the flare activity was low with 27 flares of class A9.9-C1.2 stated in the GOES event summary. The RHESSI flare list (not corrected for satellite night times) recorded 19 events emitting in the 3-6 keV range and 2 events with emission up to 12-25 keV.
The instruments included in our campaign were pointed to AR 10898
located 200'' from disk center. An overview on the data set illustrating the appearance of AR 10898 in
TRACE white light and EUV images, in selected DOT channels and an
MDI magnetogram can be seen in Fig. 1. The active
region consisted of a major sunspot (Mt. Wilson class
)
which was embedded into a network
cell of opposite magnetic polarity. Over
the day, the spot was observed to rotate in counter-clockwise
direction. DOT traced the spot between
07:44 and 10:09 UT
and acquired observations suitable for speckle
reconstruction
. The center of the CDS slit was fixed at
X=106'' west and Y=-149'' south of disk center.
3.1 Microflare detection
During the DOT observing run we searched for microflares which occurred
inside of the DOT FoV. To this end, we derived
images in the 3-8 keV range of peaks observed in the RHESSI light
curves and compared the position of the X-ray source to the FoV of
the DOT. We found 3 RHESSI events which were also observed in the
DOT H
and Ca II line. These three microflares also featured brightenings inside the CDS slit. The RHESSI peak times of the microflares in the
3-6 keV band are 08:26:20 UT, 08:38:10 UT and 08:45:30 UT (cf.
Fig. 5). The three microflares are
very small regarding their X-ray classification. Only the first of
them could be determined to be of GOES class A9.2/A0.7 with/without
background, whereas the other microflares were too weak to be
observed by GOES. In the following, we concentrate on these three
events for the detailed analysis of their chromospheric, transition region
and coronal fine structure as well as their associated plasma flows.
3.2 Coronal activity
TRACE 17.1 nm maps of AR 10898 were of good quality when the first
event presented here occurred (08:26 UT), whereas for the
later two microflares at 08:38 UT and 08:45 UT, the filtergrams were
spoilt by particle hits of the Earth's atmosphere.
The TRACE 17.1 nm data for the first microflare at 08:26 UT reveal a
very complex evolution (see Fig. 2).
In the course of the event, several impulsive brightenings as well
as narrow loops appear. All of the TRACE brightenings probably
constitute footpoints of a complex microflaring loop system (they are numbered from 1-4 in Fig. 2). The brightenings
are located in the penumbra of the sunspot and in areas of enhanced
magnetic flux of opposite magnetic polarity. A jet is ejected near to the
northernmost TRACE brightening, close in time to the hard X-ray
peak. The RHESSI 3-8 keV X-ray source associated with the event
forms a small loop between the southernmost and strongest TRACE
brightening situated in the penumbra (X=106'', Y=-130'', footpoint no. 1) and
another one to the north (X=110'', Y=-110'', footpoint no. 2), thus identifying
these patches as footpoints of a hot (10 MK) X-ray emitting
loop. Another microflare brightening turns up directly
on the CDS slit (X=106'', Y=-100'', footpoint no. 4).
One image taken in the 19.5 nm passband of the EIT instrument during
the late phase of the third event is available. EIT data have a
spatial resolution of 5.4'' and do not allow us to study the
detailed fine structure of the event. However, a bright loop
(X=106'', Y=-130'') and a brightening to the north (X=100'',
Y=-110'') at roughly the same position as during the first event
are visible. A loop-shaped RHESSI X-ray source reconstructed for
energies <8 keV showing plasma at temperatures
MK is
located in between these EIT brightenings (see
Fig. 3). The position of the CDS
slit at the recording time of the EIT image coincides with the
southern microflare brightening whereas the northern one is located at the very edge of the slit.
Although we do not have imaging information from TRACE or EIT
available for the second event at 08:38 UT, we can speculate that
the coronal signatures are similar to the ones of the other two microflares as all three events
show homologous brightenings in the DOT H
and Ca II channels. For this microflare, the only imaging information about the coronal appearance comes from RHESSI which
observed a 3-8 keV X-ray source in between DOT H
footpoints indicating the presence of a hot
microflare loop (see Fig. 4).
3.3 Magnetic field environment
![]() |
Figure 2:
TRACE 17.1 nm image sequence of the microflare which peaked in X-rays at |
Open with DEXTER |
For the events for which images of the whole microflare site were available (08:26 UT and 08:45 UT event), we studied the magnetic field topology in which they were formed. TRACE and DOT footpoint brightenings of the two events are found to be situated in
areas of strong or enhanced magnetic flux of opposite polarities
(see Fig. 2). With an MDI magnetogram
time series recorded over the whole day we searched for changes in
the magnetic field at the microflares' site which might facilitate
reconnection like emergence/cancellation of magnetic flux (see
e.g. Priest & Forbes 2002). The large sunspot of AR 10898 was observed to
rotate over the day, which will by default cause shearing of
magnetic field lines which connect the sunspot with surrounding
areas of opposite polarity. Magnetograms at a 1 min cadence taken one hour before
the events show small scale (2
)
magnetic flux patches moving in the sunspot penumbra and
emergence/movement of flux in the opposite polarity zone where microflare loop footpoints are observed. This motion of magnetic flux could cause
disturbances in the coronal magnetic field leading to the creation
of microflares.
