Issue |
A&A
Volume 694, February 2025
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A107 | |
Number of page(s) | 16 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347386 | |
Published online | 10 February 2025 |
Spherical bias in the 3D reconstruction of the ICM density profile in galaxy clusters
1
INAF – Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica di Milano, Via A. Corti 12, 20133 Milano, Italy
2
INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, Via Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy
3
IFPU – Institute for Fundamental Physics of the Universe, Via Beirut 2, 34151 Trieste, Italy
4
INAF – Osservatorio Astronomico di Brera, Via E. Bianchi 46, 23807 Merate (LC), Italy
5
DiSAT, Università degli Studi dell’Insubria, Via Valleggio 11, I-22100 Como, Italy
6
Dipartimento di Fisica, Universitá degli Studi di Milano, Via G. Celoria 16, 20133 Milano, Italy
⋆ Corresponding author; silvano@iasf-milano.inaf.it
Received:
6
July
2023
Accepted:
7
September
2024
Context. X-ray observations of galaxy clusters are routinely used to derive radial distributions of intracluster medium (ICM) thermodynamical properties, such as density and temperature. However, observations only allow access to quantities projected on the celestial sphere, so an assumption on the three-dimensional distribution of the ICM is necessary. Usually, spherical geometry is assumed.
Aims. The aim of this paper is to determine the bias due to this approximation on the reconstruction of the ICM density radial profile of a cluster sample and on the intrinsic scatter of the density profiles’ distribution, particularly when the substructures of clusters are not masked.
Methods. We used simulated clusters for which we can access the three-dimensional ICM distribution. In particular, we considered a sample of 98 simulated clusters drawn from THE THREE HUNDRED project. For each cluster, we simulated 40 different observations by projecting the cluster along 40 different lines of sight. We extracted the ICM density profile from each observation, assuming the ICM to be spherically distributed. For each line of sight, we then considered the mean density profile over the sample and compared it with the three-dimensional density profile given by the simulations. We thus derived the spherical bias in the density profile by considering the ratio between the observed and the input quantities. We also studied the bias in the intrinsic scatter of the density profile distribution by performing the same procedure.
Results. We find a bias in the density profile, bn, smaller than 10% for R ≲ R500, and it increases up to ≈50% for larger radii. The bias in the intrinsic scatter profile, bs, is higher, reaching a value of ≈100% for R ≈ R500. We find that the bias for both of the analyzed quantities strongly depends on the morphology composition of the objects in the sample. For clusters that do not show large-scale substructures, both bn and bs are reduced by a factor of two. Conversely, for systems that do show large-scale substructures, both bn and bs increase significantly.
Key words: galaxies: clusters: general / galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium / X-rays: galaxies / X-rays: galaxies: clusters
© The Authors 2025
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe to Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.