| Issue |
A&A
Volume 709, May 2026
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | A258 | |
| Number of page(s) | 11 | |
| Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202557820 | |
| Published online | 27 May 2026 | |
Evidence of dynamical dark energy found via the DESI DR2 Lymanα forest
1
Dipartimento di Fisica “E. Pancini”, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, Complesso Universitario di Monte Sant’ Angelo, Edificio G, Via Cinthia, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
2
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Sezione di Napoli, Via Cinthia 9, I-80126 Napoli, Italy
3
Scuola Superiore Meridionale, Via Mezzocannone 4, I-80134 Napoli, Italy
4
Department of Physics, Babes-Bolyai University, Kogălniceanu Street, Cluj-Napoca, 400084, Romania
5
Research Center of Astrophysics and Cosmology, Khazar University, 41 Mehseti Street, AZ1096 Baku, Azerbaijan
6
Department of Physics, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, People’s Republic of China
7
Pacif Institute of Cosmology and Selfology (PICS), Sagara, Sambalpur, 768224 Odisha, India
★ Corresponding author: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Received:
24
October
2025
Accepted:
16
March
2026
Abstract
We present a comprehensive analysis of the cosmological implications of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 2 Lyman-α forest baryon acoustic oscillation measurements, combined with complementary datasets including DESI DR2 galaxy BAO, Type Ia supernova samples (Pantheon+, DES-Dovekie, and Union3), and the cosmic microwave background CamSpec likelihood. We consider several dark-energy parameterizations such as chevallier–polarski–linder, logarithmic, exponential, jassal–bagla–padmanabhan, barboza–alcaniz, and generalized emergent dark energy, as well as the wCDM model and non-flat extensions of the standard ΛCDM and wCDM models. Using the Metropolis-Hastings MCMC algorithm, we constrain the cosmological parameters of each model and compute the Bayesian evidence using the publicly available code MCEvidence to assess the performance of each model relative to ΛCDM. Our results show that the non-flat extensions remain consistent with spatial flatness, with Ωk ≈ 0 for all dataset combinations. Further, all dark-energy parameterizations predict w0 > −1, wa < 0, and w0 + wa < −1, which favor a dynamical dark-energy scenario of the Quintom-B type. We also find a moderate preference for dynamical dark-energy models relative to the standard ΛCDM scenario, reaching up to ∼3.10σ for the Lyα + CMB + Galaxy BAO dataset. When DESI DR2 Lyα measurements are combined with different SNe Ia samples and the CMB, the deviations decrease and remain typically below ∼2σ, corresponding only to inconclusive preference relative to ΛCDM. However, this level of evidence is not statistically decisive, and it remains too early to rule out the ΛCDM model. Finally, the Bayes factor in logarithmic space (lnBij) shows that model preference relative to ΛCDM depends strongly on the dataset combination. For Lyα + CMB + Galaxy BAO, wCDM and owCDM show moderate evidence, while most other models provide weak or inconclusive evidence. With Pantheon+ or DES-Dovekie, owCDM shows strong evidence, whereas other models show moderate evidence.
Key words: cosmological parameters / cosmology: theory / dark energy
© The Authors 2026
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.