Volume 504, Number 2, September III 2009
|Page(s)||359 - 371|
|Section||Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)|
|Published online||16 July 2009|
Designing future dark energy space missions*
I. Building realistic galaxy spectro-photometric catalogs and their first applications
Laboratoire d'Astrophysique de Marseille, CNRS-Université d'Aix-Marseille, 38 rue Frederic Joliot-Curie, 13388 Marseille Cedex 13, France e-mail: email@example.com
2 Institute of Astronomy, 2680 Woodlawn Drive Honolulu, HI 96822-1897, USA
3 University of Pennsylvania, 4N1 David Rittenhouse Lab 209 S 33rd St Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
4 CFHT, 65-1238 Mamalahoa Hwy Kamuela, Hawaii 96743, USA
5 Space Telescope Science Institute, 3700 San Martin Drive Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
6 Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille, 163, avenue de Luminy, Case 902, 13288 Marseille Cedex 09, France
7 Service d'Astrophysique, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
8 California Institute of Technology 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena CA 91125, USA
9 Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris 98bis, bd Arago 75014 Paris, France
Accepted: 23 June 2009
Context. Future dark energy space missions such as JDEM and EUCLID are being designed to survey the galaxy population to trace the geometry of the universe and the growth of structure, which both depend on the cosmological model. To reach the goal of high precision cosmology they need to evaluate the capabilities of different instrument designs based on realistic mock catalogs of the galaxy distribution.
Aims. The aim of this paper is to construct realistic and flexible mock catalogs based on our knowledge of galaxy populations from current deep surveys. We explore two categories of mock catalogs: (i) based on luminosity functions that we fit to observations (GOODS, UDF, COSMOS, VVDS); (ii) based on the observed COSMOS galaxy distribution.
Methods. The COSMOS mock catalog benefits from all the properties of the data-rich COSMOS survey and the highly accurate photometric redshift distribution based on 30-band photometry. Nevertheless this catalog is limited by the depth of the COSMOS survey. Thus, we also evaluate a mock galaxy catalog generated from luminosity functions using the Le Phare software. For these two catalogs, we have produced simulated number counts in several bands, color diagrams and redshift distributions for validation against real observational data.
Results. Using these mock catalogs we derive some basic requirements to help design future Dark Energy missions in terms of the number of galaxies available for the weak-lensing analysis as a function of the PSF size and depth of the survey. We also compute the spectroscopic success rate for future spectroscopic redshift surveys (i) aiming at measuring BAO in the case of the wide field spectroscopic redshift survey, and (ii) for the photometric redshift calibration survey which is required to achieve weak lensing tomography with great accuracy. In particular, we demonstrate that for the photometric redshift calibration, using only NIR (1–1.7 μm) spectroscopy, we cannot achieve a complete spectroscopic survey down to the limit of the photometric survey (). Extending the wavelength coverage of the spectroscopic survey to cover 0.6–1.7 μm will then improve the fraction of very secure spectroscopic redshifts to nearly 80% of the galaxies, making possible a very accurate photometric redshift calibration.
Conclusions. We have produced two realistic mock galaxy catalogs that can be used in determining the best survey strategy for future dark-energy missions in terms of photometric redshift accuracy and spectroscopic redshift surveys yield. These catalogues are publicly accessible at http://lamwws.oamp.fr/cosmowiki/RealisticSpectroPhotCat, or at the CDS.
Key words: cosmology: observations / surveys / catalogs / techniques: miscellaneous
© ESO, 2009
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.