Issue |
A&A
Volume 664, August 2022
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A62 | |
Number of page(s) | 17 | |
Section | Atomic, molecular, and nuclear data | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039943 | |
Published online | 09 August 2022 |
X-ray spectra of the Fe-L complex
III. Systematic uncertainties in atomic data★
1
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research,
Niels Bohrweg 4,
2333
CA Leiden, The Netherlands
e-mail: l.gu@sron.nl
2
RIKEN High Energy Astrophysics Laboratory,
2-1 Hirosawa, Wako,
Saitama,
351-0198
Japan
3
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center,
8800 Greenbelt Rd,
Greenbelt,
MD 20771
USA
4
Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik,
Heidelberg,
69117
Heidelberg, Germany
5
Department of Physics, Hiroshima University,
1-3-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima,
Hiroshima,
739-8526
Japan
6
Department of Physics, University of Strathclyde,
Glasgow,
G4 0NG
UK
7
Astronomical Institute “Anton Pannekoek”,
Science Park 904, 1098 XH Amsterdam,
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
8
INAF – IASF Palermo,
Via U. La Malfa 153,
90146
Palermo PA, Italy
9
Department of Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University,
Kotlářská 2,
Brno,
611 37
Czech Republic
10
Leiden Observatory, Leiden University,
PO Box 9513
2300
RA Leiden, The Netherlands
11
Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI), University of Tokyo,
Kashiwa,
277-8583
Japan
12
ESTEC/ESA,
Keplerlaan 1,
2201AZ
Noordwijk, The Netherlands
13
Laboratory of Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics (LIBPhys-UNL), Department of Physics, NOVA School of Science and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon,
2829-516
Caparica, Portugal
14
Space Science Laboratory, University of California,
Berkeley,
CA 94720
USA
Received:
20
November
2020
Accepted:
14
June
2022
There has been a growing request from the X-ray astronomy community for a quantitative estimate of systematic uncertainties originating from the atomic data used in plasma codes. Though there have been several studies looking into atomic data uncertainties using theoretical calculations, in general, there is no commonly accepted solution for this task. We present a new approach for estimating uncertainties in the line emissivities for the current models of collisional plasma, mainly based upon a dedicated analysis of observed high resolution spectra of stellar coronae and galaxy clusters. We find that the systematic uncertainties of the observed lines consistently show an anticorrelation with the model line fluxes, after properly accounting for the additional uncertainties from the ion concentration calculation. The strong lines in the spectra are in general better reproduced, indicating that the atomic data and modeling of the main transitions are more accurate than those for the minor ones. This underlying anticorrelation is found to be roughly independent of source properties, line positions, ion species, and the line formation processes. We further applied our method to the simulated XRISM and Athena observations of collisional plasma sources and discuss the impact of uncertainties on the interpretation of these spectra. The typical uncertainties are 1–2% on temperature and 3–20% on abundances of O, Ne, Fe, Mg, and Ni.
Key words: atomic data / techniques: spectroscopic / stars: coronae / galaxies: clusters: intracluster medium
Full Table A.1 is only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (130.79.128.5) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/cat/J/A+A/664/A62
© L. Gu et al. 2022
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This article is published in open access under the Subscribe-to-Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.