Open Access
Erratum
This article is an erratum for:
[https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039574]


Issue
A&A
Volume 664, August 2022
Article Number C2
Number of page(s) 1
Section Cosmology (including clusters of galaxies)
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039574e
Published online 24 August 2022

In this erratum, we would like to correct a typographical mistake in Eq. (5) from Schuldt et al. (2021) that converts the complex ellipticity of an ellipse into its axis ratio q and position angle θ. Eq. (4) from Schuldt et al. (2021) gives the definition of the complex ellipticity as

e x = 1 q 2 1 + q 2 cos ( 2 θ ) , e y = 1 q 2 1 + q 2 sin ( 2 θ ) , $$ \begin{aligned} e_x&=\frac{1-q^2}{1+q^2} \, \cos (2\theta ), \nonumber \\ e_y&=\frac{1-q^2}{1+q^2} \, \sin (2\theta ), \end{aligned} $$(1)

which was used throughout the published article. For completeness, we gave a back transformation of the complex ellipticity into the axis ratio q and the position angle θ in Eq. (5). The expression for the axis ratio q ∈ (0, 1] is correct,

q = 1 e x 2 + e y 2 1 + e x 2 + e y 2 . $$ \begin{aligned} q = \sqrt{\frac{1-\sqrt{e_x^2+e_y^2}}{1+\sqrt{e_x^2+e_y^2}}}\, . \end{aligned} $$(2)

The error concerns the second part, the position angle θ ∈ [0, π), defined counter-clockwise with respect to the positive x-axis. According to Eq. (1) of this erratum, the cosine function corresponds to e x and the sine function corresponds to e y, which was unfortunately switched for the back transformation. A clearer and correct transformation is given by

θ = { f if e x 0 and e y 0 f + π if e x 0 and e y < 0 1 2 π f if e x < 0 $$ \begin{aligned} \theta = \left\{ \!\begin{array}{cc} f&\text{ if } e_{\mathrm{x}} \ge 0 \text{ and } e_\text{ y} \ge 0\\ f + \pi&\text{ if } e_{\mathrm{x}} \ge 0 \text{ and } e_\text{y} < 0\\ \frac{1}{2}\pi -f&\text{ if } e_\text{x} < 0 \end{array} \right. \end{aligned} $$(3)

with

f = 1 2 arcsin ( e y 1 + q 2 1 q 2 ) $$ \begin{aligned} f = \frac{1}{2} \arcsin \left( e_\text{y} \frac{1+q^2}{1-q^2} \right) \, \end{aligned} $$(4)

and

f [ π / 4 , + π / 4 ] . $$ \begin{aligned} f \in [-\pi /4, +\pi /4]. \end{aligned} $$(5)

Since we only used Eq. (1) (i.e., Eq. (4) from Schuldt et al. 2021) to transform the axis ratio q and position angle θ of our mock lenses into the complex parameterization for training the networks, and as we worked from then on in complex notation, we never used the back transformation. Therefore, this mistake does not affect any results in Schuldt et al. (2021).

References

  1. Schuldt, S., Suyu, S. H., Meinhardt, T., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A126 [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]

© S. Schuldt et al. 2022

Licence Creative CommonsOpen Access article, published by EDP Sciences, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

This article is published in open access under the Subscribe-to-Open model. Subscribe to A&A to support open access publication.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.