EDP Sciences logo
Subscriber Authentication Point
Search
Menu
Home All issues A&A, 564 (2014) A103 Article references

Articles citing this article

The Citing articles tool gives a list of articles citing the current article.
The citing articles come from EDP Sciences database, as well as other publishers participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking Program. You can set up your personal account to receive an email alert each time this article is cited by a new article (see the menu on the right-hand side of the abstract page).

Cited article:

Combining strongly lensed and unlensed fast radio bursts: To be a more precise late-universe probe

Ji-Guo Zhang, Yi-Fan Jiang, Ze-Wei Zhao, Jing-Zhao Qi, Jing-Fei Zhang and Xin Zhang
Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 68 (8) (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-024-2647-2

SN H0pe: The First Measurement of H 0 from a Multiply Imaged Type Ia Supernova, Discovered by JWST

Massimo Pascale, Brenda L. Frye, Justin D. R. Pierel, Wenlei Chen, Patrick L. Kelly, Seth H. Cohen, Rogier A. Windhorst, Adam G. Riess, Patrick S. Kamieneski, José M. Diego, Ashish K. Meena, Sangjun Cha, Masamune Oguri, Adi Zitrin, M. James Jee, Nicholas Foo, Reagen Leimbach, Anton M. Koekemoer, C. J. Conselice, Liang Dai, Ariel Goobar, Matthew R. Siebert, Lou Strolger and S. P. Willner
The Astrophysical Journal 979 (1) 13 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9928

The overconcentrated dark halo in the strong lens SDSS J0946 + 1006 is a subhalo: evidence for self-interacting dark matter?

Wolfgang J R Enzi, Coleman M Krawczyk, Daniel J Ballard and Thomas E Collett
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 540 (1) 247 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf697

TDCOSMO

F. Dux, M. Millon, A. Galan, E. Paic, C. Lemon, F. Courbin, V. Bonvin, T. Anguita, M. Auger, S. Birrer, E. Buckley-Geer, C. D. Fassnacht, J. Frieman, R. G. McMahon, P. J. Marshall, A. Melo, V. Motta, F. Neira, D. Sluse, S. H. Suyu, T. Treu, A. Agnello, F. Ávila, J. Chan, M. Chijani, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 697 A139 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553807

Stars as cosmic scales: measuring stellar mass with microlensed supernovae

Luke Weisenbach, Thomas Collett, Wolfgang Enzi, Lindsay Oldham and Ana Sainz de Murieta
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 539 (1) 393 (2025)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staf535

Gravitational imaging through a triple source plane lens: revisiting the ΛCDM-defying dark subhalo in SDSSJ0946+1006

Daniel J Ballard, Wolfgang J R Enzi, Thomas E Collett, Hannah C Turner and Russell J Smith
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 528 (4) 7564 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae514

Weak lensing of strong lensing: beyond the tidal regime

Théo Duboscq, Natalie B. Hogg, Pierre Fleury and Julien Larena
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2024 (08) 021 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/021

Exploiting the diversity of modeling methods to probe systematic biases in strong lensing analyses

A. Galan, G. Vernardos, Q. Minor, D. Sluse, L. Van de Vyvere and M. Gomer
Astronomy & Astrophysics 692 A87 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451095

How to break the mass sheet degeneracy with the light curves of microlensed Type Ia supernovae

Luke Weisenbach, Thomas Collett, Ana Sainz de Murieta, Coleman Krawczyk, Georgios Vernardos, Wolfgang Enzi and Andrew Lundgren
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 531 (4) 4349 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1396

Extrapolating the projected potential of gravitational lens models: property-preserving degeneracies

Jori Liesenborgs, Derek Perera and Liliya L R Williams
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 529 (2) 1222 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae615

Time-Delay Cosmography: Measuring the Hubble Constant and Other Cosmological Parameters with Strong Gravitational Lensing

