EDP Sciences
Free Access
Volume 390, Number 1, July IV 2002
Page(s) 307 - 326
Section Diffuse matter in space
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20020629
Published online 05 July 2002

A&A 390, 307-326 (2002)
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020629

Turbulent velocity structure in molecular clouds

V. Ossenkopf1 and M.-M. Mac Low2

1  I. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, Zülpicher Straße 77, 50937 Köln, Germany
2  Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192, USA

(Received 13 December 2000 / Accepted 22 April 2002)

We compare velocity structure observed in the Polaris Flare molecular cloud at scales ranging from 0.015 pc to 20 pc to the velocity structure of a suite of simulations of supersonic hydrodynamic and MHD turbulence computed with the ZEUS MHD code. We examine different methods of characterising the structure, including a scanning-beam method that provides an objective measurement of Larson's size-linewidth relation, structure functions, velocity and velocity difference probability distribution functions (PDFs), and the $\Delta$-variance wavelet transform, and use them to compare models and observations.

The $\Delta$-variance is most sensitive to characteristic scales and scaling laws, but is limited in its application by a lack of intensity weighting so that its results are easily dominated by observational noise in maps with large empty areas. The scanning-beam size-linewidth relation is more robust with respect to noisy data. Obtaining the global velocity scaling behaviour requires that large-scale trends in the maps not be removed but treated as part of the turbulent cascade. We compare the true velocity PDF in our models to simulated observations of velocity centroids and average line profiles in optically thin lines, and find that the line profiles reflect the true PDF better unless the map size is comparable to the total line-of-sight thickness of the cloud. Comparison of line profiles to velocity centroid PDFs can thus be used to measure the line-of-sight depth of a cloud.

The observed density and velocity structure is consistent with supersonic turbulence with a driving scale at or above the size of the molecular cloud and dissipative processes below 0.05 pc. Ambipolar diffusion could explain the dissipation. Over most of the observed range of scales the velocity structure is that of a shock-dominated medium driven from large scale. The velocity PDFs exclude small-scale driving such as that from stellar outflows as a dominant process in the observed region. In the models, large-scale driving is the only process that produces deviations from a Gaussian PDF shape consistent with observations, almost independent of the strength of driving or magnetic field. Strong magnetic fields impose a clear anisotropy on the velocity field, reducing the velocity variance in directions perpendicular to the field.

Key words: ISM: clouds -- ISM: magnetic fields, turbulence -- ISM: kinematics and dynamics -- MHD

Offprint request: V. Ossenkopf, ossk@ph1.uni-koeln.de

SIMBAD Objects

© ESO 2002

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.