Issue |
A&A
Volume 698, May 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A78 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | Stellar structure and evolution | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452788 | |
Published online | 29 May 2025 |
A magnetar powers the luminous supernova 2023pel, which is associated with a long gamma-ray burst
1
Facultad de Ciencias Astronómicas y Geofísicas Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Paseo del Bosque S/N B1900FWA, La Plata, Argentina
2
Instituto de Astrofísica de La Plata, CONICET, La Plata, Argentina
3
RIKEN Center for Interdisciplinary Theoretical and Mathematical Sciences (iTHEMS), Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
4
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
5
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI),The University of Tokyo. Institutes for Advanced Study, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8583, Japan
⋆ Corresponding author.
Received:
28
October
2024
Accepted:
2
April
2025
Aims. We explore supernova (SN) 2023pel, the most recent event associated with gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), specifically GRB 230812B. SN 2023pel has a high luminosity (∼1.5 × 1043 erg s−1 at the peak) and low expansion velocities (v ∼ 16 000 km s−1 at the peak) compared to other GRB-SNe. These properties seem difficult to reconcile with a single nickel power source. We searched for models that can explain the properties of this event.
Methods. We calculated a grid of hydrodynamic models based on pre-SN structures derived from evolutionary calculations. We compared our models with observations of SN 2023pel and selected our preferred model using statistical analysis, taking both light curves and expansion velocities into account. This allowed us to derive a set of physical properties for SN 2023pel.
Results. Our models suggest that the most probable scenario involves a millisecond magnetar as the primary power source, supplemented by energy from radioactive decay. Our preferred model has a spin period of P = 3.2 ms, a magnetic field of B = 28 × 1014 G, an explosion energy of 2.3 foe, a nickel mass of MNi = 0.24 M⊙, and an ejected mass of 3.4 M⊙. Alternatively, we find that a purely nickel-powered model also provides a good match with the observations, though MNi ≥ 0.8 M⊙ are always required. However, the combination of such high values of MNi and low Mej is difficult to reconcile, indicating that this scenario is less probable. We have also identified a specific region within the peak luminosity-velocity plane where an additional energy source beyond nickel may be necessary to power SNe with characteristics similar to SN 2023pel.
Conclusions. Our study indicates that an additional energy source beyond radioactive decay is essential to explain the high brightness and relatively low expansion velocities of SN 2023pel. A magnetar-powered model, similar to the models proposed for the very luminous GRB-SN 2011kl, aligns well with these characteristics.
Key words: hydrodynamics / stars: magnetars / supernovae: individual: SN 2023pel / gamma rays: stars / gamma-ray burst: individual: GRB 230812B
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.