Issue |
A&A
Volume 526, February 2011
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | A30 | |
Number of page(s) | 10 | |
Section | Extragalactic astronomy | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015458 | |
Published online | 16 December 2010 |
The nature of “dark” gamma-ray bursts
1
Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik,
Giessenbachstrasse 1,
85748
Garching,
Germany
e-mail: jcg@mpe.mpg.de; kruehler@mpe.mpg.de;
pafonso@mpe.mpg.de; cclemens@mpe.mpg.de;
filgas@mpe.mpg.de; nardini@mpe.mpg.de;
felipe@mpe.mpg.de; arau@mpe.mpg.de;
pschady@mpe.mpg.de
2
Universe Cluster, Technische Universität München,
Boltzmannstraße 2,
85748
Garching,
Germany
3
Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg,
Sternwarte 5,
07778
Tautenburg,
Germany
e-mail: klose@tls-tautenburg.de; rossi@tls-tautenburg.de
4
Clemson Univ., Dept. of Physics and Astronomy,
Clemson,
SC
29634,
USA
e-mail: dieter@clemson.edu; aupdike@clemson.edu
5
Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge,
Madingley Road,
Cambridge
CB3 0HA,
UK
e-mail: aky@ast.cam.ac.uk
Received:
22
July
2010
Accepted:
11
October
2010
Context. Thirteen years after the discovery of the first afterglows, the nature of dark gamma-ray bursts (GRB) still eludes explanation: while each long-duration GRB typically has an X-ray afterglow, optical/NIR emission is only seen for 40–60% of them.
Aims. Here we use the afterglow detection statistics of the systematic follow-up observations performed with GROND since mid-2007 in order to derive the fraction of “dark bursts” according to different methods, and to distinguish between various scenarios for “dark bursts”.
Methods. Observations were performed with the 7-channel “Gamma-Ray Optical and Near-infrared Detector” (GROND) at the 2.2 m MPI/ESO telescope. We used the afterglow detection rate in dependence on the delay time between GRB and the first GROND exposure.
Results. For long-duration Swift bursts with a detected X-ray afterglow, we achieve a 90% (35/39) detection rate of optical/NIR afterglows whenever our observations started within less than 240 min after the burst. Complementing our GROND data with Swift/XRT spectra we construct broad-band spectral energy distributions and derive rest-frame extinctions.
Conclusions. We detect 25–40% “dark bursts”, depending on the definition used. The faint optical afterglow emission of “dark bursts” is mainly due to a combination of two contributing factors: (i) moderate intrinsic extinction at moderate redshifts, and (ii) about 22% of “dark” bursts at redshift >5.
Key words: gamma-rays burst: general / techniques: photometric
© ESO, 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.