The insignificant evolution of the richness-mass relation of galaxy clusters
A&A, 568 (2014) A23
Published online: 2014-08-08
Articles citing this article
The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).
Cited article:
This article has been cited by the following article(s):
Gravity-selected Cluster Samples: A New Take on the Compton-y–Mass Relation
S. Andreon and M. RadovichThe Astrophysical Journal 985 (1) 78 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/adc71e
The uncommon intracluster medium features of the first massive clusters selected independently of their baryon content
S Andreon, M Radovich, A Moretti, F -X Desert, T Hamana, M Pizzardo, C Romero, H Roussel and G TrinchieriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 536 (4) 3466 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2780
Intrinsic Mass–Richness Relation of Clusters from THE THREE HUNDRED Hydrodynamic Simulations
Mingjing Chen, Weiguang Cui, Wenjuan Fang and Zhonglue WenThe Astrophysical Journal 966 (2) 227 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad3931
Do gas-poor galaxy clusters have different galaxy populations? The positive covariance of hot and cold baryons
Emanuella Puddu and Stefano AndreonMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 511 (2) 2968 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3632
Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?
Stijn N B Debackere, Henk Hoekstra, Joop Schaye, Katrin Heitmann and Salman HabibMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 515 (3) 3383 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1687
A CO Survey of SpARCS Star-forming Brightest Cluster Galaxies: Evidence for Uniformity in BCG Molecular Gas Processing across Cosmic Time
Delaney A. Dunne, Tracy M. A. Webb, Allison Noble, Christopher Lidman, Heath Shipley, Adam Muzzin, Gillian Wilson and H. K. C. YeeThe Astrophysical Journal Letters 909 (2) L29 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/abeb6f
The stellar mass function and evolution of the density profile of galaxy clusters from the Hydrangea simulations at 0 < z < 1.5
Syeda Lammim Ahad, Yannick M Bahé, Henk Hoekstra, Remco F J van der Burg and Adam MuzzinMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (2) 1999 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1036
Environmental processing in cluster core galaxies at z = 1.7
G. Castignani, F. Combes and P. SaloméAstronomy & Astrophysics 635 L10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201937155
Constraining the Mass of the Emerging Galaxy Cluster SpARCS1049+56 at z = 1.71 with Infrared Weak Lensing
Kyle Finner, M. James Jee, Tracy Webb, Gillian Wilson, Saul Perlmutter, Adam Muzzin and Julie Hlavacek-LarrondoThe Astrophysical Journal 893 (1) 10 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7bdb
Weak-lensing mass calibration of the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich effect using APEX-SZ galaxy clusters
B Westbrook, C Tucker, C L Reichardt, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 1728 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1904
Optical follow-up study of 32 high-redshift galaxy cluster candidates from Planck with the William Herschel Telescope
Matthias Klein, Henk Hoekstra, Jan Luca van den Busch, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2) 2523 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1838
The XXL Survey
Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori, Dominique Eckert, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 632 A54 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628521
Mass–Richness Relations for X-Ray and SZE-selected Clusters at 0.4 < z < 2.0 as Seen by Spitzer at 4.5 μm
A. Rettura, R. Chary, J. Krick and S. EttoriThe Astrophysical Journal 867 (1) 12 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad818
The XXL Survey
M. Ricci, C. Benoist, S. Maurogordato, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 620 A13 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201832989
Apples to applesA2– II. Cluster selection functions for next-generation surveys
B. Ascaso, S. Mei, J. G. Bartlett and N. BenítezMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 464 (2) 2270 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2508
Precise clustering and density evolution of redMaPPer galaxy clusters versus MXXL simulation
Pablo Jimeno, Tom Broadhurst, Ruth Lazkoz, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466 (3) 2658 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw3253
Intrinsic scatter of caustic masses and hydrostatic bias: An observational study
S. Andreon, G. Trinchieri, A. Moretti and J. WangAstronomy & Astrophysics 606 A25 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201730920
Galaxy Merger Candidates in High-redshift Cluster Environments