![]() |
Figure 3:
EIT 19.5 nm maps in inverse grey scale recorded |
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Snapshots of the three microflares as observed in DOT H |
Open with DEXTER |
3.4 Chromospheric response
Whereas not the whole flaring region was covered by DOT, some of the
microflare brightenings were also observed within the DOT FoV for
all three events. For comparison, TRACE brightenings nos. 1-3 seen
during the first event (Fig. 2) are
also observed by DOT whereas brightening no. 4 is located outside
the DOT FoV. During each microflare, the chromospheric DOT
brightenings appeared at roughly the same position (2''difference in x- and y-direction). The strongest brightening was
always situated inside the sunspot penumbra (X=106'', Y=-130'')
at the southern end of the RHESSI X-ray sources. Another brightening
observed for all three events was located close to the edge of the
DOT FoV
(X=110'', Y=-110''). For
the first microflare, a third and weak brightening to the east
(X=90'', Y=-115'') was also seen.
Figure 4 shows a compilation of the three
microflares' time evolution in the H
and Ca II
channels. The southernmost brightening in the penumbra is captured
completely in all DOT channels for all events. None of the images is
saturated and the full fine structure at the telescope resolution
limit of 0.2''-0.3'' is exhibited. The brightenings show fine
sub-structure with patches of enhanced emission sized down to
(see Fig. 4). Interestingly,
for some times during the events, the H
brightenings are
partly hidden behind dark fibrils which show enhanced Doppler shifts
(cf. Fig. 4, H
intensities and velocities at 08:45:30 UT). Most noticeably in the
third event, fibrils brighten up in between the footpoint
brightenings (Fig. 4, image at 08:45:53 UT).
The connectivity of the magnetic field at the microflare site can be
estimated by the shape of chromospheric fibrils which closely follow
the shape of the RHESSI X-ray sources observed for the first and
second event. Approximately 3 min after the southern footpoint of
the third event has faded, dark ``threads'' from outside the DOT FoV
are observed to flow down to the position of the former microflare
brightening in the red wing of the H
line, maybe due to the
restructuring of the magnetic field on a larger scale, although the
formation and origin of these flows is unclear.
Compared to the dynamic range of the H
emission, the flare
brightenings observed in the Ca II line are much more intense than
the quiet sun emission and fade away faster. The brightenings have a
spikier appearance than in H
.
Most visible in the 08:45 UT
event but also observed for the other two, a bright, loop-shaped feature in between the southern penumbral
footpoint and the brightening at the edge of the DOT FoV appears. This feature looks similar to the bright fibrils observed in the H
line.
All the H
and Ca II microflare brightenings are found to be
dynamic. They were moving for a small amount (on the order of
<5'') during their life time. According to the eruptive standard
flare model, chromospheric flare loop footpoints appear moving with time further
away from the magnetic neutral line. Although the DOT brightenings
observed during the microevents are moving, they do not clearly
separate from each other as is generally observed for large two
ribbon flares. However, they are of very short duration and occur in
a complex small-scale magnetic field topology which could be the
reason why no clear separation is observed.
A movie combining DOT images from the G band, H
(intensities and velocities), Ca II intensities as well as RHESSI data of the
microflares is available as online supplementary material (see Appendix A for a description).
4 Associated plasma flows
4.1 CDS - flows at chromospheric, transition region and coronal temperatures
![]() |
Figure 5: Top: specific intensities along the slit in the He I line, i.e. the amplitudes of the broadened Gaussian fit applied to the line profiles in each pixel (units of erg cm-2 s-1 sterad-1 Å-1). Middle: same as the top panel but the velocities are plotted in the range [-30,+30] km s-1 (black indicates blue- and white redshifts). For better comparison with the top panel, contours mark the positions of high He I intensity. The intensities and velocities are derived from one component broadened Gaussian fits to the observed line profiles. Bottom: RHESSI light curves in the energy bins 3-6 keV (light grey), 6-9 keV (dark grey) and 9-12 keV (black). In each panel, black or white dashed lines mark the start and end of RHESSI X-ray emission in the microflares. |
Open with DEXTER |
For each of the 3 microflares, the CDS instrument observed 2 brightenings in all lines, situated at roughly the same location on
the slit. They are located in the range
and -140
.
In the following,
we will refer to them as to the ``northern'' brightening or
``southern''/``penumbral'' brightening (as it is situated in the
penumbra). See Fig. 2 for a
comparison how they appear in spatially resolved TRACE data recorded
for the first microflare (footpoints nos. 1 and 4). Although the DOT
and TRACE brightenings corresponding to the CDS brightenings are
very small (
2-5''), the CDS brightenings cover several CDS
pixels (5-20'', see Figs. 5
and 6). The microflare brightenings were
not always located at the position of the CDS slit in the impulsive
phase (i.e. at the time of largest energy input) which is important
to keep in mind when interpreting the results. For the first event,
the northern and southern brightening lie directly inside the
CDS slit (see Figs. 2
and 4). For the second event, the timing of
the RHESSI light curve and the evolution of the CDS intensities in
all lines suggests that CDS observed the microflare only in the
X-ray decline phase (cf. Fig. 5). For the
third microflare, both the southern and northern brightening are
observed at the flare peak. However, it seems that only the edges of
both brightenings are located in the CDS slit (Fig. 3
and 4). As CDS data show an abundance of
information not only confined to bright microflare pixels, we first
illustrate the velocity field along the whole CDS slit for
45 min with a CDS space-time plot. Afterwards, details on the
intensity and velocity development in selected pixels inside the
microflare brightenings are shown. In the following text and
all figures showing CDS observations, ``intensities'' mean the
amplitude of the broadened Gaussian function fitted to the line
profiles (units of erg cm-2 s-1 sr -1 Å-1,
i.e. the specific intensity).
![]() |
Figure 6:
The evolution of intensities (units of erg cm-2 s-1 sterad-1 Å-1) in the Si XII line (
|
Open with DEXTER |
Figure 5 shows the RHESSI X-ray emission in
the range 3-12 keV together with the time evolution of the
intensities and velocities along the CDS slit in the chromospheric
He I 58.43 nm line. This CDS space-time plot has the
advantage that flows associated with the events occurring in pixels
in- as well as outside the main flare brightenings become visible.
