Volume 533, September 2011
|Number of page(s)||5|
|Published online||09 September 2011|
Global dynamo models from direct numerical simulations and their mean-field counterparts
MAG (ENS/IPGP), LRA, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 24 rue Lhomond,
Paris Cedex 05,
Accepted: 24 June 2011
Context. The test-field method permits us to compute dynamo coefficients from global, direct numerical simulations. The subsequent use of these parameters in mean-field models enables us to compare self-consistent dynamo models with their mean-field counterparts. This has been done to date for a simulation of rotating magnetoconvection and a simple benchmark dynamo, which are both (quasi-)stationary.
Aims. It is shown that chaotically time-dependent dynamos in a low Rossby number regime can be appropriately described by corresponding mean-field results. We also identify conditions under which mean-field models disagree with direct numerical simulations.
Methods. We solve the equations of magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) in a rotating, spherical shell in the Boussinesq approximation. Based on this, we compute mean-field coefficients for several models with the help of the previously developed test-field method. The parameterization of the mean electromotive force by these coefficients is tested against direct numerical simulations. In addition, we use the determined dynamo coefficients in mean-field models and compare the outcome with azimuthally averaged fields from direct numerical simulations.
Results. The azimuthally and time-averaged electromotive force in rapidly rotating dynamos is sufficiently well parameterized by the set of determined mean-field coefficients. In comparison to the previously considered (quasi-)stationary dynamo, the chaotic time-dependence leads to an improved scale separation and thus to a closer agreement between direct numerical simulations and mean-field results.
Key words: methods: numerical / magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) / dynamo
© ESO, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.