S. Birrer, M. Millon, D. Sluse, A. J. Shajib, F. Courbin, S. Erickson, L. V. E. Koopmans, S. H. Suyu and T. Treu
Space Science Reviews 220 (5) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01079-w

Breaking the mass-sheet degeneracy in strong lensing mass modelling with weak lensing observations

Narayan Khadka, Simon Birrer, Alexie Leauthaud and Holden Nix
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 533 (1) 795 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1832

Forecast of strongly lensed supernovae rates in the China Space Station Telescope surveys

Jiang Dong, Yiping Shu, Guoliang Li, Xinzhong Er, Bin Hu and Youhua Xu
Astronomy & Astrophysics 689 A192 (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450838

Robust test of general relativity at the galactic scales by combining strong lensing systems and gravitational wave standard sirens

Tonghua Liu, Marek Biesiada, Shuxun Tian and Kai Liao
Physical Review D 109 (8) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.084074

Invariance transformations in wave-optics lensing: Implications for gravitational-wave astrophysics and cosmology

Anson Chen, Paolo Cremonese, Jose María Ezquiaga and David Keitel
Physical Review D 110 (12) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123015

Strong Gravitational Lensing and Microlensing of Supernovae

Sherry H. Suyu, Ariel Goobar, Thomas Collett, Anupreeta More and Giorgos Vernardos
Space Science Reviews 220 (1) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01044-7

Strong Lensing by Galaxies

A. J. Shajib, G. Vernardos, T. E. Collett, V. Motta, D. Sluse, L. L. R. Williams, P. Saha, S. Birrer, C. Spiniello and T. Treu
Space Science Reviews 220 (8) (2024)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01105-x

The effect of the perturber population on subhalo measurements in strong gravitational lenses

Adam Coogan, Noemi Anau Montel, Konstantin Karchev, Meiert W Grootes, Francesco Nattino and Christoph Weniger
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527 (1) 66 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2925

Mass Reconstruction of Galaxy-scale Strong Gravitational Lenses Using a Broken Power-law Model

Wei Du, Liping Fu, Yiping Shu, Ran Li, Zuhui Fan and Chenggang Shu
The Astrophysical Journal 953 (2) 189 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdf45

The ellipticity parameterization for an NFW profile: An overlooked angular structure in strong lens modeling

Matthew R. Gomer, Dominique Sluse, Lyne Van de Vyvere, Simon Birrer, Anowar J. Shajib and Frederic Courbin
Astronomy & Astrophysics 679 A128 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346308

Simulation-guided galaxy evolution inference: A case study with strong lensing galaxies

Andreas Filipp, Yiping Shu, Rüdiger Pakmor, Sherry H. Suyu and Xiaosheng Huang
Astronomy & Astrophysics 677 A113 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346594

Anisotropic strong lensing as a probe of dark matter self-interactions

Birendra Dhanasingham, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Charlie Mace, Annika H G Peter and Andrew Benson
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 526 (4) 5455 (2023)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3099

Strong-lensing source reconstruction with variationally optimized Gaussian processes

Konstantin Karchev, Adam Coogan and Christoph Weniger
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 512 (1) 661 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac311

STRIDES: automated uniform models for 30 quadruply imaged quasars

T Schmidt, T Treu, S Birrer, A J Shajib, C Lemon, M Millon, D Sluse, A Agnello, T Anguita, M W Auger-Williams, R G McMahon, V Motta, P Schechter, C Spiniello, I Kayo, F Courbin, S Ertl, C D Fassnacht, J A Frieman, A More, S Schuldt, S H Suyu, M Aguena, F Andrade-Oliveira, J Annis, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (1) 1260 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2235

Systematic Errors Induced by the Elliptical Power-law model in Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Lens Modeling

Xiaoyue Cao, Ran Li, J. W. Nightingale, et al.
Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 22 (2) 025014 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4527/ac3f2b

Interlopers speak out: studying the dark universe using small-scale lensing anisotropies

Birendra Dhanasingham, Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine, Annika H G Peter, Andrew Benson and Daniel Gilman
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 518 (4) 5843 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2993

