Reaching micro-arcsecond astrometry with long baseline optical interferometry

Application to the GRAVITY instrument

¹ LESIA/Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, UPMC, Université Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon, France
e-mail: sylvestre.lacour@obspm.fr
² Max-Planck Institut fur extraterrestrische Physik (MPE), Giessenbachstrasse 1, 85748 Garching, Germany
³ European Southern Observatory (ESO), Karl-Schwarzschild-Str. 2, 85748 Garching, Germany
⁴ Institut de Planétologie et d’Astrophysique de Grenoble, 38400 St Martin d’Hères, France

Received: 3 April 2014
Accepted: 23 May 2014

Abstract

Context. A basic principle of long baseline interferometry is that an optical path difference (OPD) directly translates into an astrometric measurement. In the simplest case, the OPD is equal to the scalar product between the vector that links the two telescopes and the normalized vector pointing toward the star. However, in some circumstances, too simple an interpretation of this scalar product leads to seemingly conflicting results, called here “the baseline paradox”.

Aims. For micro-arcsecond accuracy astrometry, we have to model the metrology measurement in full. It involves a complex system subject to many optical effects: from pure baseline errors to static, quasi-static, and high-order optical aberrations. The goal of this paper is to present the strategy used by the “General Relativity Analysis via VLT InTerferometrY” instrument (GRAVITY) to minimize the biases introduced by these defects.

Methods. It is possible to give an analytical formula for how the baselines and tip-tilt errors affect the astrometric measurement. This formula depends on the limit points of three type of baselines: the wide-angle baseline, the narrow-angle baseline, and the imaging baseline. We also numerically include non-common path, higher order aberrations, whose amplitudes were measured during technical time at the Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI). We end by simulating the influence of high-order, common-path aberrations due to atmospheric residuals calculated from a Monte-Carlo simulation tool for adaptive optics (AO) systems.

Results. The result of this work is an error budget of the biases caused by the multiple optical imperfections, including optical dispersion. We show that the beam stabilization through both focal and pupil tracking is crucial to the GRAVITY system. Assuming the instrument pupil is stabilized at a 4 cm level on M1 and a field tracking below 0.2 λ/D, we show that GRAVITY will be able to reach its objective of 10 μas accuracy.