A. G. Delahaye, T. M. A. Webb, J. Nantais, A. DeGroot, G. Wilson, A. Muzzin, H. K. C. Yee, R. Foltz, A. G. Noble, R. Demarco, A. Tudorica, M. C. Cooper, C. Lidman, S. Perlmutter, B. Hayden, K. Boone and J. SuraceThe Astrophysical Journal 843 (2) 126 (2017)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa756a
Prospects for high-zcluster detections withPlanck, based on a follow-up of 28 candidates using MegaCam at CFHT
R. F. J. van der Burg, H. Aussel, G. W. Pratt, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 587 A23 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527299
The amazing diversity in the hot gas content of an X-ray unbiased massive galaxy clusters sample
S. Andreon, Ana Laura Serra, A. Moretti and G. TrinchieriAstronomy & Astrophysics 585 A147 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201527408
Next generation cosmology: constraints from theEuclidgalaxy cluster survey
B. Sartoris, A. Biviano, C. Fedeli, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 459 (2) 1764 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw630
Weak-lensing-inferred scaling relations of galaxy clusters in the RCS2: mass-richness, mass-concentration, mass-bias, and more
Edo van Uitert, David G. Gilbank, Henk Hoekstra, et al.Astronomy & Astrophysics 586 A43 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526719
A MATURE GALAXY CLUSTER AT z = 1.58 AROUND THE RADIO GALAXY 7C 1753+6311
E. A. Cooke, N. A. Hatch, D. Stern, A. Rettura, M. Brodwin, A. Galametz, D. Wylezalek, C. Bridge, C. J. Conselice, C. De Breuck, A. H. Gonzalez and M. JarvisThe Astrophysical Journal 816 (2) 83 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/83
Richness-based masses of rich and famous galaxy clusters
S. AndreonAstronomy & Astrophysics 587 A158 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526852
An accurate cluster selection function for the J-PAS narrow-band wide-field survey
B. Ascaso, N. Benítez, R. Dupke, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 456 (4) 4291 (2016)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2988
Making the observational parsimonious richness a working mass proxy
S. AndreonAstronomy & Astrophysics 582 A100 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201526081
Constraints on the richness–mass relation and the optical-SZE positional offset distribution for SZE-selected clusters
A. Saro, S. Bocquet, E. Rozo, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 454 (3) 2305 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2141
Mass calibration of galaxy clusters at redshift 0.1–1.0 using weak lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stripe 82 co-add
Matthew P. Wiesner, Huan Lin and Marcelle Soares-SantosMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 452 (1) 701 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1332
CoMaLit – II. The scaling relation between mass and Sunyaev–Zel'dovich signal for Planck selected galaxy clusters
Mauro Sereno, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3649 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv809
CALIBRATION OF THE OPTICAL MASS PROXY FOR CLUSTERS OF GALAXIES AND AN UPDATE OF THE WHL12 CLUSTER CATALOG
Z. L. Wen and J. L. HanThe Astrophysical Journal 807 (2) 178 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/178
THE STAR FORMATION HISTORY OF BCGs TOz= 1.8 FROM THE SpARCS/SWIRE SURVEY: EVIDENCE FOR SIGNIFICANT IN SITU STAR FORMATION AT HIGH REDSHIFT
Tracy M. A. Webb, Adam Muzzin, Allison Noble, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 814 (2) 96 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/96
CFHTLenS: a weak lensing shear analysis of the 3D-Matched-Filter galaxy clusters
Jes Ford, Ludovic Van Waerbeke, Martha Milkeraitis, et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 447 (2) 1304 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu2545
CoMaLit – IV. Evolution and self-similarity of scaling relations with the galaxy cluster mass
Mauro Sereno and Stefano EttoriMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 450 (4) 3675 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv814
On optical mass estimation methods for galaxy groups
R. J. Pearson, T. J. Ponman, P. Norberg, A. S. G. Robotham and W. M. FarrMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (3) 3082 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv463
AN EXTREME STARBURST IN THE CORE OF A RICH GALAXY CLUSTER ATz= 1.7
Tracy Webb, Allison Noble, Andrew DeGroot, et al.The Astrophysical Journal 809 (2) 173 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/173
The mass–concentration relation in lensing clusters: the role of statistical biases and selection effects
Mauro Sereno, Carlo Giocoli, Stefano Ettori and Lauro MoscardiniMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 449 (2) 2024 (2015)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv416
The important role of evolution in thePlanck YSZ-mass calibration
S. AndreonAstronomy & Astrophysics 570 L10 (2014)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424387