\begin{table}%t2
\caption{\label{table:ZL_estimates}The estimated zodiacal light emission.}
\par
\small%\centerline
 {
\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrr}
\hline \hline
Field   &  $T_{\rm ZL}$ &   
        $I$(25)   &  $I$(90)  
        &  $I$(150)  &  $I$(180) &  rms \\
        &  (K)  &  \multicolumn{4}{c}{(MJy/sr)} &  error  \\
\hline
   EBL22      & 280  &  40.51 &   7.69 &   3.03 &   2.19 &   13\% \\  
   EBL26\_ZL1 & 270  & 106.05 &  21.03 &   8.34 &   6.02 &   21\% \\  
   EBL26\_ZL2 & 270  & 100.50 &  19.84 &   7.87 &   5.68 &   7\% \\  
   EBL26 (aver.)      & 270  & 100.98 &  19.94 &   7.91 &   5.71 &   14\% \\
   NGP\_ZL1   & 260  &  28.65 &   5.95 &   2.38 &   1.72 &   5\% \\  
   NGP\_ZL2   & 260  &  29.15 &   6.06 &   2.42 &   1.75 &   18\% \\  
   NGP (aver.)       & 260  &  28.69 &   5.96 &   2.38 &   1.72 &   12\% \\
\hline
\end{tabular}}
\medskip
The columns are: (1) name of the EBL field (see Appendix, Table~\ref{table:ZL_observations}); (2)~temperature of the zodiacal light spectrum (Leinert et~al. \cite{Leinert2002}); (3)$-$(6)~estimated intensity of the zodiacal light at 25~$\mu$m, 90~$\mu$m, 150~$\mu$m, and 180~$\mu$m; and (7)~relative uncertainty of the ZL~value calculated on the basis of the difference of the fitted ZL~model and the observations in the range 7.3$-$90~$\mu$m. The zodiacal light estimates are given at the nominal wavelengths assuming a spectrum $\nu I_{\nu}$~= const. For EBL26
and NGP, two separate positions were observed (see Fig.~\ref{fig:allsky} and Table~\ref{table:ZL_observations}).
\end{table}