EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 503 / No 2 (August IV 2009) A&A, 503 2 (2009) 467-468 Full HTML
Free Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:200811212]

Issue
A&A
Volume 503, Number 2, August IV 2009
Page(s) 467 - 468
Section Extragalactic astronomy
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200811212e
Published online 02 July 2009

Erratum

The mass function of young star clusters in spiral galaxies

S. S. Larsen

Astronomical Institute, University of Utrecht, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC, Utrecht, The Netherlands

A&A 494, 539-551 (2009), DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:200811212

Abstract
An error was introduced in the equation used to calculate the number of clusters per age- and luminosity bin (Eq. (7)), affecting the predicted age distribution for a given cluster luminosity. Correction of this error leads to small adjustments in the relation between absolute magnitude and median age (Fig. 4) and in the model luminosity functions (Fig. 7). However, the changes are small enough that the results and conclusions of the paper remain unchanged.

Key words: Open clusters and associations: general - galaxies: star clusters - galaxies: spiral - errata, addenda

1 Erratum

An error was introduced when going from Eqs. (6) to (7) in the paper. While Eq. (6)

\begin{eqnarray*}\frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}L_V} = \frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}M} \frac{{\rm d}M}{{\rm d}L_V} \end{eqnarray*}


is correct for current cluster mass M and V-band luminosity LV, the current mass function is

\begin{eqnarray*}\frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}M} = \frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}M_i} \frac{{\rm d}M_i}{{\rm d}M} \end{eqnarray*}


for initial mass Mi (see also Gieles 2009). The factor  ${\rm d}M_i/{\rm d}M$ follows by differentiation of Eq. (4) in the paper, but was neglected in Eq. (7) and the figures based on this equation. For brevity we define the ICMF, the initial cluster mass function (normalised to unit mass per unit time over a range of initial cluster masses $M_{\rm lo} < M_i < M_{\rm up}$), as

\begin{eqnarray*}\psi(M_i) \equiv \frac{{\rm d}N}{{\rm d}M_i} \end{eqnarray*}


where, for example, $\psi(M_i)$ may be the Schechter function asassumed throughout the paper. We may then write

\begin{eqnarray*}\frac{{\rm d}^2N}{{\rm d}L_V ~ {\rm d}\tau} = \psi(M_i) ~ \left... ...right) ~ \Upsilon_V(\tau) ~ {\rm CFR}(\tau) ~ f_{\rm surv}(\tau) \end{eqnarray*}


for a star formation rate in clusters of CFR, mass-to-light ratio $\Upsilon_V(\tau) = {\rm d}M/{\rm d}L_V$ and infant mortality survival fraction  $f_{\rm surv}$. This relation replaces Eq. (7) in the paper.

In addition, the figures included in this erratum have been modified to use the Bruzual & Charlot (2003) tabulations of the mass fractions remaining after stellar evolution, rather than the parameterisation of  $\mu_{\rm ev}(t)$ from Lamers et al. (2005). Neither of these corrections change the conclusions of the paper, but lead to small adjustments in Figs. 4 and 7. The luminosity function slopes quoted in Sect. 4 of the paper remain the same within 0.01.

References

 \begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=15cm,clip]{11212e4.eps} \end{figure} Figure 4:

The median absolute magnitude of the brightest ( top) and 5th brightest ( bottom) cluster versus median age. Results are shown for Schechter mass functions with $M_{\rm c}$ = 104, 105, 106 and 107 $M_\odot $ and $\alpha =-2$ (solid curves), as well as for $M_{\rm c}$ = 3 $\times $ $10^5~M_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm c}$ = $10^{15}~M_{\odot}$ (dotted curves). The (red) dashed lines are for constant total number of clusters (n6=101, 102, ..., 105) brighter than $\mathcal{M}_V=-6$. The error bars mark the median absolute deviation of log(age) and  $\mathcal{M}_V$ for fixed $M_{\rm c}$ and n6. The triangles mark clusters in irregular galaxies while circles are for spirals (see Table 1).
Open with DEXTER

 \begin{figure} \par\hspace*{5mm} \includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{11212e7.eps}\hspace*{5mm}\end{figure} Figure 7:

Top: luminosity functions for a cluster sample with a Schechter mass function with $M_{\rm c}$ = 2.1 $\times $ $10^5~M_{\odot}$. Bottom: local logarithmic slope. In all cases, a constant cluster formation history has been assumed and various disruption scenarios are applied, as indicated in the legend.
Open with DEXTER


All Figures

  \begin{figure} \par\includegraphics[angle=90,width=15cm,clip]{11212e4.eps} \end{figure} Figure 4:

The median absolute magnitude of the brightest ( top) and 5th brightest ( bottom) cluster versus median age. Results are shown for Schechter mass functions with $M_{\rm c}$ = 104, 105, 106 and 107 $M_\odot $ and $\alpha =-2$ (solid curves), as well as for $M_{\rm c}$ = 3 $\times $ $10^5~M_{\odot}$ and $M_{\rm c}$ = $10^{15}~M_{\odot}$ (dotted curves). The (red) dashed lines are for constant total number of clusters (n6=101, 102, ..., 105) brighter than $\mathcal{M}_V=-6$. The error bars mark the median absolute deviation of log(age) and  $\mathcal{M}_V$ for fixed $M_{\rm c}$ and n6. The triangles mark clusters in irregular galaxies while circles are for spirals (see Table 1).
Open with DEXTER
In the text

  \begin{figure} \par\hspace*{5mm} \includegraphics[width=7cm,clip]{11212e7.eps}\hspace*{5mm}\end{figure} Figure 7:

Top: luminosity functions for a cluster sample with a Schechter mass function with $M_{\rm c}$ = 2.1 $\times $ $10^5~M_{\odot}$. Bottom: local logarithmic slope. In all cases, a constant cluster formation history has been assumed and various disruption scenarios are applied, as indicated in the legend.
Open with DEXTER
In the text

Copyright ESO 2009

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.