Consequences of the lack of azimuthal freedom in the modeling of lensing galaxies

Lyne Van de Vyvere, Dominique Sluse, Matthew R. Gomer and Sampath Mukherjee
Astronomy & Astrophysics 663 A179 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243382

Detecting gravitational lenses using machine learning: exploring interpretability and sensitivity to rare lensing configurations

Joshua Wilde, Stephen Serjeant, Jane M Bromley, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 512 (3) 3464 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac562

Gravitational Lensing Formalism in a Curved Arc Basis: A Continuous Description of Observables and Degeneracies from the Weak to the Strong Lensing Regime

Simon Birrer
The Astrophysical Journal 919 (1) 38 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1108

Improved time-delay lens modelling and H0 inference with transient sources

Xuheng Ding, Kai Liao, Simon Birrer, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (4) 5621 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab1240

The dynamical structure of broken power-law and double power-law models for dark matter haloes

Maarten Baes and Peter Camps
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 503 (2) 2955 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab634

An unexpected high concentration for the dark substructure in the gravitational lens SDSSJ0946+1006

Quinn Minor, Sophia Gad-Nasr, Manoj Kaplinghat and Simona Vegetti
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 507 (2) 1662 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab2247

Galaxy-lens determination of H0: the effect of the ellipse + shear modelling assumption

Matthew R Gomer and Liliya L R Williams
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (1) 1340 (2021)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab930

The Hubble constant from eight time-delay galaxy lenses

Philipp Denzel, Jonathan P Coles, Prasenjit Saha and Liliya L R Williams
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 501 (1) 784 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3603

Systematic errors in strong gravitational lensing reconstructions, a numerical simulation perspective

R Benton Metcalf, Jen-Wei Hsueh, Giulia Despali, Simona Vegetti and Wolfgang Enzi
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 496 (2) 1718 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1224

Free-form grale lens inversion of galaxy clusters with up to 1000 multiple images

Jori Liesenborgs, Liliya L R Williams and Agniva Ghosh
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 3998 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa962

Model independent comparison of supernova and strong lensing cosmography: Implications for the Hubble constant tension

Shivam Pandey, Marco Raveri and Bhuvnesh Jain
Physical Review D 102 (2) (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023505

An Accurate Analytic Mass Model for Lensing Galaxies

Wei Du, Gong-Bo Zhao, Zuhui Fan, Yiping Shu, Ran Li and Shude Mao
The Astrophysical Journal 892 (1) 62 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab7a15

Lessons from a blind study of simulated lenses: image reconstructions do not always reproduce true convergence

Philipp Denzel, Sampath Mukherjee, Jonathan P Coles and Prasenjit Saha
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 492 (3) 3885 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa108

Extended lens reconstructions with grale: exploiting time-domain, substructural, and weak lensing information

Sven De Rijcke, Jenny Wagner, Liliya L R Williams and Jori Liesenborgs
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (3) 3253 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa842

Could Quasar Lensing Time Delays Hint to a Core Component in Halos, Instead of H0 Tension?

Kfir Blum, Emanuele Castorina and Marko Simonović
The Astrophysical Journal Letters 892 (2) L27 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab8012

The first simultaneous measurement of Hubble constant and post-Newtonian parameter from time-delay strong lensing

Tao Yang, Simon Birrer and Bin Hu
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters 497 (1) L56 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slaa107

H0LiCOW XII. Lens mass model of WFI2033 − 4723 and blind measurement of its time-delay distance and H0

Cristian E Rusu, Kenneth C Wong, Vivien Bonvin, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 498 (1) 1440 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3451

Time-delay cosmographic forecasts with strong lensing and JWST stellar kinematics

Aleksi Halkola, Sherry H Suyu and Akın Yıldırım
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493 (4) 4783 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa498

STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354

A J Shajib, S Birrer, T Treu, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 494 (4) 6072 (2020)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa828

