The 5–10 keV AGN luminosity function at 0.01 < z < 4.0
A&A, 587 (2016) A142
Published online: 2016-03-03
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Euclid preparation
M. Selwood, S. Fotopoulou, M. N. Bremer, L. Bisigello, H. Landt, E. Bañados, G. Zamorani, F. Shankar, D. Stern, E. Lusso, L. Spinoglio, V. Allevato, F. Ricci, A. Feltre, F. Mannucci, M. Salvato, R. A. A. Bowler, M. Mignoli, D. Vergani, F. La Franca, A. Amara, S. Andreon, N. Auricchio, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 693 A250 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450894
Multiwavelength Constraints on the Local Black Hole Occupation Fraction
Colin J. Burke, Priyamvada Natarajan, Vivienne F. Baldassare and Marla GehaThe Astrophysical Journal 978 (1) 77 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad94d9
XXL-HSC: Host properties of X-ray detected AGNs in XXL clusters
E. Drigga, E. Koulouridis, E. Pouliasis, Y. Toba, M. Akiyama, A. Ruiz, C. Vignali, I. Georgantopoulos, T. Nagao, S. Paltani, M. Plionis, M. Pierre and B. VijarnwannalukAstronomy & Astrophysics 697 A234 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452965
Chandra Discovery of a Candidate Hyperluminous X-Ray Source in MCG+11-11-032
Adi Foord, Francesca Civano, Julia M. Comerford, Martin Elvis, Giuseppina Fabbiano, Tingting Liu, Elisabeta Lusso, Stefano Marchesi, Mar Mezcua, Francisco Muller-Sanchez, Rebecca Nevin and Kristina NylandThe Astrophysical Journal 984 (1) 79 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc4e8
The Halo Occupation Distribution Modeling of X-Ray-selected Active Galactic Nuclei at 0.6 < z < 2.6 in the COSMOS Field
Hiroyuki Ikeda, Takamitsu Miyaji, Taira Oogi, Yoshiki Toba, Héctor Aceves, Stefano Marchesi, Viola Allevato, Akke Viitanen and Francesca CivanoThe Astrophysical Journal 982 (2) 192 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adb719
The Compton-thick active galactic nuclei luminosity function in the local Universe
I. Georgantopoulos, E. Pouliasis, A. Ruiz and A. AkylasAstronomy & Astrophysics 695 A128 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451282
Active galactic nucleus X-ray luminosity function and absorption function in the Early Universe (3 ≤ z ≤ 6)
E. Pouliasis, A. Ruiz, I. Georgantopoulos, F. Vito, R. Gilli, C. Vignali, Y. Ueda, E. Koulouridis, M. Akiyama, S. Marchesi, B. Laloux, T. Nagao, S. Paltani, M. Pierre, Y. Toba, M. Habouzit, B. Vijarnwannaluk and C. GarrelAstronomy & Astrophysics 685 A97 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348479
Genuine Retrieval of the AGN Host Stellar Population (GRAHSP)
Johannes Buchner, Hattie Starck, Mara Salvato, Hagai Netzer, Zsofi Igo, Brivael Laloux, Antonis Georgakakis, Isabelle Gauger, Anna Olechowska, Nicolas Lopez, Suraj D. Shankar, Junyao Li, Kirpal Nandra and Andrea MerloniAstronomy & Astrophysics 692 A161 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449372
CIRCLEZ : Reliable photometric redshifts for active galactic nuclei computed solely using photometry from Legacy Survey Imaging for DESI
A. Saxena, M. Salvato, W. Roster, R. Shirley, J. Buchner, J. Wolf, C. Kohl, H. Starck, T. Dwelly, J. Comparat, A. Malyali, S. Krippendorf, A. Zenteno, D. Lang, D. Schlegel, R. Zhou, A. Dey, F. Valdes, A. Myers, R. J. Assef, C. Ricci, M. J. Temple, A. Merloni, A. Koekemoer, S. F. Anderson, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 690 A365 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450886
Probing properties of nearly two-hundred new active galactic nuclei
Samrat Ghosh, Samir Mandal, Sudip Bhattacharyya and Shivam KumaranMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 534 (3) 1889 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2208
Impact of stellar population synthesis choices on forward modelling-based redshift distribution estimates
Luca Tortorelli, Jamie McCullough and Daniel GruenAstronomy & Astrophysics 689 A144 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450694
4483 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_113
Searching for the Highest-z Dual Active Galactic Nuclei in the Deepest Chandra Surveys
Brandon Sandoval, Adi Foord, Steven W. Allen, Marta Volonteri, Nianyi Chen, Tiziana Di Matteo, Aaron Stemo, Kayhan Gültekin, Melanie Habouzit, Clara Puerto-Sánchez, Edmund Hodges-Kluck and Yohan DuboisThe Astrophysical Journal 974 (1) 121 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad6986
