Simulation of kinematics of SS 433 radio jets that interact with the ambient medium

Institute of Mathematics, Physics and Information Technologies (IMFIT), Togliatti State University, Belorusskaya 14, 445667, Russia
e-mail: panfS@yandex.ru

Received: 7 August 2013
Accepted: 8 January 2014

Abstract

Context. The mildly relativistic jets of SS 433 are believed to inflate the surrounding supernova remnant W 50, possibly depositing more than 99% of their kinetic energy in the remnant expansion. Where and how this transformation of the energy occurs is as yet unknown. We can learn from this that the jets decelerate and that this deceleration is non-dissipative.

Aims. We uncover the deviation of the arcsecond-scale precessing radio jets of SS 433 from the ballistic locus described by the kinematic model as a signature of the dynamics issuing from the interaction of the jets with the ambient medium.

Methods. To do this, we simulated the kinematics of these jets, taking into account the ram pressure on the jets, which we estimated from the profile of brightness of synchrotron radiation along the radio jets, assuming pressure balance in the jets.

Results. We found that to fit an observable locus in all scales the radio jets need to be decelerated and twisted in addition to the precession torsion, mostly within the first one-fifth of the precession period, and subsequently they extend in a way that imitates ballistic jets. This jet kinematics implies a smaller distance to SS 433 than the currently accepted 5.5 kpc. The physical parameters of the jet model, which links jets dynamics with radiation, are physically reliable and characteristic for the SS 433 jets. The model proposes that beyond the radio-brightening zone, the jet clouds expand because they are in pressure balance with the intercloud medium, and heat up with distance according to the law T = 2 × 10⁴(r/10¹⁵  cm)^1.5 K.

Conclusions. This model naturally explains and agrees with, the observed properties of the radio jets: a) the shock-pressed morphology; b) the brightness profile; c) the ~10% deflections of the jet kinematics from the standard kinematic model – a magnitude of the jet speed decrement in our simulation; d) the precession-phase deviations from the standard kinematic model predictions; e) the dichotomy of the distances to the object, 4.8 kpc vs. 5.5 kpc, which are determined on the basis of the jet kinematics on scales of sub-arcsecond and several arcseconds, respectively; and f) the reheating on arcsecond scales.