The general flow pattern observed in this chromospheric line is
complicated. For the 08:26 UT microflare, the start and end of
enhanced emission closely follows the RHESSI light curve.
He I downflows are observed at the position of the northern
and southern flare brightenings as well as in between them. However,
the strongest downflows within the penumbral brightening are
observed two or three pixels to the north from the intensity
maximum, whereas only small velocity enhancements are found in the
brightest pixels. In the northern brightening, approximately at the
time of a second small peak in the RHESSI light curves, blueshifts
indicating upflow velocities of
km s-1 appear at
.
These upflows ``move'' with time further to the
north, forming a streak in the CDS space-time plot. This might be a
signature of the jet seen by TRACE to move out of the corona close
to the northern footpoint brightening
(Fig. 2). During the second event,
the He I line is blueshifted in the entire southern
brightening indicative of upflows whereas in the northern
brightening, blueshifts can only be observed in pixels with low
intensities at the lower edge. For the third event, first blueshifts
and a fast change to redshifts can be seen at the position of the
northern footpoint whereas weak downflows are observed for the
southern brightening. The reason why we do not a priori see the
strongest flows in the brightest pixels might be a geometry effect
as we can only observe the line of sight velocity. On the other
hand, this could also have a physical reason, e.g. the strongest
flows occur at the edge of the microflare brightenings.
Flows
associated with the microflare events, however, are not only confined to
pixels with high emission. Strong downflows which reach speeds of
+70 km s-1 are observed up to
10'' to the south of the penumbral
footpoint. During all three events, such enhanced downflows into the sunspot
penumbra occur. Similar downflows are also observed in the O V line.
In the coronal Si XII
line ( MK), high intensities are found at the location of the two chromospheric He I brightenings which mark heated flare loop footpoints (Fig. 6). With time, pixels in between these brightenings become more intense, probably showing emission from a hot
flare loop located in between the chromospheric microflare brightenings. However, no blueshifts
which would indicate the motion of matter from the
chromosphere into the corona are observed for the Si XII line which is at rest during all three events. This could be due to low count statistics in Si XII. On the other hand, we could observe heating of the footpoints
of the flare loops early in the events followed by cooling of hotter
plasma created during the flare into the 2 MK range. The presence of
plasma hotter than 2 MK is proved by RHESSI X-ray spectra derived at the microflares' peak which can be fitted at the lowest energies by an isothermal bremstrahlung component with a temperature around 10 MK. Studying four regular flares, Kamio et al. (2005) found
the Mg IX line (
MK) formed at similar temperatures as
the Si XII line also to be at rest. They argued that this might
indicate that the line is formed at an intermediate temperature
where neither up- nor downflows can be observed. This could also
apply to the Si XII line in these microflares.
![]() |
Figure 7:
For the first event, the time development of intensities and velocities in the CDS He I (
|
Open with DEXTER |
![]() |
Figure 8: Same as Fig. 7 for the microflare at 08:38 UT. |
Open with DEXTER |
Details on the velocity signal in chromospheric and transition
region microflare brightenings are shown in CDS light curves derived
for individual bright pixels. In Figs. 7
to 9, we show for each event the time evolution
of CDS He I and O V intensities and velocities in
selected pixels of the northern and southern brightening. We
concentrate on the He I and O V line as they have
the best signal to noise ratio, and the line fits are also reliable
for quiet sun areas. Velocity enhancements observed in other lines
are only discussed in the text. For the first microflare, the
He I, O V and Ne VI lines are redshifted
for both northern and southern brightening indicating plasma flows
of +10-40 km s-1. For the second event at 08:38 UT,
chromospheric upflows both in He I (-10 km s-1),
O V (-40 km s-1) as well as in the hotter
Ne VI line (-40 km s-1) are observed in the
penumbral brightening (cf. Fig. 8). In the
northern brightening, no line shows a clear velocity signal in the
brightest pixels and upflows are only observed at the lower edge of
the brightening (He I:
20 km s-1,
O V:
50 km s-1). Event no. 3 which peaked
in X-rays at
08:45:30 UT shows the smallest RHESSI peak flux.
The flow speeds and directions suggested by CDS line fits indicate
upflows reaching velocities of at most -30 km s-1 in the
northern brightening (He I, O V and
Ne VI) and weak downflows of up to +20 km s-1 in the
southern footpoint (He I and O V, see
Fig. 9).
![]() |
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7 for the microflare at 08:45 UT. |
Open with DEXTER |
Line profiles were for most of the time well fitted with a one
component broadened Gaussian. However, for a short time right at the
microflares' maxima (1-3 CDS exposures), the CDS profiles of
several lines show two or even three peaks. For the 08:26 UT event,
such multi-component profiles are observed in He I,
O V and Ne VI at as well as in between the
northern and southern brightening. Double component fits to these
spectra indicate strong downflows of +180 km s-1 and
upflows up to
-80 km s-1 within the same pixel area (see
Fig. 10). As these double component
profiles are not only observed at the footpoint brightenings but
also in between the northern and southern CDS brightening, these
oppositely directed flows could indicate a twisting motion of the
flare loop. Multi component profiles suggesting twist motions are
also observed in the second event where they occur in several bright
pixels and in several lines (He I, O III and
O V at the northern footpoint, up- and downflow velocities
160 km s-1). Also for the third event, two-component
profiles of the O V line right at the penumbral as well as
the northern footpoint indicate up- and downflows of
-70 and
+100 km s-1 within the same pixel area.