Generalized multi-plane gravitational lensing: time delays, recursive lens equation, and the mass-sheet transformation

Peter Schneider
Astronomy & Astrophysics 624 A54 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424881

Sparse Lens Inversion Technique (SLIT): lens and source separability from linear inversion of the source reconstruction problem

R. Joseph, F. Courbin, J.-L. Starck and S. Birrer
Astronomy & Astrophysics 623 A14 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201731042

Magnified or multiply imaged? – Search strategies for gravitationally lensed supernovae in wide-field surveys

Radosław Wojtak, Jens Hjorth and Christa Gall
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (3) 3342 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1516

Impact of the 3D source geometry on time-delay measurements of lensed type-Ia supernovae

V. Bonvin, O. Tihhonova, M. Millon, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 621 A55 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201833405

Unified lensing and kinematic analysis for any elliptical mass profile

Anowar J Shajib
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (1) 1387 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1796

The role of multiple images and model priors in measuringH0 from supernova Refsdal in galaxy cluster MACS J1149.5+2223

Liliya L R Williams and Jori Liesenborgs
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482 (4) 5666 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty3113

Strongly lensed SNe Ia in the era of LSST: observing cadence for lens discoveries and time-delay measurements

S. Huber, S. H. Suyu, U. M. Noebauer, et al.
Astronomy & Astrophysics 631 A161 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935370

A SHARP view of H0LiCOW: H0 from three time-delay gravitational lens systems with adaptive optics imaging

Geoff C-F Chen, Christopher D Fassnacht, Sherry H Suyu, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 490 (2) 1743 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2547

Generalised model-independent characterisation of strong gravitational lenses – VI. The origin of the formalism intrinsic degeneracies and their influence on H0

Jenny Wagner
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (4) 4492 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1587

Galaxy mass profiles from strong lensing I: the circular power-law model

C M O’Riordan, S J Warren and D J Mortlock
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 487 (4) 5143 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1603

H0LiCOW – IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant

S Birrer, T Treu, C E Rusu, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 484 (4) 4726 (2019)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz200

On the choice of lens density profile in time delay cosmography

Alessandro Sonnenfeld
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 474 (4) 4648 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx3105

Testing the uniqueness of gravitational lens mass models

Levi G Walls and Liliya L R Williams
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (1) 655 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2263

Improving time-delay cosmography with spatially resolved kinematics

Anowar J. Shajib, Tommaso Treu and Adriano Agnello
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 (1) 210 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2302

Prediction of Supernova Rates in Known Galaxy–Galaxy Strong-lens Systems

Yiping Shu, Adam S. Bolton, Shude Mao, Xi Kang, Guoliang Li and Monika Soraisam
The Astrophysical Journal 864 (1) 91 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aad5ea

The Herschel-ATLAS: magnifications and physical sizes of 500-μm-selected strongly lensed galaxies

A Enia, M Negrello, M Gurwell, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 475 (3) 3467 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty021

The impact of microlensing on the standardization of strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae

Max Foxley-Marrable, Thomas E Collett, Georgios Vernardos, Daniel A Goldstein and David Bacon
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 478 (4) 5081 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1346

Ambiguities in gravitational lens models: impact on time delays of the source position transformation

Olivier Wertz, Bastian Orthen and Peter Schneider
Astronomy & Astrophysics 617 A140 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732240

Constraining the microlensing effect on time delays with a new time-delay prediction model in H0 measurements

Geoff C-F Chen, James H H Chan, Vivien Bonvin, et al.
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (1) 1115 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2350

Evidence for the line-of-sight structure in the Hubble Frontier Field cluster, MACSJ0717.5+3745

Liliya L R Williams, Kevin Sebesta and Jori Liesenborgs
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 480 (3) 3140 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2088

Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age

Sherry H. Suyu, Tzu-Ching Chang, Frédéric Courbin and Teppei Okumura
Space Sciences Series of ISSI, Astronomical Distance Determination in the Space Age 66 353 (2018)
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1631-2_8