EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues Volume 500 / No 2 (June III 2009) A&A, 500 2 (2009) 763-768 Full HTML
Free Access
 

 

Table 2:

The estimated zodiacal light emission.
Field $T_{\rm ZL}$ I(25) I(90) I(150) I(180) rms
  (K) (MJy/sr) error
EBL22 280 40.51 7.69 3.03 2.19 13%
EBL26_ZL1 270 106.05 21.03 8.34 6.02 21%
EBL26_ZL2 270 100.50 19.84 7.87 5.68 7%
EBL26 (aver.) 270 100.98 19.94 7.91 5.71 14%
NGP_ZL1 260 28.65 5.95 2.38 1.72 5%
NGP_ZL2 260 29.15 6.06 2.42 1.75 18%
NGP (aver.) 260 28.69 5.96 2.38 1.72 12%
The columns are: (1) name of the EBL field (see Appendix, Table B.2); (2) temperature of the zodiacal light spectrum (Leinert et al. 2002); (3)-(6) estimated intensity of the zodiacal light at 25 $\mu $m, 90 $\mu $m, 150 $\mu $m, and 180 $\mu $m; and (7) relative uncertainty of the ZL value calculated on the basis of the difference of the fitted ZL model and the observations in the range 7.3-90 $\mu $m. The zodiacal light estimates are given at the nominal wavelengths assuming a spectrum $\nu I_{\nu}$ = const. For EBL26 and NGP, two separate positions were observed (see Fig. B.1 and Table B.2).

Source LaTeX | All tables | In the text

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.