4.2 DOT - chromospheric flows
The DOT Doppler maps derived from H
wing images
also show flows associated with the microflares. Most prominent,
fine loop-shaped fibrils in between the footpoints are
Doppler shifted during the events. Up- as well as downflowing plasma with speeds of the
order of 5 km s-1 appear in very close proximity to each other
(see Fig. 4). At the positions of
H
footpoints, however, rarely any change in flow speed is
observed. Only for the first microflare at 08:26:30 UT, H
downflows appear at the footpoint close to the edge of the DOT field
of view (Fig. 4, H
velocity map at
08:27:52 UT). This is interesting as the chromospheric He I line
profiles recorded at the position of flare brightenings are Doppler
shifted for each flare. The reason for the ``missing'' flows at high
intensity areas in H
may be that the line profiles at the
footpoints have a complex shape due to heating and thus, reliable Doppler
shifts cannot be derived from only two sample points (wings) of the spectral line.
![]() |
Figure 10: He I and O V line spectra recorded in the penumbral footpoint of the 08:26 UT event at the time of highest intensity ( middle column) as well as in the preceding and following exposure. We show the profiles for 2 different pixels ( Y=-131.6'', Y=-133.3''). The grey solid lines mark broadened Gaussians which were fitted to the profiles in order to derive Doppler velocities. Where applicable, a second component was fitted (black, bold line) and the sum of both Gaussians is plotted as a thin black line. The results for the fitted line of sight velocities are given in the top right corner of each panel. Note, that the He I line at 08:26:22 UT shows even three components in the Y=-133.3'' pixel. |
Open with DEXTER |
5 RHESSI X-ray spectroscopy
Based on RHESSI spectra, information on the temperature and emission
measure of the hottest part of the microflare plasma can be gained.
Also, we searched for signs of non-thermal bremsstrahlung emission
indicating the presence of electron beams. For each event, we
derived the spectra at a binning of 1/3 keV integrated over 12 s
at the peak of the RHESSI X-ray light curves (see
Fig. 11). Energy bins of 1/3 keV are actually
only correct for spectroscopy with single detectors whereas for our
microflares we derived spectra summed over all detectors excluding
detectors 2 and 7. However, when analyzing spectra for the same time
intervals which have the nominal spectral resolution of 1 keV, we
got very similar results (as was also found by Qiu et al.
2004). Therefore, we here show the RHESSI spectra
binned at 1/3 keV. In RHESSI spectral analysis software, a
user defined model spectrum is fitted to the observed data where the
selected model is not a unique choice. The quality of the fit
(expressed in terms of the
quantity) can be used to
distinguish which models are physically appropriate. For the first
and second event, the spectra were fitted with a two component model
consisting of an isothermal bremsstrahlung component at the lowest
energies and a non-thermal power-law including a low-energy cutoff
at
9 keV. A purely thermal fit for these events was of
very poor quality with
whereas for the 2-component
fit
.
Thus, the combination of a thermal and
non-thermal bremsstrahlung model spectrum is certainly to be
preferred to a solely thermal fit. In contrast, the peak spectrum of
the third event was acceptably fitted with a thermal fit alone
(
)
and showed only weakly enhanced flux at energies
9 keV relative to the purely thermal fit. The derived
emission measures (
cm-3) and temperatures
(
-13 MK) of the flare plasma lie in the range generally
found for RHESSI microflares (Hannah et al. 2008). However, the EMlie at the low end of the observed distribution, indicating that we
deal with very small events.
![]() |
Figure 11:
RHESSI photon spectra at an energy resolution of 1/3 keV (crosses) derived at the X-ray peak of the three analyzed events.
The spectra for the 08:26 UT and the 08:38 UT event were fitted with two components: a thermal bremsstrahlung
model at low energies (dashed grey line) and a non-thermal power-law at energies |
Open with DEXTER |
Clear signatures of a non-thermal power-law spectrum in the first
and second event indicate the presence of beamed electrons
accelerated during the reconnection process. This suggests the
possibility that the observed plasma flows are caused by beam driven
chromospheric evaporation. The non-thermal bremsstrahlung fit to the
power-law spectra yielded photon spectral indices of
and
in the 08:26 UT and
08:38 UT event, respectively. These are rather hard power-law
spectra for such weak events. Analyzing the spectra of thousands of
RHESSI microflares, Hannah et al. (2008) reported a median value of
.
The non-thermal component is of special interest
as it allows us to estimate the energy of supra-thermal electrons
deposited in the chromosphere which determines the characteristics
of chromospheric evaporation, i.e. whether it is ``explosive'' or
``gentle''. Although the non-thermal electron power in the microflares
is by orders of magnitude smaller than in regular flares, we observe
very small footpoint areas. This means that the non-thermal energy
flux density can nevertheless be high. For the events for which a
non-thermal spectrum is observed, we can determine if flux densities
on the same order of magnitude as serve as input for flare
simulations can also be attained in microflares. If so, a
substantially lower amount of non-thermal flux density in the
second than in the first microflare would be support coming from the
RHESSI analysis that the threshold between gentle and explosive
evaporation is surpassed in the first event. In the
simulations of Fisher et al. (1985b), the critical heating flux
separating the gentle and explosive evaporation regime is estimated
to
1010 erg cm-2 s-1. With the fits of the
RHESSI power-law spectra in the first and second event, we can
determine the non-thermal power of the beam at the flare peak. The
low energy cutoff of the beams was found to be situated at
8-10 keV. We assume that all electrons with energies
10 keV reach the chromosphere (see
also Stoiser et al. 2008). This is certainly a rather generous estimate
and constitutes an upper boundary. The power of the beam above
10 keV for the two events is
erg s-1 and
erg s-1. To derive the electron flux density,
we need the impact area of the beams which we estimated from DOT or
TRACE images at the flare peak. For simplicity, we assumed that the
beam in both microflares is incident on an area twice the size of
the penumbral footpoint observed in the DOT H
filtergrams.
