Issue |
A&A
Volume 643, November 2020
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A158 | |
Number of page(s) | 16 | |
Section | Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038658 | |
Published online | 19 November 2020 |
Shear measurement bias
II. A fast machine-learning calibration method
1
DEDIP/DAP, IRFU, CEA, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
e-mail: arnaupv@gmail.com
2
AIM, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
3
Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), 08034 Barcelona, Spain
4
Institute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), 08193 Barcelona, Spain
5
Institute of Particle and Cosmos Physics (IPARCOS), Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
6
Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, UMR7095 CNRS, Université Pierre & Marie Curie, 98bis boulevard Arago, 75014 Paris, France
Received:
15
June
2020
Accepted:
24
September
2020
We present a new shear calibration method based on machine learning. The method estimates the individual shear responses of the objects from the combination of several measured properties on the images using supervised learning. The supervised learning uses the true individual shear responses obtained from copies of the image simulations with different shear values. On simulated GREAT3 data, we obtain a residual bias after the calibration compatible with 0 and beyond Euclid requirements for a signal-to-noise ratio > 20 within ∼15 CPU hours of training using only ∼105 objects. This efficient machine-learning approach can use a smaller data set because the method avoids the contribution from shape noise. The low dimensionality of the input data also leads to simple neural network architectures. We compare it to the recently described method Metacalibration, which shows similar performances. The different methods and systematics suggest that the two methods are very good complementary methods. Our method can therefore be applied without much effort to any survey such as Euclid or the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, with fewer than a million images to simulate to learn the calibration function.
Key words: gravitational lensing: weak / methods: numerical / methods: data analysis / methods: observational / methods: statistical / cosmology: observations
© A. Pujol et al. 2020
Open Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.