Volume 525, January 2011
|Number of page(s)||15|
|Published online||29 November 2010|
Cross-calibration of the X-ray instruments onboard the Chandra, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Suzaku, Swift, and XMM-Newton observatories using G21.5–0.9⋆
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, Institute of Space and
Astronautical Science, 3-1-1
Yoshino-dai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa
2 European Space Agency, European Space Astronomy Centre, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain
3 Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, MS-70, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK
5 INAF, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale e Fisica Cosmica, via del Fosso del Cavaliere, 100 00133 Roma, Italy
6 National Aeronautics and Space Agency, Goddard Space Flight Center, Code 662, Laboratory for X-ray Astrophysics, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA
Accepted: 14 September 2010
Context. For many years, X-ray astronomy missions have used the Crab nebula as a celestial calibration source for the X-ray flux and spectral shape. However, the object is often too bright for current and future missions equipped with instruments with improved sensitivity.
Aims. We use G21.5–0.9, a pulsar-wind nebula with a time-constant power-law spectrum and a flux of a few milli-Crab in the X-ray band, as a viable, fainter substitute to the Crab. Using this source, we conduct a cross-calibration study of the instruments onboard currently active observatories: Chandra ACIS, Suzaku XIS, Swift XRT, and XMM-Newton EPIC (MOS and pn) for the soft-band, and INTEGRAL IBIS-ISGRI, RXTE PCA, and Suzaku HXD-PIN for the hard band.
Methods. We extract spectra from all instruments and fit under the same astrophysical assumptions. We compare the spectral parameters of the G21.5–0.9 model: power-law photon index, H-equivalent column density of the interstellar photoelectric absorption, and flux in the soft (2–8 keV) or hard (15–50 keV) energy band.
Results. We identify systematic differences in the best-fit parameter values unattributable to statistical scatter of the data alone. We interpret these differences as due to residual cross-calibration problems. The differences can be as large as 20% and 9% for the soft-band flux and power-law index, respectively, and 46% for the hard-band flux. The results are plotted and tabulated as a useful reference for future calibration and scientific studies using multiple missions.
Key words: instrumentation: detectors / X-rays: individuals: G21.5 / 0.9
© ESO, 2010
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.