Issue |
A&A
Volume 644, December 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A52 | |
Number of page(s) | 14 | |
Section | Interstellar and circumstellar matter | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039152 | |
Published online | 01 December 2020 |
Role of the magnetic field in the fragmentation process: the case of G14.225-0.506
1
Institut de Ciències de l’Espai (ICE, CSIC),
Can Magrans s/n,
08193
Cerdanyola del Vallès,
Catalonia,
Spain
e-mail: nacho.anyez@gmail.com
2
Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC),
08034
Barcelona,
Catalonia,
Spain
3
Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics,
Taipei
10617,
Taiwan
4
Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy,
Königstuhl 17,
69117
Heidelberg,
Germany
5
Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA), and Department of Physics & Astronomy, Northwestern University,
2145 Sheridan Rd,
Evanston,
IL
60208,
USA
6
Instituto de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
PO Box 3-72,
58090
Morelia, Michoacán,
México
7
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics,
Cambridge,
MA
02138,
USA
Received:
11
August
2020
Accepted:
22
October
2020
Context. Magnetic fields are predicted to play a significant role in the formation of filamentary structures and their fragmentation to form stars and star clusters.
Aims. We aim to investigate the role of the magnetic field in the process of core fragmentation toward the two hub–filament systems in the infrared dark cloud G14.225-0.506, which present different levels of fragmentation.
Methods. We performed observations of the thermal dust polarization at 350 μm using the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO) with an angular resolution of 10″ toward the two hubs (Hub-N and Hub-S) in the infrared dark cloud G14.225-0.506. We additionally applied the polarization–intensity-gradient method to estimate the significance of the magnetic field over the gravitational force.
Results. The sky-projected magnetic field in Hub-N shows a rather uniform structure along the east–west orientation, which is roughly perpendicular to the major axis of the hub–filament system. The intensity gradient in Hub-N displays a single local minimum coinciding with the dust core MM1a detected with interferometric observations. Such a prevailing magnetic field orientation is slightly perturbed when approaching the dust core. Unlike the northern Hub, Hub-S shows two local minima, reflecting the bimodal distribution of the magnetic field. In Hub-N, both east and west of the hub–filament system, the intensity gradient and the magnetic field are parallel whereas they tend to be perpendicular when penetrating the dense filaments and hub. Analysis of the |δ|- and ΣB-maps indicates that, in general, the magnetic field cannot prevent gravitational collapse, both east and west, suggesting that the magnetic field is initially dragged by the infalling motion and aligned with it, or is channeling material toward the central ridge from both sides. Values of ΣB ≳ 1 are found toward a north–south ridge encompassing the dust emission peak, indicating that in this region magnetic field dominates over gravity force, or that with the current angular resolution we cannot resolve a hypothetically more complex structure. We estimated the magnetic field strength, the mass-to-flux ratio, and the Alfvén Mach number, and found differences between the two hubs.
Conclusions. The different levels of fragmentation observed in these two hubs could arise from differences in the properties of the magnetic field rather than from differences in the intensity of the gravitational field because the density in the two hubs is similar. However, environmental effects could also play a role.
Key words: stars: formation / ISM: clouds / ISM: individual objects: G14.225-0.506 / ISM: magnetic fields
© ESO 2020
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.