EPOCHS VII: discovery of high-redshift (6.5 < z < 12) AGN candidates in JWST ERO and PEARLS data
Ignas Juodžbalis, Christopher J Conselice, Maitrayee Singh, Nathan Adams, Katherine Ormerod, Thomas Harvey, Duncan Austin, Marta Volonteri, Seth H Cohen, Rolf A Jansen, Jake Summers, Rogier A Windhorst, Jordan C J D’Silva, Anton M Koekemoer, Dan Coe, Simon P Driver, Brenda Frye, Norman A Grogin, Madeline A Marshall, Mario Nonino, Nor Pirzkal, Aaron Robotham, Russell E Ryan Jr, Rafael Ortiz III, Scott Tompkins, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525 (1) 1353 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2396
Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics
Stefano Bianchi, Vincenzo Mainieri and Paolo PadovaniHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_113-1
Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics
Stefano Bianchi, Vincenzo Mainieri and Paolo PadovaniHandbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics 1 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_113-2
X-ray emission from a rapidly accreting narrow-line Seyfert 1 galaxy at z = 6.56
J. Wolf, K. Nandra, M. Salvato, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 669 A127 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244688
A unique, ring-like radio source with quadrilateral structure detected with machine learning
M Lochner, L Rudnick, I Heywood, K Knowles and S S ShabalaMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 520 (1) 1439 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad074
Exploring Low Mass Galaxies at Different Wavelengths
Thomas JohnsonEmerging Minds Journal for Student Research 1 120 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.59973/emjsr.31
A High Fraction of Heavily X-Ray-obscured Active Galactic Nuclei
Christopher M. Carroll, Tonima T. Ananna, Ryan C. Hickox, Alberto Masini, Roberto J. Assef, Daniel Stern, Chien-Ting J. Chen and Lauranne LanzThe Astrophysical Journal 950 (2) 127 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acc402
LeMMINGs – IV. The X-ray properties of a statistically complete sample of the nuclei in active and inactive galaxies from the Palomar sample
D R A Williams, M Pahari, R D Baldi, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510 (4) 4909 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3310
The X-Ray Luminosity Function Evolution of Quasars and the Correlation between the X-Ray and Ultraviolet Luminosities
J. Singal, S. Mutchnick and V. PetrosianThe Astrophysical Journal 932 (2) 111 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6f06
GAMA/XXL: X-ray point sources in low-luminosity galaxies in the GAMA G02/XXL-N field
E Nwaokoro, S Phillipps, A J Young, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 502 (2) 3101 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab242
Spectroscopic observations of PHz G237.01+42.50: A galaxy protocluster at z = 2.16 in the Cosmos field
M. Polletta, G. Soucail, H. Dole, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 654 A121 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202140612
Photometric redshifts for X-ray-selected active galactic nuclei in the eROSITA era
M Brescia, M Salvato, S Cavuoti, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 489 (1) 663 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2159
The dependence of the X-ray AGN clustering on the properties of the host galaxy
G Mountrichas, A Georgakakis and I GeorgantopoulosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 483 (1) 1374 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3140
A Giant Green Pea Identified in the Spectroscopy of Spatially Extended [O iii] Sources
Suraphong Yuma, Masami Ouchi, Seiji Fujimoto, Takashi Kojima and Yuma SugaharaThe Astrophysical Journal 882 (1) 17 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f87
CPz: Classification-aided photometric-redshift estimation
S. Fotopoulou and S. PaltaniAstronomy & Astrophysics 619 A14 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730763
The XXL Survey
E. Koulouridis, L. Faccioli, A. M. C. Le Brun, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 620 A4 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730789
