Identifying synergies between VLBI and STIX imaging

¹ Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn (Endenich), Germany
e-mail: hmueller@mpifr-bonn.mpg.de
² National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 1011 Lopezville Rd, Socorro, NM 87801, USA
³ Department of Physics & Astronomy, Western Kentucky University, 1906 College Heights Blvd., Bowling Green, KY 42101, USA
⁴ Departament d’Astronomia i Astrofísica, Universitat de València, C. Dr. Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain
⁵ Observatori Astronòmic, Universitat de València, Parc Científic, C. Catedràtico José Beltrán 2, 46980 Paterna, València, Spain
⁶ Dipartimento di Scienze Matematiche “Giuseppe Luigi Lagrange”, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi, 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Received: 22 September 2023
Accepted: 18 January 2024

Abstract

Context. Reconstructing an image from noisy, sparsely sampled Fourier data is an ill-posed inverse problem that occurs in a variety of subjects within science, including data analysis for Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) and the Spectrometer/Telescope for Imaging X-rays (STIX) with respect to solar observations. The need for high-resolution, high-fidelity imaging fosters the active development of a range of novel imaging algorithms in a variety of different algorithmic settings. However, despite these ongoing, parallel developments, such synergies remain unexplored.

Aims. We study, for the first time, the synergies between the data analysis for the STIX instrument and VLBI. In particular, we compare the methodologies that have been developed in both fields and evaluate their potential. In this way, we identify key trends in the performance of several algorithmic ideas and draw recommendations for the future spending of resources in the study and implementation of novel imaging algorithms.

Methods. To this end, we organized a semi-blind imaging challenge with data sets and source structures that are typical for sparse VLBI, specifically in the context of the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) as well as STIX observations. We used 17 different algorithms from both communities, from six different imaging frameworks, in the challenge, making this work the largest scale code comparison for STIX and VLBI to date.

Results. We identified strong synergies between the two communities, as proven by the success of the imaging methods proposed for STIX in imaging VLBI data sets and vice versa. Novel imaging methods outperform the standard CLEAN algorithm significantly in every test case. Improvements over the performance of CLEAN offer deeper updates to the inverse modeling pipeline necessary or, consequently, the possibility to replace inverse modeling with forward modeling. Entropy-based methods and Bayesian methods perform best on STIX data. The more complex imaging algorithms utilizing multiple regularization terms (recently proposed for VLBI) add little to no additional improvements for STIX. However, they do outperform the other methods on EHT data, which correspond to a larger number of angular scales.

Conclusions. This work demonstrates the great synergy between the STIX and VLBI imaging efforts and the great potential for common developments. The comparison identifies key trends on the efficacy of specific algorithmic ideas for the VLBI and the STIX setting that may evolve into a roadmap for future developments.