For the first event, this area
is
estimated to
cm2. With these limits for
,
the beam flux
density for the 08:26 UT event ranges in between
erg cm-2 s-1. For the 08:38 UT event, we
derived limits to the footpoint area of
cm2. The non-thermal flux
density
is thus
erg cm-2 s-1. The numbers for the
non-thermal electron energy flux density are very similar for both
events and, within their respective uncertainties, straddle the
theoretical threshold (
1010 erg cm2 s-1)
between explosive and gentle evaporation (Fisher et al. 1985b). So we
cannot conclude from X-ray observations that there exists a clear
distinction between the first and second microflare which would
explain their different flow behavior in the chromosphere and
transition region. However, we have shown that energy flux densities
sufficiently high to produce explosive evaporation may occur in very
small flares, consistent with the observation of downflows in the
impulsive phase of microevents.
For the third event, we have no clear spectral signs of non-thermal electrons. Certainly, the absence of a non-thermal spectrum could be also due to insufficient sensitivity of the RHESSI detectors for such a small event. So beam driven evaporation is not ruled out as a process to cause the observed flows. However, beam evaporation is not the only process in which hot RHESSI flare plasma can be produced. Direct heating of coronal pre-flare plasma to RHESSI temperatures and subsequent conductive chromospheric evaporation is also a process to be considered. In this scenario, the origin of chromospheric and transition region downflows in the southern flare brightening in He I and O V is, however, unclear.
6 Discussion
Observations of three microflares in the chromosphere, transition region and corona at high spatial and temporal resolution reveal a wealth of information on the dynamic evolution of microflares. It is, however, a challenge to combine all particulars into a coherent, general picture of the processes going on in the events with respect to the standard flare model.
We analyzed three homologous microevents of GOES class <A9 which
peaked within several minutes from each other. The general
multi-wavelength properties and magnetic field topology of the three
events are in basic agreement with the ones observed for regular flares and
microflares, believed to be created by magnetic reconnection.
Imaging information (TRACE and EIT maps) with high resolution of the
entire flaring region are only available for the first and third
event. TRACE 17.1 nm, maps of the first event at 08:26 UT
reveal a complex flare sequence with several footpoint brightenings
and narrow loops. An EUV jet is ejected at the event peak of the
first microflare, revealing the eruptive nature of the event. The
chromospheric fine structure is exhibited
in DOT Ca II and H
images which outline brightenings with substructure to
1
.
In both
chromospheric lines, loop-shaped fibrils lying in between the
footpoints are observed to brighten up at the flare peak. For all
three events, RHESSI observed a hot loop (
10 MK) in between the footpoint brightenings.
Using spectroscopic data from CDS sampling the chromosphere,
transition and corona, we searched for mass flows in the solar
atmosphere associated with the microflares. However, although the
multi-wavelength properties are similar for the three microflares,
their flow dynamics is different. As expected from chromospheric
evaporation theory, enhanced plasma flows could indeed be observed.
CDS EUV line spectra reveal a very complex flow pattern at the site
of CDS He I, O V and Ne VI microflare
brightenings themselves as well as for adjacent, dark pixels. Except
for few seconds at the flare peak where we observe double component
line profiles, the flow speeds in the brightest pixels in
chromospheric and transition region lines do not surpass
50 km s-1. The direction of the flows differs among the
events themselves as well as for the footpoints within the same
microflare in the third event: downflows are observed for both
penumbral and northern footpoint of the 08:26 UT event as well as in
the penumbral footpoint of the event at 08:45 UT. On the other hand,
upflows are most prominent at the penumbral footpoint of the
08:38 UT event and are also observed at the northern footpoint of
the third event. When judging from the chromospheric and
transition region flows, the observations in the first event are in
agreement with the explosive evaporation scenario whereas in the
second event, gentle evaporation is implied. On the other hand, the
flows in the third microflare are more complex and even suggest a
different behavior for different footpoints.
The coronal response, however, is not at first sight in line
with the results for the chromosphere and transition region. The
hottest available CDS line formed at coronal temperatures
(Si XII, MK) is not Doppler shifted during any
microflare. Thus, we lack clear evidence that hot plasma is
transported from the chromosphere to the corona. Maybe, the
``missing'' upflows indicate that hot, coronal flare plasma in these
events is rather produced by direct heating than chromospheric
evaporation (see e.g. observations of Falchi et al.
2006 and Milligan
2008). On the other hand, the Si XII
line could be formed at a temperature too cool to observe upflows as
argued by Kamio et al. (2005). Also, the signal to noise ratio of this
weak line is maybe too low in our microflares to get a clear
velocity signal.
As RHESSI X-ray spectra for the first and second microflare
show a non-thermal power-law component indicating the existence of
beamed electrons, we were able to estimate the non-thermal electron
flux density deposited in the chromosphere. Simulations of beam driven chromospheric evaporation
computed by Fisher et al. suggest explosive evaporation above a
certain threshold heating flux which should be observable by redshifts of
chromospheric and transition region lines. The electron energy flux
density incident on the chromosphere in two microflares was found to be high (
erg cm-2 s-1) which is right at the threshold between the gentle and the explosive evaporation regime. When considering the uncertainties contained in the observations (errors in X-ray spectra, impact areas) as well as in simulations (e.g. model assumptions), we cannot clearly discriminate if the electrons induce gentle or explosive evaporation. As the third event did not show a clear non-thermal
component in the spectrum, we do not have distinct support that the
observed mass flows can be caused by the impact of electron beams.
