Issue |
A&A
Volume 465, Number 1, April I 2007
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | L13 - L16 | |
Section | Letters | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20066896 | |
Published online | 12 February 2007 |
On the nature of X-ray flashes in the SWIFT era
1
IASF-Roma/INAF, via fosso del cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy e-mail: [gendre;galli;piro]@iasf-roma.inaf.it
2
Università degli Studi di Milano, Bicocca, Piazza dell'Ateneo Nuovo 1, 20126 Milano, Italy
3
INFN-Trieste, Padriciano 99, 34012 Trieste, Italy
Received:
7
December
2006
Accepted:
6
February
2007
Aims.X-Ray Flashes (XRFs) are soft gamma-ray bursts whose nature is not clear. Their soft spectrum can be due to cosmological effects (high redshift), an off-axis view of the jet or can be intrinsic to the source. We use SWIFT observations to investigate different scenarios proposed to explain their origin.
Methods.We have made a systematic analysis of the afterglows of XRFs with known redshift observed by SWIFT. We derive their redshift and luminosity distributions, and compare their properties with a sample of normal GRBs observed by the same instrument.
Results.The high distance hypothesis is ruled out by the redshift distribution of our sample of XRFs, indicating that, at least for our sample, the off-axis and sub-energetic hypotheses are preferred. Of course, this does not exclude that some XRFs without known redshift could be at high distance. However we find that taking into account the sensitivity of the BAT instrument, XRFs cannot be detected by SWIFT beyond ≈3. The luminosity distribution of XRF afterglows is similar to the GRB one. This would rule out most off-axis models, but for the homogeneous jet model. However this model predicts a GRB rate uncomfortably near the observed rate of supernovae. This implies that XRFs, at least those of our sample, are intrinsically soft.
Key words: X-rays: flashes / gamma rays: bursts
© ESO, 2007
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.