X-ray Luminosity Function of Quasars at 3 < z < 5 from XMM-Newton Serendipitous Survey Data
G. A. Khorunzhev, S. Yu. Sazonov and R. A. BureninAstronomy Letters 44 (8-9) 500 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063773718090049
Looking at cosmic near-infrared background radiation anisotropies
A. Kashlinsky, R. G. Arendt, F. Atrio-Barandela, et al.Reviews of Modern Physics 90 (2) (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.025006
Constraints on submicrojansky radio number counts based on evolving VLA-COSMOS luminosity functions
M. Novak, V. Smolčić, E. Schinnerer, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 614 A47 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731635
AGN contamination of galaxy-cluster thermal X-ray emission: predictions for eRosita from cosmological simulations
V Biffi, K Dolag and A MerloniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2) 2213 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2436
No evidence for a significant AGN contribution to cosmic hydrogen reionization
Shaghayegh Parsa, James S Dunlop and Ross J McLureMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (3) 2904 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2887
Systematic Survey for [O ii], [O iii], and Hα Blobs at z = 0.1–1.5: The Implication for Evolution of Galactic-scale Outflow
Suraphong Yuma, Masami Ouchi, Alyssa B. Drake, Seiji Fujimoto, Takashi Kojima and Yuma SugaharaThe Astrophysical Journal 841 (2) 93 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa709f
AGNs and Their Host Galaxies in the Local Universe: Two Mass-independent Eddington Ratio Distribution Functions Characterize Black Hole Growth
Anna K. Weigel, Kevin Schawinski, Neven Caplar, O. Ivy Wong, Ezequiel Treister and Benny TrakhtenbrotThe Astrophysical Journal 845 (2) 134 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa803b
Active Galactic Nuclei Search
Sergey Kotov and Sergey DodonovAtoms 5 (4) 45 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3390/atoms5040045
Constraining the UV emissivity of AGN throughout cosmic time via X-ray surveys
Federica Ricci, Stefano Marchesi, Francesco Shankar, Fabio La Franca and Francesca CivanoMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 465 (2) 1915 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2909
The Chandra deep fields: Lifting the veil on distant active galactic nuclei and X-ray emitting galaxies
Y.Q. XueNew Astronomy Reviews 79 59 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2017.09.002
The VLA-COSMOS 3 GHz Large Project: Cosmic star formation history sincez~ 5
M. Novak, V. Smolčić, J. Delhaize, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 602 A5 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201629436
On the mean radiative efficiency of accreting massive black holes in AGNs and QSOs
XiaoXia Zhang and YouJun LuScience China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 60 (10) (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-017-9062-1
An Optically Faint Quasar Survey at z ∼ 5 in the CFHTLS Wide Field: Estimates of the Black Hole Masses and Eddington Ratios
H. Ikeda, T. Nagao, K. Matsuoka, N. Kawakatu, M. Kajisawa, M. Akiyama, T. Miyaji and T. MorokumaThe Astrophysical Journal 846 (1) 57 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa83ae
The 2–10 keV unabsorbed luminosity function of AGN from the LSS, CDFS, and COSMOS surveys
P. Ranalli, E. Koulouridis, I. Georgantopoulos, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 590 A80 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527013
The cosmic evolution of massive black holes in the Horizon-AGN simulation
M. Volonteri, Y. Dubois, C. Pichon and J. DevriendtMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 460 (3) 2979 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1123
The deepest X-ray view of high-redshift galaxies: constraints on low-rate black hole accretion
F. Vito, R. Gilli, C. Vignali, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 463 (1) 348 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1998
The XXL Survey
S. Fotopoulou, F. Pacaud, S. Paltani, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 592 A5 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527402