Certainly, limited instrument sensitivity could account for missing
indications of non-thermal emission. Also, as argued by
Brosius & Holman (2009), the simultaneous peak of the RHESSI X-ray and
chromospheric He I emission is consistent with energy
deposition of non-thermal electrons. However, the process causing
chromospheric flare brightenings and mass flows in the 08:45 UT
event could also be direct heating of coronal plasma and subsequent
conductive evaporation.
Apart from the general flow behavior at the flare brightenings, we
found many details in the time evolution of the spectra as well as
flows at locations not immediately connected with high intensities.
An intriguing behavior of the CDS EUV lines is observed during a
short period (typically only for one exposure) right at the peaks of
the microflares. In all events, line profiles (He I,
O V for all 3 events, Ne VI for the first and
O III for the last event) located at the flare brightenings
themselves as well as in between them show two or three peaks
indicating oppositely directed flows within the same pixel area.
Fits yield red- and blueshifts of up to +190 and
-80 km s-1, respectively. The appearance of multi-component
profiles is coupled with times of high energy deposit in the
microflares. As multi-component profiles are observed in several
pixels between northern and penumbral brightenings, we possibly see
twisting motions of the flare loop. Maps of the Doppler velocities
in the H
line corroborate this picture as narrow fibrils
with opposite line of sight motions located in immediate proximity
to each other show up during the microflares. These Doppler shifted
chromospheric fibrils, however, have a much lower line of sight
velocity (
5 km s-1) than in the CDS observations. Also,
the fast change from redshifts to blueshifts observed at the
northern footpoint of the third microflare could be due to twist
motions.
Apart from the location of flare brightenings themselves, enhanced
downflows in the chromosphere and transition region are also
observed to the south of the strongest flare brightenings located in
the penumbra of the sunspot. These flows reach velocities of +80 km s-1 which are much higher than the sound speed in the
chromosphere which is on the order of
km s-1. Transient supersonic downflows
in the photosphere and chromosphere are often observed at locations
where new magnetic flux is formed or where moving magnetic features
near sunspots are observed (e.g. recently Shimizu et al. 2008).
Magnetogram sequences for the day also show motions of the magnetic
flux at the microflares' site. Czaykowska et al. (1999) also reported
downflows of
+60 km s-1 into a sunspot during an M-class
flare observed by CDS with no obvious origin of such flows. As a
possible cause for the strong downflows into the penumbra associated
with our microflares we propose solar gravitation. Indications of
free falling plasma are usually observed in the late phase of flares
when cooling flare plasma flows from the corona to deeper layers
(see e.g. Brosius 2003; Del Zanna et al. 2006). For our microflares, we
can speculate that in the course of the reconnection process, the
magnetic field topology is reconfigured in such a way that material
in the pre-reconnection magnetic configuration is not sustained any
more and flows downwards in newly formed loops. Assuming the
observed flows to be accelerated in free fall, we can estimate the
height where they should originate. The solar gravitational
acceleration is
cm s-2 and the
acceleration time for the 08:26 UT event was estimated to
s from the CDS velocity evolution in
pixels showing strong downflows. With these parameters, the height
where the plasma starts to accelerate can be back-extrapolated to
cm. This is indeed
still at a chromospheric level. Also, h is comparable to the
RHESSI loop height
which we approximated to
cm. This could indicate a common formation process. So a free
fall of plasma into the penumbra could in principle explain the CDS
observations. Another possibility for the creation of
enhanced downflows could be a structural change of a sunspot plume
due to the microflare. When inspecting O V and
Ne VI raster scans obtained
90 min before the
08:26 UT microflare, a small sunspot plume is observed at the
positon where during the microflares enhanced downflows are
observed. In sunspot plumes, considerable downflows have been
reported (see e.g. Brynildsen et al. 2001; Maltby et al. 1999; Brosius & Landi 2005)
and also for the sunspot plume in our raster images, downflows are
observd (
+40 km s-1). Thus, it could be possible
that the restructuring of the magnetic field in the microflare
enhances the downflows in the plume.
7 Conclusions
Micro- and nanoflare coronal heating models require the occurrence of a multitude of reconnection events. Therefore it is important to evaluate whether small flares on the Sun behave like powerful flares, with the same physics underlying them and with the same processes occurring, hence the same creation mechanism, as regular flares. With our data set of 3 X-ray microflares emitting at the sensitivity threshold of current X-ray detectors, we are able to study many different aspects of the smallest X-ray microflares and the response of the solar atmosphere to these events.In accordance with previous studies, our findings suggest that the analyzed microflares have multi-wavelength and magnetic field properties comparable to regular flares and behave consistently with events powered by magnetic reconnection in the corona. TRACE 17.1 nm imaging data for the first event show a complex appearance with several brightenings probably constituting the hot footpoints of the flaring loop system. Utilizing the DOT speckled data available for all three microflares, we were able to study aspects like their chromospheric fine structure at a resolution of 0.2''-0.3'' in unprecedented detail. The microflares were indeed found to be finely structured on the arcsecond level and associated small scale features like bright fibrils were discovered.
