Volume 530, June 2011
|Number of page(s)||26|
|Section||Catalogs and data|
|Published online||17 May 2011|
Early star catalogues of the southern sky
De Houtman, Kepler (second and third classes), and Halley⋆
Astronomical Institute, Utrecht University, PO Box 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
2 SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands
3 Until Jan. 2010: URU-Explokart, Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, PO Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
4 Institute for the History and Foundations of Science, PO Box 80 000, 3508 TA Utrecht, The Netherlands
Received: 27 February 2011
Accepted: 31 March 2011
De Houtman in 1603, Kepler in 1627 and Halley in 1679 published the earliest modern catalogues of the southern sky. We provide machine-readable versions of these catalogues, make some comparisons between them, and briefly discuss their accuracy on the basis of comparison with data from the modern Hipparcos Catalogue. We also compare our results for De Houtman with those by Knobel in 1917 finding good overall agreement. About half of the ~ 200 new stars (with respect to Ptolemaios) added by De Houtman are in twelve new constellations, half in old constellations like Centaurus, Lupus and Argo. The right ascensions and declinations given by De Houtman have error distributions with widths of about 40′, the longitudes and latitudes given by Kepler have error distributions with widths of about 45′. Halley improves on this by more than an order of magnitude to widths of about 3′, and all entries in his catalogue can be identified. The measurement errors of Halley are due to a systematic deviation of his sextant (increasing with angle to 2′ at 60°) and random errors of 07. The position errors in the catalogue of Halley are dominated by the position errors in the reference stars, which he took from Brahe.
Key words: astrometry / history and philosophy of astronomy
The full Tables Houtman, Classis, Aliter and Halley (see Tables 6, 7, 8) are only available at the CDS via anonymous ftp to cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr (126.96.36.199) or via http://cdsarc.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/qcat?J/A+A/530/A93
© ESO, 2011
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.