Volume 606, October 2017
|Number of page(s)||9|
|Section||Numerical methods and codes|
|Published online||12 October 2017|
The impact of numerical oversteepening on the fragmentation boundary in self-gravitating disks
1 Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Leibnizstr. 15, 24118 Kiel, Germany
e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
2 Hamburger Sternwarte, Universität Hamburg, Gojenbergsweg 112, 21029 Hamburg, Germany
3 Steward Observatory, The University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry Ave., Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Received: 13 February 2017
Accepted: 8 July 2017
Context. Whether or not a self-gravitating accretion disk fragments is still an open issue. There are many different physical and numerical explanations for fragmentation, but simulations often show a non-convergent behavior for ever better resolution.
Aims. We aim to investigate the influence of different numerical limiters in Godunov type schemes on the fragmentation boundary in self-gravitating disks.
Methods. We have compared the linear and non-linear outcomes in two-dimensional shearingsheet simulations using the VANLEER and the SUPERBEE limiter.
Results. We show that choosing inappropriate limiting functions to handle shock-capturing in Godunov type schemes can lead to an overestimation of the surface density in regions with shallow density gradients. The effect amplifies itself on timescales comparable to the dynamical timescale even at high resolutions. This is exactly the environment in which clumps are expected to form. The effect is present without, but scaled up by, self-gravity and also does not depend on cooling. Moreover it can be backtracked to a well known effect called oversteepening. If the effect is also observed in the linear case, the fragmentation limit is shifted to larger values of the critical cooling timescale.
Key words: methods: numerical / instabilities / hydrodynamics / protoplanetary disks / accretion, accretion disks
© ESO, 2017
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.