As regards the mass flow pattern associated with the events, the interpretation of results in the frame of chromospheric evaporation theory and hydrodynamic simulations is difficult. CDS observations of the three microflares indeed prove the existence of plasma flows in the chromosphere and transition region in the microflare brightenings. The flow direction and velocities suggest that explosive evaporation is occurring in the first and gentle evaporation in the second event. A more complex behavior is indicated for the third microflare. Observations from the coronal Si XII line and RHESSI spectroscopy, however, do not clearly support this picture. The electron energy flux densities estimated for two events showing non-thermal X-ray spectra are at the margin between gentle and explosive evaporation. Given the errors in measurements, it is impossible to determine whether the observed flows and electron fluxes in microflares are in agreement with the results proposed by simulations of beam driven evaporation. Details in the observed flow dynamics like short-time high velocity flows of opposite direction at the flare peaks indicative of twist motions reveal the complexity of the flare process even for such small events. CDS velocity data also show that dynamic processes are not only confined to the bright microflare site but also involve adjacent areas.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Ryan Milligan for his helpful comments. We also acknowledge the referee's contributions which improved the text. This work was supported by the exchange program SK-AT-0004-08 of the Österreichischer Austauschdienst ÖAD (Austria) and the Slovak Research and Development Agency SRDA (Slovakia) as well as by the SRDA project APVV-0066-06. The University of Graz, the Austrian Academy of Sciences and the company L'Oréal Austria supported S. B.-S. with research scholarships.Data were acquired in the frame of the SOHO Joint Observing Program JOP 171 operated in cooperation with the TRACE satellite and the DOT. The authors are grateful for the cooperation of the SOHO, TRACE, and DOT teams during the run of JOP 171 in July 2006.
The DOT is operated by the Utrecht University at the Spanish Observatorio del Roque de los Muchachos of the Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias. SOHO is a project of international cooperation between ESA and NASA. TRACE is a mission of the Stanford-Lockheed Institute for Space Research and part of the NASA Small Explorer program. RHESSI is a NASA small explorer mission.
In the frame of this work, we used NASA's Astrophysics Data System.
References
- Abbett, W. P., & Hawley, S. L. 1999, ApJ, 521, 906 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Acton, L. W., Finch, M. L., Gilbreth, C. W., et al. 1980, Sol. Phys., 65, 53 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Allred, J. C., Hawley, S. L., Abbett, W. P., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 573 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Antonucci, E., Gabriel, A. H., Acton, L. W., et al. 1982, Sol. Phys., 78, 107 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Antonucci, E., Dodero, M. A., & Martin, R. 1990, ApJS, 73, 147 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Aschwanden, M. J. 2004, Phys. Solar Corona (Springer), 382 (In the text)
- Aschwanden, M. J., Winebarger, A., Tsiklauri, D., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 1673 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Brosius, J. W. 2003, ApJ, 586, 1417 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Brosius, J. W., & Holman, G. D. 2009, ApJ, 692, 492 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Brosius, J. W., & Landi, E. 2005, ApJ, 632, 1196 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Brosius, J. W., & Phillips, K. J. H. 2004, ApJ, 613, 580 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Brynildsen, N., Maltby, P., Fredvik, T., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., & Wilhelm, K. 2001, Sol. Phys., 198, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Culhane, J. L., Bentley, R. D., Hiei, E., et al. 1991, Sol. Phys., 136, 89 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Czaykowska, A., de Pontieu, B., Alexander, D., et al. 1999, ApJ, 521, L75 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Del Zanna, G. D., Schmieder, B., Mason, H., Berlicki, A., & Bradshaw, S. 2006, Sol. Phys., 239, 173 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Delaboudinière, J.-P., Artzner, G. E., Brunaud, J., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 291 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Domingo, V., Fleck, B., & Poland, A. I. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 1 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Doschek, G. A., Feldman, U., Kreplin, R. W., et al. 1980, ApJ, 239, 725 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Falchi, A., Teriaca, L., & Maltagliati, L. 2006, Sol. Phys., 239, 193 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Feldman, U., Doschek, G. A., Kreplin, R. W., et al. 1980, ApJ, 241, 1175 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Fisher, G. H. 1989, ApJ, 346, 1019 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Fisher, G. H., Canfield, R. C., & McClymont, A. N. 1985a, ApJ, 289, 434 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, G. H., Canfield, R. C., & McClymont, A. N. 1985b, ApJ, 289, 425 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Fisher, G. H., Canfield, R. C., & McClymont, A. N. 1985c, ApJ, 289, 414 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Fludra, A., Bentley, R. D., Lemen, J. R., Jakimiec, J., & Sylwester, J. 1989, ApJ, 344, 991 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Gömöry, P., Rybák, J., Kucera, A., Curdt, W., & Wöhl, H. 2006, A&A, 448, 1169 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Hammerschlag, R. H., & Bettonvil, F. C. M. 1998, New Astron. Rev., 42, 485 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Handy, B. N., Acton, L. W., Kankelborg, C. C., et al. 1999, Sol. Phys., 187, 229 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Hannah, I. G., Christe, S., Krucker, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 704 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Harrison, R. A., Sawyer, E. C., Carter, M. K., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 233 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Hurford, G. J., Schmahl, E. J., Schwartz, R. A., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 61 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Kamio, S., Kurokawa, H., Brooks, D. H., Kitai, R., & UeNo, S. 2005, ApJ, 625, 1027 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Krucker, S., Christe, S., Lin, R. P., Hurford, G. J., & Schwartz, R. A. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 445 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Kundu, M. R., Schmahl, E. J., Grigis, P. C., Garaimov, V. I., & Shibasaki, K. 2006, A&A, 451, 691 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Lin, R. P., Dennis, B. R., Hurford, G. J., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 3 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Liu, C., Qiu, J., Gary, D. E., Krucker, S., & Wang, H. 2004, ApJ, 604, 442 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- MacPherson, K. P., & Jordan, C. 1999, MNRAS, 308, 510 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Maltby, P., Brynildsen, N., Fredvik, T., Kjeldseth-Moe, O., & Wilhelm, K. 1999, Sol. Phys., 190, 437 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Mariska, J. T., Doschek, G. A., & Bentley, R. D. 1993, ApJ, 419, 418 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Milligan, R. O. 2008, ApJ, 680, L157 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Milligan, R. O., Gallagher, P. T., Mathioudakis, M., et al. 2006, ApJ, 638, L117 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Parker, E. N. 1988, ApJ, 330, 474 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Peter, H., & Judge, P. G. 1999, ApJ, 522, 1148 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Priest, E. R., & Forbes, T. G. 2002, A&A Rev., 10, 313 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Qiu, J., Liu, C., Gary, D. E., Nita, G. M., & Wang, H. 2004, ApJ, 612, 530 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Rutten, R. J., Hammerschlag, R. H., Bettonvil, F. C. M., Sütterlin, P., & de Wijn, A. G. 2004, A&A, 413, 1183 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
- Scherrer, P. H., Bogart, R. S., Bush, R. I., et al. 1995, Sol. Phys., 162, 129 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Schwartz, R. A., Csillaghy, A., Tolbert, A. K., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 165 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Shimizu, T., Lites, B. W., Katsukawa, Y., et al. 2008, ApJ, 680, 1467 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Smith, D. M., Lin, R. P., Turin, P., et al. 2002, Sol. Phys., 210, 33 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Stoiser, S., Veronig, A. M., Aurass, H., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 246, 339 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] (In the text)
- Stoiser, S., Brown, J. C., & Veronig, A. M. 2008, Sol. Phys., 250, 315 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef]
- Sturrock, P. A. 1973, NASA Spec. Publ., 342, 3 [NASA ADS] (In the text)
- Sütterlin, P., Hammerschlag, R. H., Bettonvil, F. C. M., et al. 2001, in Advanced Solar Polarimetry - Theory, Observation, and Instrumentation, ed. M. Sigwarth, ASP Conf. Ser., 236, 431 (In the text)
- Teriaca, L., Falchi, A., Falciani, R., Cauzzi, G., & Maltagliati, L. 2006, A&A, 455, 1123 [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] (In the text)
Online Material
Appendix A: Movie description
![]() |
Figure A.1:
Black and white snapshot of a movie showing photospheric and chromospheric images obtained during the DOT observing run on July 4, 2006 ( |
Open with DEXTER |
Footnotes
- ... microflares
- Appendix A and the movie are only available in electronic form at http://www.aanda.org
- ... Gaussian
- The broadended Gaussian profile is used for CDS observations acquired after the recovery of the SOHO spacecraft in 1998. Details can be found in CDS software note no. 53 at http://orpheus.nascom.nasa.gov/cds/swnote/cds_swnote_53.ps
- ...
reconstruction
- The processed DOT data are available in the DOT database at http://dotdb.phys.uu.nl/DOT/Data/2006_07_04/index.html
- ... FoV
- In the Ca II images, a broader strip of
the upper image part was cropped in the course of speckle
reconstruction. Thus, this brightening could only be observed in
H
an not in Ca II.
- ... area
- The lower and upper limits of
were derived from DOT H
difference images and the plain H
maps at the flare peak, respectively.
- ... height
- We estimated the RHESSI loop of the
08:26:30 UT event to be a half circle connecting the DOT H
footpoint brightenings located at the end of the RHESSI 3-8 keV source.
All Figures
![]() |
Figure 1:
AR 10898 as observed by TRACE, MDI and DOT before the 08:26 UT microflare occurred. Panel a): TRACE white light image with the position of the CDS slit and the DOT FoV indicated by a black and grey frame, respectively. Panel b) shows an MDI high resolution longitudinal magnetogram recorded |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 2:
TRACE 17.1 nm image sequence of the microflare which peaked in X-rays at |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 3:
EIT 19.5 nm maps in inverse grey scale recorded |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 4:
Snapshots of the three microflares as observed in DOT H |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 5: Top: specific intensities along the slit in the He I line, i.e. the amplitudes of the broadened Gaussian fit applied to the line profiles in each pixel (units of erg cm-2 s-1 sterad-1 Å-1). Middle: same as the top panel but the velocities are plotted in the range [-30,+30] km s-1 (black indicates blue- and white redshifts). For better comparison with the top panel, contours mark the positions of high He I intensity. The intensities and velocities are derived from one component broadened Gaussian fits to the observed line profiles. Bottom: RHESSI light curves in the energy bins 3-6 keV (light grey), 6-9 keV (dark grey) and 9-12 keV (black). In each panel, black or white dashed lines mark the start and end of RHESSI X-ray emission in the microflares. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 6:
The evolution of intensities (units of erg cm-2 s-1 sterad-1 Å-1) in the Si XII line (
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 7:
For the first event, the time development of intensities and velocities in the CDS He I (
|
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 8: Same as Fig. 7 for the microflare at 08:38 UT. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 9: Same as Fig. 7 for the microflare at 08:45 UT. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 10: He I and O V line spectra recorded in the penumbral footpoint of the 08:26 UT event at the time of highest intensity ( middle column) as well as in the preceding and following exposure. We show the profiles for 2 different pixels ( Y=-131.6'', Y=-133.3''). The grey solid lines mark broadened Gaussians which were fitted to the profiles in order to derive Doppler velocities. Where applicable, a second component was fitted (black, bold line) and the sum of both Gaussians is plotted as a thin black line. The results for the fitted line of sight velocities are given in the top right corner of each panel. Note, that the He I line at 08:26:22 UT shows even three components in the Y=-133.3'' pixel. |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure 11:
RHESSI photon spectra at an energy resolution of 1/3 keV (crosses) derived at the X-ray peak of the three analyzed events.
The spectra for the 08:26 UT and the 08:38 UT event were fitted with two components: a thermal bremsstrahlung
model at low energies (dashed grey line) and a non-thermal power-law at energies |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
![]() |
Figure A.1:
Black and white snapshot of a movie showing photospheric and chromospheric images obtained during the DOT observing run on July 4, 2006 ( |
Open with DEXTER | |
In the text |
Copyright ESO 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.